CdnFox

I see we're back to your usual attempts to misinterpret English when your argument itself is falling apart. It would not be possible to have a concern without some species of evidence that there was a reason to have a concern. Evidence is not proof. But it's an indication. if there was NO indication of a health problem then you wouldn't be concerned. In the example you provided the fact that I coughed and spat up blood would be evidence that there is a problem with my physical health. That is why you would be concerned. It doesn't mean that there is guaranteed a problem with my physical health, or that there isn't another explanation, but because it's evidence that they're is a problem you would have concerns until you were able to determine one way or another If there was absolutely no evidence of any physical health issue, you would have nothing to be concerned about Here's Merriam Webster: evidence 1 of 2 noun ev·i·dence ˈe-və-dən(t)s -və-ˌden(t)s Synonyms of evidence : an outward sign : indication evidence of an early spring I didn't accuse you of picking a fight with me, when you talk on an open form you're talking to everybody. If you just want to talk to one person take it to PM'S. As it is I'm going out of my way to make sure that I'm engaging you with reasons and arguments and not attacking you personally overmuch I don't think that's particularly true. Many a teenager has stayed up for hours talking to their friends on the phone for example. While the behavior may be a little unusual you would have to show some evidence as to why this is some sort of reason to believe there's a mental health issue. I'm not talking about one of your chat GPT searches You have to make a case Right now the case for they're being concerned over mental health issue is that your concerned over mental health issues, it's just circular logic. I can't help but feel if Biden did it you'd be trying to dismiss it. For me I look at it and think I can totally see trump with his obsessive Behavior staying up and making a whole crap ton of posts. I wouldn't consider it a sign of some species of new mental health issue that he had, I would just say that trump is a little weird that way and sometimes he obsesses over things and fixates. So again you'd have to make the case a little stronger.

When she farts, it talks! Sure kid

Well then ask your mother to change your diapers again. Honestly if you're going to poop yourself this often we're going to need to get you a whistle or something Sounds like you got diaper rash again too. It's because your mom always uses those cheap dollar store diapers for you. I don't think your mom likes you all that much. Which means she likes you more than most people like you so at least there's that

The documents like 1500 pages long, there's no universe where trump read it. And no, none of what he has done indicates he knew anything about what was in it. And the rest of your post is just the usual Orange man bad, me hate trump stuff. Again, it's okay to dislike trump, it's okay to think that his methods and his plan for the united states are not good or that his strategies will not be effective. But it would be wrong to say that he's charlatans are at con man unless you actually got some species of argument that supports that and so far you haven't presented one. He has done what he said he was going to do and none of what he's doing is in contrast to what he said he would do. Somebody who does what they say they're going to do is not a con man. A con man is when you don't do what you said you were going to do substantially and that just isn't trump. If anything the fact that he does do what he says he's going to do is pissing a lot of people off

No, again this is the kind of nonsense we always see. They take elements of project 2025 and then they twist how it sort of worded and presented and then take something trump has done and try and shoehorn it into that definition and say look, he's doing 2025. And that is nonsense. Again tell me something he's doing that he never campaigned on. There's nothing. So any comparison between him and project 2025 is meaningless. He said this is what I'm going to do, he is doing what he said he's going to do, he has a mandate for that. I don't think so. I think there were some vague generalities in project 2025 that you are matching up with things that trump promised to do and is now doing. He had nothing to do with project 2025. And everything he's doing now is well within what he promised he would do. There is no con. What you are stating is false. It is a dishonesty. For you to make the claim that he's following project 2025 that hit that during the election you would have to demonstrate a number of things which fall in contrast or in conflict with promises he made during the election but which are clearly contained in project 2025. And that's not something you can do

You realize the liberals do actually consider that an accomplishment. I know you think it's sarcasm, but you may not have considered your audience The guy who voted for 10 years despite the fact that he was corrupt in every way possible and a pedophile who had to flee his previous job You remember. You had a poster of them up above your bed for ages

He was quite eloquent two days before about how terrible carney was and how carney is starving Canadians and it has to stop Sounds like he's the kind of guy that is willing to be eloquent for whoever is the highest bidder. Obviously he fits in with the liberals I think he wasn't planning on crossing just yet, but carney was taking a lot of heat for the vote in parliament on the MOU and wanted a distraction now.

