Leaderboard

Except that: ROBOMONKEY NEVER spoke about it, so all allegations against ROBOMONKEY have NO EVIDENCE he was involved in LOOKING at HIMSELF in A mirror. Duh. It could be that he simply has: "NOTHING BETTER than a gish gallop of NON EXPERT BULLSHIT and try to pretend that means something." In any case it's fun "Just to see the clown draw really STUPID conclusions with DRIVEL." ... and argue with himself at length. "Like "turbo charge the merg" Here he is delivering the speech Robo wrote for him:

And now we move to the gaslighting phase where instead of defending your BS, you just pretend like you did.

Here you are again interjecting the same dribble as Joe. Buzz of back to your shoeshine corner.

I pointed you to some of his quotes. I apologise for him actually saying those things...oh, wait...

The irony is that if a white Canadian was to try to wrangle votes by saying "Vote for me, I'm white like you," or "Vote for me, I'm a wastp/british like you!" everyone would call it racist and say that tribal voting was a terrible thing, but no one dares to say the same about the 'newcomers' and how they vote.

A sad ending to what should have been a happy event, but that was the point of it IMO. Early days though so we will see what the true motive was as the evidence unfolds. https://www.foxnews.com/us/witness-says-new-hampshire-country-club-shooter-yelled-free-palestine-during-wedding-violence-ap In the mean time though (based on names only) it looks like a non Palestinian shooting other non Palestinians for not being Palestinian enough. Makes sense, right Chrissy?

That's the level of debate we've come to expect from your side.

Lets say for a moment he is. He isn't really but it's close enough that we can say so for the purposes of discussion. So what. This is what you and others on the left wanted the rules to be like I mean, did you raise a complaint when it was found out biden gave instructions to the social media platforms to repress and suppress right wing groups such as the daily wire and others? No? I seem to recall you thinking that was ok. Or how about the fbi etc threatening people over discussing the biden notebook during the eleciton, even daring to mention it could have severe impacts and get you fired or worse. You seemed pretty calm then. So, after 4 years of pretty heavy censorship from the biden admin (52 examples i believe of him censoring people?) you SUDDENLY have an issue with it. So here's the deal. I hate censorship. I think it's bad. I think most on the right don't like it. BUT at the end of the day, we all have to play by the same rules. You can't have one set for the bidens and a different one for the trumps. Despite YEARS of the right complaining about cancel culture and censorship the left insisted it was good and healthy. well, now you get to live with it too. When you guys start calling out your OWN people when they do it, then you can come talk to the right about calling out right wing people for doing it. Same with all the other things we've been complaining about such as lawfare, making up new rules for the border, etc etc. You open the door, you can't get mad if someone else walks through.

DID he NEED to SAY it WHILE he WAS DOING it FOR it TO count, MONKEY Duh? The ROBO-MONKEY says: "YOUR ^FANTASIES" are RIDICULOUS. See Dunning-Kruger thread for WHY."

I didn't ask you any such thing. I asked you which example of biden's numerous assaults on free speech you stood up for here. LOLOL you painted yourself into a corner and are having a freak out yet again aren't you You never supported free speech at all, you were happy to see it squashed under biden. Now you look stupid and you're getting desperate. Shame on you

There it is! But... aren't the Laurentian Elites dwindling as well?

How's about the thousands of lying pigs that think Kimmel was punished over saying something about Charlie Kirk? He barely said shit about him, absolutely nothing negative. He pointed out the Main Lying Pig was more interested in blabbing about his Ballroom than his own concern over the shooting. That's what made the nutless wonders at ABC react, Go on and pretend otherwise,

