ironstone Posted February 20 Report Posted February 20 21 minutes ago, SpankyMcFarland said: He wants to be a dictator. Only his own supporters or the wilfully ignorant can deny that. The courts have been a bigger obstacle than his own party to his obvious intent. So is he an actual dictator or not? Quote Beware the Brookfield industrial complex...
robosmith Posted February 20 Report Posted February 20 37 minutes ago, WestCanMan said: Quit, dummy. Inflation cause by the Dems and LPoC cost taxpayers 1,000 times as much money as US tariffs did. The screwed up supply chain caused the inflation and that was NOT caused by "Dems." Maybe you missed the news reels of China locking their people in their apartments. LMAO So Quit (being a) dummy. Quote
User Posted February 20 Report Posted February 20 5 minutes ago, robosmith said: The screwed up supply chain caused the inflation and that was NOT caused by "Dems." Maybe you missed the news reels of China locking their people in their apartments. LMAO So Quit (being a) dummy. Of course the 2 Trillion Dollars Biden dumped into the economy in give aways to all his crony special interests didn't do anything at all... Quote
TreeBeard Posted February 20 Report Posted February 20 4 hours ago, ironstone said: So...a man who is routinely labeled as a dictator...gets stopped by the Judicial branch of government? Theres usually a “wannabe” in front of that. 54 minutes ago, ironstone said: So is he an actual dictator or not? Wannabe. Quote
robosmith Posted February 20 Report Posted February 20 Trump is now calling SCOTUS "very unpatriotic and disloyal." When he starts a CON, he is very persistent but the MAGAts here will always defend that. 🤮 Quote
Hodad Posted February 20 Report Posted February 20 I am honestly shocked. This sad incarnation of the Supreme Court has done everything possible to enable and protect Trump--unthinkable decisions that overturn fundamental precedent. I expected them to continue to let him run roughshod over every constitutional principle on the road to dictatorship. I wonder what exactly was the breaking point on this one. I want the backstory. Quote
West Posted February 20 Report Posted February 20 5 minutes ago, robosmith said: Trump is now calling SCOTUS "very unpatriotic and disloyal." When he starts a CON, he is very persistent but the MAGAts here will always defend that. 🤮 At least he didnt dox them like Chuck Schumers brown shirts after the fall of baby murder Trump slaps on a 10% global tariff. Quote
John Johnston Posted February 20 Report Posted February 20 15 minutes ago, Hodad said: I am honestly shocked. This sad incarnation of the Supreme Court has done everything possible to enable and protect Trump--unthinkable decisions that overturn fundamental precedent. I expected them to continue to let him run roughshod over every constitutional principle on the road to dictatorship. I wonder what exactly was the breaking point on this one. I want the backstory. John Roberts is and has always been a staunch Federalist, albeit very Conservative. Same with Gorsuch. Barrett and Kavanagh are just Maga clowns. Let the whining and baby fits commence from the Toddler N Chief. Quote
West Posted February 20 Report Posted February 20 (edited) Democrats would rather let people die in wars than increase tariffs to end wars. So sad. Probably getting money from the weapons manufacturers Edited February 20 by West 1 Quote
herbie Posted February 20 Report Posted February 20 It's interesting to see some GOP supporters admit that tariffs are simply a tax in disguise, and also see some still think that other countries and companies should pay them so consumers don't have to. And others who refuse to admit that Wannabe King will simply pronounce new tariffs ignoring the ruling or seek an end run run around it so they'll avoid congressional approval. Quote
West Posted February 20 Report Posted February 20 1 minute ago, herbie said: It's interesting to see some GOP supporters admit that tariffs are simply a tax in disguise, and also see some still think that other countries and companies should pay them so consumers don't have to. And others who refuse to admit that Wannabe King will simply pronounce new tariffs ignoring the ruling or seek an end run run around it so they'll avoid congressional approval. I don't disagree its a tax, though think those who use the services i.e shipping ports or roadways to move goods and services around should be paying a proportionate % of how much they benefit from these services. If they feel they can offload some of that onto people using the services, then that will be between them and the consumer to determine how much of that they are willing to take on. Being able to offshore jobs and then not pony up when you want to sell your product back to the place you just screwed over is dumb. Then making them alone pay increase in taxes while you suck the tit of the taxpayer... no thanks. Tariffs = free market. Quote
John Johnston Posted February 20 Report Posted February 20 8 minutes ago, West said: I don't disagree its a tax, though think those who use the services i.e shipping ports or roadways to move goods and services around should be paying a proportionate % of how much they benefit from these services. If they feel they can offload some of that onto people using the services, then that will be between them and the consumer to determine how much of that they are willing to take on. Being able to offshore jobs and then not pony up when you want to sell your product back to the place you just screwed over is dumb. Then making them alone pay increase in taxes while you suck the tit of the taxpayer... no thanks. Tariffs = free market. A tariff is a tax imposed by a government on imported goods to raise revenue, protect domestic industries, or influence trade behavior. Definition and Purpose A tariff is a tax levied on goods as they cross national borders, usually by the importing country's government, and is typically paid by the importer rather than the exporter. While most tariffs target imports, some countries may also impose export tariffs, though this is less common. Tariffs serve multiple purposes: generating government revenue, protecting domestic industries from foreign competition, and influencing trade negotiations or political leverage. By making imported goods more expensive, tariffs encourage consumers to buy locally produced alternatives, supporting domestic economic growth. Quote
