CdnFox

Would you have been more comfortable if we had simply called you a chud? And how could you possibly know, you insisted you stopped reading after the first line of my post which didn't insult you at all. It just said you gave the wrong answer. And you wonder why people call you a liar

It's not misused or misinterpreted. But it brings us back to the same old problem the romans wrestled with, Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? - Who will guard the guardians. The gov't has military and police forces to enforce order and guard against threats. But those forces can and often have been used by gov'ts to control the people. So to protect the people from those guards they created the right of the people to be armed, and THEY would be the guardians who guarded the guards,. But.... then who guards THOSE guardians? every time you create a force that is intended to be protective it can also be used to be offensive, and you must then have another force to protect against that offense and you're back to the same problem But at the end of the day worrying about the tool used is not terribly productive. The bad guys will always find tools.

Because that's where the evidence is pointing. I'm sorry I guess I should have written it as too soon to say for sure. I assumed most of the intelligent people on this board would get what my meaning was. I forgot you might be reading it too I doubt very much that this person cared about gun control one way or another. In fact if they were targeting republicans it works in their favor, they get to kill a republican and they also get to make the case for gun control True. There's been a lot of left-wing people shooting right-wing people these days

It's not hard. We do it in Canada although the system has gotten away from us. Background check before receiving a license. License to be revoked if there's any criminal activity or overt an actionable signs of mental health issues, testing to be done before issuing the license Works very well and reduces accidents which is the bigger killer if you exclude organized crime shootings. The licenses should be "shall issue" and the test should be challengeable, but other than that it works pretty well. But at the end of the day your whole line of reasoning is stupid. We don't "know' someone will drive a car safely when we let them buy a car, yet we sell cars to just about anyone. And cars kill more than guns by far. we don't "know" someone will use a pocket knife wisely. Or gasoline, or any number of other tools very common in murders and mass killings. But we sell them SO explain why you want to see guns banned but not cars?

Dude, that's probably the worst example you could have given. Do some reading on that particular person in their case and you'll find that it is not a good example. It is more likely a case of self-loathing, he frequented that place with others many times. And his religious leader definitely would not have been a pastor

Liar. Anybody who bothers to take the time to write that took the time to read the post. You just don't want to cope with it . But I do love that your defense is that "I deliberately chose to remain ignorant so that I didn't have to cope with anything you said I didn't like because that made more sense to me". And what I said doesn't change. The only thing that's sort of changed is that we now know with certainty but you do not base your opinions on reason or logic, but rather only on what does or does not appeal to you. How very leftist of you

Everybody thought that was funny big guy I'm surprised you didn't see it for the humor value. But then again I frequently forget that you're not a real little boy

Well we know that to be a lie. And a bit of a silly lie considering they were desperate for ammunition, they certainly couldn't afford to waste any just randomly bombing things. They had their hands full going after the actual targets. So there you go. You have been misinformed

Ella Cook ID'd as first victim in Brown University shooting | New York Post Two people were killed and nine others were wounded in a shooting at an engineering and physics building on Brown's campus in Providence, Rhode Island Looks like the shooter may have been targeting republicans. Ella was president of the republican club. Too early to say and no suspect in custody at this time (the guy they had earlier isn't the shooter turns out) so we'll have to wait and see ,

They knew where the bad guys were. They shot at the bad guys. If the bad guys happen to put children in front of them then the bad guys are still the bad guys and got a lot of children killed. This is simple math even you can do. How many children would have been killed if the October 7th attack had not happened? Zero. So how many that did die are a result of the attack? All of them. You don't even need to get your calculator out for that

But they killed themselves. It literally picked the fight. If they want to go to war and hide behind their children and get their people killed and shouldn't you be mad at them and not Israel?

This is just starting to get mind-meltingly stupid If there was any actual evidence in the file the police would have gone after trump already . They would have gone after him years ago long before he was even running for president.

Leave him alone, that mirror was the best toy we ever bought for his cage and if he gets TOO worked up he'll attack it and break it.

