CdnFox

Sure, and I'll show it to you for only $100 a week! (Got to try to get my tax dollars back from you liberals one way or another Oh look at you trying to change the subject again as soon as you realize you've lost. And you may have heard of the snc scandal, that happened because of harper's law. So you're a two-time loser

LOL no you need a qualified psychiatric professional, but i'm the one who's here And sorry kid, i hate to burst your fantasies but you'll have to find that pedophile you're so desperate for elsewhere. Maybe you'll get lucky and your mom will come up short again this month and be willing to sell you to one for a bit? LOLOL - harper was 10 years ago kiddo. Still failing math i see And it's not just my opinion, in survey after survey he shows up as the number one or two spot amongst canadians. He did very well There's no better proof of that than the fact the only real scandal you could come up with is where he tried to force a corrupt politician to pay money BACK to taxpayers instead of stealing it LOLOLO OH NOES!!!! We could use a HELL of a lot more scandals like that Harper was very comfortably one of our best ever and it's obviously upsetting you. As people who was better, harper or trudeua and it won't even be close But he didn't remove the restrictions of red tape. And the industry has come forward and said that they're not interested in building a pipeline while those restrictions are in place. He also said he'd remove the inter provincial trade barriers by negotiating with provinces. That never happened. He said he'd build more homes and we're building less homes. He said he'd deal with trump's tariffs and we have more terrorists than we ever had Carney has failed to cross the board. That's 100% verifiable

When he fired? Nope. He was in front of it and then he was barely to the side which means he could have easily been snagged by parts of that car which is what happened to him the last time. And nothing to stop her turning back the other way You just wrong here like 100%. You can't defend this she was coming right for him when he fired I was still moving and still a threat when he fired the next rounds and now she's dead for being stupid. I think it's sad that she's dead but the fact that it's sad doesn't make it his fault.

Tax-free day for the average Canadian is after June 1st. The vast majority of us pay 50% in taxes. Tax Freedom Day | Fraser Institute And the wealthy pay more. That's what these leftists don't realize. They've been screaming about how taxes should be higher for so long that taxes are higher and they just didn't notice. How much more than 50% of your income in taxes is fair? How much does the average person have to pay before they're paying their fair share of tax when the country literally takes half of everything you earn?

None of that is true with you. You've been very clear. Also did you someone hack your account and start to teach you English or something? Kind of feels like maybe your mom wrote this for you For the last 2 years you have been all about the superficial traits. And in fact you have been about nothing other than superficial traits when it comes to Poilievre. And you make that statement and then you go on to talk about how important superficial traits are. In any case harper was easily one of the best prime ministers we've ever had in this country, and he was not well liked nor was he charming. But it was good at his job. Trudeau was charming. Carney is charming. Neither are good at their job And sooner or later Canadians are going to really desperately want someone who's good at their job. Carney was able to gaslight people into thinking he was good at the job but they're very obviously beginning to realize he wasn't and that's why the liberal party and his personal numbers are beginning to sag a bit

LOL a little late to the party kiddo, that was addressed long ago ROFLMAO!!!

I'm sure you do, it's the only way you can get dates Or are you talking about your mom's boyfriends? Sorry that wasn't clear?

You can see from the video clearly that they were crossing in front of the vehicle to approach and he wasn't directly in front of the vehicle until she backed up and then lurched forward. At that point with a vehicle now pointed in his direction and moving forward specifically it was an immediate threat and he shot and killed the dumbass who thought it was a good idea to back up and then charge a cop. Hard feeling your part. That's what happens when you trust AI to try and take a generalized statement and make it specific. She turned and backed up, now the vehicle was in line with him. then she accelerated. Pow. Look at the video again. When the car is stopped the agent is NOT in front of it. She aligns the car with him and then accelerates forward Were there any other pretzel moves you'd like to try or are you about done looking like a twat?

