CdnFox

We remember. The main reason for that though is because you're happy and show no respect for the dead. It's the same thing here it's not terribly different, black dog just posted how he's happy that there's one less trump supporter. Your side literally glows over any gas that isn't gun related and when it is gun related Your side pretends that it's the most tragic thing in the universe and then refuses to actually look at the causes or the reasons behind it and just demands that we ban guns even in when we see that that won't actually help reduce violence. I don't recall you doing that specifically off the top of my head, but you certainly don't get the right to complain that people point that out about your side

My comments are there for anyone to see. You really don't believe me because you just realized you proved yourself a loser again. And specifically a loser with an absolutely horrible sense of timing He certainly don't have any fear of doubling down on looking retarded do you

That's because you are a racist. So around you there was racism. Racism wasn't a major problem for the most part in Canada for most of the 70s 80s 90s and early 2000s. Sure it existed, And sure there were isolated examples that needed to be dealt with. The first nations and police come to mind. But generally speaking racism was a pretty muted issue. They are quite correct that the woke effort to turn racism into a political division has done more to breathe life into serious racism than anything else in our history. Racism is more prevalent now, and more importantly the groups have been divided more than ever. The liberals legacy will have been to divide people and teach them to hate each other. And not only is that a fact it's a fact that's backed up by the evidence. Hate crimes are not down

I actually fell out of my chair laughing a little

It's been proven beyond a doubt decades ago. Sigh. Sometimes it's like you can't hear your own stupid. Anyway as I said you clearly don't believe that given your support of programs which do absolutely nothing to combat climate change and your failure to hold governments who supposedly support fighting climate change to account. Biden obviously doesn't believe it. Trudeau definitely doesn't believe it. I have a hard time believing that you do

I know, I was the one that pointed that out. Seems like you still haven't got over your fixation on it

I have. In fact I said it about the guy who just ran over a bunch of people with their trucks as well with an Isis flag. That was like a few days ago LOL, you just never miss a chance to be wrong or look stupid do you ROFLMAO!

Aww muffin Sounds like you're extra buthurt these days It was a good interview. And he does explain those things very carefully. Whereas Trudeau is currently hiding from the public At his interviews are usually fluff pieces with zero substance. With the far left agenda having been such an unmitigated disaster and with Trudeau turning out to be such a pathetic leader understand why someone who is on the left such as yourself might be a little sorts.

You're right, now there's two of you who believe that nonsense.

Not right now that's for sure. We'll see how things go over the next 4 years. If they can purge the woke you might see some more traditional democrats moderates coming forward.

Obama wasn't able to transfer his popularity into votes for kamala himself directly, I don't think his offspring are going to be able to play off that name quite as much. You never know. But I suspect it won't be a golden ticket

It was a VERY good interview. There were some tough questions in there, it wasn't all softballs at all and a lot of the questions were the 'atypical' ones. i found it very interesting to hear how he preps his day and his team informs him and about his touring schedule. And he stumbled a bit over at least one question so he probably wasn't given these in advance, probably just the general topics. He came across very well. IT's not accident he's doing so well in the polls. Yes trudeau is a hot mess but it's more than that.

So in your mind democracy only works if people are forced NOT to run and the people don't get to choose. I think you may need to look up the definition of democracy again As long as there's full disclosure and people are aware of what's involved the democracy means you have to leave it up to the people. Nobody really believed that the January 6th thing was a true insurrection. That was just the democrat diehards. Further people didn't believe that the crimes he was convicted of were actual crimes. Everyone realized they were politically motivated concoctions. Allowing the public to make that judgment safeguards democracy it doesn't break it. It means that people like you can't dictate democracy or use political stunts in order to oppress an opponent and get away with it. For over a year myself and several others were warning people like you and the democrats that their nonsense was going to backfire and put trump right back in office. And that's what the people chose. And you have to learn that democracy means respecting people's choices

Well my hope is if he was trying to send a message she may have left something behind to spell that out. I think knowing the motivation in these sorts of events is important. I think it helps gives us insight that can help identify people that are struggling before they get to the point where they think blowing themselves up is a good idea. The guy was obviously suffering from some sort of mental anguish

