Leaderboard
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation on 01/26/2021 in all areas
-
Biden Administration Adds Forcing Female Soldiers To Shower With Men Oh and speaking of the Virginia decision showing voting irregularities are still being considered in court the general issue is being looked by opinionator Dan Boginino as he takes us through a debate Rand Paul had with opinionator from the left, George Stephanopoulos. It's a good one because it gets us into how the left is demanding the right shut up about the fixed election and there are those who won't and make superior points doing it.2 points
-
2 points
-
Last week on CNN, they showed a clip of a video taken during the siege of the Capitol. The anchor warned of scary image of "a black guard being chased by the mob." Of course, that got my attention. I was thinking the worse. So I watched the clip. What was shown was a lone black guard blocking the mob in the hallway. The mob were shouting, wanting to proceed - the guard was holding out his hand, gesturing and talking to them. He was inching and stepping back, and as he stepped back the mob also stepped forward. He then stepped back up the steps of the stairs, the mob following him. THERE WAS NO REAL CHASE! It was a natural movement of a persistent mob (in a situation like this), wanting to go upstairs and proceed. Finally, the guard just gave up, turned around and semi-walked/run upstairs - he wasn't really running! The mob walked upstairs too. Most if not all of the time, there was only one guy from the mob who went close to the guard (and he talked to the guard) - the others seem to be staying back! The guard stopped to talk to them every now and then, considering he was just by himself .....therefore, I don't think he even felt threatened. I can understand that in situations like this, it can get hairy since the situation is fluid - things can go sideways fast. But that's part of a cop's everyday life when they answer to calls, or confront anyone! Media makes it look like they were going to lynch this black guard! That's what I get from this news reporting. What's so outrageous was that the anchor still stuck to her narrative about that "SCARY" event for the black guard being "CHASED" by the mob! She was lying blatantly to our face. CNN is blatant now about giving disinformation! This morning with Smerconish on CNN, the anchor was interviewing a former lawyer of Trump. The anchor was accusing the lawyer of inciting the crowd. He played a clip of what the lawyer was saying to a crowd an event (I don't know when or where it was taken). The lawyer said (referring to Pence).....something like, anyone who doesn't stand up for it shouldn't be in office. "SHOULDN'T BE IN OFFICE," was apparently the phrase that this moron anchor thinks incited the crowd. He said, "look how the mob responded, listen to what they say..." It was the clip that mob was chanting "hang Pence, hang Pence." The lawyer accused Smerocnish guy of taking his words out of context - which is true! Since when is saying someone "shouldn't be in office" be the equivalent of inciting? You know what the anchor said? And, this is what's scary - because this is the mentality that could spring up from this "new era:" It may not be what you mean, but that's how it was taken." How is that the lawyer's fault? How many among us here had said Trudeau shouldn't be in office - and there was that army guy they caught trying to get to Trudeau's residence. Could it be that he read our posts here and he took our message to mean that he should pay a visit to Trudeau. Are we guilty of incitement? What about that comedienne who showed a decapitated Trump head on social media. No one from CNN found that to be an incitement of violence towards the President. Heck, they made it even to be Trump's fault! Look, moronic anchor, we have no control over what people think....or, how they want to interpret what is being said! UNLESS of course, you want to take control of that too! Like how I take the messaging by CNN about that video shown above! I'm sure others would have a different take on it! Should I say that CNN anchor is inciting blacks (BLM) and Antifa to do a payback? Are you MEDIA inciting RACIAL WAR between colored and white people? Can you see down the road with this kind of mentality? YOU WON'T BE ABLE TO SAY ANYTHING! This is a new era. - at least they got that right! It is an era so close to how Communists deal with any dissenting voice. You could find yourself facing unjustified charges, and be penalized for whatever it is "they" consider a "crime." Trumped-up charges.....no pun intended. And we thought what happened to Kavanaugh, and all people accused of harassment that happened 10 or 20 years ago - reputations tarnished, or some even lost their jobs WITHOUT ANY TRIAL IN COURT, was bad enough? Obviously, we haven't seen nothing yet.1 point
-
