CdnFox

I doubt he can start a lawn mower The thing is you're right, but the challenge is just pulling that money out of Spending immediately would cause significant financial repercussions to the economy. It will take a number of years, you'd have to allow a significant portion to be a result of attrition, you'd probably be able to replace a lot of the jobs with automation but then that means an upfront cost to develop and deploy the automation, etc It absolutely has to be done and it absolutely can be done and it absolutely would save many tens if not hundreds of billions of dollars. But the challenge is it will take a while to get there and that's probably our biggest problem, the damage to our economy and our country is so severe that there is simply no way to repair it in a time scale that's less than decades. Even if we did everything right starting today it's probably close to 10 to 15 years before the housing situation is under control, 5 to 10 years before government spending even has a chance of being under control properly, years before major investment even considers eyeballing Canada never mind breaking ground on new projects that are significant in the kind of numbers we need, probably a decade before new pipelines can be finished that would allow us to diversify our oil market. Meanwhile people like treebeard keep laughing at the very idea that we should start correcting our problems, which doesn't bode well for getting underway anytime soon

Here's a video you may not have seen. You can see what happens exactly. And you can see how fast it happens. The car goes strait at the agent and hits him and he fires his shots in less than a second while the car is still moving and a threat. And it did hit him. BTW, they're saying that officer was struck by a car a few months earlier and snagged on the side of the car and was dragged with very serious injuries resulting. That car is 100 percent still a threat, he fires 3 quick shots and that's it. The vast majority of lawyers commenting are suggesting the law favours the cop, barring additional evidence.

That's not how it works and there are several cases in the united states that have already explored this. If the vehicle is moving and has already come in contact with him he has a split second and firing three shots of succession is perfectly normal and acceptable. It's not like you get the opportunity to say oh hold on a second, what she doing now, maybe she's not trying to kill me anymore I can't really tell I guess I'll wait and see. What you're saying is akin to suggesting that if a bad guy shoots at you and misses you should assume that they're done and they're not going to try again or there's no additional threat. That's not how it works She had already accelerated towards him, she had already hit him, and the car is still in motion. It's not like she was driving away and he was safe, he was still right there she could easily turn the wheel and risk getting him again, physically in contact with the vehicle, it's perfectly acceptable at that point to assume you're still at risk. She brought her own death about the moment she accelerated towards a police officer, who doesn't even appear to have drawn his gun till she began to accelerate towards him and then struck him. If she's driving down the street and he's looking at her in the rear view mirror then that's completely different but I'm sorry it is 100% justified to shoot someone in the circumstances he did It's not even remotely similar. In that case the bad guy was already on the floor and unable to move and the police officer shot him anyway. In this case the vehicle was still in motion, still in contact with the police officer and the bad guy was still quite capable of committing harm. Absolutely night and day. End of the day if you don't want to get shot don't drive your vehicle out of police officer

You mean the Julie elected lawful authority that at this point in time hasn't actually subverted anything. Yeah, sedition

Well thinking like him is difficult at the very best of times. The closest I've managed to come is to try and mix together "6 year old mentality" and "concussion/brain injury", and then you get close but even then he's a little weirder...

Sure Mike, it's utterly impossible to express what it means to hate something. I mean that's just beyond possible description. Sigh. Yet another in a long series of posts where you just vaguely insulting and dismissive without actually saying anything substantive or contributing in any meaningful fashion. This is why a lot of people hold you in contempt. It's actually fairly easy to describe what it means to hate something.

Oh it's quite easy, we're smarter cooler and prettier. But we can alwaus act dumber, and dress down so blending in with you is a cinch

I'm sorry but you're a 100% wrong. The shots were fired from the officer in front which we see in the last picture there. And the car did strike that officer. Two officers were hit or hurt by the vehicle and went to the hospital and were treated for minor injuries All those photos are of the guy at the side and he's not the one who fired. the guy you see forward of that in the last picture is the one who shot. You can see the shot hit the front window (the glass exploding off of it) in the video And your shot placement tells me you've never shot much. If the bullet placement was from where you said it was it couldn't possibly have hit the person. That Shot obviously came from in front of the vehicle Either from someone firing from the right of the vehicle facing head on and passing through the side window or from just in line with the left of the vehicle bumper and into the driver's seat area So everything you said was wrong. You are falling victim to the spin that the left is desperately trying to create on the subject but it's wrong. If you watch the video the shot comes from in front and that guy is actually struck by the vehicle.