Holy crap, you're not even making sense any more LOLOL you're just screaming and crying like a baby! You're going to be scaring all the dogs in your neighbourhood if you keep that up

It already is. But again... what kind of jobs, and how does the increase compare to inflation. That's the real issue. if people are working but cant afford food and rent then they will be pissed. Again you appear to be operating in defiance of the evidence that we already have. A large number of companies have moved their operations to the united states and employment is still going up as a result. While the amount it climbs varies it's been steadily going up no job losses. Most countries have had at least some months of job losses since the beginning of the year, Canada has been VERY poor in that regard. And the us job numbers are doing decent despite trump laying off a bazillion gov't people, and that's pretty impressive. I'm afraid you can't just dismiss tariffs like that. Your 'belief' is grounded in your dislike of trump and your desire to see his policies fail. And that is not a good basis for an argument. What happened to think you're probably going to wind up being correct in the sense that over time the policy is going to produce mediocre growth and actually be a drag on the US economy overall, but there's no actual evidence or strong argument to support that just yet.

I accept your surrender

I provide facts examples reason logic.... you provide this Well there you go. Anyway, wrong section, lets get back to the meme's. We seem to agree on most of those

I'm referencing your own words here. Carney is all about caving to the us, everyone with a brain knew his 'elbows up' thing was a sham. He's mr capitulation. Even as we speak he's buying american goods and weapons and such despite saying he probably wouldn't. I argue that we should stand up for canada, that canada is worth being sovering, and point out factually that canadians are avoiding america and american products. I say we should be leery of the americans, they are not our friends based on trump's actions. You say we SHOULD buy american, nobody is avoiding america, trumps right and we don't deserve sovereignty and we should allow them to take us over and do as we're told. I'm really sorry bud but that makes you sound a hell of a lot more like carney. If you're uncomfortable with that, i'd strongly suggest giving your position another review and seeing if it reflects your real values. It's not a contradiction or shameful to say you like this and that about trump but dislike the other thing. the way he treated canada was unforgivable. Why would we trust an american again? We're going to have to deal with them in the end but that doesn't mean we have to ever like or trust them as a country again. we deal with china and i don't trust them.

Ok, the national headlines WERE a tad dramatic i'll admit....

Conservatives don't lie to ourselves. I did provide evidence and you've admitted to it already, acknowledging that Ontario did in fact ban sales. So did other provinces. And I provided ample evidence that the Americans are suffering from Canadians not purchasing their stuff or visiting Wallowing in denial won't help. You were wrong, Canadians are stepping up big time to avoid buying American or giving them our money. Of course I didn't vote carney, carney's like you he wants Canadians to do with the Americans tell them to I don't approve of that. And yes, we have to rid ourselves of the liberal disease. You and I are absolutely on the same page there.

Lying to yourself to feel better? What the hell, you channeling the libs now? LOL i've already shown you were wrong. You said nobody stopped drinking us booze, i pointed out entire provinces did. You said people weren't avoiding the states i posted proof they were. Etc etc. Every single thing you said was wrong. Why, does he not think canada should be soverign either? And yeah, a lot of canadians are dumb. That doesn't mean canada itself shouldn't exist or be a soverign nation. Hey, you can think that trump is right and we don't deserve to have our own country and should just be ruled over by the united states with no say. It's a free country (for now) and your opinion is yours. I disagree, and the vast majority of canadians disagree. That's where we're at.

Maybe, but you can't make the claim a Canadians have stopped drinking American booze can you. And in fact it's a very popular policy and was followed by several other provinces for quite a while. Even where it is sold sales are down tremendously Also I live in BC, not Ontario. So basically in the last two posts you've been wrong about literally everything you posted And while I appreciate your consistency it's probably best to deal with the truth rather than untruths that are simply comforting. It's not every Canadian, but a huge percentage of Canadians are avoiding American Products, failing to travel to the united states as they did in the past, selling off their properties in the states, and avoiding buying American Goods whenever there's a option for a canadian product or even one from somewhere other than the states. Interstates are feeling it. They've commented on it very loudly and noted that it's having a huge impact on them There's a million articles. Here's one Exclusive: U.S. businesses are getting throttled by the drop in tourism from Canada | Fortune It wasn't a good idea to make an enemy out of their closest neighbor. That's just a simple and demonstrable truth. It could have done tariffs without doing that but trump chose to make an enemy of Canada and as he represents all Americans that's having an impact on them too

