Leaderboard

Um... once again, you're the most worthless poster on this forum.

HUGE BLOW to Democrats as this was how they snuck extra representives to red states. I forsee a lot of redistricting coming up to dismantle those unconstitutional districts. In other news it looks like the Virginia insane gerrymander plan is going to be smacked down by the Virginia Supreme Court. https://www.12onyourside.com/2026/04/28/virginia-supreme-court-upholds-block-redistricting-certification/ https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/supreme-court/supreme-court-limits-use-race-redistricting-win-republicans-rcna245856

I can, but that generally doesn't include do-your-own-research Karens regurgitating their social media feeds. I'm not too worried if that bugs you, and I'll continue to make fun of you for your garbage posting. Feel free to ignore me. I won't mind not hearing back from you. 🙃 There are lots of bigger problems to worry about, but that doesn't make Goddess puking her social media feeds and dumping "links" everywhere any less ridiculous.

LMAO... it was an anomaly and not Harpers fault!!! But no covid anomaly for Trudeau was there, or Carney and anomaly of US tariff attacks is there....because they're liberals 😂. Obviously facts elude you when they don't flatter your hero or right wing logic. What didn't you understand of the Stats Canada data?

I'm talking about 2015 clown, and yes I'm aware of the covid years and how affordability here and elsewhere became more pronounced as economies worked back from the pandemic.

That was what all Donnie Diapersniper's bellowing lies about Biden's weaponizing of Justice and witch hunts was all about. To get the suckers to believe it and therefore think it's normal when he takes it to the limit himself. Kindergsrten behaviour from a corrupt, petty scumbag in the White House.

Another politically motivated SHAM persecution by the most corrupt president in US history. Just as the Dictator On Day One promised he would do.

Laura Ingram said likely around 19 seats will flip Republican.

Sure. You should leave. I realize I'm interrupting you do derailing this thread to say that

Putin wants to protect Russians. Americans want to be first. We Canadians want to get along.

That is true. Trump sure is a Space Cadet. 🤣

Do you realize what your actually saying? That racist Democrats won't vote for black people unless we give them special districts. Republicans aren't going to vote for them because their Democrats not because their black. If they are soooooo qualified why do they need a special district when there are plenty of Democrat districts out there. You all keep telling on yourselves and you don't even know it.

All those that are on social media literally encouraging it and praying for it. God help us if Trump is assassinated in office they would probably have a parade, not realizing that the VP is far more conservative than Trump is and will pretty much be unbeatable in the next election.

Wait… how does that stop a black candidate? OMG, how did Obama ever become President?!

YOU'RE LYING. When ALL districts are white majority, THEY stop the black candidate from getting elected. Of course you KNOW that and pretend you don't and that's what makes it YOUR LIE.

It's to STOP the LONG HISTORY of black voter suppression; esp in the South. Of course you IGNORANT Canucks KNOW NOTHING about that. LMAO Voter suppression is Jim Crow. Duh RepubliCON RACIAL gerrymander is Jim Crow. Duh

Jealousy. They hated Justin for being smarter, more popular, better looking and slightly wealthier than them. They hate Carney for being way more educated, trusted by others and far wealthier than them and having more hair and no potbelly at his age. That's why they have to make up bullshit allegations

We're not and literally everyone agrees Kid, trudeau changed the definition of poverty in 2018 and it massively reduced the number of 'poor'. In 2018, the Trudeau government formally adopted the Market Basket Measure (MBM) as Canada's official definition of poverty, a significant shift in how poverty is measured in the country. trudeau changes definition of poverty - Google Search Poverty didn't get better, the definition got better. Also 2015 was an anomaly. IN 2014 it was 11.3 and 2016 it was 12 and change poverty rate in canada 2014 - Google Search poverty rate in canada 2016 - Google Search The 2015 number was created by Justin Trudeau in 2016 To create a baseline in his artificially High because he needed a high number to compare his future numbers to. Then he changed the definition so that tons of people who were poor before now did not qualify So nice try Here's some other proof things are worse As of March 2025, Canadian food bank usage reached an all-time high of roughly 2.2 million monthly visits, a 99% increase since 2019. The highest demographic groups seeking assistance include market renters (approx. 70%), children (33%), and a rapidly rising number of employed individuals (1 in 5 users). CBC +3 Key Poverty Trends (2026 Data Analysis) National Poverty Rate: The rate was 11% in 2024, essentially unchanged from 11.1% in 2023, but sharply higher than the 7% recorded in 2020. Income Decline: Median after-tax income dropped by nearly $2,000, from $77,400 in 2020 to $75,500 in 2024, adjusted for inflation. Rising Food Insecurity: Roughly 9.8 million people (about 24% of the population) reported household food insecurity in 2024. CBC +1 So even with the new definition the reality is you cherry picked your numbers and the number of people living in poverty is about the same as it was under harper except that it would be about 30% higher if we still use the same definition we used during harper's time There's more poor people and the gap between poor and rich is growing

