Jump to content

CdnFox

Senior Member
  • Posts

    41,498
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    351

Everything posted by CdnFox

  1. Carney you mean? Yeah, this really didn't go his way. This is where as inexperience shows I know you do kid but I'm sorry I'm just not interested in adolecents OR males no matter how much you constantly beg or wish it to be different. I'm sure over time you will find a boy that you like in the real world that's closer to your age He's 100% right and you're 100% wrong. You need to learn to read kid And every time we see it down arrow everybody knows you're crying a little
  2. I see that you are yes Back to just spamming the forum I see with absolutely nothing to contribute, But it's not like we expect much from a kid your age Yeah a few of those going around. The liberals won't care, they don't really mind corruption
  3. Yes and no but really no. As I explained previously. Is the government's way of trying to get people and businesses to use and eat other things You are not the only one who has said that and there is a strong argument to be made there Which is strange because it doesn't seem like you've ever missed not having a point
  4. Absolutely nonsense. This base care is very little for politics, in fact probably feels that all politicians are the same and whatever the American version of liberal tory same old story is. It was clear in 2016 that this was one of his biggest appeals in fact. Many specifically stated that they were voting for him in order to throw a wooden shoe or two in the cogs of government. They thought he was like an anti-hero figure. Thus people who had no interest in politics began to gravitate towards him The people that tend to support him are people that aren't that interested in politics at all, they're interested in how much they pay for food what kind of job they have whether or not they're safe in their neighborhood. And they probably don't believe the average politician when he says he'll do something about that but they believed trump. And in fairness he is doing something about all of those things. Some would argue not the right things but you can't argue that he's not taking action. They like it that he tells the democrats to f off essentially and ignores them, because they don't like them or their opinions. They're glad that he tells the courts to f off because they don't particularly believe in the courts anymore. They're glad he basically tells congress to f off because they don't believe in their congressman and their senators i think @John Stone Correct than not with what he said and that trump managed to harness the power of the non-political people politically
  5. LOL yeah i see that, welcome back Carney lost this one kid. But hey, if lying about it helps you get through the night then so be it
  6. ALmost insulting to you if you think about it. What, you're not 'biteworthy'? WTF?
  7. Yes Which is precisely what you deserved Want respect, be respectable, No it doesn't. THat's just a stupid thing to say. This is why nobody respects you, Kid.... you're not sounding any alarms. You're spreading hatred and bigotry, and that's it. Make. Good. Arguments. Gain respect, have people take you seriously The nonsense you've been spouting won't work on anyone outside your echo chamber. Think for yourself and do better.
  8. And you're stuck in repeat mode. I would have thought of all the threads you wouldn't derail it would be this one, but then i remembered you were never actually in the military, you're not old enough to be in the military yet Interesting but not operational till 2041? If we have inadequate systems now as they suggest what are we supposed to do till then?
  9. Nope. Perfectly legit. And unless you can provide some clause or line that says otherwise the law absolutely allows it. The fact that he's already broken the ethics commissioner's requirements is a matter of public record. Trudeau taking bribes from the aga khan is a matter of record. That means nothing to these people, they correctly believe people like you will always forgive them and stand up on their behalf and conitnue to vote for them. I'm a little shocked i have to explain this.... there is a border between canada and the country you're referencing. They're not the same country. And conservatives aren't some unified massive block entity, we're different people in different places, but your question is interesting. The answer is because the dems did and nobody punished them. So now the republicans do. Right now the libs are. ANd nobody's punishing them. What kind of canada do you want? You better choose quick, the libs won't be in forever and the CPC more and more is going to want payback.
  10. Like what? So far he's delivered precisely what he said he would during his campaign. For better or worse. What's the false pretense? Again, how? Sounds like something you'd hear in an echo chamber, i don't see any indication that anyone's 'enthralled' by manipulation. People just seem to like him or his ideas so far. And where did he rob the country? And how would that make him a 'con artist'? Again, not really a 'con man' activity. And at least he didn't call them human garbage like biden or deplorables like clinton. So far he's delivering what he said he would. A person who sells you something then delivers exactly what he sold you isn't a con man Again your entire argument seems to be 'Me no like him" and that's fine, but it's not being a 'con man'. I think trump really believes what he's doing is the best thing for people. Which doesn't mean he's not a narcissistic borderline sociopath. But it does rule out 'con man'. It's like you pick whatever insult you think sounds bad and run with that, then your reason for it is 'orange man bad". There's enough legit reasons to criticize trump without making stuff up isn't there? And if there isn't then why don't you like him?
