What The Liberals Did To Canada

[WestCanMan]

2 hours ago, LinkSoul60 said:

Canadian's are still doing better than 2015 on the poverty line front;

How did that happen, weasel?

FYI it wasn't from increasing the number of jobs, or from wages increasing, it was due to covid spending. 

The rate suddenly dropped to 6.4% during covid and has been going back up ever since. 

[Goddess]

51 minutes ago, Moonbox said:

Oh I see....So in another thread, at another time, you gave me a link...supposedly.

The only time you are active on this forum is to attack my sources.  So, yes.  I've given you the links before.

And you know it.

53 minutes ago, Moonbox said:

Since you supposedly did this, you don't have to provide cites for anything you claim from committees anymore?

I do provide cites.  You just don't like them and want me to go hunt down another source that you will accept.

But the fact is - you reject, without consideration, ANY source that criticizes the Liberals in any way.

That is cult thinking.

100%

Cult thinking.

You can't - and you don't even try - to discuss facts or opinions.

You go directly to "I don't like this source - go find another one.  Nope, I don't like that one either, go find another one.  This source is also crap, go find another one."

It's a game.

Because you can't engage intellectually with facts, ideas or opinions.  So you just reject any source, any cite that doesn't say what you want it to say.

[LinkSoul60]

8 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

How did that happen, weasel?

FYI it wasn't from increasing the number of jobs, or from wages increasing, it was due to covid spending. 

The rate suddenly dropped to 6.4% during covid and has been going back up ever since. 

Are you confused about when '2015' was?

Yes, covid had a profound effect on affordability here in Canada and most world economies that is still lingering today.

 

[Moonbox]

1 minute ago, Goddess said:

The only time you are active on this forum is to attack my sources.  So, yes.  I've given you the links before.

Responding to you is a small part of my activity on this forum, but most of my responses to you are probably attacking your sources.  That's because your sources aren't usually just bad, but often absurdly, comically bad. 

Telling us Michael Ma met with Chinese agents before crossing the floor was the best recent example, with an anonymous social media post claiming it as your only evidence.  You have no credibility after seriously and unironically offering that sort of garbage, so spare me the tears when we continue to attack and question your sources.  That's the bed you've made.  

9 minutes ago, Goddess said:

Cult thinking.

You can't - and you don't even try - to discuss facts or opinions.

This is coming from someone who outright dismisses the mainstream media whenever it suits her, and considers copy-pasting her social media feeds the superior alternative.  🫠

[Goddess]

The federal Liberals have moved to turn the cameras off in a fourth Parliamentary committee this week.

The government house leader denies they are weaponizing their new majority status.

I've been watching committees for a lot of years and this has only been done occasionally when something being discussed is related to national security.

It is looking like the Liberals are going to move that all committees are out of camera, which makes government business inaccessible to the public and the media, as well as MPs on those committees cannot speak publicly about what goes on in them.

Accountability was squelched to near zero under the Liberal minority government, but at least the committees brought the more massive scandals to light - SNC Lavalin, SDTC, foreign interference, ArriveCan, PrescribeIT and so many more scandals.

Any one of these would destroyed any previous government. Without the public at least being aware, the malfeasance will only worsen.

Liberal cheerleaders - Some critical thinking, please.

First they stacked the committees and now - cameras "off".

Combine this with the ruthless push for censorship bills and we are quickly getting into banana republic, North Korea levels.

[Goddess]

16 minutes ago, Moonbox said:

This is coming from someone who outright dismisses the mainstream media whenever it suits her, and considers copy-pasting her social media feeds the superior alternative. 

I'm not discussing this with you further.

You cannot engage honestly to discuss actual facts, ideas and opinions.

"I don't like your source" is all you ever got.

Seriously dude or whatever you are - the Libs have just stacked committees and moved to turn off cameras and the majority gives them the votes to deny handing over documentation in corruption investigations by committee.

You got bigger problems here than "I don't like Goddess' sources."

Edited April 30 by Goddess

[ExFlyer]

On 4/29/2026 at 12:59 PM, CdnFox said:

I'll be able to do that anymore with the liberals taking all of the important ones in camera

 

On 4/29/2026 at 1:01 PM, CdnFox said:

You sea lioning again there big guy

 If you disagree with her then it IS your job to support your own position. We've been over this. 

You should be able to find the info OR info to disprove it easily.  Use google, use AI, use whatever.  There's no excuse these days other than you're being a dishonest poster yet again. 

HA HA HA

All the bltching and moaning and whining and crying and trying to lay blame and it gets you what???

DIDDLEY  SH!T!!! 

 

Liberals are still in power.

Conservatives are crossing the floor.

