Epstein files drop shows Democrats covered for Bill Clinton

[West]

https://www.foxnews.com/us/new-epstein-documents-include-photos-bill-clinton-topless-hot-tub-socializing-michael-jackson

😫 🤒 SICK

[WestCanMan]

OMG, now robo has to admit that Clinton slept with thousands of underage girls, because there's a picture. Unless he's some kind of hypocrite 😱

[Nationalist]

As I'd predicted...the release of these files reveals nothing of consequence.

[TreeBeard]

Arrest him.  He can share a cell with the Pedo-in-chief.  

[West]

18 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

As I'd predicted...the release of these files reveals nothing of consequence.

The entire democrat party should be LOCKED UP

[herbie]

The desperation of whataboutism. 
Drag up the guy from 30+ years ago as if it has any relevance to the piece of shit doing the job today.
Cuz they're still jealous hr got a consensual blow job  and they never have.,...

[CdnFox]

2 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

OMG, now robo has to admit that Clinton slept with thousands of underage girls, because there's a picture. Unless he's some kind of hypocrite 😱

Amateur. He's at least 8 different kinds of hypocrite and is currently in classes to qualify for a 9th!  Pffft, shows how much you know. 

[West]

19 minutes ago, herbie said:

The desperation of whataboutism. 
Drag up the guy from 30+ years ago as if it has any relevance to the piece of shit doing the job today.
Cuz they're still jealous hr got a consensual blow job  and they never have.,...

Everyone including Clinton's wife knew he was a sex predator back in the 90s yet the Democrat establishment protected him. 

[Nationalist]

57 minutes ago, herbie said:

The desperation of whataboutism. 
Drag up the guy from 30+ years ago as if it has any relevance to the piece of shit doing the job today.
Cuz they're still jealous hr got a consensual blow job  and they never have.,...

Son...go back to your coloring book. The files show nothing we didn't already know.

Take your TDS pills too.

[robosmith]

2 hours ago, West said:

Everyone including Clinton's wife knew he was a sex predator back in the 90s yet the Democrat establishment protected him. 

What protected Bill was LACK OF EVIDENCE of anything but a BJ and the woman admitting it was CONSENSUAL.

Of course you're too stupid to understand the DIFFERENCE.

1 hour ago, Nationalist said:

Son...go back to your coloring book. The files show nothing we didn't already know.

Take your TDS pills too.

You're the one handing out Deification pills. LMAO

[User]

2 hours ago, herbie said:

The desperation of whataboutism. 
Drag up the guy from 30+ years ago as if it has any relevance to the piece of shit doing the job today.
Cuz they're still jealous hr got a consensual blow job  and they never have.,...

LOL, there is no relevance to Trump today either... 

 

[robosmith]

4 hours ago, Nationalist said:

As I'd predicted...the release of these files reveals nothing of consequence.

As I'd predicted, you're easily FOOLED by a partial release which FAILS to FOLLOW THE LAW.

Because you never care about the LAW and don't even know that's called CRIMINAL.

[User]

10 minutes ago, robosmith said:

As I'd predicted, you're easily FOOLED by a partial release which FAILS to FOLLOW THE LAW.

Because you never care about the LAW and don't even know that's called CRIMINAL.

No... I don't think you understand what CRIMINAL means at all. 

[Nationalist]

53 minutes ago, robosmith said:

As I'd predicted, you're easily FOOLED by a partial release which FAILS to FOLLOW THE LAW.

Because you never care about the LAW and don't even know that's called CRIMINAL.

Yes dear...

[Fluffypants]

7 hours ago, robosmith said:

As I'd predicted, you're easily FOOLED by a partial release which FAILS to FOLLOW THE LAW.

Because you never care about the LAW and don't even know that's called CRIMINAL.

You mean like when the Supreme Court abortion draft was leaked that you drooled over. Did that follow the LAW.

Did the Democrats release of all those Trump picture they selectively censored pictures of Trump with girls to make it look like they were hiding the faces of minors follow the LAW.

[Fluffypants]

7 hours ago, robosmith said:

What protected Bill was LACK OF EVIDENCE of anything but a BJ and the woman admitting it was CONSENSUAL.

Of course you're too stupid to understand the DIFFERENCE.

 

Lets not forget Juanita Broaddrick, Kathleen Willey, Paula Jones

[West]

8 hours ago, robosmith said:

As I'd predicted, you're easily FOOLED by a partial release which FAILS to FOLLOW THE LAW.

Because you never care about the LAW and don't even know that's called CRIMINAL.

Democrats are working overtime to again protect sexual deviant and predator Bill Clinton. This time they are attempting to stall and interfere with any attempt to bring Democrats to justice by going after Pam Bondi

[Venandi]

All of this is why I thought the data dump was a bad idea.