Nice lies and propaganda. He clearly said the fund would be independent and arms length not under the control of politicians and definitely not “him personally” as you dishonesty claim. We alteady have of arms length independent bodies such as CPP for there’s a model to follow. People have been calling for a sovereign wealth fund for a long time. Must you people really invent fake news in order to have something to criticize?

What the Liberals did, minus the lies....

I'm not discussing this with you further. You cannot engage honestly to discuss actual facts, ideas and opinions. "I don't like your source" is all you ever got. Seriously dude or whatever you are - the Libs have just stacked committees and moved to turn off cameras and the majority gives them the votes to deny handing over documentation in corruption investigations by committee. You got bigger problems here than "I don't like Goddess' sources."

Responding to you is a small part of my activity on this forum, but most of my responses to you are probably attacking your sources. That's because your sources aren't usually just bad, but often absurdly, comically bad. Telling us Michael Ma met with Chinese agents before crossing the floor was the best recent example, with an anonymous social media post claiming it as your only evidence. You have no credibility after seriously and unironically offering that sort of garbage, so spare me the tears when we continue to attack and question your sources. That's the bed you've made. This is coming from someone who outright dismisses the mainstream media whenever it suits her, and considers copy-pasting her social media feeds the superior alternative. 🫠

Are you confused about when '2015' was? Yes, covid had a profound effect on affordability here in Canada and most world economies that is still lingering today.

It should, thanks.

Oh I see....So in another thread, at another time, you gave me a link...supposedly. Since you supposedly did this, you don't have to provide cites for anything you claim from committees anymore? That's some pretty comfy reasoning there.

What robowoke is trying to say is that REPRESENTATION means blacks are to be led and manipulated by white democrats.

Getting rid of segregation is Jim Crow?

We have seen a few flipping to Red, so that's been nice.

Yep. Golden Years my A@@...

Fortunately for America, these are the golden years. The rest of the world having to manage the economic blows this war has and will continue to cause every country.... not so golden.

Interesting that you noted the names shown on universities original research/publications. An indicator that China is leading the world on the innovation front are the names on scientific publications throughout critical technological fields. As you noted, there seems little doubt that within the not too distant future they will be the world's dominant economy. https://itif.org/publications/2025/09/23/how-china-is-outperforming-the-united-states-in-critical-technologies/ This is concerning as it threatens to erode U.S. leadership across the innovation landscape. ITIF conducted a comprehensive analysis of China’s innovation capabilities last year, and that research concluded that China’s strategic, state-backed scientific advancement across advanced sectors—driven by bold industrial policy, generous government subsidies, and ecosystem integration—has resulted in a surge of global patents, indicating it has transitioned to become a global innovation leader. China is demonstrating dominance in robotics, leading in battery supply, innovating public health by doubling clinical biotech trials, outpacing in quantum communication with a 1,200-mile QKD corridor, experiencing near-peer achievement in AI output, and narrowing gaps in semiconductors and chemicals.

Couldn't afford the Trailer in Florida.

Yes yes...Just gotta settle some issues first.

I saw the questions jidges were asking in Viriginia definately skewed in the favor of rejecting it.

You literally only ever show up here To insult other people and complain about the posts. I've never seen you start a topic i've never seen you contribute meaningfully to a topic and even this conversation is you and Michael who also doesn't contribute very much whining about the other people instead of actually contributing Your hypocrisy is absolutely stunning

Unfortunately the media does not show that aspect, it does not sell papers.....if it bleeds it leads, is their moto....the other side of the story is the people who read that sh!t fill in the blanks with their own imagination....not knowing the full story, but then again they don't want to know they need to justify their anger towards Israel and what they are doing...

