OftenWrong

Agreed, back to the topic... I think Kamala Harris has a nice smile. She would probably be a nice person as president.

Message to liberals:

Why did you say they were martyred? I thought martyr means they died for a religious reason, like in the name of Allah or something. These soldiers died in service to their country, to protect the people of Turkiye. Since the PKK terrorists also believe in Allah, I am asking why you call it martyrdom.

Another option is not to be so extreme one way or another, but to use wisdom and intelligence to make more moderate judgements. That's not a liberal trait these days.

No, it does not. It comes down to a question of discriminating between degrees of things, which seems to be problem that liberals have. Equating one thing to another, different thing is not always the best way to decide on a matter.

There's little doubt that Mueller's presentation was intentionally staged to muddy the waters. He must have been well paid. At this point he is saying he never wants to talk about the report again.

Great ideas, that our enemies Russia and China would agree with. We should investigate ourselves to the point that we become dysfunctional, as the crimes inherent to our human nature are exposed. Then we should condemn ourselves, while our enemies applaud our self-loathing virtue.

The people of the UK must resist, just as the people of Canada must. Stand up and speak out against the globalists. But we are far too passive in Canada when it comes to protesting against government. The British are more vocal and more politically active. The French are going right wing now, they have endorsed Marine Le Pen. Her right-wing party won decisively over Macron, who is a liberal progressive, in the EU parliamentary elections. The French have spoken. I know the French are assholes, but they don't screw around wasting time like Canada. They want to retake control of their own country. At least they brave enough to take a bold first step away from the EU. Vive la France, and God Save the Queen.

They do? Nonsense. The right and the far-right and not one and the same, just as the left and far-left disagree. There's political position and then there's an extreme position. Not the same. But I know it's a typical liberal trademark to find it hard to discriminate the difference between things. Those articles are written by leftist agent provocateurs. They have ensnared your mind.

The UK must resist.

I thought I did answer. I think it's to maintain their geopolitical interest in the region, versus someone else's. To keep Iran weak or on the defensive. Iran being part of a different "axis" in the ME. All countries are aligned to greater powers... the people with the big nukes. That's what I said. Also sometimes what you see is posturing, sabre-rattling. Necessary to keep primitive dogs at bay. That is the only language they do understand. Yer tree-hugging, feminist, apologizing leftist liberal for a president wouldn't stand a chance.

What the Greens represent in terms of voter interest is a disenfranchisement of Liberals and their over-the-top BS. Ordinary people are not as stupid as liberals think, and are turned off by their obvious, phoney behaviour. Liberal voters are looking for an alternative. As to liberal alarmist predictions that the "Far Right" would sweep through Europe, it proved to be just more fear-inducing hype to rally voters. It's not the far right that's coming into power, but it will be The Right.

I answered the question. It's geopolitical power at a higher level that matters. There is more at play than an argument over a few boats. Iran has no nukes (yet).

Even if they did, there is no certainty that remain would win. The Brexit party swept the recent EU elections, although the party was formed just a few weeks ago. They got the most seats over any other UK party, by a strong margin. That's a clear indication that many people do want Brexit.

That's not the way it happened. Everyone knew what it means. At the time of the referendum, nobody cared. Voter turnout was low, if I recall. Apathy is the reason, not ignorance.

Iran is not a big problem. Someone else

Sept. 11 2001 comes to mind. Don't forget that 'socialism' is a toxic word in the US. Not 100% toxic but there is a tendency to refrain from creating large-scale government run programs. National defence is a top priority, especially for the number one superpower.

I should have named myself Trump, so you people would hate me even more, right? Ay, there's the point... who's got liberals heads spinning? What are liberals doing? Attacking Trump. Consequently what are liberals not doing? Governing. Instead of focusing on important problems that the American people need them to solve, they are wasting time with this ongoing drama. They have politically trapped themselves in a corner with their categorical opposition to anything Trump, to the extent they can not function at all. And Donald Trump, like it or not, is the sole person who has done this to them. - Syria over quick and clean. I like that. Mr. Putin apparently didn't like it at all. I like that, too. - Don't know about abortion laws in US, that's a state issue I think. No idea why that's come out again, but there are political elements who are always pushing to bring this law back. Whether it involves Trump, I don't know. - My personal view on all the unrest, don't know how big a problem it really is. It's a big country and you only hear about bad news. Unrest exists, and is escalating. I agree with Trump that the responsibility for the violence lies with both sides, and both sides are equally violent. It shouldn't be a partisan issue.

+2 points

I consider using a medium like twitter puzzling, but not offensive. I answered your question, but you didn't answer mine. Because you know where that leads.

I know, but let's discuss within the limits of reality.

I do not "pretend" things, nor do I care what you think of me. That's right, attack me. Threaten to call me names for what I think. All you are doing is giving me the win and making yourself look like a jackass.

1. Ok, so apparently you object to the format of his communication. Let me know which format(s) you think are more appropriate for threatening complete annihilation. Is there a proper etiquette? 4. One should not ignore or underestimate one's enemy, and my take on Donald Trump is that he is a formidable opponent indeed. He has survived an onslaught that would leave most people curled up in a fetal position on the floor. More than just survived it, Trump can say he's been redeemed by the Mueller report. He is now a force to be reckoned with, to which Dems have no answer. The road to 2020 looking pretty good... for Trump.

By "dominant species" you mean the British, right? I agree, they have ruined everything. Damn you James Watt, you were the antichrist.