There was too much potential to hurt innocent acquaintances and victims alike. At some point you have to trust the DOJ to do the right thing. I'd accept the idea that different administrations have differing motivations wrt prosecutions, but I'm just cynical enough to believe that if Trump was culpable Biden would have outed him... same deal for Clinton under a Trump administration.

All of this has Roboduh demanding evidence to support wild allegations... you have to know something is up when that happens.

I don't believe a word of it and the redacted photos of Trump with the Miss Universe contestants stands as an example of what I mean.... it was a deliberate hit job that did no favours for Democrats in the credibility department. 

The alternative to trusting consecutive DOJs to do the right thing is to release everything with total transparency and let the chips fall where they may. Not only does it strike me as the only other viable option, it completely defangs those who would seek to vilify innocents for their own gain.

I would (again) point to the redacted photos of Trump... the only reason for those redactions was to falsely suggest that the girls were underage. While I'm glad it blew up in Democratic faces, it reinforces the notion that the release either shouldn't have been done at all, or should have been done with total and complete transparency.... nothing in between.

If I were going to release this I would never have done it incrementally.... IMO Trump got this badly wrong. 

[Radiorum]

12 hours ago, West said:

Everyone including Clinton's wife knew he was a sex predator back in the 90s yet the Democrat establishment protected him. 

This is a funny thing to say considering only Trump has had a verdict made against him for sexual abuse and not only do the Republicans protect him, they treat him like he is a god

12 hours ago, Nationalist said:

The files show nothing we didn't already know.

That's because it was so heavily redacted, including whole pages blacked out

[Fluffypants]

14 minutes ago, Radiorum said:

This is a funny thing to say considering only Trump has had a verdict made against him for sexual abuse and not only do the Republicans protect him, they treat him like he is a god

That's because it was so heavily redacted, including whole pages blacked out

From a crazy woman in a place where they had to change the law for him to even be put on civil trial and where there was 0 chance he would get a fair trial. On top of that had a judge literally claim he defamed her when he said he didn't rape her which literally was one of the charges made against him that came back not guilty and awarded her with a bunch of money.

[West]

22 minutes ago, Radiorum said:

This is a funny thing to say considering only Trump has had a verdict made against him for sexual abuse and not only do the Republicans protect him, they treat him like he is a god

That's because it was so heavily redacted, including whole pages blacked out

It helps when Clinton has the powerful people allowing him to commit heinous sex crimes and get away with it

[West]

[Radiorum]

13 minutes ago, West said:

It helps when Clinton has the powerful people allowing him to commit heinous sex crimes and get away with it

You realize this more accurately describes Trump?

[West]

6 minutes ago, Radiorum said:

You realize this more accurately describes Trump?

Clinton was credibly accused in the 1990s of raping at least three women. We know he rode the Lolita and pics have him frolicking with potentially underage girls. 

His wife, who later went on to hold powerful titles as a Senator, and within the Obama administration, viciously attacked these women. A group know as "Media Matters" for which many of the Democrat talking heads are apart of formed in part to provide propaganda on behalf of Bill Clinton. They don't call it the "Clinton machine" for nothing. 

Prior to that, when at least one of the rapes allegedly occurred, Clinton was the Governor of Arkansas. Hillary Clinton was a member of a high powered law firm in Little Rock.

Edited December 20, 2025 by West

[Radiorum]

9 minutes ago, West said:

Clinton was credibly accused in the 1990s of raping at least three women. We know he rode the Lolita and pics have him frolicking with potentially underage girls. 

His wife, who later went on to hold powerful titles as a Senator, and within the Obama administration, viciously attacked these women. A group know as "Media Matters" for which many of the Democrat talking heads are apart of formed in part to provide propaganda on behalf of Bill Clinton. They don't call it the "Clinton machine" for nothing. 

Prior to that, when at least one of the rapes allegedly occurred, Clinton was the Governor of Arkansas. Hillary Clinton was a member of a high powered law firm in Little Rock.

If anyone commits any crime, then the full weight of the law should be put on them.

What you seem to be implying is that if a Democrat commits that crime, then it absolves Republicans - like Trump - from the same crime. No, they all should be held accountable.

Now, this thread is about the Epstein files, so I will mention that Susie Wiles, in her Vanity Fair interviews, said that Bill Clinton is not in the files. She says she has read the Epstein files, and in her words:

 

Trump has claimed, without evidence, that Bill Clinton visited Epstein’s infamous private island, Little St. James, “supposedly 28 times.” “There is no evidence” those visits happened, according to Wiles; as for whether there was anything incriminating about Clinton in the files, “The president was wrong about that.”