CdnFox

That is not necessarily true.

Oh so you did mean an investigation You can't even keep your eyes straight Oh so now it's not everybody in the Epstein file?? Sorry you keep changing your tune so fast it's hard to keep track without a spreadsheet. So which name specifically do you feel weren't investigated but were potential witnesses? That is the stupidest thing you've said in quite a while and I have to say it was up against some pretty stiff competition The client list is absolutely not the responsibility of investigators to compile. Ever.

Start with a federal government. Get rid of the laws that forbid pipelines and tankers and streamline the process. That's more than enough to get the ball rolling The federal ones were the ones they were complaining about The feds have the authority. They can exercise it as they need to You realize you're the gerbil right?

Again - not a single scrap of any evidence there. When did it contradict? What day was that? What were the numbers? What did they actually say? NOTHING. this is garbage propaganda. it's worse than useless and you should be mildly embarrassed for having put it forward as any kind of 'proof'. Even "Cast doubt"... what the hell does that mean? "We're not sure the hamas numbers are entirely accuate". Entirely fair statement and casts doubt but does NOT refute the numbers. Hatred and bigotry my friend - it's a very negative thing that clouds the judgement of even intelligent men.

True shit. I know i know.... it hurts your feelings that your heroes are starving people, and you're big mad you can't blame the 'evil capitalist' businesses that actually provide and deliver food to people, but ... such is life.

You presented no such thing. The first example you give is just someone's opinion of someone's reaction to a thing that you couldn't prove was ever in doubt. It is exactly the opposite of evidence Your second one is just plain hearsay, (my friend told me that his friend told him,....) and also supports the idea that the Israelis were not denying the numbers. So the only fact here is that you have presented no facts at all to suggest Israel was denying numbers. So what's left over to explain this absolute insistence of yours that Israel was denying the numbers? Based on your other statements it's obvious that it's bigotry and hatred. You have more than once now provided evidence that Israel's account of the numbers we're not substantially different than gases although they clearly questioned whether the information provided by Gaza was factually accurate, and that's not the same as denying the numbers. And I think anybody would have been asking that question You're not dumb enough not to know what a fact is. If this was a post from Robo Smith I might glance over it but you know what a fact is and you know that what you presented is not fact in the slightest. You're being led by your hatred and bigotry instead of fact and reason

REALITY: DON BROKE THE LAW AND THAT ISN"T JOURNALISM, AND NOW THE RACIST BIGOT IS GOING TO WIND UP IN JAIL WHERE HE BELONGS

There's really no evidence of that and considering that your claim has already been disproven that israel "denied" The number of casualties it sounds like you're just letting your hatred and bigotry speak for you

yes, i see you made another post. Good work!!! You're Winning!!

True. You were wrong BEFORE he listened to the recordings

Sorry kiddo but in your case if the hamster fits.....

The opposite is true. The government would get the hell out of the way private industry would be happy to step up as I posted several times before they've come right out and said the impediment is the regulatory environment

Well that might be a 'lapse' for the media or the like but i'm not sure it' s a lapse in criminal justice. It was the political types and the media types who blew it up, not the justice system . You called it a list. But i'm loving that your argument is "I wasn't' THIS kind of wrong and stupid, i was THAT kind of wrong and stupid!" Sure kid isn't that part of investigation? How would you interrogate someone unless you're investigating something? Just randomly ask questions? "Chicken or beef, which is better. Answer me! ANSWER ME YOU SICK BASTARD!!" So in other words you've realized what you said was stupid and that I was correct and rather than address it in a more adult fashion you are having a bit of a hissy fit and desperately trying to weasel on technicalities And you accuse others of being argumentative and focusing on details

Installing speed bumps while bragging how they just increased the speed limit to 120. That's it exactly, great analogy. Oh we LOVE the idea (impediment) of more pipelines (impediment impediment) and we're doing everything (pisses off first nations, calls their mothers fat) that we possibly can (impediment) to facilitate that!

But you told us the doj was uncorruptible! He brought this up when we discussed Clinton running across the tarmac etc. It's amazing how the doj can't be possibly corrupted when someone you like is in power and how it can be completely and easily totally corrupted when someone you don't like is in power You get this is why nobody takes you seriously right?

Sure, or the facilities or the materials. But we have all that. I'm sure it will not take us very long at all to assemble some moms and that's if we didn't buy plans from somebody like Britain or France or Israel or India or Pakistan or any of the other nuclear powers. And it's not like we don't have plenty of nuclear test Facilities or processing already up and running. Really the only thing holding us back would be delivery systems and that would not be that hard to figure out

That's RIGHT!! Why if i were facebook i would be SUING @Nationalist for DARING to suggest someone being as dumb as you is THEIR fault! (the horror!!!!)

A blip. When he gets lots of media he gets a blip. But at the end of the day people still can't afford food and they can't pay rent and nobodys' going to remember the speech in davos in a month. At the end of the day he'll still be vunerable to an election. That doesn't mean they're going to call one, just that he will have a tough time stopping it if they do. On the flip side he may do a preemptive strike and call one before they can on his own terms, which a lot of people are saying is likely given his campaign like announcements. That's why they asked him straight out and he studdered and fumbled before saying no he isn't, which makes it pretty obvious he was thinking about it.

OK, i'll give you points for that, it was mildly amusing and got a snicker

Like i said, every accusation you make turns out to be an admission

All of which can be laid at the federal government's feet And it was never designed to solve the problem by itself. They're not grateful because the government then trashed the other pipeline which was necessary and has done everything you can to hurt the industry The thief breaks into your home and steals $1,000 but leaves five bucks on the table for you you're probably not that grateful But they won't. Because carney is actually blocking any new pipeline while pretending that he'd really like to but it's not his fault they can't.

Really How is this the biggest lapse in history? How is it even a lapse? There is no list. This is another little fantasy that's been floating around for ages now, but somehow there's a client list with all the names of anyone who biked an underage girl along with their current phone number and email contact. That is not the case. This is just a compilation of every scrap of paper the police found or came up with or wrote down or had an idea about including a whole bunch of stuff that has absolutely no relevance to the investigation but they thought it might so into the pilot went. The police have already suggested that they investigated everybody who is actually suspected of wrongdoing. And when you say 'should investigate everyone' do you also mean going back to harass the victims? They're in the files too. In fact some of them had their nude pics and info posted when the files were published. Which is precisely why the cops have said it's bad to publish those kinds of things. Get a clue, THEN talk.

Then why don't you define it yourself instead of being a useless twat who's only purpose in life is to show up and criticize others while failing to do anything yourself. You do this all the time. Why don't you contribute meaningfully instead? Offer an opinion of what term would be more appropriate if you prefer. Honestly I don't know what the hell is the matter with the left these days

Yeah. And that's the first time this has ever happened in our history, Only over the last few years have we seen this. We've had periods we're investment slowed down but this is the first time we've looked at actual outflow But of course it's all harpers fault🙄

Don't tell him to god until we got them I doubt they'd start a nuclear war over it. And we no longer care what the Americans think. If they don't like the idea they are absolutely welcome to come talk to us about a whole range of issues we have with them right now and maybe we can work something out Absolute 100 percent bullshit. There is EVERY reason canada would respond to an invasion with nuclear strikes, and if the US struck back it would be dropping nukes right on the doorsteps of it's own cities. Nobody would risk it. You think russia would be in ukrane right now if they still had nukes? Nopers.