Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
4 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Oops...extreme TDS alert.

Stop that deification NOW dropout! Your hero is guilty of war crimes.

And he's desperately negotiating immunity from the ICC.

Quote
Recent news reports from late 2025 indicate that the Trump administration is reportedly pushing the International Criminal Court (ICC) to amend its founding document (the Rome Statute) to grant an exemption from prosecution for Donald Trump and his top officials. 
Reports, citing a Trump administration official, state that the U.S. has threatened the ICC with further sanctions if it does not meet these demands, which also include dropping investigations into Israeli officials regarding actions in Gaza, as well as a probe into potential war crimes committed by U.S. troops in Afghanistan

 

  • Downvote 1
Posted
1 hour ago, West said:

image.thumb.jpeg.9ff82b01f80cca50ea31f0725011c6a0.jpeg

Bernie Sanders sides with narcoterrorism. 

Not surprised. He will likely be outside the prison demanding they release his drug kingpin. Sick person

And you're siding with a WAR CRIMINAL.

1 hour ago, paxamericana said:

I don’t know of any grown man kidnapped with his wife…

Do you know ANY GROWN MAN who was kidnapped?

1 hour ago, West said:

image.thumb.jpeg.2e401c0f0839522ba4e0554079393b37.jpeg

Your memes are PATHETIC LIES.

Posted
18 minutes ago, TreeBeard said:

Wasn’t it you going on about how Trump doesn’t start wars? 

What war? It's over before it started. 

 

 

Posted
20 minutes ago, robosmith said:

We did nothing to start nor wage war in Libya. We did help prevent a massacre by gaDaffy with air support in Libya. :applause:

Who’s we?  Lol, Obama killed Gaddafi.  At least Maduro gets due process right?  Plenty of oil in Libya, probably just a coincidence that they interjected in that civil war as opposed to other civil wars.

  • Like 1
  • Downvote 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, robosmith said:

^MORE pathetic lies supporting a WAR CRIMINAL.

Maduro: the ONLY illegal alien Trump is BRINGING TO the US.

Meh.  You guys had no problem with Obama toppling Gaddafi, and you guys had no problem with Obama killing an American citizen without due process.  So spare me the crocodile tears.

Just now, Radiorum said:

So, the US can hold a foreign president accountable for crimes, for breaking US law, but they cannot hold their own president accountable for crimes? How does that make sense?

Which crimes?

  • Downvote 1
Posted
8 hours ago, John Stone said:

.......... sincerely hope this works out - u break it, u own it. 

Regime change hasn't been much of a success story the past 30 years. 

Annexation is in vogue now.  If it's good enough for Putin and Trump it shouldn't be long until Jinping is in on it.

There'll probably be a cascade of annexations now. Who or what is there to prevent it? Three old tyrants nursing their old grudges and grievances? They'll be too busy encouraging it.

 

 

 

 

 

I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical,
a liberal, oh fanatical criminal

Posted
3 minutes ago, Radiorum said:

So, the US can hold a foreign president accountable for crimes, for breaking US law, but they cannot hold their own president accountable for crimes? How does that make sense?

What crimes? 

So is your argument that no criminals should be punished or held accountable because you hate Trump so much that you think he should be to whatever extent you think?

2 minutes ago, eyeball said:

Annexation is in vogue now.  If it's good enough for Putin and Trump it shouldn't be long until Jinping is in on it.

There'll probably be a cascade of annexations now. Who or what is there to prevent it? Three old tyrants nursing their old grudges and grievances? They'll be too busy encouraging it.

 

 

 

 

 

There is no annexation. 

However, you try to act like the barbaric terrorism of Hamas is no worse than Israel, so of course you think this action by Trump is the same as Putin's full-scale invasion of Ukraine to conquer it literally. 

 

 

 

Posted
20 minutes ago, TreeBeard said:

Wasn’t it you going on about how Trump doesn’t start wars? 

Does this qualify as a full blown war or is it more accurately characterized as a limited military operation at this point?

People said the same thing when the Trump administration bombed the nuclear weapons facilities in Iran but it doesn't seem like the US and Iran are in an actual war now.

I don't know how this operation in Venezuela is going to play out in the long run but I hope it works out well for the people there since Socialism failed...yet again.

I don't recall what I said exactly about Trump not starting wars. I know at some point I pointed out that Putin was much less aggressive when Trump was in office compared to other US presidents.

Beware the Brookfield industrial complex...

Posted
24 minutes ago, robosmith said:

And you're siding with a WAR CRIMINAL.

Do you know ANY GROWN MAN who was kidnapped?

Your memes are PATHETIC LIES.

