Reg Volk Posted March 1 Report Posted March 1 1 Quote As Democrat and Liberal governments fall, Republicans and Conservatives come to the rescue.
Reg Volk Posted March 1 Report Posted March 1 Quote As Democrat and Liberal governments fall, Republicans and Conservatives come to the rescue.
Nationalist Posted March 1 Report Posted March 1 4 hours ago, John Johnston said: Problem is that Trump does not think anything through. All his ideas and policies eventually turn out badly. We saw that in the first Trump Administration and it's happening daily now. The man has far less guardrails than the last Administration. And it shows. Everything that comes out of his mouth is a lie, and he has the most unqualified bunch of monkeys surrounding him for this reason. Of course people want a change in the Iranian Regime. However to sit here and say Trump is concerned about free elections and freedom for the Iranians is a laugh. Trump does not even care about American freedom or elections, or free press or anything else. Like everything he does this will end poorly for everyone around him. Gawd you whine a lot. I didn't say Trump is concerned with anything other than keeping nukes our of the hands of Iran. As for successes...border...deportations...lower gas prices...reduced inflation... Not bad...not bad at all, considering the mess you Tweenkies left behind. Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
Shady Posted March 1 Report Posted March 1 23 hours ago, TreeBeard said: Which ones? Bill Clinton, George Bush. Lots of senators and representatives too. Quote
Shady Posted March 1 Report Posted March 1 23 hours ago, robosmith said: Only if you don't care about actually selling the war so the military is MOTIVATED. Are you saying that if a president hasn’t served in the military that the military won’t be motivated? Quote
robosmith Posted March 1 Author Report Posted March 1 48 minutes ago, Nationalist said: Gawd you whine a lot. I didn't say Trump is concerned with anything other than keeping nukes our of the hands of Iran. As for successes...border...deportations...lower gas prices...reduced inflation... Not bad...not bad at all, considering the mess you Tweenkies left behind. Of course you're LYING as USUAL Inflation has not been reduced just because Trump changed the metric and no longer uses the CPI. 1 Quote
robosmith Posted March 1 Author Report Posted March 1 43 minutes ago, Shady said: Are you saying that if a president hasn’t served in the military that the military won’t be motivated? I am saying that longer term motivation to fight depends on soldiers believing the war is righteous. AKA are sold on it. Of course if Trump hews to his current promise of no boots on the ground, jet jockeys are less motivation dependent. Quote
User Posted March 1 Report Posted March 1 1 minute ago, robosmith said: Of course you're LYING as USUAL Inflation has not been reduced just because Trump changed the metric and no longer uses the CPI. OK, give us the CPI numbers. What was inflation when Biden was in office compared to now? 1 Quote
Reg Volk Posted March 1 Report Posted March 1 19 minutes ago, robosmith said: I am saying that longer term motivation to fight depends on soldiers believing the war is righteous. AKA are sold on it. Of course if Trump hews to his current promise of no boots on the ground, jet jockeys are less motivation dependent. are you basing this opinion on your long years of service? Quote As Democrat and Liberal governments fall, Republicans and Conservatives come to the rescue.
paxamericana Posted March 1 Report Posted March 1 Look folks, it’s simple what America wants, pick another despot that align with America’s interests, if not it’ll be an explosive veto. Quote
Reg Volk Posted March 1 Report Posted March 1 1 Quote As Democrat and Liberal governments fall, Republicans and Conservatives come to the rescue.
Reg Volk Posted March 2 Report Posted March 2 Quote As Democrat and Liberal governments fall, Republicans and Conservatives come to the rescue.
