CdnFox

First off you cliamed we accepted them willingly. Now you claim the internet says we didn't want them. And as usual you can't provide a cite. I can. From google ai "American draft dodgers and military deserters were generally welcomed in Canada during the Vietnam War, with an estimated 30,000 to 50,000 fleeing across the border." OOopppsie! Do you just enjoy looking like a twat or something? Not really. After 69 they didn't even ask about whether someone was a draft dodger or not. The public wouldn't have known how many were coming in and apperently generally didn't mind draft dodgers anyway. Your entire narrative has fallen apart AGAIN due to the facts. But please, go ahead and explain how your stupidity and lack of truth is somehow my fault again LOLOLOL

His base is every bit as big as the liberals. It was only about a 1% difference between them last election So what you're saying is you're basing your opinion on hatred and bigotry. That's very common for the left these days

LOL i always know when i've really upset you because you some how lose the ability to speak english "it is a pedophile is you calling people." ??? In any case kid nobody 'lured' you. I know you're desperate to have someone actually be physically attracted to you and you favour men but nobody here at all ever actually showed any interest in you that way. ESPECIALLY me. Yet you constantly seem to daydream about it and fixate on it, to the point where you convince yourself. Which if anything is more proof you're just a kid. And it's goddess that calls you 12, i usually peg you at 15 or so, tho she might be right.

Sure, if this was the 1970s And where are you seeing that canadians didn't accept them? They wouldn't have even known, these people for the most part immigrated normally.

You have posted no evidence. All you've shown is that you're driven by bigotry and hatred and are willing to put forward propaganda. You couldn't even address the issues i raised with your 'evidence' and despite your constant claims that this was a common thing for the israeli gov't to do you couldn't post A SINGLE EXAMPLE of it. Post away. Everyone reading your posts can see what i'm saying is true, all you're posting is propaganda and insisting it's fact. But they didn't choose to dispute them publicly and you have never come up with a single example of them doing so. And Hamas was the one who attacked and started the conflict.

I assume we can buy the plans and the missiles if we want from our allies. America may not want us to have it but the Brits in France won't care. No black market necessary And we've got tons of uranium, wouldn't be hard to have enrichment up and running quite quickly. Something we should have been doing already Again you come up with every reason in the world for failure. But the reality is is that none of what you said is a hold back. We could absolutely have nuclear weapons, and frankly it would be more useful than new jets or tanks

Based on what? There's no poling out since his leadership renewal. I'm sure we'll see some new polls out in a week or so and we'll see. You're really not very good at this are you ?

There is a great deal of tax on food. The gov't charges all kinds of carbon taxes and other input taxes and such on the producers and sellers of food. Lets just look at the carbon tax. There's carbon tax associated with producing the fertilizer and other components. THis must be paid by the farmer and is added to his prices. There is a carbon tax associated with storing and moving the items for processing and THAT gets added to the costs on top of what the farmer marked up, another for distribution to the end user OR to a producer who will produce a value added finished product. and all that gets marked up. "In 2025, Canadian farmers continued to express concerns regarding the financial burden of carbon pricing, despite significant policy shifts that removed the consumer-facing federal fuel charge on March 31, 2025. While the removal of the consumer carbon tax was welcomed as a relief, farmers reported that input costs remained high due to remaining industrial carbon taxes and other supply chain pressures. farmers complain of carbon taxes 2025 - Google Search Honestly it's like you WANT to look stupid. Nope They can't. It's not like the gst or provincial sales taxes. They cannot deduct it other than as an imput expense, which means they MUST mark it up. And the next guys do and the next guys do. Wah wah waaaaaahhh... you look like a tard yet again

Hell, the way he obsesses over pedophilia he might be the liberal in question

They said so specifically. Actually posted those quotes short time ago. But as always if you haven't got an argument you got a lie handy

As you say, an investigation. Yes, the experience of having a brain and having read a book at some point. Try it LOL - you're always spinning your wheels. Look at you go!!!!