I'm not convinced that's true and you cannot know that it's true. But even if it is true the denying the US the purchase of their military equipment and moving to someone else is still the best response. Children always push their boundaries until they get a smack and told that they've gone too far. And yeah we'll probably suffer a little bit but you got to do that with a bully. If a bully's picking on you you hit back as hard as you can. You might lose the fight but at the end of the day the bully knows that there's a price with messing with you and the vast majority of bullies will back off after that. We've seen that with trump more than once now And again I hear what you're saying about you feeling that the F-35 is the best choice but we cannot be buying our gear from America right now. So what's the next best choice? Cuz that's what we're going to probably have to do Like I said it is very unfortunate we're in the position we're in. Weak militarily and weak economically. But that is where we are and if it takes us a little longer to build back doing it right it makes more sense than half-assing it and doing it wrong because it's faster

I accept your admission of defeat LOL OF course we are. Your meltdowns are endlessly hilarious LOLOL LOL and once again everyone's laughing at you kid

I've posted the deal that westinghouse did in 2025, so you're not looking for anything. At this point you realize that you were wrong not once, not twice, but three times and you're desperately hoping if you keep asking the same answered questions you'll magically be right. Better luck next time kid HOw's those math lessons going?

But you don't. And that's obvious and that's why people laugh at you ????? Wow. You get so flustered that your English skills crash. This is what people mean by you having a hissy fit Kid, you wake up every single morning and run around finding all my posts to put little down arrows on and that of the other people you don't like. That's the first thing you do everyday. The person here with compulsive Behavior would be you You've got this total rockstar Idol fixation with me and with a few other people and it's all you think about are interact with. The vast majority of my posts here are not replying to you, the vast majority of your posts here are replying to me Everything you accuse others of is always just a reflection of your own admissions of your own behavior

It 100% is. That is exactly what it is, when somebody comes towards a police officer with a vehicle to the point where they're actually striking the officer and they're accelerating that's time for the officer to shoot. A hell of a lot of officers are injured or even killed in exactly those circumstance.

I think technically it's more of a long term lease

Umm no. In fact it's quite real, you thought it was fake because you looked up the wrong company But westinghouse has indeed struck deals URC 2025: Westinghouse and Energoatom Reinforce Ukraine’s Energy Independence with Partnership for Fuel Assembly Capability And: In 2025, Westinghouse and Ukraine's Energoatom signed key agreements at the Ukraine Recovery Conference (URC) to boost Ukraine's nuclear fuel independence, establishing full-scale manufacturing in Ukraine for Westinghouse's Western-designed VVER fuel, a crucial step away from Russian reliance and towards long-term energy security and potential new reactors, including AP1000s, as reported by the Ukrainian Ministry of Energy and Energoatom. Key Developments in 2025 Fuel Manufacturing Partnership: Westinghouse and Energoatom agreed to deploy full-scale production facilities in Ukraine for components of Westinghouse VVER fuel technology, making Ukraine a producer, not just a consumer, of Western nuclear fuel. Energy Independence: This agreement is a major strategic move to permanently remove dependence on Russian fuel supply chains, enhancing Ukraine's energy security during the ongoing conflict. Support for New Reactors: Westinghouse reinforced its commitment to building new AP1000 reactors in Ukraine, discussing financing with Ukrainian officials and the U.S. Export-Import Bank (EXIM). Focus on Recovery: These deals were announced during the Ukraine Recovery Conference (URC) in Rome (URC), linking nuclear energy to Ukraine's long-term reconstruction. Background Ukraine relies heavily on nuclear power (around 50% of electricity), and reducing dependency on Russia for fuel has been a critical goal for years, with initial Westinghouse fuel supply contracts dating back to 2018. Westinghouse, now owned by Brookfield, has been a key partner in Ukraine's efforts to diversify its energy sources and modernize its Soviet-era nuclear fleet. Ooooopssieeee LOLOLOL A 2 second google search would have made that apperent. So the deal is very real and worth billions and you're a complete twat yet again. Hows those math lessons going? BWAAAHAHAHAHAHAAHA!!!!! You come back again real soon, we miss you when you're not here to laugh at

The interesting thing about your posts is that I can really tell what I've said that hurt you because you try and repeat it back but it's out of context The only one having a hissy fit is you kiddo. I assume your mommy didn't change your diaper yet this morning

Yeah, that's pretty much what we all think about you LOL i love it when you have these weird fantasies about me Sounds like a bad case of jealousy, you imagined a fake relationship and then got jealous of it

ROFLMAO!!!!! OH NOES! TRIGGERED ZUCCHINI COMMUNIST IS TRIGGERED! The only one who's been caught lying here is you. That's why you're so angry at me, I pointed out your lies earlier a few times and you can't possibly argue against them But it's always funny to watch you Spaz out No wonder you're afraid to talk to me