Still replying to me I see LOLOLOL

On the other hand you seem to lie succinctly No question was dodged You sound like you're pretty buthurt. This is the kind of thing people say when they know they're wrong but they can't actually argue the point so they just try and attack the person. Try and do better little guy

You mean that it's OUR fault that we point out that he lied and didn't keep his promise, or even try to. Not HIS fault for failing to do so LOL you blame harper for trudeau's corruption and you blame us for carney's lies. And you're trying to tell me you're NOT a Liberal supporter? You blame everyone else for everything they do, you're practically overqualified

I assume by we you mean you and the other voices in your head. And No what you're looking for is a chance to try and undo the fact that you already look like a ****** in this thread. And this will go on and I will keep providing proof and you will keep trying to twist what is said to try and find a way that you don't look like a complete twat. We've seen this a million times. I'm sorry you screwed up and Looked like a tard when you mistook brooksfield for a brooksfield-owned company and then doubled down on it. But your mental anguish is not my problem. I've provided evidence, the only evidence you provided was a web search with AI involving the wrong company. How's those math lessons going? Did you find out what a variable is? Have you managed to work out what 100 - 50 is? I can't be holding your hand every time you do something stupid and feel bad about it.

LOL back to your weird fantasies again i see So how's puberty going for you? Still can't find a boyfriend in the real world i see. You should ask your mom if she can spare any of hers?

Now Now i was very specific that we would have to see and wait, i was just very skeptical. To be honest i still am. These numbers are good, but there's other numbers which contrast to it which still paint an uncertain situation. As I said these numbers are good. Anything above 3% GDP growth is strong. And we've seen better than 3% for a couple of quarters now if we're looking at this as well. That says their economy is growing nicely. But you're getting weird Information from other metrics, inflation is still being very sticky and while job growth is up wages are not increasing to keep pace with inflation. And we see these concerns raised by a lot of Americans in interviews and polling. That suggests that there's a lot of market activity but it's not yet trickled down to the actual average American who may be facing higher expenses Without an increase in wage and therefore is actually losing ground. Employment numbes were always actually pretty good, but it's how much they're making that's the issue Some of that is to be expected. But there is this weird issue right now where growth is good but also stagflation is happening. We'll have to see how that levels out, it was expected that there would be time of transition and there may be lags between when the overall economy improves and when those benefits reach the worker.

Well technically now that she's resigned it's not a conflict of interest, but boy did that come late. At least not on the surface, but the problem is she is very close friends with carney. Carney is the grandfather of her children. Not kidding. Carney still has shares and interests in Brookfield including share futures. Brooks fields companies are going to be doing billions of dollars in the Ukraine and now she is in charge of picking or helping to advise who to pick to do projects and giving those people instructions . So it kind of feels like zalensky got the word that he had to hire her in order to get access to Canada's money and that she would be recommending brooks fields owned companies and carney will make sure he has the money to spend on them They're lining their pockets, there's no ways about it and they're doing so using Canada's money and it's at the publicn's expense

Oh i'm SURE they consider this a blessing from heaven and are milking it for every single drop they can, i'm completely with you there. She hit him. Even you are not stupid enough to try to claim that she wasn't driving right for him if she hit him. FFS

No. By all accounts this woman was not an activist or even terribly political. Probably leaned left but all family and friends say she's never had any interest in activism. Her wife on the other hand is a bit more activist and apparently according to her wife the wife talked her into going down there and causing trouble that day. I think what happened is that she got into a situation and then suddenly realize she might be in real trouble and decided to try and flee the scene when they were going to arrest her and foolishly when she decided to leave drove right at a police officer that was standing in front of her vehicle. I doubt very much that she meant to kill him. But from the officers perspective you've got a person not listening to instructions and then backing up and flooring the car right in your direction without any regard for your safety and actually hitting you. And that officer recently was struck by another vehicle doing exactly the same thing and was dragged for dozens of feet and required stitches and hospitalization. So he knows exactly what kind of threat a car coming at him like that is. So of course he shot her. He has no idea what her intention is and she's driving right at him. This is just a sad story, the woman probably got into a situation she wasn't able to handle, got emotional, decided she was going to flee the scene and in a moment to panic drove right at a cop possibly without even realizing he was there but the cop had no choice as she hit him with her car but to defend himself

They're dishonesty is proportional to how frustrated they are about the truth. The truth is as sad as it is that she died, she died because she made a very bad decision and put the life of a federal agent at risk. Apparently at the insistence of her wife she went to that scene, caused trouble on purpose, then refused police officers instructions and then drove her car at a cop who very reasonably felt his life was in danger and shot her. It is a series of decisions that she made that led to her death. And if she hadn't died she'd be in jail. Which would also have been a stupid decision on her part. People need to learn that it's not okay to interfere with ice. You cannot like what they're doing, you can protest legitimately, you can try and change the government there are midterms coming up there's a lot of things you have in the way of options but you don't have the option of interfering with police or threatening their lives. I feel it's a tragedy this girl is dead but the tragedy is that she listened to her wife and did something stupid and made bad decisions and didn't realize that she wasn't entitled to put officer's lives at risk. And now she's dead.

