robosmith Posted March 4 Author Report Posted March 4 3 hours ago, ironstone said: Calls to 'release the files!' during the Biden/Harris administration? Crickets. To date, the Epstein files have been kind of a nothing-burger as far as Trump being implicated in them is concerned. Your DENIAL won't make the Trump victim's accusations go away. Quote
robosmith Posted March 4 Author Report Posted March 4 (edited) 2 hours ago, Venandi said: When your polls are as dark as the night, And your logic remains out of sight, He will start a big show, With explosions that glow, And turn liberal wrongs into rights. And throw the Constitution OUT OF SIGHT. Just to get YOU to FIGHT an IRRATIONAL BLIGHT. LMAO Edited March 4 by robosmith Quote
John Stone Posted March 4 Report Posted March 4 47 minutes ago, ironstone said: Sadly, governments of all stripes are rather secretive under the guise of 'national security'. ...........Trump likely regrets his boasts during the election campaign of 24, fk'n disaster politically. The person i enjoy tho is Bondi - twisting herself in knots denying, lying, exaggerating .......the ironic part is that she likely sees herself as a patriot - protecting the Nation - by doing same. Guaranteed book fodder - make her a fortune - course it could also put her behind bars or worse Quote
herbie Posted March 4 Report Posted March 4 Blowed 'em up good. Blowed 'em up real good. Whoops! Blowed 'em up too good, got our replacements blowed up too! Quote
ironstone Posted March 4 Report Posted March 4 1 hour ago, robosmith said: Your DENIAL won't make the Trump victim's accusations go away. Are there actual credible accusations against Trump, or are they 'Christine Blasey-Ford' type allegations where the alleged victim can't remember any important details? Quote Beware the Brookfield industrial complex...
User Posted March 4 Report Posted March 4 1 hour ago, robosmith said: Your DENIAL won't make the Trump victim's accusations go away. OK. So what? Quote
robosmith Posted March 4 Author Report Posted March 4 47 minutes ago, ironstone said: Are there actual credible accusations against Trump, or are they 'Christine Blasey-Ford' type allegations where the alleged victim can't remember any important details? 3 of the 302 interview files are currently MISSING from the public release, but The Guardian has copies. The issue is Bondi's testimony under oath that "there are no accusations of wrong doing by Trump in the Files." The 3 missing Files ARE such accusations which the FBI found credible when given in 2019 which is why there were FOUR INTERVIEWS. Obviously the investigation was shut down by the Trump admin. But Bondi clearly LIED in her testimony which apparently was why the files disappeared. This is the last time I'm going to repeat the story. If you can't be bothered to read the thread, then you're just NOT INTERESTED in KNOWING WHAT HAPPENED. Quote
Nationalist Posted March 4 Report Posted March 4 3 hours ago, robosmith said: It is a violation of the Constitution's separation clause, IGNORAMUS. Why do you keep pretending that whatever Trump can get away with is LEGAL, while remaining completely IGNORANT of the Constitution? LMAO No it's not. What constitutional article say such? 1 1 Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
robosmith Posted March 4 Author Report Posted March 4 40 minutes ago, Nationalist said: No it's not. What constitutional article say such? ^Thanks for proving your IGNORANCE like I said. Do you believe it's legal for teachers to lead student prayers in public schools? Quote
Nationalist Posted March 4 Report Posted March 4 9 minutes ago, robosmith said: ^Thanks for proving your IGNORANCE like I said. Do you believe it's legal for teachers to lead student prayers in public schools? Legal? It probably is. Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
Reg Volk Posted March 5 Report Posted March 5 Just when the Democrats couldn't suck any harder, they go ahead and suck harder, and are defeated anyway. 1 Quote As Democrat and Liberal governments fall, Republicans and Conservatives come to the rescue.
robosmith Posted March 5 Author Report Posted March 5 (edited) 4 hours ago, Nationalist said: Legal? It probably is. According to whom? You didn't even BOTHER to cure your IGNORANCE. LMAO Quote It is generally illegal for public school teachers, coaches, or officials to lead, encourage, or compel students in prayer during school-sponsored activities or while acting in their official capacity. The First Amendment's Establishment Clause prohibits government employees from promoting religion, though they may pray privately when not on duty. U.S. Department of Education (.gov) +2 Key guidelines regarding teachers and prayer: Active Leadership: Teachers cannot lead, organize, or encourage student prayers. Official Capacity: When acting as a representative of the state (during class, in the hallway, at sports events), teachers must remain neutral regarding religion. Coercion: School officials cannot create an environment where students feel pressured to participate in, or fear consequences for not participating in, religious activities. Private Prayer: Teachers may engage in private prayer during non-duty time, such as during a lunch break, or when it does not interfere with their duties. Student Rights: Students themselves are allowed to pray, read religious texts, or gather for prayer, provided it is voluntary, student-initiated, and not disruptive. Strike 3! You're OUT! Edited March 5 by robosmith Quote
robosmith Posted March 5 Author Report Posted March 5 2 hours ago, Reg Volk said: Just when the Democrats couldn't suck any harder, they go ahead and suck harder, and are defeated anyway. Only an lDIOT defends a war the explanation for which is NONEXISTENT. The blood of SIX US soldiers is on your hands. Quote
Reg Volk Posted March 5 Report Posted March 5 1 hour ago, robosmith said: Only an lDIOT defends a war the explanation for which is NONEXISTENT. The blood of SIX US soldiers is on your hands. The blood of 30,000 Iranians is on yours. 1 Quote As Democrat and Liberal governments fall, Republicans and Conservatives come to the rescue.