LOL I can always tell when you're beginning to have a bit of a mental breakdown you have these weird little fantasies about me. Like you come up with the strangest little Daydreams about me having bad days or things like that. I suspect it's the trauma of your youth being projected on to others that you hope are having a bad day It's not a sign of good mental health bud You're lying about what I said because you can't cope with what I actually said? How very left wing of you Trudeau himself was caught in harper's laws. Snc-lavin was a direct result of harper's changes to the law. Justin tossed a lot of other things but I guess he missed that one So yeah, pretty effective. Sure, everyone! Why just yesterday I said it to nationalist and the day before the west can man! I'm always on about it to deluge, I never stop bugging shady,..... ohhhh wait!!! LOL i say it to scumbag liberals like yourself. and that's it

Trump campaigned on the idea that he would go after the woke and get rid of environmental policies that he felt were harmful to the economy. He also said he was going to slash inefficient departments. Literally everything you've mentioned falls under one of those three and I'm sorry but he did campaign on it So you can't claim con man. It would be far more accurate to say that project 2025 writers were copying trump than the other way around

I'm sorry but that's just a lie. He had nothing to do with the creation of project 2025. That appears to be the case. And there is much evidence to support that being true Subsequent to that he has failed to follow through on the vast majority of project 2025 ideals. He has done some things which appear to be in 2025, but they're just conservative ideas that literally any conservative would tend to follow He has done precisely what he campaigned on. He introduced tariffs which he campaigned on. He's going after illegals which he campaigned on. He's going after allies and trying to get them to spend what he feels is their fair share which he campaigned on. He's trying to put out wars that are happening across the world which he campaigned on. Virtually everything he's doing is stuff he campaigned on So pretending it's a con is of course simply just childishness. If something in the book happens to match what trump believes and campaigned on that's of no interest to anybody. He's doing what he campaigned on

I know right? You must buy it by the case You have to be drinking the stuff to think that an election can't make a difference to a government

So far you're wrong. We'll have to see how it works in the long term. But to be honest the number of jobs really isn't the question. It probably will result in more jobs for Americans, but the real issue is whether or not those jobs are going to pay more and whether or not that increase in pay exceeds inflation. He's betting it will, we'll have to see. So far there's nowhere near enough evidence to say he's wrong. I don't tend to think it's a good strategy over time but we'll have to see how it plays out

Really. So when your opinion it's impossible that an election can result in the change of a government? You are such an lying putz

They don't even stalk it anymore in a Ontario shelves. The Americas are screaming bloody blue murder about the reduced alcohol sales. So no it's not just a few people And yes, Americans are far less welcoming Canada. You can drive whatever you like but the reality is those sales are starting to slip. People are eyeballing Toyota Hyundai another manufacturer's a lot more closely. Sorry but a lot of bridges have been burned and the Americans are noticing and it's not small. I won't be buying American if there's a Canadian opportunity instead for a long time. Why would I? Got to have a little pride in your country bud and trump didn't just bring in tariffs, he said we didn't deserve our sovereignty. That's not forgivable not if you're a Canadian

No kid this is one of those one in a trillion times that he's actually right. There is a huge movement in Canada to boycott American goods and America. Our dollar has been this low many times in the past and has never stopped us from coming across the border. You can say a lot of positive things about trump and you can think he does an overall good job. But he turned and p*ss in the face of one of your greatest allies for no good reason and ruined that relationship and I wouldn't expect it to come back soon. Even if the tariffs vanish tomorrow we would spend less money with you It's unfortunate. It wasn't just the tariffs was the constant insults. But Americans are far less welcome in Canada and Canadians are not interested in spending money in America. we buy less groceries, we don't buy your booze anymore, People are beginning to avoid American cars. Trump may have decided to put tariffs on but there was no call for his behavior and that's not going away soon

Fact that the public including even liberal supporters isn't up in arms over this kind of corruption still surprises me. But then again I don't really understand rapists either. I've never attacked proper robust mechanisms or measures to prevent corruption. You constantly propose measures which will perpetuate corruption and I'm not supportive of them. And no I didn't argue that any new minister can change whatever. I argued that a new prime minister and his government could. And they can and if they go to do that that's one thing because they do it through the parliament in full scrutiny of the public. But this is something very different than that He could get up in arms right now with a minority government and send a clear message to the liberals that this kind of behavior will be punished. We could do that right this second as a group, the public could stand up and say this is outrageous and won't be tolerated. And Kearney who is well aware that an election is probably not far off would have to seriously reconsider this. It would be a very effective tool. The problem of course is that liberals like yourself support corruption if it's liberal. Which is why you don't want anybody to even vote in an election. You insisted in elections are useless and we should give them up. And that's simply not true. We could use our power as voters right this second to correct this problem if people like you weren't supportive of corruption