All Activity

No one cares about your ^BULLSHIT. Just cause you write ^this BULLSHIT doesn't make it true. You ONLY PARROT the MAGA CULT here.

Biden followed the LAW which requires allowing applications for ASYLUM. You "understanding" of US law is just BULLSHIT. ^Despicable lack of empathy for the extremely downtrodden. Can tell you have NO MORALS WHATSOEVER;^HELLBOUND..

The SCOTUS has ruled that immigration must give detainees due process much greater than the 24 hours they were being given, but DHS has been ROUTINELY ignoring that requirement. That has been called a Constitutional crisis. They've been caught ON CAMERA trying to sneak busloads off to airports to fly them to foreign countries and in some cases those busses turned around and brought them back, after being filmed.

Literally what I said. They don't take an official vote which is what standing for a vote and recorded division means. Only you would be so stupid as to write back what I literally said As if you were telling me something LOL no official vote. The opposition let them skate because nobody wanted an election and nobody wanted to vote for it. They literally voted to not have a vote when asked if they wanted an official vote But i'm glad you figured it out finally

I'm waiting for User to reply.

Your rights? ====== While I admire its intent, I strongly disagree with the federal US Civil Rights of 1964. This US federal act attempted to control private interactions. If I refuse to marry a person of a different race, it is my choice. As Pierre Trudeau famously said.

"When debating legislation in the House, the Speaker will ask if MPs request a "recorded division," or a standing vote. If no MP asks for one, the motion is deemed adopted. No MP asked for recorded division on the throne speech when the time to vote came, meaning it was passed without MPs standing to vote." Hey dipshit...no recorded vote = NO VOTE LOL LOL But hey, I'll bet PP while sitting in the cheap seats, is pi$$ed his MP's did not vote LOL Typical BS attempt from the LOSER conmanfux and as usual...you LOSE. LOSER LOL LOL

awwww - reduced to repetatively posting the same cheezy picture because you can't cope. That's pretty sad big guy, I guess it's hard to type when you're crying ROFLMAO!!!! And reposts it again FROM THE SAME QUOTE!!!! LOL wow that's pretty upset!! Crying your eyes out and can't even type, double posting, and i've brought you to this state before5 pm

Nowadays, it's called "privilege" - your parents. As a man, Reagan had every advantage - his voice was so convincing. Thatcher was tall, blonde, blue eyes.

No, it's an old way of having an unofficial vote so the opposition can send a message to the gov't without it being a binding vote. Rarely used but still valid. It allowed the opposition to register their non acceptance of the speech without having to bring the gov't down. Nobody wants an election right now, but nobody wanted to vote for the speech and abstaining is kind of chickensnit. That's ok little guy, you'll learn about this stuff in high school LOLOL

Slave Zucchini is the best zucchini!

"there is no recorded vote but there is a vote "WTF??? Typical confux reasoning Ha a Ha Hey dipshit...no recorded vote = NO VOTE LOL LOL But hey, I'll bet PP is pissed he didn't get to vote and really pissed at his MP's for not wanting to vote LOL

Direct democracy was practiced in ancient Greece more than 2,000 years ago. Direct democracy can also be practiced today with the help of a powerful communication system.

and BTW you again revealed your lack of thinking.

Well not exactly, there is no recorded vote but there is a vote and the opposition let them off the hook with that, Sends a pretty serious message, Carney is already losing control, The opposition had to throw him a pity bone. They probably won't next time

Only a simpleton thinks like that. There are lots of extenuating factors. Every case is different. There are laws and courts and human rights that play into it.

LOL the entire forum is laughing at you This is what happens when you Phackt around LOLOL

Sigh. Usually you're a pretty clever guy, but that was like 'robosmith' level stupid. We can discuss the pros and cons of public health insurance instead of private health care but calling it the "Worlds greatest human rights violation in history" is just ídiotic. You know that right? You don't need me to explain why that was over the top right? Geeez.

Justin said it everywhere. "We know it, leaders know it, scientists know it and the private sector knows it: putting a price on pollution is the most efficient and powerful way to keep 1.5 alive": (referring to the push to limit global temperature increases to 1.5 degrees Celsius). He said it a billion times, Carbon tax is the best way to fight cilmate change, i'll meet our goals, it will keep climate change under control Sooooo.... we paid the tax, SO climate change must be solved, Turns out it wasn't. Thats why you're sea lioning. You know you're wrong so you're trying to delay and derail the conversation. You promoted carbon tax as the be all and end all and you YOURSELF said it was critical And it wasnt. It failed utterly. And you yourself have been unable to provide even a single scrap of scientific evidence to show that the climate change issue is a 'crisis'.

Then maybe we shouldn't have been wasting our time with an expensive carbon tax and instead been building a fleet of fire bombers.

You're confusing retort with 'observation' LOL there's no need for a retort when you're already making an ass of yourself You're self-retorting!

It's ok that you don't want it. That's you choice.

You can't even stand up to someone commenting here you coward. You hide from me and run away from just about any thread you have been in with me after I clearly destroy your lies and falsehoods.