Nationalist Posted March 5 Report Posted March 5 (edited) 8 hours ago, robosmith said: According to whom? You didn't even BOTHER to cure your IGNORANCE. LMAO Strike 3! You're OUT! Interesting. We said the lord's prayer when I was in elementary school. Must be a different law up here. What's this got to do with the war? Edited March 5 by Nationalist Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
Barquentine Posted March 5 Report Posted March 5 22 hours ago, Nationalist said: War sucks. But it does happen and when it does, it's rather irrelevant what motivates soldiers. Except Religious fanatics will slaughter people just to get to their 'Heaven'. As Hodad said: "I think the latter. Religion is inherently irrational, and so are its true believers. Any nuclear arsenal wielded as an extension of religious authority--the smiting hands of ill-conceived gods--cannot be trusted to play according to game theory. The "D" in MAD only concerns Earthly destruction, and that's not an effective deterrent to anyone who believes that they are taking direction from the creator of the universe." Quote
Nationalist Posted March 5 Report Posted March 5 22 minutes ago, Barquentine said: Except Religious fanatics will slaughter people just to get to their 'Heaven'. As Hodad said: "I think the latter. Religion is inherently irrational, and so are its true believers. Any nuclear arsenal wielded as an extension of religious authority--the smiting hands of ill-conceived gods--cannot be trusted to play according to game theory. The "D" in MAD only concerns Earthly destruction, and that's not an effective deterrent to anyone who believes that they are taking direction from the creator of the universe." Well...Im not gonna defend religion. IMO, "The Dirty Three" have been on a collision course all along. Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
User Posted March 5 Report Posted March 5 2 hours ago, Barquentine said: Except Religious fanatics will slaughter people just to get to their 'Heaven'. As Hodad said: "I think the latter. Religion is inherently irrational, and so are its true believers. Any nuclear arsenal wielded as an extension of religious authority--the smiting hands of ill-conceived gods--cannot be trusted to play according to game theory. The "D" in MAD only concerns Earthly destruction, and that's not an effective deterrent to anyone who believes that they are taking direction from the creator of the universe." And yet some of the greatest atrocities in human history were carried out under secular communism. Quote
robosmith Posted March 5 Author Report Posted March 5 11 hours ago, Reg Volk said: The blood of 30,000 Iranians is on yours. ^No EVIDENCE of count nor INNOCENCE. Quote
robosmith Posted March 5 Author Report Posted March 5 4 hours ago, Nationalist said: Interesting. We said the lord's prayer when I was in elementary school. Must be a different law up here. And why would you believe OTHERWISE? Like I said ^IGNORAMUS. 4 hours ago, Nationalist said: What's this got to do with the war? It has to do with US Officials (officers) VIOLATING Constitutional BOUNDS in the separation of church and state and Fist Amendment of which you've repeatedly displayed YOUR IGNORANCE. Duh Quote
John Johnston Posted March 5 Report Posted March 5 Relax folks. You have a weekend Fox News Host acting like a 12 year old playing COD. I'm sure everything will work out just fine. Quote
Nationalist Posted March 5 Report Posted March 5 34 minutes ago, robosmith said: And why would you believe OTHERWISE? Like I said ^IGNORAMUS. It has to do with US Officials (officers) VIOLATING Constitutional BOUNDS in the separation of church and state and Fist Amendment of which you've repeatedly displayed YOUR IGNORANCE. Duh Violating what??? Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
robosmith Posted March 5 Author Report Posted March 5 5 minutes ago, Nationalist said: Violating what??? What don't you understand about the First Amendment besides EVERYTHING? LMAO Quote
Nationalist Posted March 5 Report Posted March 5 14 minutes ago, robosmith said: What don't you understand about the First Amendment besides EVERYTHING? LMAO Your chasing your tail Dweebles. What exactly are you whining about? Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
robosmith Posted March 5 Author Report Posted March 5 11 minutes ago, Nationalist said: Your chasing your tail Dweebles. No, that's you our of your IGNORANCE. 11 minutes ago, Nationalist said: What exactly are you whining about? ^LAZY or UNABLE? Quote The Establishment Clause, part of the First Amendment ("Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion"), prohibits the government from creating an official state religion, favoring one religion over another, or preferring religion over non-religion. It serves to separate church and state, ensuring religious freedom and preventing government-mandated religious orthodoxy. LII | Legal Information Institute +3 Key principles and details regarding the Establishment Clause include: Interpretation: Modern Supreme Court interpretation, such as in Kennedy v. Bremerton School District (2022), often relies on historical practices and traditions rather than just the Lemon test. Arguments: Proponents argue it protects religious liberty and prevents government interference in faith. Critics sometimes argue it can be used to exclude religious viewpoints from the public square, though it generally prohibits government-sponsored prayer or financial aid to religious institutions. Purpose: To prevent the federal government from forcing citizens to support or participate in religious activities. Legal Application (The Lemon Test): Established in Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971), this three-part test dictates that government action must have a secular purpose, neither advance nor inhibit religion, and avoid excessive government entanglement with religion . Officers using religious arguments to motivate soldiers is A VIOLATION of the First Amendment. Duh Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.