And exactly how much longer do you expect the central banks to be able to keep pumping new money into the banking and finance systems before a critical mass is reached where too many people realize there is no way they will get full returns on investment? Inflation wouldn't be low and shouldn't be low...we're talking permanent zero percent interest loans coming from the Federal Reserve banks in the US for christs sakes! Back when Japan went through their much smaller economic meltdown in 2000, their central bank went through to 'negative' value interest rates, and now the rest are doing it as well to try to keep priming the pump and keep the already richest men in the world earning more billions in undeserved riches. Either Japan was going rogue 20 years ago, or more likely -- they were set up to plot out this 'flood the markets with free money scheme,' since Japan didn't pay the economic price expected if they weren't a close US ally. Similar to when banks in Malta made a seizure of deposits to cover their debts. The 'great minds' who come up with economic schemes have a hard time in the transition from theory to practice, since people are unpredictable and they don't know exactly how the public will react. And that's why some, suspicious skeptics considered Malta a test run for asset seizure plans by the big players. Similar reasoning led Bush/Obama administrations' cautious bank bailout announced in 08 to be careful not to let the first round of money creation go over the one trillion mark! It was seen as a psychological breakpoiint to just pull up a trillion....now no one has 2nd thoughts about it! And every time since then, when the stock market has faltered, even a bit, in comes Treasury with the money hose to flood the markets with and keep equities rising higher and higher for no valid reasons! At some poiint.....and I don't know when...but likely real soon, the search for real value will lead to more than a few buying gold and crypto's and there will be a mass exodus out of the Dollar (both) and the Euro and all of the other fiat Dollar-linked currencies, and we will have the economic crash that should have been expected when it became clear that all future recessions would only hit the little people on so called "Main Street," while Wall Street and its Euro and other equivalents continue getting richer no matter what's going on in the real world. *a little off the track, but I can't think of a greater example than Elon Musk winning the billionaire sweepstakes now! His electric car company that isn't worth a pot to piss in, keeps going up and up -- way beyond the values of companies actually making a significant number of automobiles....electric cars included! This shit lets you know the system is rigged! I would like to see interest rates rise also, at least a little! Since I'm retiring very soon and have no outstanding loans or debts to pay off. Aside from my pensions, I want to keep my savings in the careful, conservative investments like GIC's and not have to wade out into the market stream where it's impossible to judge stocks by earnings ratios any more! So far, I have been ignoring everything I see about the "Great Reset" because it was coming from sources I have long considered suspect. But now that the Great Reset is being announced over in Davos as official international financial strategy, it's time to question what they have in store for younger people, and I mean aside from leaving us ageing out boomers as the last generation of humans who will not be debt serfs to our future overlords!1 point
-
Then goes on to set a record of executive orders on the first day of his presidency. They're all f**king hypocrites.1 point
-
Denzel making too much sense for stupid reporter. Have dreams...but have goals... But that's not what 'equity' is about...equity is about taking my dream and giving it to someone else...and not getting a damn thing in return.1 point
-
Tucker was saying last night that Nancy is trying to pass a law that legalizes all the Democrats fraudulent shenanigans that allowed them to fix the last election.1 point
-
In the First Denzel video link above, one of the things he said was, “If you don’t listen to the news, you’re uninformed. If you do listen to them, you’re misinformed”. All you defenders of the MSM should ponder this, or is it easier just to cancel Denzel?1 point
-
He cheered on the riot. But it's okay. He says we were supposed to interpret it as sarcasm.1 point
-
Apology for what? When you say: It's pretty clear you want to insinuate somebody cheered on the death of Brian Sicknick. Nobody did that. You're lying.1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
You still don’t understand sarcasm do you? You still don’t understand when your side is being mocked. Sad.1 point
-
1 point
-
Lefties can't stop talking about Trump. The most important man on the planet.1 point
-
Biden has been quick to undo a lot of the damage Trump has done. I'm feeling optimistic about the next 8 years.1 point
-
What leftists fail to understand is that there's a big difference between throwing out an inflammatory and incendiary false message out to people before, during and after riots and roundly condemning all riots. Dem: "Well uh geez Trump said [insert lie here] and then there was like a massive riot inside the capitol, there was some uhh smoke, and yelling, and people were murdering other people left and right and chasing black cops around trying to lynch them. This is the first time in my life that I've seen politicians support rioting, looting, arson and murder that wasn't good for the Democrat party." GOP: "Republicans condemned rioting and looting for the last 6 years and they did it again on the day of the riot at the capitol. That's called 'consistency' bitch. There's no reason to suspect that there would be another riot after it was condemned by everyone in the GOP. It's not like Trump and Pence were bailing out rioters and telling them to 'stay angry' and saying 'the rioting should not let up!!!!!!!'"1 point