Yawn

Posted (edited)
30 minutes ago, Shady said:

Which crimes?

 attempting to fraudulently overturn the 2020 presidential election and illegally retaining classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago estate.

Charges were deferred because he won the election

‘A president can be acting outside his duties and engaging in criminal conspiracies or even violent crimes, and is immune from prosecution while he’s in office,’ Devine says. ‘President Trump has absolute, unqualified immunity while he’s sitting as president. The most that could happen is, after the next election, a new government could decide to press charges.’ 

 

https://www.ibanet.org/trump-case-dismissed

Edited by Radiorum
Posted (edited)
21 minutes ago, ironstone said:

Does this qualify as a full blown war or is it more accurately characterized as a limited military operation at this point?

Sounds like you attended Putin University.  

Edited by TreeBeard
Posted
3 minutes ago, Radiorum said:

 attempting to fraudulently overturn the 2020 presidential election and illegally retaining classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago estate.

Charges were deferred because he won the election

Well, for starters, he never tried to fraudulently overturn the 2020 election anymore than any candidate does when they pursue any and every legal strategy to contest an election. 

Also, Trump was engaged in discussions with the National Archives to get back documents, as every President has access to this crap and then boxes junk up after office, this happens, as we seen with Biden who also retained classified documents. 

You guys want to ignore Biden though and ignore his charges being deferred, because he was too mentally incompetent to be charged. LOL

The whole thing was a political prosecution. 

 

 

Posted (edited)
39 minutes ago, User said:

However, you try to act like the barbaric terrorism of Hamas is no worse than Israel, so of course you think this action by Trump is the same as Putin's full-scale invasion of Ukraine to conquer it literally. 

What makes it very similar is the pretext of a threat to national security - the same tried and true pretext of many a military intruder.

Ironically enough Israel is living proof countries can annex away with impunity. Just declare it legal and Bob's your uncle.

China will have little problem floating a similar pretext to occupying Taiwan as Israel in Palestine...they were always there and just taking back what was taken from them. Putin does that too so....

In all cases and if not sooner than later it awllllll gets perfectly legalized!

 

 

Edited by eyeball

I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical,
a liberal, oh fanatical criminal

Posted
7 minutes ago, User said:

Well, for starters, he never tried to fraudulently overturn the 2020 election anymore than any candidate does when they pursue any and every legal strategy to contest an election. 

Also, Trump was engaged in discussions with the National Archives to get back documents, as every President has access to this crap and then boxes junk up after office, this happens, as we seen with Biden who also retained classified documents. 

Trump did not only pursue legal channels.

Trump refused to return the boxes of documents.

Posted
33 minutes ago, eyeball said:

Annexation is in vogue now.  If it's good enough for Putin and Trump it shouldn't be long until Jinping is in on it.

There'll probably be a cascade of annexations now. Who or what is there to prevent it? Three old tyrants nursing their old grudges and grievances? They'll be too busy encouraging it.

 

 

 

 

 

............... likely hegemony will (is?) become much more overt. 

Russia with the  near abroad countries.

China with countries bordering the South China Sea (nine dash line). 

The U.S. with South / North America 

 

 

 

Posted

Trump’s support of Putin and Russia is starting to make sense.

Trump would give Ukraine to Putin, and in return Putin would give Venezuela to Trump.

Venezuela is Russia's most important trading and military ally in Latin America. Russia recognized Nicolás Maduro as the president of Venezuela, instead of Juan Guaidó

This was a case of “You keep out of my face, I’ll keep out of yours.”

Putin gets his prize in Europe, and Trump gets trillions of dollars in oil.

You think it is a coincidence that Trump sent warships into the Caribbean one day after his meeting with Putin in Anchorage?

 

Posted
3 hours ago, TreeBeard said:

Would you support a Chinese invasion of Taiwan?  

Support? Meh...It wouldn't bother me...

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted

..............still waiting for the announcement that restoring Democracy was the motivation. 

Calling an election and inviting observers to make it legitimate would likely be a good strategic suggestion  by ...................someone? 

Election, then get the fk out! 

Never happen ............people can't be trusted! 

 

Posted
4 minutes ago, Radiorum said:

Trump’s support of Putin and Russia is starting to make sense.

Is that why he took control of Russian oil tankers and deprived Russia of the money they were using to kill Ukrainians? 

Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it? 

 

 

Posted
3 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

Russian oil tankers

I couldn't find anything substantiating this. What I did find was Venezuelan tankers under Russian protection

Can you please provide your source?

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      11,015
    • Most Online
      2,945

    Newest Member
    agackibal
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...