Mark Carney is running the economy like a conservative. And that’s okay Kevin Yin is a contributing columnist for The Globe and Mail and an economics doctoral student at the University of California, Berkeley. Imagine waking up again in early 2025, before the April election. A candidate who you do not recognize steps to the podium and lays out his platform: axe the carbon tax, drop countertariffs on the United States in adherence to free-market doctrine, foster rapprochement with the oil and gas industry, and cancel the capital gains tax hike. Without knowing which party he stands for, you might be forgiven for thinking he is running for the Conservative Party. Alas, this is exactly the approach Liberal Prime Minister Mark Carney has taken. That the Prime Minister has now also paused the federal EV mandate only strengthens the case; Mark Carney could just as easily have run as a Conservative. The mandate, which once required Canadian automakers to guarantee that 20 per cent of their sales were electric by 2027, was a hallmark Trudeau-era policy meant to reduce carbon emissions. However, with the automotive sector under tariff pressure from the United States, the Carney government has decided that economic relief is more important at present. It is one more amongst a slew of decisions that make Mr. Carney an ideological blur. Story continues below advertisement LNG Canada expansion among first five major projects to be identified for fast-tracking, sources say Shannon Proudfoot: Carney was elected on a wave of tariff panic. Now he has other problems In fact, many of Mr. Carney’s actions in the first year of his premiership echo the spirit of proposals from the Conservative Party under Pierre Poilievre. Mr. Poilievre’s Conservatives also promised to eliminate taxes on carbon and a deal where Canada would remove tariffs on the U.S. They also stressed the need for cutting red tape on energy projects and infrastructure, as well as advocating for tax cuts for the middle class. And on issues where Mr. Carney came from the left, for example on deficits, the Conservatives were forced to converge to his stance. Of course, there are still reasons that Mr. Carney fits better within the large-tent Liberal Party, which has historically been home to a diverse leadership ranging from fiscal hawks to advocates of nationalized oil. He is a technocrat first and foremost, which the party leadership loves, and means circumstances determine policy direction more than ideology. His intention to recognize Palestine is an example where party values coincided with shifting global opinion and geopolitical realism. The Liberal label also gave him more flexibility on deficit spending, which he has made extensive use of – although this election also saw large deficits proposed by the Conservative Party. And while cutting the carbon tax was strategic, it is hard to imagine that Mr. Carney, an economist and former climate envoy to the United Nations, does not himself believe in their efficacy. Does this mean the Conservative Party was “right” in April? To some extent. Trudeau-ism, which was content to “let the bankers worry about the economy”and argued there was little “business case” for exporting liquefied natural gas, was rankling even moderate Liberals by the end, including his own cabinet. And as tariffs and wars now dominate the agendas of Western capitals, more classically right-wing notions like emphasis on the economy and military build-up are naturally in vogue. In that sense, Mr. Carney is simply responding to the times, and the Conservative Party deserves some credit for its foresight. Yet the manner and enthusiasm with which one embarks on this is also important. Whether one endorses tariff concessions to the United States because the costs of retaliation are perceived to be fundamentally too high, or simply as a conditional token of goodwill to reset talks, matters for how our negotiations with the U.S. ultimately play out. Whether one pauses EV sales requirements because of short-run economic realities, or a general failure to accurately weigh the risks of climate change, matters for how we should expect the government to deal more broadly with a rapidly warming planet. While I do worry about the long-run preservation of our green initiatives, it is perhaps a feature, not a bug, of the Canadian political system that a Conservative candidate can propose large deficits while Liberals can compromise on net-zero objectives. That parties are often not too far apart in actuality and that dogma can give way to rational policy (or at least what is perceived internally to be) when circumstances change is something to be celebrated. In fact it is probably this feature, that Canadians are in greater agreement than we think, that has protected Canada for decades from the worst excesses of U.S. polarization on social issues. Thus, while reasonable people can disagree on whether Mark Carney should govern as conservatively as he has, it at least says something of the quality of our politics that he does. https://www.theglobeandmail.com/business/commentary/article-mark-carney-is-running-the-economy-like-a-conservative-and-thats-okay/

I don’t “run away”. Unlike losers like you who have no life outside the the internet and presumably live alone, I limit the time I spend going round and round with people making absurd arguments like your claim that Trump’s attempts to steal the 2020 election were no different than Gore exercising the explicit provision that allows any candidate to request a manual recount, or your suggestion that Trump’s baseless lawsuits being dismissed as lacking the basic standard for evidence or legal argument for a hearing and tossed out more than 60 times is the same thing as Al Gore winning his cases in all the way up to highest level of appeal and losing by a single SCOTUS vote and that Trump’s refusal to concede the election until after his Jan 6 assault on the Capitol failed is the exact same thing as Gore conceding as soon as the SCOTUS decision was delivered. Amd here you are trolling me when I wasn’t even talking to you. AGAIN. You’ve got Beaver Derangement Syndrome.