-
You're saying he didn't die now? I wish I could pick and choose reality like you guys.1 point
-
Let's keep it all in context Boges. When a large army of Dems' militias, BLMers and Antifa, was burning buildings by the WH and screaming for the violent removal of the POTUS, there was no '26,000 National Guards' called. There were only 200 people that went inside the Capitol Building. 26,000 men were there as a photo op and to fear monger and they were treated like garbage. If there was good reason for them to be there then the parking garage campout wouldn't be nearly as big of a deal.1 point
-
That’s why in another thread I specifically stated that none of the rioters should be pardoned and should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. Unlike you people that cheered on abs excused rioting and looting throughout the summer. Is there a Biden Cult member that isn’t a complete and utter hypocrite?1 point
-
1 point
-
"We all need to understand the prevalence of the new B.1.1.7 variant." That's the media today. So interesting.1 point
-
A little glimpse into the way things work behind the scenes. Doug Ford was confronted about the problems in Long Term Care homes in Ontario, why they ave not been addressed yet since Covid-19 began. The most serious outbreaks are happening in these homes. When asked why hasn't the military been called in again, his response was "When I asked that question, I was told to say we don't need 'em." In other words, I am but a patsy...1 point
-
"That one anecdote is now the official account of exactly what happened." - Argus LMAO. Leftists will take the simplest lie as proof of something that has far more proof to the contrary. "The parking garage was "so warm that I was almost sweating...." - on a day when it was 46 degrees fahrenheit during the day (7 Celsius). During the middle of the day. We all saw the picture of Bernie basking in the sun, right? I think he's actually black now from that blistering sunlight. https://kutv.com/news/local/thousands-of-national-guards-banished-from-resting-in-us-capitol-slept-in-garage (no heat in the parking garage) There were fluorescent lights on all night too. Such a perfect place to nap. "The coziest place I ever slept on duty." On duty? No one in the military sleeps 'on duty'. That's enough to get one court-martialled. He could be on manoeuvres, or on active duty, or on a deployment, on a tour etc and still have a rack, cart, hammock, bunk etc to sleep on. He could be on a raid or a sortie or a mission and bivouac somewhere, that's not fun. But no one sleeps 'on duty'. He has the jargon all wrong. He's no soldier.1 point
-
No. The graph on the left doesn't zoom out. The graph on the right magnifies so that you are concerned with tenths of a degree. Normally when we think of weather we think of it in full degrees. When it becomes climate we pretend we can see it clearer in a magnification to tenths of a degree. We can't but you can get a better reaction when you pretend you can. My point was you can't actually measure earth's climate precisely to a tenth of a degree so this assertion of yours that you are the one concerned with objective reality is objectively incorrect. We come to conclusions on climate based on estimates. We estimate the global temperature has risen about a degree in the last century or so. Don't be fooled by the difference between Fahrenheit and Celsius in the 2 graphs I showed you. Global temperature rise is usually presented in Celsius and is claimed to be about 1 to 1.5 degrees since 1850. A cabal of scientists predicts that in another century or so it will rise 2 degrees or 1 degree more than it did in the last 100 years. They imagine this extra degree will come out of postulated positive feedbacks. It's just a hypothesis but they predict this extra degree will lead to catastrophes that exist at the present time wholly in their imaginations. That's where it becomes political. Not from any what you call "objective reality" but from subjective projections. It's like, "OMG! We're all gonna die. Quick raise taxes. Give us global political control." The politicizing of imagined problems is the problem. If you sincerely want to impress me with your objectivity and what you call "the obvious scale of the problem" first of all tell me specifically what that is and what your evidence is for it. Otherwise you're just falling into the trap of politically charged subjectivity. This while you tell me I have no objectivity.1 point
-
1 point
-
If they really mattered the journalists would give them faces. Eg: "Here's Jack Humphries of Mesa Arizona who left his wife and two children to fly across the country and fulfill his patriotic duty. Jack served two tours of duty in Iraq and has a purple heart. His wife is expected to give birth while he's at the capitol, and he was sleeping in the parking garage with no cellular service." Jack: "I've lived here for 30 years and I've seen thousands of terrorists in my day, but they were all either Antifa & BLM Demmies that destroyed the city I live in (who are still free because Dems control my city and they temporarily legalized arson, assaults and looting) or the ones that I fought in Iraq (who are free to come here now that Biden is President). I am only here as a prop to create the false impression that the 'white supremacist bogeyman' is real, and I am being treated like garbage." Obviously that [nameless] guy wasn't in the ME when Obama POTUS or he'd know all about being left to twist in the wind.1 point