And PP is losing Canadian public support.

And Conservatives are still in second place...after 13 years and a few more to come LOL LOL LOL

 

 

[Goddess]

40 minutes ago, Moonbox said:

Telling us Michael Ma met with Chinese agents before crossing the floor was the best recent example, with an anonymous social media post claiming it as your only evidence.  You have no credibility after seriously and unironically offering that sort of garbage, so spare me the tears when we continue to attack and question your sources.  That's the bed you've made.  

I will go through this one more time for those unfamiliar with the chain of events.

• A week before Ma crossed the floor, he posted on his official facebook page (not anonymous source), a meeting with a CCP-linked organization.  The post was screenshotted by independent journalists tracking his CCP connections.
• The meeting was also entered into the records that all political parties keep of which meetings and with whom MPs are meeting with.
• Moonface rejects those sources.
• Ma deleted the post after crossing the floor.
• Ma is then given a right-hand position by Carney at talks with Beijing about Canada participating in establishing a New World Order with China.
• Ma then uses CCP talking points in a committee meeting to infer that slave labor is not being practiced in China.

You are all welcome to make of this whatever you want.

Moon clearly rejects all this.  And he will go on rejecting all Liberal Party connections to CCP-linked organizations, because he only accepts CBC headlines as proof of anything and he is in a cult, so emotionally, he has to defend the Liberal party to the point of id10cy.

 

Edited April 30 by Goddess

[Legato]

4 minutes ago, ExFlyer said:

 

 

 

Hayzeus man you must weigh at least 50Lbs. Time to get that weight off.

[CdnFox]

12 hours ago, LinkSoul60 said:

Sure you did, and the back peddling isn't working kiddo.  Affordable my äss.

 

:LOL there's NO backpedaling.   Vancouver in 2015 was expensive but affordable   I've said that from the start, i'm saying it now, i provided tonnes of evidence, and your entire argument was "if they can't afford a house in the british props then it's not affordable" which is simply assinine    And all of this was pointed out to you and i even used stats from your own links to show why you were wrong  

Lie harder cry harder, it's the liberal way  

[CdnFox]

8 minutes ago, ExFlyer said:

 

HA HA HA

All the bltching and moaning and whining and crying and trying to lay blame and it gets you what???

 

LOL what was it SUPPOSED to get me?  I mean he looks stupid now and everyone seems to agree but honestly people thought he was stupid before he showed up, so no gain  

When you grow up and get out there in the real world (assuming you ever leave your mommie's basement) you'll learn about adult conversations 

A better question is what do YOU get out of repeating the same posts endlessly and screaming  "LOOOZER!! LOOOOOOZR" constantly till you poop your pants   

13 minutes ago, Goddess said:

I will go through this one more time for those unfamiliar with the chain of events.

• A week before Ma crossed the floor, he posted on his official facebook page (not anonymous source), a meeting with a CCP-linked organization.  The post was screenshotted by independent journalists tracking his CCP connections.
• The meeting was also entered into the records that all political parties keep of which meetings and with whom MPs are meeting with.
• Moonface rejects those sources.
• Ma deleted the post after crossing the floor.
• Ma is then given a right-hand position by Carney at talks with Beijing about Canada participating in establishing a New World Order with China.
• Ma then uses CCP talking points in a committee meeting to infer that slave labor is not being practiced in China.

You are all welcome to make of this whatever you want.

Moon clearly rejects all this.  And he will go on rejecting all Liberal Party connections to CCP-linked organizations, because he only accepts CBC headlines as proof of anything and he is in a cult, so emotionally, he has to defend the Liberal party to the point of id10cy.

 

There is no length that the liberals and their supporters won't go to when it comes to lies and self delusion in order to prop up their cult leader and avoid any criticism

[herbie]

What the Liberals did, minus the lies....

 

[CdnFox]

1 minute ago, herbie said:

What the Liberals did, minus the lies....

 

Buried Canada in a repressed and depressed economy while destroying the hopes and opportunity of an entire future generation while siphoning money into their own pockets and eating $2,000 a plate airline food?

Yeah. We know

[WestCanMan]

1 hour ago, LinkSoul60 said:

Are you confused about when '2015' was?

Yes, covid had a profound effect on affordability here in Canada and most world economies that is still lingering today.

 

Are you confused about when 2020 was, relative to 2015 and 2026, dummy?

Again, like I said: 

• How did that happen, weasel?

  FYI it wasn't from increasing the number of jobs, or from wages increasing, it was due to covid spending. 

  The rate suddenly dropped to 6.4% during covid and has been going back up ever since.

Just so we're clear, "covid" was from 2020-2022, and 2020-2022 came between 2015 and 2026, ret4rd. 