I can always tell when you realize you're losing an argument when you begin to make up fake things that I've never said and start to argue against those LOLOL You would claimed he had never explained himself. All I did was point out that he very clearly has explained himself. Whether or not you like the explanation is irrelevant, you said he hadn't given one and he has As for the validity I haven't dug into it. But I can say at this point is most likely I believe strongly that he believes it strongly even if it's complete nonsense. We all know trump says things that aren't true. But what is often forgotten is that he very frequently he convinces himself they are true and when he makes his comments he's making them absolutely believing that every word he's saying is correct. His argument here is that this guy was treated inappropriately and his case was mishandled or some such thing and that might or might not be true I honestly don't know. Like I said I haven't looked into it. But I am 100% sure that trump himself was badly mistreated by the legal system and that his conviction is a joke. Knowing that with absolute certainty it is not hard for me to believe that it's easy to convince him that somebody else was mistreated and that their conviction may not be as legitimate as some would say. Well you've been told the why. You may not agree with the why but pretending that this hasn't already been answered just makes you look childish. I would recommend if you want to compare the two that you go back and try and take a look at trump's claims of mistreatment by the legal system for the other person and see if there's any sort of substance to it or possible substance to it. I'm honestly not that interested. But it is absolutely true that that guy is no longer leader of that country. And it's probably quite true that even if he wins his court cases, which he might, maduro will have been removed from office and therefore no longer be the same threat that he was. Tell maybe the difference in the long run is that in both cases trump was satisfied with removing them from power and after they were removed from power he didn't consider them to be such a threat

Guess it depends on how you define scared. He certainly not scared of carney. But it is obvious that he knows better than to push things to the point where Canada becomes furious and he has had to back off a couple of times.

But that's what carney said he would do. That was his promise. He was going to "build baby build " and he was going to supercharge the economy and he was going to catalyze literally everything in sight and we would move at a pace never before seen in our history So what you reply boils down to is "what, you actually believed him???? BWAAAHAHAHAAH~"

but I didn't. As we discovered everything I said was absolutely accurate. The only one who made it fool here was you of yourself by taking the time to look up something that nobody said and then provide the shocking evidence that the thing that nobody claimed isn't true There's no making this look good kid. This was you being in a rush to try and find something that you could call me out on as you always try and once again for the billionth time because you're rushing and not paying attention you wound up looking stupid You mean now that I've told you. Yes and you will completely stupid for having to be told It doesn't change the fact that that never happened. Westinghouse has many contracts with Ukraine and that is easily verifiable and agreed to new ones in 2025 and that is easily verifiable and that those are backed by guarantees as described above. All of that is common knowledge and reported. It's all 100% true it's not up for debate. So the only thing on the bottom of my shoe is you being A tard and me wiping the floor with you again The only part of this which is sort of controversial is the direct connection between the loan from Canada and the guarantee. It's true the Canada provided that money and it's true that that organization provided the loan guarantee but it's harder to say that because of the Canadian loan that's why the deal was struck. Money is fungible. But it's pretty obvious there's a connection. We donate money to a fund that then provides money to the Ukraine to buy contracted goods from Westinghouse which is owned by Brooksfield. Anybody over the age of four can successfully connect those dots But as always I appreciate you being stupid, doubling down on your stupid, and then quadrupling down on your stupid until eventually you reach Max stupid LOLOLOL!!! At this point I imagine in your brain you've already admitted defeat having realized you've made it hard of yourself again and are now considering blaming the whole thing on my post count 😆😆😆😆

Well, more hilariously amused then worried And you're little but you're not old Like I said however in free in your head and you wake up every morning and immediately run to the internet with your little bowl of cereal to give down arrows to me and anyone who is a big meanie to you LOLOLOL Goddess already posted hers but here's you this morning chasing me all over the forum like a whipped dog Seriously - who does that?!?!

Well that's not quite true, But at the same time while I'm poking fun at the american (who is actually albertan) who keeps making jabs about us not being the 51st state, It is pretty obvious that trump is concerned about potential military conflict with Canada where is he isn't with others. In any real war america would win eventually but not before paying a rather steep price and possibly winding up with many decades of terrorist attacks within its own borders. More so than any two countries on earth, our people can blend with their people and be completely unnoticed even when engaged in casual conversation. There's no Shibboleth or Goedendag here And the American people wouldn't stand for it. There's already a lot of pushback even over the economic sanctions. Trump is more leery of pushing Canada than he is with other countries. There's a couple of good reasons for that

He was taken to the hospital. The fact that she hit him at this point is accepted fact, it's not conjecture or based on the video . Which would make you the liar