Lots of things and places have special status, meaning no one can target them deliberately, Schools are one of those places....how ever the Geneva convention is very clear on this If the enemy is using your example to operate in then Yes it is a legitimate military target...there are many other considerations that take place as well, Such as is their students in the school, then your options would need to be table topped to see different courses of action....They will pick the best option that offer the best results....ie dead terrorist, children safe...If the target is a high value target they "may" target the school regardless of who is in there....It is up to the commander in charge....keep in mind if the order is illegal then the entire kill chain could face charges. Most soldiers are trained before they go over seas on the rules of engagement, over and over and over again....and when in doubt ask...in a lot of cases you do need permission to engage a target... I just want to add this, Civilians regards of what conflict, always pay the highest price....and while tragic...it is war...most decisions are made on the fly, with no time to think and the outcome is not always a good one...Murphy's law rules what can go wrong normally does...

https://cbs12.com/news/local/secret-service-fbi-and-pbso-to-discuss-overnight-investigation-that-at-mar-a-lago PALM BEACH, Fla. (CBS12) — A 21-year-old man carrying a gas can and a shotgun was shot and killed early Sunday after breaching the perimeter of Mar-a-Lago, authorities said. ********** Trump wasn't there at the time but the móron thought he was going ro do something.

Has any Trump supporter acknowledged that the joke is about gold diggers?

The exchange is posted clearly here. Anyone can just scroll up and read it. It doesn't really matter if you have a make-believe version of it compiled in your little head. The funniest thing about all of this is that despite all your protests otherwise, you've been asked the same question now like 3 or 4 times, directly, and you still won't answer it: Did the October 7th attack give Israel carte-blanche to do whatever they want in the region, and make them immune to criticism? Being the intellectual coward that you are, you'll squeal and complain and do everything you can to change the subject. The bottom line is that you don't like the question and can't address it, so instead you RUN AWAY. 🤡👍

So are you pointing out that the Liberals use slogans sometimes, or rhetoric? Is this the zinger you think you landed? 🫠

It was an observation. The Conservative base is the least educated demographic in the voting public. They're not all id1ots, but the majority of them never received any formal education on critical reasoning or *gasp* how to research or cite anything. They're very easy to fool, and very easy to play. They like THREE WORD SLOGANS. AXE THE TAX STOP THE STEAL CARBON TAX CARNEY DIRTY BACKROOM DEALS Of course you do. Pierre Polievre tells the doing-her-own-research Karens exactly what they want to hear.

They have. The Conservative "base" in Canada (ie. the die-hards) are amongst the least-educated people in the country. https://abacusdata.ca/who-is-in-the-conservative-party-base-and-how-does-it-differ-from-other-canadians/ The Conservative base represents 23 percent of Canadians. These voters would only consider voting Conservative and are deeply anchored in Conservative identity. Over 40% of the screeching monkeys in the base have high school or less levels of education. These are folks we hear the most from on this forum. Less than 1/4 of them even a bachelor's degree.

I'm not interested in sitting around watching committees debate for countless hours. I'm interested in the material you keep telling us you've seen, but can't actually cite. It's not my job to back up your claims. It's yours. 🙃

You're a wealth of information.... but rarely stay on topic in your quest to show 'look what the liberals did!' 2.9M people isn't going to change the fact the majority of Canadian's are born in Canada, and certainly doesn't confirm they're all in low income housing, at food banks and syphoning off our social programs. I have better things to do than watch committee meetings so will rely on you for those updates 👍

Ah yes, the committee meetings you can't reference, post or source for us. 🫠

No that's called a non-sequitur. I asked you a very straightforward, yes or no question, and the only response you could muster was to ask me a question of your own that has no relevance to the one I asked, and that I'm apparently not even expected to answer. That's also called running away. This braindead logic only works under the mistaken belief that you can only be critical of one side at a time. Any criticism of Israel, according to your logic, demonstrates full-hearted support for Hamas' terrorism? Is that how this works for you? If that's the case, then why can't you just answer the question: Did the October 7th attack give Israel carte-blanche to do whatever they want in the region, and make them immune to criticism?

Speaking for myself, I'm finding the good ol' disordered world is way more entertaining. Hah, just watch me.