So the number of people living under the poverty line dropped sharply under covid, when minimum-wage earners were getting paid more to stay at home than they were to work, and has been going back up again ever since. 

And FYI I don't have a problem with unemployed people living below the poverty line. 

[WestCanMan]

56 minutes ago, Goddess said:

The federal Liberals have moved to turn the cameras off in a fourth Parliamentary committee this week.

The government house leader denies they are weaponizing their new majority status.

You got a down-arrow for that.

One of our resident cultists wants everything done behind closed doors because.... You know he won't say. 

[CdnFox]

4 hours ago, LinkSoul60 said:

Canadian's are still doing better than 2015 on the poverty line front;

We're not and literally everyone agrees 

Quote

 

https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/daily-quotidien/210323/t003a-eng.htm

https://madeinca.ca/poverty-statistics-canada/

Data from the last two censuses and other surveys on poverty in Canada show that the country’s poverty rate has decreased. The overall poverty rate has fallen from 14.5% in 2015 to 8.1% in 2020. However, there are still groups of people who are far more likely to live in poverty or low income so there is more work to be done to address poverty across all groups in Canada.]

 

Kid, trudeau changed the definition of poverty in 2018 and it massively reduced the number of 'poor'. 

In 2018, the Trudeau government formally adopted the Market Basket Measure (MBM) as Canada's official definition of poverty, a significant shift in how poverty is measured in the country. 

trudeau changes definition of poverty - Google Search

Poverty didn't get better, the definition got better.

Also 2015 was an anomaly.  IN 2014 it was 11.3 and 2016 it was 12 and change

poverty rate in canada 2014 - Google Search

poverty rate in canada 2016 - Google Search

The 2015 number was created by Justin Trudeau in 2016 To create a baseline in his artificially High because he needed a high number to compare his future numbers to.

Then he changed the definition so that tons of people who were poor before now did not qualify

 

So nice try  

 

Here's some other proof things are worse

As of March 2025, Canadian food bank usage reached an all-time high of roughly 2.2 million monthly visits, a 99% increase since 2019. The highest demographic groups seeking assistance include market renters (approx. 70%), children (33%), and a rapidly rising number of employed individuals (1 in 5 users). 

CBC +3

Key Poverty Trends (2026 Data Analysis)

• National Poverty Rate: The rate was 11% in 2024, essentially unchanged from 11.1% in 2023, but sharply higher than the 7% recorded in 2020.
• Income Decline: Median after-tax income dropped by nearly $2,000, from $77,400 in 2020 to $75,500 in 2024, adjusted for inflation.
• Rising Food Insecurity: Roughly 9.8 million people (about 24% of the population) reported household food insecurity in 2024.

 

CBC +1

 

So even with the new definition the reality is you cherry picked your numbers and the number of people living in poverty is about the same as it was under harper except that it would be about 30% higher if we still use the same definition we used during harper's time

 

There's more poor people and the gap between poor and rich is growing

Edited April 30 by CdnFox

[ExFlyer]

1 hour ago, CdnFox said:

LOL what was it SUPPOSED to get me?

 

"LOOOZER!! LOOOOOOZR" constantly till you poop your pants   

 

HA HA HA

Nope, would never try to "get" you...I. already got you...I am in your head...tap dancing  LOL

Who remembers or cares about second place??

Second place is for LOSERS  and only those LOSERS keep on keeping on

Poop my pants???  Keeping whining for 13 years only proves you have nothing in your life and all you can do is poop you pants LOL LOL LOL

[ExFlyer]

1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

You got a down-arrow for that.

One of our resident cultists wants everything done behind closed doors because.... You know he won't say. 

Naw, just love giving the little arrows...it pi$$es you guys off so much you keep having to bring it up LOL

13 + years of you guys crying about being in second place has gotten you where?? Oh yeah, second place

"wants everything done behind closed doors"? oh hell no!!! I love reminding you that you are all LOSERS...second place LOSERS for over a decade.

Edited April 30 by ExFlyer

[LinkSoul60]

1 hour ago, CdnFox said:

:LOL there's NO backpedaling.   Vancouver in 2015 was expensive but affordable   I've said that from the start, i'm saying it now, i provided tonnes of evidence, and your entire argument was "if they can't afford a house in the british props then it's not affordable" which is simply assinine    And all of this was pointed out to you and i even used stats from your own links to show why you were wrong  

Lie harder cry harder, it's the liberal way  

Sure Kid... you've provided nothing and can't provide nothing, because it doesn't exist.  Interesting how you say you've provided 'tonnes' but can't find a single one to prove your defence of your political hero.