Not in the same thread no. It's a justification. You're drawing a connection between the two events. It's not like you were randomly feeling for those who are suffering from hunger in Africa. You tied this event to that event and suggest that this event is understandable or acceptable because of that event. And no it is not possible to introduce that other one into the conversation and just claim it sort of randomly you feel for both. The attack here had nothing to do with Gaza, Gaza is entirely a responsibility of Gaza because Gaza was the one who started that war and even if they didn't it's still absolutely has nothing to do with two arm Psychopaths deciding to kill a bunch of Jews in Australia. If we were to accept that logic we'd have to accept that jews killing muslims here in canada was perfectly acceptable. I mean, milhemet mitzvah is as valid as jihad right? I'm sure if we go back far enough the palestinians were mean to the jews so it's all good. It's unacceptable.

LOL so back to just out and out spamming huh ? LOL Greg should punt your ass from the site. IT's one thing to disagree or trade barbs and in fact it's expected of a teen. But doing nothing but spamming is just disruptive for the sake of being disruptive.

You're not being clear. You appear to be lying. Your statements do not match this statement. You are giving excuse as to why it's okay to kill people without warning in a terrorist attack . You should be disgusted with your statements. There is absolutely nothing happening in Israel that justifies the attack we saw in Israel or in Australia. You don't get to say' oh i don't support it... .BUUUUUUUTTTTTT....." There is no justification for it. None. And the children dead in Gaza are the responsibility of Hamas and no one else. Not 1943, not the Israelis, not Canada not America and certainly not Australia. You should get on the right side of history a little bit quicker kiddo, you don't get to soft support terrorism and pretend like you're half pregnant on the issue. It's a flat-out condemnation or nothing You are absolutely doing that and you cannot dodge that. If you want to retract that statement and come out condemning the attacks without trying to soft justify it by saying oh but 1943 or whatever then that's fine but right now you are in fact justifying the attacks by saying it's in retaliation for children who died because of Hamas. It is beyond disgusting and you don't get to walk that back or pretend that you didn't really mean it that way

They're dead. That's history. The people today are making the choices themselves they weren't pushed into it and it's not because of somebody in 1943. It stuns me how quick you lefties are to support terrorism and try and justify murders like this.

Thousands and thousands. Gaza has a significant and sizeable army operating under Hamas Did you think there was a reason why the Gaza authority never released separate numbers for its military dead and civilian? And you seem to be suggesting that this is some sort of excuse for the murders in Australia. As if the Australian Jews killed anyone. You need to take a step back and think for a minute kiddo. You're walking a dangerous line.

Wrong answer. You might approve of these kinds of killings but a lot of other people don't That's beyond stupid. If somebody were to say that Nazis and those who held Nazi beliefs didn't assimilate as well as those who held more open beliefs you would be the first to stand up and clap your hands These people aren't assimilating, they're killing people. And the violence is Ratcheting up here in Canada as well with constant reports of these people harassing Jews and others unprovoked on a regular basis. Pretending otherwise is just enabling the terrorism

No it's not! Carney said so! If these people could think past tomorrow there wouldn't be a liberal party in the first place.

Based on his history, if what he was saying was true he'd start voting for trump

The only thing carney is done is run up about 100 billion dollars in debt. The liberals sure know how to do that, and they're sure good at lining their own pockets. I hear carney has been meeting again with brooksfield people when he was told not to. You and the rest of the liberal supporters have got to be the only people that think stealing Canadians money while letting them suffer is doing something

She crossed the floor and then almost immediately went into an election She didn't get elected And then crossed the floor. She crossed the floor and then very quickly faced her constituents in an election. I think everyone would be fine with this floor crossing if he gave up his seat and ran as a liberal. But I think we both know that that's not going to happen But sure, crossing the floor and then immediately facing your constituents in an election is exactly the same as crossing the floor and then trying to serve 4 years. Is there anything the left won't lie about?

One of the primary differences between the liberals and the conservatives is that the conservatives genuinely care about the welfare of Canada moving forward. The liberals supporters care about the moment and that's it and their tribalism, and the liberal party cares about lining his pockets it doesn't care if Canada Burns tomorrow as long as they're walking away with bags of money

That's the kind of thing a 12-year-old would say Sounds like you're having a bit of a freak out, still emotionally broken from this morning are you? I see the latest polling numbers today... once again carney is down in his favorability and the cpc is tied even with the libs Even if he manages to get a better majority, there's a million things that can happen to cause Carney's government to fail and every month without fail people like him less. And they absolutely hate the liberals. I guess you're getting a little scared and nervous again. Honestly you shouldn't worry about these things this much. Your mom's going to run out of underwear