How about just shut the f*ck up and not say anything at all? Of course you can't do that because you celebrate Kirk's death just like muslim terrorists celebrate death.

Gee I hear lots of quacking, but your downvotes and lack of reasoned response, the doubling down on the exact thing i criticized you for can only be taken as a badge of honour. You're in the wrong, but can't admit it even though you know it.

Yes i can', but i've been providing you links for days now and all you do is either run away crying calling me names or ignore and carry on lying. Soooo what's the point? I never see you posting links And ABC is the one who cancelled kimmel, so if your point is that this doesn't apply to companies then i guess this isn't a free speech issue LOL well you just can't keep your lies straight can you

It's common knowledge, shares in teleprompter cleaning materials were at an all time high. Bupkis sales tanked after Joe stepped down.

Demographics are destiny. As Muslims gain political power via ethnic/religious voting blocks they will completely reshape Canadian laws, government, and culture.

This is the level of sheer obstinance of the MAGA crowd, quoting the man's own words are "shitting all over him". And not fawning over the guy like the fools worshipping the Holy Shoe of Christ in the Life of Bran, call you the one that's deranged. The world of the stubbornly self induced blind, you're either 100% with us or 100% you're against us. An having no opinion is 100% against too. Artificial semi-Intelligence: Recognize some words, query the precompiled database for anything at all to refute them, else go to index list of buzzwords for deflection or ad hominem, pick two and reply.

By all means don't let facts get in the way of your biases.

https://www.salon.com/2025/09/20/right-wing-extremist-violence-is-more-frequent-and-more-deadly Based on government and independent analyses, right-wing extremist violence has been responsible for the overwhelming majority of fatalities, amounting to approximately 75% to 80% of U.S. domestic terrorism deaths since 2001.

Appeared to me that you discriminate on both race and religion here. So be it.... 'A lot of people there to vote and I noticed a large number of middle eastern looks speaking the rough language (Arabic). They all had come to elect muslim candidate likely some without knowing anything about him other than he was muslim. Fortunately this did not happen.'

You can't say "i'm not happy he's dead" and in the same breath say "but he was a monster who doesn't deserve a kind word' . It doesn't work like that. The word "but" in a sentence tends to cancel anything before it. "I should jog but it's raining", means you're not working out. "Its raining but i should jog" means you're going jogging. When you say "I take no pleasure he's dead BUT he was a terrible person and the world is better off without him because he was so bad", what you're saying is "i don't want to LOOK like i'm happy but i'm happy". And that's the left for you

Ahhhh... we all got fooled again did we. The vast majority of Canadian's believe in and accept diversity. Open your mind and give it a try sometime....

It’s f**king insane. The left is insane.

1. Perfect.... 😂 2. Then, no. At this rate you're never going to be Canadian...

Go back home, foreigner... 😂😂😂 This is what you're saying. Is there a word for irony in your language?

Stop. You're missing the ability to think rationally.

Just a reminder of how Republicans and conservatives reacted to the Minnesota murders.

Yeah... you didn't waste much time shitting all over Kirk after he was murdered... but you threw in the "he didn't deserve to die" part in there as like a small afterthought. You have no problem throwing the mud around when it suits you on here.

Speaking of one of the dangers of multiculturalism being when ethnic groups vote as a bloc for their own as mentioned earlier. I'd add when they vote as a bloc for causes external to Canada but important to them. Muslims pretty much vote as a bloc. They don't vote conservative because conservatives won't give them what they want: more immigration of Muslims, more tolerance for their separateness, more accommodation, and more agreement with their desire for how Canada should treat the Muslim world. Thus, we have Canada joining Australia and the UK in rewarding Hamas for its savage attack on Israel by recognizing a Palestinian state. All three of these leaders speak in high-minded ways as though they expect this will help anything over there. But the truth is all three are led by weak, leftist leaders whose parties rely on Muslim votes, and whose base, progressives, increasingly feel empowered to express their disdain and dislike for Jews. The reason for recognition of Palestine has nothing to do with any interest they have for Palestine and everything to do with catering to Muslim and anti-israel/jewish voters at home.