That is not necessarily true.

Oh so you did mean an investigation You can't even keep your eyes straight Oh so now it's not everybody in the Epstein file?? Sorry you keep changing your tune so fast it's hard to keep track without a spreadsheet. So which name specifically do you feel weren't investigated but were potential witnesses? That is the stupidest thing you've said in quite a while and I have to say it was up against some pretty stiff competition The client list is absolutely not the responsibility of investigators to compile. Ever.

Start with a federal government. Get rid of the laws that forbid pipelines and tankers and streamline the process. That's more than enough to get the ball rolling The federal ones were the ones they were complaining about The feds have the authority. They can exercise it as they need to You realize you're the gerbil right?

Again - not a single scrap of any evidence there. When did it contradict? What day was that? What were the numbers? What did they actually say? NOTHING. this is garbage propaganda. it's worse than useless and you should be mildly embarrassed for having put it forward as any kind of 'proof'. Even "Cast doubt"... what the hell does that mean? "We're not sure the hamas numbers are entirely accuate". Entirely fair statement and casts doubt but does NOT refute the numbers. Hatred and bigotry my friend - it's a very negative thing that clouds the judgement of even intelligent men.

True shit. I know i know.... it hurts your feelings that your heroes are starving people, and you're big mad you can't blame the 'evil capitalist' businesses that actually provide and deliver food to people, but ... such is life.

You presented no such thing. The first example you give is just someone's opinion of someone's reaction to a thing that you couldn't prove was ever in doubt. It is exactly the opposite of evidence Your second one is just plain hearsay, (my friend told me that his friend told him,....) and also supports the idea that the Israelis were not denying the numbers. So the only fact here is that you have presented no facts at all to suggest Israel was denying numbers. So what's left over to explain this absolute insistence of yours that Israel was denying the numbers? Based on your other statements it's obvious that it's bigotry and hatred. You have more than once now provided evidence that Israel's account of the numbers we're not substantially different than gases although they clearly questioned whether the information provided by Gaza was factually accurate, and that's not the same as denying the numbers. And I think anybody would have been asking that question You're not dumb enough not to know what a fact is. If this was a post from Robo Smith I might glance over it but you know what a fact is and you know that what you presented is not fact in the slightest. You're being led by your hatred and bigotry instead of fact and reason

REALITY: DON BROKE THE LAW AND THAT ISN"T JOURNALISM, AND NOW THE RACIST BIGOT IS GOING TO WIND UP IN JAIL WHERE HE BELONGS

There's really no evidence of that and considering that your claim has already been disproven that israel "denied" The number of casualties it sounds like you're just letting your hatred and bigotry speak for you

yes, i see you made another post. Good work!!! You're Winning!!

True. You were wrong BEFORE he listened to the recordings

Sorry kiddo but in your case if the hamster fits.....

The opposite is true. The government would get the hell out of the way private industry would be happy to step up as I posted several times before they've come right out and said the impediment is the regulatory environment

Well that might be a 'lapse' for the media or the like but i'm not sure it' s a lapse in criminal justice. It was the political types and the media types who blew it up, not the justice system . You called it a list. But i'm loving that your argument is "I wasn't' THIS kind of wrong and stupid, i was THAT kind of wrong and stupid!" Sure kid isn't that part of investigation? How would you interrogate someone unless you're investigating something? Just randomly ask questions? "Chicken or beef, which is better. Answer me! ANSWER ME YOU SICK BASTARD!!" So in other words you've realized what you said was stupid and that I was correct and rather than address it in a more adult fashion you are having a bit of a hissy fit and desperately trying to weasel on technicalities And you accuse others of being argumentative and focusing on details

Installing speed bumps while bragging how they just increased the speed limit to 120. That's it exactly, great analogy. Oh we LOVE the idea (impediment) of more pipelines (impediment impediment) and we're doing everything (pisses off first nations, calls their mothers fat) that we possibly can (impediment) to facilitate that!