OftenWrong

Again lefty putting words in someone's mouth. You people are dull. Go back and show me where I said she's not allowed. She can say whatever and do whatever. She can even crap her nylons on stage. Just when people shun her product for doing so, don't come crying to me.

You must be replying to the wrong person. At no point did I even mention your conspiratorial claims. On fact I said the opposite. Lefties always try to put words in other people's mouths, then call them out for it. They begin with "So you're saying...". No, I'm not saying that. You said that, It's a cheap tactic used by political Lowenbrows.

Turdeau et al want to americanize Canadian politics. Another reason we really, really need to flush that turd down the toilet. Speaking of which, I gotta go make a Prime Minister...

I don't see or hear 'fear' in it, although you keep pimping that line. Outrage, perhaps. Annoyance, sure. Just like you are annoying, but only mildly so, when you stomp around these forums calling people hypocrits and such. But you're having fun right now so it's ok, right? The reality as far as I'm concerned is if a celebrity enters the political foray they are fair game for criticism. That could also mean financial backlash, for example at least some NFL fans are Trump supporters. Roughly 50%, I would guess. So those fans, while they may have like seeing her at the game events when it was all cute stuff might now be rather po'd at giving her air time. That's pretty straightforward, isn't it? As we saw with Bud Light, these people are getting upset when the product they enjoy becomes a political football instead. Stick to singing and wiggling ass on stage, keep politics out of it, would be good advice. Lest ye reap what ye've sown...

This isn't about anyone actually defending and being friends with China, it's about politicians using them as a political football while the keeping the voting dupes highly deluded. Hence it was faux outrage when Trump called it the China virus, and bullshyte from Pelosi when she encouraged people to "go out for dinner in China town." Pure and sublime. But shouting at people to "Go back to China!" tells us where it's really at.

"But but but..." Looking back at what westcanman said, it seems you are rather confused. "Pelosi currently represents California's 11th congressional district, which includes most of San Francisco." Which raises the question, what else are you confused about.

I get that you're defending Pelosi for being a shameless bigot, which is fine. Up to you. It's the double standard that galls me.

Right, that is the real concern. Even Blackbird is not so far off with his observation that we may end up with the state "playing god". Soon enough, some of us may end up in a bed drooling and shittin ourselves. Pretty young nurses will visit twice a day to give you a wipe. You are incoherent and incapable of communicating, but not to worry. Some government chivatto in an office will make that decision for you. .... In retrospect, I'll take it...

I agree. But another couple hundred years is alright. Things are just startin to get good. I'm smarter now, more capable, more loving and compassionate. At my age you reach a certain level of mastery, everyone looks up to you and needs you. But I figure got maybe ten years left, or twenty at the most. So in a way I am ripe for it. Ambrosia. Food for the gods...

I appreciate your detailed response. I looked up those bible references but they do not appear to be about mercy killing. As far as I know, the concept of mercy killing does not appear in the bible. But I am no scholar. Following your link, these arguments are based on bible quoted that appear to question how to avoid death, not embrace it. No man can avoid death, hence god has the final say. To claim that suffering is good for the person is a value judgement, it doesn't say that in the bible and doesn't necessarily apply in every case. Else we could argue that suffering can be used to educate us in our morals, which takes us down a dark road of self-flagellation and justifies inquisition. We have certainly moved on from that.

My objection to god's grand design relates to the second law of thermodynamics actually. That really finishes us all. It's a LAW.

The hypocrisy of her shouting "Go back to China" after her remarks about Don Trump's "The China Virus", etc. All the media piled on with voracious glee. Now a different story, for those who have eyes to see, ears to hear, and can remember. Liberal house of cards collapsing in upon itself.

One thing that's noteworthy, other countries that are currently debating MAID in their parliament are pointing to Canada as a bad example of how NOT to do it. That should tell us something right there, eh? I think you're right, since the bible does not cover the issue of MAID. It's a complex, modern issue. I say 'modern' in that we've extended our lives through technology and medicine, where people in the olden days died much younger, and generally quicker. Today we can extend the life of someone who is terminally ill, but what if they don't want that. The reason could be, for example, they are in terrible pain. The quality of their life is low. We may euthanize our dog or cat in these circumstance out of "humaneness". Is that too not a form of mercy? When in doubt, I defer to a position of compassion or mercy. That way if it be a "sin" to euthanize, it was done for compassionate reasons. I guess what I'm asking is, who would Jesus kill?

1. Yes, criticism is what it's all about. I criticize you, you criticize me. Then I criticize you for criticizing me. Welcome to the forums... 2. How should one be held accountable. I might say "I disagree with you sir" and it is in fact my very right to criticize your idea and disagree. It is not necessarily my right to judge you though, as a thing in itself. If I say you are a rude meanie, it is passing a judgement. Which we all do but that it is still just my personal opinion. As long as I keep that in mind, no harm is done to you. Meanwhile, by argument one might persuade, and change the other.

How do you know they didn't try? Could that be the reason why they've delayed it again? Why aren't they telling us what's going on?

A surprising transformation, but surely not a conspiracy. These guys are simply playing for something bigger. The amazing power of pussey...

For now. If liberals have their way in the future, some government chivatto in an office will make the decision for them.

Yassir. "His Name is Jesus..."

It doesn't seem all that complicated to me. Is like the quote attributed to Voltaire- "I may not agree with what you have to say monsieur, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.” Hmm. This part caught my discerning eye. It's a good question, but beware inconsistency, the hallmark of degenerate liberal thought. More training is needed. More training.

I would call it evolution, more aptly. Which is based on Darwinism and survival of the fittest.

Your cantankerous outrage is like... this sweet and salty caramel macchiato I am sipping right now. Salted with Aristides tears... ahhh...

Am simply walking in your footsteps. Unless of course you want to claim you are above that and don't do it as well, because if so, I would say you're a self-deluded liar.

According to the bible Jesus saved Peter from drowning after he doubted him. You're welcome.

So they can't be a leftist then.

Who cares, aristides. I won't point it out because I don't want you to cry no more.