All Activity

Typical reading comprehension issue from confux LOSER. LOL You : Stornoway is fine why would we renovate it? ? Me: Who said anything about renovating Stornoway except you just now?? Me: Maybe we should renovate Stornoway and really give the Stornoway Squatter something to whine about??? 7+ years no rent, no taxes, no maintenance fees, plenty of staff, cooks cleaners grounds keepers etc." and then added all the repairs and renovations done to Stornoway in recent years. Seems the one that needs, as you say " a team of top notch comedy writers to make you look more stupid than you make yourself look"

It's relevant if we're discussing their motivations. It is not, by itself, evidence that their textual conclusions were wrong. Those are two separate questions. A historian may have political bias and still correctly translate an ancient document. Likewise, a devout Christian may make a textual error. The manuscript evidence does not become true or false because of the editor's theology. Even if I granted that premise for the sake of argument, it still wouldn't establish that the textual decisions they made were incorrect. It would only suggest a possible motivation. To demonstrate they were wrong, you must show that their textual choices were wrong. That is still assuming the conclusion. You are arguing from motive rather than evidence. Even if someone had an anti-KJV bias, that does not prove every textual decision they made was incorrect. The decisions still have to be evaluated on manuscript evidence. [Ad hominem] [Guilt by association] Whether I were Catholic, Protestant, Orthodox, or atheist has absolutely no bearing on whether Codex Vaticanus preserves an earlier reading than the Byzantine tradition. Let's keep the discussion on the manuscripts rather than each other. Of course they do. That's why there is a textual debate. The question isn't whether they disagree. The question is which reading is more likely original. Simply observing that two manuscript traditions differ doesn't resolve that question. So do Byzantine manuscripts. No two handwritten manuscript traditions are completely identical. The existence of textual variation is precisely why textual criticism exists. The relevant question is whether the differences materially affect reconstruction of the original text, not whether differences exist. That's a conclusion, not an argument. To establish that conclusion, you would need to demonstrate that their readings are consistently secondary or corrupted using textual evidence. Calling them "depraved" simply restates your position. No, you've provided sources that argue your position. That is not the same as proof. Those articles represent one side of a long-standing scholarly debate. Appealing to an article that reaches your preferred conclusion doesn't end the discussion any more than my citing a critical-text scholar would end it. The evidence still has to be weighed. That's why the debate has continued for generations among scholars who have examined the same manuscripts.

You just gave me a link to a different study. So, did you do that on purpose to try to deceive me or was it ignorance?

Don't forget toxic masculinity - it's also a culprit. From AI: Toxic masculinity contributes to climate change through deeply ingrained social norms that link consumption and environmental dominance to manhood. These cultural scripts fuel higher carbon footprints and climate denial, hindering the collective shift toward sustainability. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6] The connection between masculine identity and environmental damage manifests in several specific ways: The "Green-Feminine" Stereotype: Research shows that average consumers often subconsciously view eco-friendly behaviors as "feminine." Because of this, men are more likely to avoid sustainable products and habits for fear of appearing less masculine. [1, 2, 3] "Petro-Masculinity": Coined by political scientist Cara Daggett, this concept describes a toxic fusion between fossil fuel consumption, climate change denial, and the defense of patriarchal dominance. Driving large, inefficient vehicles and defending extraction-based industries are often culturally upheld as powerful assertions of traditional manhood. [1, 2, 3] Disproportionate Consumption: Studies demonstrate that men's spending habits result in higher greenhouse gas emissions than women's. This is largely driven by historically higher consumption of carbon-intensive goods, such as meat, fossil fuels for driving, and air travel. [1, 2] Climate Change Denial: Psychological studies, such as research conducted on adult populations in Sweden, indicate that men who feel their traditional masculinity is under threat are significantly more likely to reject climate science and resist environmental policies. [1, 2] Addressing these norms by promoting "ecological masculinities"—identities rooted in ecological stewardship, community, and care rather than dominance—is a major focus L-OH-L!!!

First of all, I never wanted to be a Prime Minister. I always wanted to be a lumberjack, leaping from tree to tree, as they float down the mighty rivers of British Columbia... the redwood, the larch, the fir, the mighty scot's pine, with my best girl by my side. And we'd sing: Oh I'm a lumberjack and I'm okay, I sleep all night and I work all day. I cut down trees, I eat my lunch. I go to the lavortry. On Wednesdays I go shopping and have buttered scone for tea. I cut down trees,I skips and jump, I like to press wild flowers. I put on women's clothing and hang around in bars. I cut down trees, I wear high heels, suspenders and a bra. I wish I'd been a girlie, just like my dear mama.

This is where they lose me, too. CO2 is a tiny trace element and it's NOT a pollutant. CO2 levels are the lowest they've ever been on earth before, we are actually in a CO2 famine. Yet they want you to believe that this tiny trace element is causing mass destruction all over the earth. They want you to believe that CO2 levels don't fluctuate naturally on their own - it's man who is 100% in control of it. They want you to believe that cloud coverage, solar activity, volcanic activity, including underwater volcanic activity and the natural ebb & flow of earth cycles - NONE of that has anything to do with the climate on earth. It's all because of man. There's a reason why they had to get rid of "global cooling" and replace it with "global warming' and then replace that with the generic "climate change." "Climate change" covers everything. Too much snow? Climate change! And it's YOUR fault for warming your car up when it's 40 below. Bad humans! Not enough snow? Climate change! And it's YOUR fault for using AC in the summer. Bad humans! Too much rain? Climate change! And it's YOUR fault for eating beef. Bad humans! Not enough rain? Climate change! And it's YOUR fault for not driving an electric car. Bad humans! Heatwave in France? No, you bad humans cannot use AC - let the old people die. The climate alarmist foot soldiers, they hate humans. Humans are a parasite to them. Humanity needs to die off to save the planet. It's a sick & twisted death cult.