Try to rise above your TDS, your low-life comments do not do you any favours. Conspiracy much?

Phhhht. Every study shows Canada and other Western nations are at the top of the list when it comes to egalitarian societies free of racism. The irony is that the people we're bringing here, and who we are, thanks to multiculturalism, not trying to integrate, are generally at the bottom and come from the most racist, misogynistic, and intolerant societies on Earth. I can't help noticing that the most leftist institutions, like universities, always seem to be filled with racism! Why is that? Trudeau said every government department and agency was institutionally racist. Are they still? Even after ten years of Liberal government? The Left sees any differences between performance and outcomes of different identity groups as PROOF that there is racism/prejudice. But that's logically indefensible. No separate groups perform identically. Even siblings in the same family don't perform identically.

I am learned and wise, so my opinions have more value than yours.

Too bad you have to come here to talk about it, where nobody cares. Why did they ban you?

OK, I see you're doing it on purpose. Have you considered that you're going to see this same tactic applied in reverse? I'd submit that you're just starting to see it manifest itself now, that there's much more of it to come and that you're not going to like it. Narrative reversal techniques like "Kirk's shooter was a MAGOT motivated by the fact Kirk wasn't MAGA enough" and studiously avoiding direct evidence to the contrary whilst repeating the talking point in sound bites is something you'll be seeing again before you know it... Republicans will (I say) are adapting and will continue to adopt progressive information management techniques... if they're wise. Frankly, you've been lucky up to this point that someone (dare I say) like me wasn't running the war room... I'd have been gleefully pummelling you with your own BS long before now.

⁴

Meanwhile on a slightly unrelated back in reality, the people who whine “Trump Derangement Syndrome” once again prove the old adage “when a politician is outed as a pedophile, it’s almost always a Republican” Republican who introduced Trump derangement syndrome bill arrested for soliciting a minor Minnesota state senator Justin Eichorn allegedly traveled to meet a 17-year-old he thought he’d met online, but was instead a cop posing as minor A Republican state lawmaker in Minnesotawho recently introduced a bill to create a mental illness category for liberals obsessed over Donald Trump was arrested on Tuesday for allegedly soliciting a minor for prostitution. Minnesota senator Justin Eichorn was arrested and booked on Tuesday. He believed he was talking to a 17-year-old female, but was communicating instead with detectives from the Bloomington, Minnesota, police department, police allege. Eichorn, a 40-year-old whose biography on the Minnesota Senate website says he is married with four kids, faces felony charges for soliciting a minor to practice prostitution. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/mar/18/minnesota-justin-eichorn-arrested-soliciting-minor

You have yet to do anything like that.

Original robosmith

why are the Laurentian Elites fixated on DEI They're not, YOU are.

Could not be clearer. Even Senator Cruz said he sounds like a mob boss. LMAO

Vancouver and greater vancouver is close to 60 percent now if you factor in the cost to the developer to comply. Around canada many cities and municipalities have become drunk on the fees and revenues from homebuilding. The us is fine with no deal. In fact, there's a very real possibility and lots of concern that trump will scrap the whole fta and do tariffs on an individual category basis. You're walking blindly towards Oblivion

You're complaining about the "other forum", while writing wise prose like this? 🙄

That's what I don't understand. Who give a shit what's going on on another forum? If you don't like it don't go there, don't expect other people to rush there and infest it with crap that suits you. Almost sounds like infantile jealousy, I'm gonna mess up your backyard so I don't have to clean up my own.

So far conservatives have been voting with Liberals in parliament because Carney doesn’t have a majority. Poilievre will vote to pass Carney’s budget soon too. Poilievre is the new Jagmeet LOL. Harper said Carney “gets it” and has been giving him advice, just a reversal of back in the day when Carney gave Harper advice and Harper awarded him the Order of Canada, our country’s highest honour. The spending is what is needed right now, we can afford it as we have by far the lowest net debt to GDP ratio in the G7 and low service ratios, which is why even Poilievre was also campaigning on running massive deficits. It never ceases to amaze me how some average people who are net beneficiaries of government spending can be so obsessed with ONE abstract metric that is not likely to ever affect them. It’s like worrying that truck a thousand miles away is driving too fast in your general direction

The Left doesn't hate Jews. This post is a troll.