There's no question that your little mind is incredibly complicated, which is a job for a psychologist. In this realm, you're just a simple minded political hack who can only see contempt for anything left, liberal, and hope for Canada faltering.

🤡

[ExFlyer]

1 hour ago, Legato said:

Hayzeus man you must weigh at least 50Lbs. Time to get that weight off.

???? Is that some sort of retort??

Probably the lamest one you posted so far ....LOSER LOL

[LinkSoul60]

1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

Are you confused about when 2020 was, relative to 2015 and 2026, dummy?

Again, like I said: 

• How did that happen, weasel?

  FYI it wasn't from increasing the number of jobs, or from wages increasing, it was due to covid spending. 

  The rate suddenly dropped to 6.4% during covid and has been going back up ever since.

Just so we're clear, "covid" was from 2020-2022, and 2020-2022 came between 2015 and 2026, ret4rd. 

So the number of people living under the poverty line dropped sharply under covid, when minimum-wage earners were getting paid more to stay at home than they were to work, and has been going back up again ever since. 

And FYI I don't have a problem with unemployed people living below the poverty line. 

I'm talking about 2015 clown, and yes I'm aware of the covid years and how affordability here and elsewhere became more pronounced as economies worked back from the pandemic.

[LinkSoul60]

1 hour ago, CdnFox said:

We're not and literally everyone agrees 

Kid, trudeau changed the definition of poverty in 2018 and it massively reduced the number of 'poor'. 

In 2018, the Trudeau government formally adopted the Market Basket Measure (MBM) as Canada's official definition of poverty, a significant shift in how poverty is measured in the country. 

trudeau changes definition of poverty - Google Search

Poverty didn't get better, the definition got better.

Also 2015 was an anomaly.  IN 2014 it was 11.3 and 2016 it was 12 and change

poverty rate in canada 2014 - Google Search

poverty rate in canada 2016 - Google Search

The 2015 number was created by Justin Trudeau in 2016 To create a baseline in his artificially High because he needed a high number to compare his future numbers to.

Then he changed the definition so that tons of people who were poor before now did not qualify

 

So nice try  

 

Here's some other proof things are worse

As of March 2025, Canadian food bank usage reached an all-time high of roughly 2.2 million monthly visits, a 99% increase since 2019. The highest demographic groups seeking assistance include market renters (approx. 70%), children (33%), and a rapidly rising number of employed individuals (1 in 5 users). 

CBC +3

Key Poverty Trends (2026 Data Analysis)

• National Poverty Rate: The rate was 11% in 2024, essentially unchanged from 11.1% in 2023, but sharply higher than the 7% recorded in 2020.
• Income Decline: Median after-tax income dropped by nearly $2,000, from $77,400 in 2020 to $75,500 in 2024, adjusted for inflation.
• Rising Food Insecurity: Roughly 9.8 million people (about 24% of the population) reported household food insecurity in 2024.

 

CBC +1

 

So even with the new definition the reality is you cherry picked your numbers and the number of people living in poverty is about the same as it was under harper except that it would be about 30% higher if we still use the same definition we used during harper's time

 

There's more poor people and the gap between poor and rich is growing

LMAO...  it was an anomaly and not Harpers fault!!!  But no covid anomaly for Trudeau was there, or Carney and anomaly of US tariff attacks is there....because they're liberals 😂. 

Obviously facts elude you when they don't flatter your hero or right wing logic.  What didn't you understand of the Stats Canada data?

[Moonbox]

4 hours ago, Goddess said:

I'm not discussing this with you further.

You cannot engage honestly to discuss actual facts, ideas and opinions.

I can, but that generally doesn't include do-your-own-research Karens regurgitating their social media feeds.  I'm not too worried if that bugs you, and I'll continue to make fun of you for your garbage posting.  Feel free to ignore me.  I won't mind not hearing back from you.  🙃

4 hours ago, Goddess said:

You got bigger problems here than "I don't like Goddess' sources."

There are lots of bigger problems to worry about, but that doesn't make Goddess puking her social media feeds and dumping "links" everywhere any less ridiculous.  

Edited April 30 by Moonbox

[WestCanMan]

4 hours ago, herbie said:

What the Liberals did, minus the lies....

Did that ret4rd in your video just complain about "Poilievre's lying" in defence of Mark Carney? 😂

He should be slapping himself in the side of the head. Ask that stupid little b1tch if he thinks that 
"Carney played a role in moving Brookfield".

[Goddess]

2 hours ago, Moonbox said:

I'll continue to make fun of you for your garbage posting.  Feel free to ignore me.  I won't mind not hearing back from you.

If you wanna obsessively follow me around the board like your 12-yr-old friend, knock yourself out.