-
National Guard members say they feel betrayed after being 'banished to a parking garage'.1 point
-
LMAO. How do you gerrymander the whole state as one big voting block? You don't even know what the word means. A simple majority of ALL TEXANS was required to win the state for the federal election, period. Hint for Demmies - stick to words with less letters than your dog's name.1 point
-
The cities in Texas are Democrat. Same for other states. Atlanta is Democrat. You know, where the educated people are. Same for Kansas, Missouri, Arizona, New Mexico and Tennessee. The uneducated rednecks and hillbillies out in the countryside who think their sisters look mighty sexy in their summer dresses vote Republican. Praise Jaysus!!1 point
-
1. Only relatively. 2. Better at what ? Not overthrowing the nation that's for sure.1 point
-
Ah yes, the art of grifting. Amazing how often that works, even in this day and age.1 point
-
LOL Texas wouldn't even be Republican if it weren't for all the gerrymandering and the determined efforts to stop minorities from voting.1 point
-
1 point
-
Donald Trump was right when he called the lying leftist liberal pro democratic mainstream media fake news. They truly have become a bunch of professional liars and pushers of fake news. The liberal/democratic media will lie to high heaven to try and make Trump or any of their opponents look like the bad and evil devil. As I always keep saying? When the media goes after anyone and tries to make them look bad and calls them nasty names then that is when people should listen to what that bad person has to say. In most cases that bad guy or gal had something to say that the MSM and their political deep state globalist bosses do not want we the sheeple to hear or know about. The MSM must never be listened or believed or watched anymore. They lie like hell all the time. With the leftist liberal MSM one will always be guilty until proven innocent and that is how they always will do things. one will never be found innocent if they are after your ass. Sad to say but only buffoons and idiots will listen to and believe anything the MSM says these days. The MSM is definitely not on the people's side but just the opposite. The media is not there to tell the truth. They are there to lie and spread fake news that their deep state political leaders want them to say. CNN is the worse of them all.1 point
-
CNN knows that no line was crossed, but that doesn't stop them from 'playing' stupid, and breathlessly speculating that "there may be a case!!!!!!!" while they know that there is not. This is not actually a precedent that they want to have established. Just remember that a lot of Dems said things that 'may have been interpreted as' - "attacks on members of the GOP are warranted/justifiable", before members of the GOP were attacked, unprovoked in their own yard (Rand Paul) or attacked in a mass-shooting (Scalise and others) at a baseball game. She was thinking it, even if she never said it.1 point
-
You are really obsessed with an American network few of us ever spend much time watching. I can only suppose the alt-right and Q sites you frequent has set it up as 'the great enemy' and so you use the accusation against everyone who denies the greatness of your new god. Can you not see the idiocy of supporting claims about a stolen election which started months before the election and never had sufficient evidence to convince a judge, or Bill Barr, or Mitch McConnell or Chris Wray?1 point
-
Betsy, you are asking fools and mockers to have discernment they simply do not have. As this thread clearly illustrates, they are only capable of arguing and babbling nonsense.1 point
-
That's what everyone liked about him. Or at least, what those who liked him liked about him. I'd love to have a politician who says what he thinks. But I think the only honest messages he communicated were the insults he directed at people he didn't like. For example, all those illegals coming in that he was going to put a stop to. There's more than enough evidence that he hired illegals at all his job sites to question whether he actually gave a damn about this vs was 'speaking his mind' in the same way a sales guy speaks to a client. That was not a spur of the moment thing to say. He's admitted that. He intended to say it before he got down there. Likewise his whining about Chinese and foreign imports. He bought Chinese steel and other cheap materials for all his businesses. All that mattered to him was what cost the least, and he certainly never showed any preference for American made stuff. I also think he was flat out lying through his teeth whenever he talked about religion, or about gun rights, or about abortion, none of which he ever gave a damn about in his long, public life. So to my mind, this is not a guy who 'speaks his mind' but a compulsive liar and lifelong sales guy who will tell you whatever he thinks you want to hear. Trump doesn't like foreigners and doesn't like minorities. He's not alone in that. But most of his life he was a registered Democrat. He might have exposed the cracks in American society, but rather than doing anything to help he just made them wider and deeper.1 point