What happens if I watch "real" news and truly accept it? Well, for sure I will be filled with hate. I will hate Christ, the nuclear family, straight white conservative males (including myself), and the country's borders. I will want to deface buildings and set cars on fire, as well. In time I will want trannies ahead of women and girls in women and girls bathrooms and locker rooms because acceptance always comes first - trans always come first, and that needs to be enforced everywhere, including private property and churches. I'll sure as hell bash Trump a lot - probably daily if not hourly. Also, my basement will be transformed into a temple of woke - all my fellow cultists will be invited. Wow, what a f*cking future.

It's obvious Israel has us by the balls somehow, but so do other countries like Somalia and Ukraine. What we need to do is expel all foreign influence in our government. Once our government is represented by REAL Americans, we can shutter most of our doors and get busy WITHIN our borders. If a city, state or federal official starts weeping like Emma Lazarus or some other crazy marxist socialist, we immediately remove their asses from office.

Which are?

https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/Entered-into-hearing-record-Impact-of-Childhood-Vaccination-on-Short-and-Long-Term-Chronic-Health-Outcomes-in-Children-A-Birth-Cohort-Study.pdf https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7268563/

No, the Opposition should not reflexively oppose everything the government proposes, or even oppose for political advantage. The Oppostion is there to correct errors by government.

Rare earths, baby. Look how Trump fawns on Xi these days. It’s pathetic.

The national mood is turning against America’s peculiar relationship with Israel. On the left and on the right, people are asking why Netanyahu has such disproportionate influence in Washington DC compared to neighbours and why the country is constantly dragged into Middle Eastern wars when China is clearly the main rival to American power. As General Caine is reported to have said about Netanyahu’s case for war in the new book, Regime Change: The Meeting: During a White House meeting, U.S. Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Dan Caine, was asked by President Trump for his assessment of Israel's plans regarding Iran. "Overselling": General Caine replied to the President, saying: "Sir, this is, in my experience, standard operating procedure for the Israelis. They oversell, and their plans are not always well-developed. They know they need us, and that's why they're hard-selling." General's Caution: General Caine had privately urged caution, noting that an extended military campaign or pursuit of full-scale regime change in Iran could deplete U.S. munitions and risk significant U.S. casualties. The Outcome: Ultimately, the sweeping promises for internal Iranian regime change did not materialize, with U.S. and Israeli officials retreating from that initial objective after the military operations proved more complicated than pitched. People are looking at which politicians have taken money from the Israel Lobby and parrot their lines - I’d say that at this stage many Democrats trust Thomas Massie on the subject more than their own leadership in Congress. If America is going to become more transactional with other countries where better to start than with Israel?

Conservatives watching, reading or listening to Real Factual News? When has that ever happened? Lol. This is why everything the Whitehouse is in a shambles. Weekend "News" Fox host running a war for example. LMAO.

https://newrepublic.com/post/207031/mike-johnson-admits-donald-trump-weak

Sounds like the Earth just doing its thing. All that shit you're talking about has happened before - it's just the way the Earth rolls, and there is nothing we can do about it. California's been in a drought for years - it's even had some nasty fires - so why in the f*ck aren't your fellow zombies scrambling like rats to get out of there? I'll tell you why, it's because they know your climate change is bullshit, but it's proven effective in scaring others into submission. Political wins come from "man-made climate change". Those perverts are staying put.

https://www.cbsnews.com/newyork/news/hempstead-union-free-school-district-clerk-throwing-away-ballots/ They found a clerk throwing ballots away and have to redo the election.

The Republicans are freaking out and clutching their pearls for the simple reason they are finished come November. They will spend the rest of this Clownish Presidents term, his cabinet and his sycophant's in investigations and in court. Panic at the Disco. Bring on the Trials. Lmao. 😄🥳👍

I watched the video and he is citing a study from Farleigh Dickinson University a school who takes just about anyone and that no one has ever heard from and the study was from 2012.

And Your FAILURE to spell HILARIOUS is funny. This video was just as useless as all your other videos but Ill play along. All this study proved was that when you change from one echo chamber to another your views change. Yay propaganda works. I find it funny they consider CNN "real news" when they are just as biased as Fox News is.

People are using the phrase to signal that Canada’s resources and policies shouldn’t be bought out The caps have become a cheap way for activists and students to show solidarity during protests and on social media I ordered a few from wholesale hats for a campus event and they arrived fast with clean embroidery That’s why you see them popping up in stores and online

I wrote it down somewhere... Oh here it is...

yes, let's never forget we're ... um... we're... oh what was it ... wait... um...

Yeah, only billions of us have been doing it for thousands of years.

You never watch it but you're an expert on it? You're either a liar or stupid, or both. You get your news from Facebook? Ok, you're stupid.