TreeBeard Posted March 2 Report Posted March 2 4 hours ago, Shady said: Bill Clinton, George Bush. Lots of senators and representatives too. All three are cowardly douchebags. Quote
robosmith Posted March 2 Author Report Posted March 2 3 hours ago, Reg Volk said: Take your stupid LYING MEMES over to the meme thread where such BULLSHIT belongs. They are OFFTOPIC HERE. Quote
CdnFox Posted March 2 Report Posted March 2 1 hour ago, robosmith said: Take your stupid LYING MEMES over to the meme thread where such BULLSHIT belongs. They are OFFTOPIC HERE. LOLOL Holy crap, triggered leftist zucchini boy is triggered!!! Geez @Reg Volk, I think you hurt his feelings! 1 Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
TreeBeard Posted March 2 Report Posted March 2 How old is Trump’s youngest son? Maybe he could join the military and fight for his country? 1 Quote
User Posted March 2 Report Posted March 2 4 hours ago, TreeBeard said: How old is Trump’s youngest son? Maybe he could join the military and fight for his country? Did you? if that is the standard to have an opinion here… Quote
Barquentine Posted March 2 Report Posted March 2 17 hours ago, CdnFox said: Which is pretty much why Iran wanted nukes. What if Iran had nukes? https://strategiecs.com/en/analyses/what-if-iran-had-the-nuclear-bomb "Theoretically speaking, Iran’s possession of a nuclear weapon doesn’t prevent its coexistence with Israel on the basis of the balance of terror rule, as is the case with the relations between India and Pakistan, Or: The case of Iran and Israel cannot be compared to that of India and Pakistan, for neither Islamabad nor New Delhi openly adopted a discourse calling to wipe the other out or target the other’s very existence, as is the case in the relationship between Iran and Israel." Quote
Hodad Posted March 2 Report Posted March 2 2 hours ago, Barquentine said: What if Iran had nukes? https://strategiecs.com/en/analyses/what-if-iran-had-the-nuclear-bomb "Theoretically speaking, Iran’s possession of a nuclear weapon doesn’t prevent its coexistence with Israel on the basis of the balance of terror rule, as is the case with the relations between India and Pakistan, Or: The case of Iran and Israel cannot be compared to that of India and Pakistan, for neither Islamabad nor New Delhi openly adopted a discourse calling to wipe the other out or target the other’s very existence, as is the case in the relationship between Iran and Israel." I think the latter. Religion is inherently irrational, and so are its true believers. Any nuclear arsenal wielded as an extension of religious authority--the smiting hands of ill-conceived gods--cannot be trusted to play according to game theory. The "D" in MAD only concerns Earthly destruction, and that's not an effective deterrent to anyone who believes that they are taking direction from the creator of the universe. 1 Quote
User Posted March 2 Report Posted March 2 6 minutes ago, Hodad said: I think the latter. Religion is inherently irrational, and so are its true believers. Any nuclear arsenal wielded as an extension of religious authority--the smiting hands of ill-conceived gods--cannot be trusted to play according to game theory. The "D" in MAD only concerns Earthly destruction, and that's not an effective deterrent to anyone who believes that they are taking direction from the creator of the universe. The bigots gotta bigot. Im pretty sure this is one of the big reasons you hide like a coward from me. You want so bad to push this nonsense about religious people and don’t like getting called out, well, at least having to see it. Quote
Michael Hardner Posted March 2 Report Posted March 2 On 2/28/2026 at 1:42 PM, robosmith said: Trump launches the regime-change effort in Iran that he pledged to avoid https://www.cnn.com/2026/03/02/world/video/pete-hegseth-pentagon-iran-strikes-digvi Pardon the fonts but... "This is not a so-called regime change war" Hegseth Quote Looks like someone has a new patronizing catch phrase ! Michael Hardner
CdnFox Posted March 2 Report Posted March 2 4 hours ago, Barquentine said: What if Iran had nukes? https://strategiecs.com/en/analyses/what-if-iran-had-the-nuclear-bomb "Theoretically speaking, Iran’s possession of a nuclear weapon doesn’t prevent its coexistence with Israel on the basis of the balance of terror rule, as is the case with the relations between India and Pakistan, Sure, it's theoretically possible that if they have nukes they don't use them. It's also entirely theoretically possible that they (or their ruler) go nuts and decide to 'river to the sea' israel and preemptively nuke it in the name of allah. IT's also theoretically possible that next time the US has a carrier battle group in the area they manage to get a boat or sub withn 3 or 4 miles and light one off. How many navy personelle in a 2 carrier battle group again? How many billions goes to the bottom if they do that? And nobody can PROVE for sure who it was? Pretty tempting if tensions are high. 4 hours ago, Barquentine said: Or: The case of Iran and Israel cannot be compared to that of India and Pakistan, for neither Islamabad nor New Delhi openly adopted a discourse calling to wipe the other out or target the other’s very existence, as is the case in the relationship between Iran and Israel." Sure. It's hard to compare any two countries like that to be fair but it's not JUST israel who'd be at risk. Neither india or pakistan are likely to pick fights with the USA, but iran frequently does. And they already have missiles that can reach into europe in their inventory right now 4 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said: https://www.cnn.com/2026/03/02/world/video/pete-hegseth-pentagon-iran-strikes-digvi Pardon the fonts but... "This is not a so-called regime change war" Hegseth Context matters and you're deliberately taking that quote out of context to try and make a very poorly organized point that was too weak to stand on its own Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
robosmith Posted March 2 Author Report Posted March 2 10 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said: https://www.cnn.com/2026/03/02/world/video/pete-hegseth-pentagon-iran-strikes-digvi Pardon the fonts but... "This is not a so-called regime change war" Hegseth Unfortunate that you're so stupid you believe ANY of the MULTIPLE LIES coming from the Trump admin. Killing 40-50 of the top government officials is CLEARLY an effort to change the regime. Duh Only way it won't do that is if Iran's succession plan works the way it was designed, and the successors don't cave to Trump's PLANS. Quote
Reg Volk Posted March 2 Report Posted March 2 Quote As Democrat and Liberal governments fall, Republicans and Conservatives come to the rescue.
Reg Volk Posted March 2 Report Posted March 2 Good job Rita!! Quote As Democrat and Liberal governments fall, Republicans and Conservatives come to the rescue.
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.