I doubt he can start a lawn mower The thing is you're right, but the challenge is just pulling that money out of Spending immediately would cause significant financial repercussions to the economy. It will take a number of years, you'd have to allow a significant portion to be a result of attrition, you'd probably be able to replace a lot of the jobs with automation but then that means an upfront cost to develop and deploy the automation, etc It absolutely has to be done and it absolutely can be done and it absolutely would save many tens if not hundreds of billions of dollars. But the challenge is it will take a while to get there and that's probably our biggest problem, the damage to our economy and our country is so severe that there is simply no way to repair it in a time scale that's less than decades. Even if we did everything right starting today it's probably close to 10 to 15 years before the housing situation is under control, 5 to 10 years before government spending even has a chance of being under control properly, years before major investment even considers eyeballing Canada never mind breaking ground on new projects that are significant in the kind of numbers we need, probably a decade before new pipelines can be finished that would allow us to diversify our oil market. Meanwhile people like treebeard keep laughing at the very idea that we should start correcting our problems, which doesn't bode well for getting underway anytime soon

Here's a video you may not have seen. You can see what happens exactly. And you can see how fast it happens. The car goes strait at the agent and hits him and he fires his shots in less than a second while the car is still moving and a threat. And it did hit him. BTW, they're saying that officer was struck by a car a few months earlier and snagged on the side of the car and was dragged with very serious injuries resulting. That car is 100 percent still a threat, he fires 3 quick shots and that's it. The vast majority of lawyers commenting are suggesting the law favours the cop, barring additional evidence.

That's not how it works and there are several cases in the united states that have already explored this. If the vehicle is moving and has already come in contact with him he has a split second and firing three shots of succession is perfectly normal and acceptable. It's not like you get the opportunity to say oh hold on a second, what she doing now, maybe she's not trying to kill me anymore I can't really tell I guess I'll wait and see. What you're saying is akin to suggesting that if a bad guy shoots at you and misses you should assume that they're done and they're not going to try again or there's no additional threat. That's not how it works She had already accelerated towards him, she had already hit him, and the car is still in motion. It's not like she was driving away and he was safe, he was still right there she could easily turn the wheel and risk getting him again, physically in contact with the vehicle, it's perfectly acceptable at that point to assume you're still at risk. She brought her own death about the moment she accelerated towards a police officer, who doesn't even appear to have drawn his gun till she began to accelerate towards him and then struck him. If she's driving down the street and he's looking at her in the rear view mirror then that's completely different but I'm sorry it is 100% justified to shoot someone in the circumstances he did It's not even remotely similar. In that case the bad guy was already on the floor and unable to move and the police officer shot him anyway. In this case the vehicle was still in motion, still in contact with the police officer and the bad guy was still quite capable of committing harm. Absolutely night and day. End of the day if you don't want to get shot don't drive your vehicle out of police officer

You mean the Julie elected lawful authority that at this point in time hasn't actually subverted anything. Yeah, sedition

Well thinking like him is difficult at the very best of times. The closest I've managed to come is to try and mix together "6 year old mentality" and "concussion/brain injury", and then you get close but even then he's a little weirder...

Sure Mike, it's utterly impossible to express what it means to hate something. I mean that's just beyond possible description. Sigh. Yet another in a long series of posts where you just vaguely insulting and dismissive without actually saying anything substantive or contributing in any meaningful fashion. This is why a lot of people hold you in contempt. It's actually fairly easy to describe what it means to hate something.

Oh it's quite easy, we're smarter cooler and prettier. But we can alwaus act dumber, and dress down so blending in with you is a cinch