All Activity

If someone wants to stand in front of traffic then they have to also want to be run-over by a car. That means drivers should be allowed to run-over people that want to be in front of their cars.

True but his problem is that he campaigned on keeping America out of regional conflicts and American soldiers out of future wars. He campaigned on peace as a peace maker and many of his supporters voted for him for these reasons. But this is an exceptional case. A golden opportunity once in a century for the whole world to be a safer place,

I guess we know now why he said he didn’t think the cost of housing should come down. It’ll impact his investments!

That's why you continue moving. You move as if the piece of shit isn't there. It's not assault if you're just moving, just like it's not assault if you're just standing in someone's way.

Once again, you have stooped to the lowest level of humanity. Demeaning my dead mother. Somewhere, somebody out there is thinking of you and the impact you have made...it is not me ...I think you are a morally unbalanced and corrupt twit. Boo Hoo LOSER. LOL As my signature states "I don't suffer fools gladly but I gladly make fools suffer " and I seem to be making my point LOL

Is ^this the same guy who defends all of Trump's crimes including FELONY CONVICTIONS? Why yes it IS. Your denial of the EVIDENCE that the Trump campaign (manager Manafort) colluded with Russia does NOT make that EVIDENCE go away. Duh No, it doesn't. YOU have ZERO EVIDENCE of fake DL being used to vote.

What I'm saying is the money the left takes goes to shit like government expansion and npo's. The poor (who by far need it the most) just stay poor. "Equity" is a facade. It's just a sneaky way for government to pillage the hardworking and the rich.

Trying to impede someone by standing in front of them is not attacking them. It may be irritating as shit but it isn't assault. There are just a ton of grey areas around this and each case has to be taken individually.

Ok...so the Bible constitutes reality on Earth for you. Interesting.

Honestly, he's correct in a sense. More of the former will lead to everyone except a handful of elite being impoverished and unable to provide for themselves outside of the control of the 'masters' of the system, and in that respect we'd all have the same opportunities AND outcome. They would just all be really really bad

They have on a number of occasions threatened him personally and tried to recruit assassins to kill him, so I'm not sure he's going to take a lot of effort to convince that maybe they need to go

Well, the 'throw his life at an automobile' would sort of indicate they were attempting to use force to stop or attack a person, but i suppose you could interpret it differently. I'd agree that you shouldn't got out of your way to hit people or the like just because you disagree with their protest.

That's all ya got eh?

Perspective being... that other countries don't have freedom ? We could ban protesting and criticizing the government too. Were you a Trudeau supporter by chance ?

If they are attacking you or you just can't avoid them, I would agree. I was responding to this statement.

This is a golden opportunity for Trump to change this evil regime. If he misses it he is an idi*t and if he helps to change the regime, his name will go into history. This regime has been fiercely anti-American for over 4 decades. They took many Americans hostage and hold them for 444 days. They attacked US soldiers in Lebanon in 1983 and killed hundreds of Americans. They have been attacking Americans ever since in Iraq and other parts of mid east and have killed many Americans past decade. The regime is not only a threat for Israel but the whole world.

I think it's instructive for first world protesters (especially those prone to political violence) to get out and see the big bad world... more progressives should consider doing it. https://nationalpost.com/opinion/naive-western-activists-get-a-harsh-dose-of-reality-in-egypt If we had compulsory military service and the requirement for 3 foreign deployments most of this nonsense would evaporate. The lack of perspective (in its absence) is simply breathtaking. How many multi tour veterans do you see assaulting citizens in their cars because they drive a Tesla... or whatever. Virtually NONE, that's how many.

More spam from @blackbird... Says the coward who ran away from me and refuses to actually address questions here to support your baseless assertions.

No, more of the former means more you communists can take from the former. Stop being deceitful you duplicitous a$$hole.

I agree with what Ron DeSantis said because it's just plain common sense: "if you're surrounded by a mob, and you're about to get attacked/possibly killed, you have the right to escape in your vehicle." Everyone has the right to defend themselves from attackers, even more of a right to escape - within reason - and that's multiplied several times if you have women and children with you. If a guy with a crowbar is walking up to your window, or the back passenger window of your car where your kid is sitting, you have no choice but get away, and the safest way to do is that is by driving. Sitting there to find out what they're gonna do with that crowbar once your window is smashed is just stupid and unrealistic, and getting your kid out of a car seat to run away is even worse. A good rule of thumb for attackers is: don't attack innocent victims because their rights to defend themselves are extensive, and quite unfortunate for you. A good rule of thumb for protesters is: once the mob gets unruly, gtfo of there unless you want to be a party to some awful crimes. From a driver's POV doesn't mean "0-60 in 2 seconds to see how many points you can score", it basically means "honk your horn, start moving slowly, then see how the situation progresses. Maybe a few swerves while you're slowly accelerating will work. Maybe someone will fall down in front of you and you will have to stop for a second. But the bottom line is; if you gotta go, you gotta go. Just know that if you do something unreasonable, you are 100% responsible for that, and could end up in jail for decades remembering the scared faces and the screams of people who were just in the wrong place at the wrong time and meant you no harm. You could even look like an attacker, giving other people the right of self-defence. Uh-ohhhhh. All of that applies equally to mostly peaceful BLM protests and ultra-violent bouncy castle protests. Ideally protesters don't behave so violently that drivers feel the need to do something that would harm another person. Ideally drivers remain calm and respect the freedoms of protesters and their right to safety. But when there are tens of thousands of interactions between angry protesters and blocked-in drivers, there are millions of permutations, all with the potential for disaster. I hope that what DeSantis said gives protesters pause to think about the potential consequences of blocking in vehicles and threatening people, and that it doesn't make angry counter-protesters think that they can get away with murder. FIFY

It's a breach of trust and it's a major scandal for him to do it in the first place, but to hide your housing assets while you are the housing minister saying that housing prices shouldn't come down isn't just an ethics violation, it's horrible optics and it shows a disregard for the portfolio your working on.

Seems like trump is prepared to back his play

Oh yeah. That was right after Carney told him that the G7 couldn't work without his guidance wasn't it LOLOLOL

It's not the fact that he owns investment properties, the fact is he failed to report it to the ethics commissioner... which is a breach of trust....Why is it that liberal Canadians think this type of behavior is normal or no big deal....These are the people that represent our nation and we ALL should expect them to be held to higher standards....and if that is to hard then why run for office.

More of the former will yield more of the latter. It goes without saying you clowns will argue otherwise but it is what it is.