West Posted February 20 Report Posted February 20 8 minutes ago, John Johnston said: A tariff is a tax imposed by a government on imported goods to raise revenue, protect domestic industries, or influence trade behavior. Definition and Purpose A tariff is a tax levied on goods as they cross national borders, usually by the importing country's government, and is typically paid by the importer rather than the exporter. While most tariffs target imports, some countries may also impose export tariffs, though this is less common. Tariffs serve multiple purposes: generating government revenue, protecting domestic industries from foreign competition, and influencing trade negotiations or political leverage. By making imported goods more expensive, tariffs encourage consumers to buy locally produced alternatives, supporting domestic economic growth. Again I have no issue with it being a tax. It shifted some of the burden onto China where they have offered slave wages and then sell into the largest market in the world while shifting the tax burden to the American citizen. They will share at least some of the tax burden now. Quote
robosmith Posted February 20 Report Posted February 20 1 hour ago, West said: At least he didnt dox them like Chuck Schumers brown shirts after the fall of baby murder Pics or it didn't happen. Show us Schumer's "brown shirts." 1 hour ago, West said: Trump slaps on a 10% global tariff. That'll just give Dems a greater advantage in the next election. Quote
robosmith Posted February 20 Report Posted February 20 53 minutes ago, West said: Democrats would rather let people die in wars than increase tariffs to end wars. So sad. Probably getting money from the weapons manufacturers So you believe Trump's LIES about ending 8 wars. Or is it 10 now? LMAO What a FOOL. Quote
robosmith Posted February 20 Report Posted February 20 46 minutes ago, West said: I don't disagree its a tax, though think those who use the services i.e shipping ports or roadways to move goods and services around should be paying a proportionate % of how much they benefit from these services. If they feel they can offload some of that onto people using the services, then that will be between them and the consumer to determine how much of that they are willing to take on. Being able to offshore jobs and then not pony up when you want to sell your product back to the place you just screwed over is dumb. Then making them alone pay increase in taxes while you suck the tit of the taxpayer... no thanks. Tariffs = free market. Shippers are already paying for those facilities. It's built into SHIPPING CHARGES. DUH Quote
eyeball Posted February 20 Report Posted February 20 3 hours ago, West said: Tariffs are back on! Made your day did he? I'm sure American consumers are dancing in the streets too. LMAO! Quote I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical, a liberal, oh fanatical criminal
herbie Posted February 20 Report Posted February 20 What did I say? The whining baby just announced a 10% global tariff. Gonna run it through Congress? Or just declare it and everyone slavishly obeys again? The Emperor says so! Quote
TreeBeard Posted February 20 Report Posted February 20 The Trump regime owes the people and businesses that paid the tariffs deemed illegal $175 BILLION. oops Quote
West Posted February 21 Report Posted February 21 2 hours ago, TreeBeard said: The Trump regime owes the people and businesses that paid the tariffs deemed illegal $175 BILLION. oops The ruling didnt specify that. Duh Quote
SpankyMcFarland Posted February 21 Report Posted February 21 (edited) So the court "has been swayed by foreign interests," eh? C’mon Trumpy, don’t be coy, give us the evidence on that QAnon-worthy accusation. You say you’re ashamed of some of the judges. Bear in mind that to be ashamed you first must be capable of shame. Edited February 21 by SpankyMcFarland Quote ‘How small we make our worlds. Gather them in, tighten them up into little castles of fear.’
West Posted February 21 Report Posted February 21 6 hours ago, robosmith said: ^Imagines granting a loan is equivalent to an ILLEGAL tariff. LMAO This ruling prevents you leftists from implementing a pollution tax under the guise of "climate emergency" like you did during the Chinese virus debacle where you abused emergencies powers while still recognizing a president can TARIFF under other statutes. Quote
Nationalist Posted February 21 Report Posted February 21 1 hour ago, SpankyMcFarland said: So the court "has been swayed by foreign interests," eh? C’mon Trumpy, don’t be coy, give us the evidence on that QAnon-worthy accusation. You say you’re ashamed of some of the judges. Bear in mind that to be ashamed you first must be capable of shame. He won't be coy. He'll levy more tariffs by other means. As im in Canada im a tad worried what that might mean for us. But as I've said before, Trump is the president of The United States...thus he does what's best for them...not Canada. So here's the raw results. You limp biscuits can stuff your whole "dictator" schtick...and the tariffs get re-imposed...oh and a shiny new global 10% tariff. Dopes... Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.