Well there you go. So I guess the fact that trump was in charge of an organization riddled with people who already hated him doesn't alter the fact that the organization was already riddled with people who hated him That is in no way shape or form any kind of reasonable question. The question is why did the FBI guardian take actions to further a political agenda rather than focusing on criminal activity. It is quite apparent that that is what happened and that is very bad for America ust remember, anything that is used against The republicans today can be used against the democrats tomorrow. So if I were you I would be focusing on calling for purge and cleansing of those who don't understand the importance of neutrality. And hoping that trump doesn't look for ways to weaponize it to his benefit the way the democrats did

Just beyond weird. We will have to see what the investigations come up with over the next few days

Several posters make this claim including yourself. Many posters have asked you to provide any scientific proof in the form of a research study or the like to show exactly why it's a crisis. So far none of you have. You just keep repeating that it's been known and proven for decades without being able to refer to a single scrap of proof. And we know you don't believe it, if you did you would never have backed the carbon tax for the last 10 years and Biden wouldn't have waited for the last 10 seconds to do what he's doing now. Your climate was a crisis you would have both been focused on measures that actually needed difference I need to cared about it a hell of a lot sooner

Dude, she's just going to keep repeating the same lies and insisting you're gay or trans. It's what she does, it's all she does. She stopped responding to me because i made such fun of her every time she tried it with me that she'd get furious and freak out. This isn't a serious conversation, s/he's not mentally well. Not to mention how messed up do you have to be to constantly be demanding we 'normalize' gays and trans and treat them like anyone else, and THEN try to use it as an insult to someone

That was done in 2022. Here's the 2024 december interview

Still drinking after new years eh? Well it is close to the week end i guess.

The fact that you think that being interviewed by someone make someone fit or unfit is yet another sign that you are not fit to be a voter

It's a clever move in many ways. I mean they say it's hard to undo, but it's really not that hard to undo. It's just hard to undo without passing new law. Trump could easily pass the new law and make all of this go away By adding the right to cancel protections explicitly in the act that they're referring to. But the thing is, trump has only so many legislative hours between now and the midterm elections. It is very likely that he will lose control of either the house or the senate in those elections, that is very often what happens. So he has only so many hours of legislature time and only so many opportunities to pass any legislation at all. So if he takes the time to deal with this while he still has control of the senate and the house then something else he wants to do will have to be put aside. So either he wastes the time necessary to fix this permanently and doesn't do something else, or he ignores it and the US possibly produces less oil and that will impact inflation despite the fact that hodad can't count. I'm sure this is probably not the last little slap in the face before he turns the keys over. It is a dick move but it's a cunning dick move

There are a number of inaccuracies here. In no particular order, Your comment about knowing who the government was before manitoba counts its first vote was certainly true in the eighties. Even to a lesser degree in the 90s. But every census the west gets more seats than the east does and that has been adding up over time. In fact Alberta got the most new seats out of the last census. Back in the day quebec had more seats than all of the west combined. Now the west has far more seats than quebec does. It has become very very hard to win a majority gov't without strong support in the west. Soon, it will become hard to win at all without strong support in the west. And alberta is growing seats faster than anyone. Trudeau and Guilbeault will likely be gone within 4 months and the liberals won't be coming back into power for at least 8 years, probably more. I'm not sure they'll even survive. Poilievre is very pro oil and grew up in Alberta. So your complaints there aren't really valid The US doesn't give a Flying Fig about Alberta and has made that absolutely clear. When Paul Martin was in and gretchen was in and Alberta separation sentiment was extremely high, even higher than it is now, balloons were floated with the united states and they came back extremely clear that they were not remotely interested. I have little doubt that Danielle Steel Will say much to trump at the inauguration about playing nice with canada and in the end peace will be made. Trump hates Trudeau, he doesn't really hate Canada. Well then a few years alberta's oil will be booming again and probably expanding. But the chances of alberta surviving on its own are very close to zero for a number of reasons, and their chances of being taken over by the United States I'm afraid are pretty much the same. Alberta will serve itself best by continuing to grow and continuing to gain political power and working with the provinces around it to present a more united front to the east. A united western Canada would be very very hard to mess with

And then posted one that doesn't. Aren't you the bright little bulb

Really. So you haven't heard the term "Illegal" immigrant for example? Just 'immigrant'. Well you're either oblivious, stupid, lying or all three. The deepest roots to maga can be traced to when trump said he'd make america great again and the left lost it's mind, so he bought some red hats to p*ss them off. The rest is pretty much leftist fabrications to try to dehumanize their opponents.