  11. That doesn't even make sense. So a tax is Progressive when poor people pay a higher percentage of their income than the wealthy? For very wealthy person an average home purchased in one of the major metros cost so much smaller percentage of their overall income than it would for a person who's middle class and earning an average Canadian income. Likewise the property tax on that property represents a much larger percentage of the average person's disposable income. This is calculated at the banks, it forms part of the affordability equation when people are looking to purchase a home. High property tax rates make it more difficult for people of averaging income to afford the purchase of a home. Far more so than it impacts a wealthy person. In addition it can make it difficult for a person to retain their home. For example there were dozens and dozens of older people living in one of the more prestigious areas of Vancouver in the last decade who own their homes outright but were forced to move because property values went up so much that the newly calculated property tax on the value of their property was more than they could afford. So they were d-homed and had to move because they were no longer earning incomes and couldn't afford the increased property tax. So as you can see the cut in property taxes would impact the middle classes far more favorably. As to renters as I said renters inevitably pay the property tax one way or another. So even the lowest income earners are impacted by property taxes when they try and buy shelter even if they're not buying the property itself. Even a small increase in the cost of rental can have a massive impact on these people's bottom line, far more so than it would on a wealthy person. The solution is easy enough from a practical point of view but the reality is that most municipalities in cities have become absolutely drunk on the massive amounts of revenue that they rake in with the fees and processes involved in new home construction projects. It would require a provincial action to resolve that and it would be a political nightmare even though the solution itself is relatively simple
  12. Sure! You're hilarious and free comedy is always welcome I think the funniest part of this is you didn't understand that this was a major blow to Carney and you were being all smug and happy thinking that this was some sort of victory for him LOLOLOL Everyone knew it was a slap for carney except you You really have no idea how poltiics works, and watching you as you suddenly realize it was a BAD day for the libs is beyond priceless
  13. You pooping your pants does not represent me being a pedophile. Unfortunately it's your wishful thinking kicking in again It's mildly disturbing that you associate pooped pants with pedophilia but I'm not here to judge you. I mean I'm probably going to anyway but that's not why I'm here. That's normal. He was trying to make it more palatable to the liberals to vote to approve their own mou. But they just couldn't No matter what the liberal caucus is so fractured over this that they couldn't even vote in favor of the language of carney's own m o u it's a major slap in the face for carney,
  14. LOL yes yes, i accept your surrender, i appreciate you acknowledging you were wrong and understand that you're butt hurt over it, Poilievre simply outmaneuvered him with this one. Having your cabinet and your colleagues vote against your memorandum of understanding is obviously a blow. He should have thought that out a little more carefully. Sadly he couldn't get them to vote yes because a lot of them seriously disagree with it
  15. You're doing an awful lot of crying and pants pooping for someone who likes it Unless you just like pooping your pants And once again I see pretty much everybody's laughing at you. No wonder you're crying and poopy again
  16. Plus a 100 billion deficit budget by all practical estimates, Fewer trade deals right at the moment, etc etc. He is worse, and he'll be worse for canada. And we're already starting off from a 'not good' position.
  17. LOL Three posts?!!?! All starting with your signature "I've lost and i'm crying" move? LOLOL Holy snit kid, go tell mommy you need a triple change of diapers! You done crapped yourself hard The liberal caucus just voted AGAINST mark carney's MOU and everyone is talking about it He backed Carney into a corner and carney didn't have any way to handle it, too many of his caucus refused to vote for his own MOU so he had to have everyone vote against it They literally shot themselves in the foot! There are giant cracks in the liberal caucus and this just proves it. And now the whole country is seeing it, ANd now they go on chrismas break and carney won't get much chance to do something positive, He got outplayed. Which is no surprise he sucks at this. No experience.
  18. Which is one of the reasons several pundits including myself questioned whether or not Carney really wanted this to happen I mean leaving the first nations of BC out of the discussions as well as the government is basically farting in their face. There's no quicker way to make them pissed off. They will now resist this idea like crazy. Especially when you invite the premiere of Saskatchewan who has absolutely nothing to do with this to the table. I think that's what gave harper the idea for the vote. He knew carney was telling his people this would never happen and telling alberta it was full steam ahead and he wanted to try to expose that I can't say if it's calculated or just inexperience. But one thing is for sure, it's not a good way to get a pipeline built
  19. I'm certain that you spend your days imagining that that's the case But there's little evidence to support it. If there's one thing that people who supported him are questioning it's that the cost of living isn't coming down. I think that's one thing they really were counting on and it's one thing he hasn't delivered on. But that's about it, the rest of it they don't care about that much. Most like his immigration actions, most are okay with his tariffs if it results in more jobs for Americans. But there is inflationary pressure and they're not happy about that
  20. You talking about hunter biden?
  21. It isn't. That's the libs. Industrial carbon tax for example drives up the costs of everything and you can't see it.
  22. Carney? Well.... more incompetent than loser i'd say but i'm not going to say you're wrong either, Nope his loss. And i did read what happened and i'm reading the reactions today in the media. It's a bad look for him, So you're saying i'm right and you're wrong and you're butthurt about it Yeah... well... no surprises.
  23. I accept your admission of defeat Like many liberal supporters he hoped feverishly that carney would be different than Justin. But just like Justin around about Christmas he has his first corruption scandal I wonder if he's going to go vacation with the Aga khan As a follow-up
  24. I accept your admission of defeat This was definitely a loss for Carney but like I said not exactly a decisive one. But it makes him look bad and it makes it clear to everybody that his cabinet is fractured
×
×
  • Create New...