What The Liberals Did To Canada

[CdnFox]

37 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

I'm not sure how this turned into a debate for you that you've now won.  

You said something stupid, then i said something smart. You doubled down on the stupid, i stayed with the smart. 

That's like 90 percent of our conversations. 

[LinkSoul60]

11 hours ago, CdnFox said:

You said something stupid, then i said something smart. You doubled down on the stupid, i stayed with the smart. 

That's like 90 percent of our conversations. 

I was talking about constant complainers like you and immigration.  Point out what was 'stupid', other than you.

On cue little Fxx has to meltdown and think he's 'won' something... 🤡

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, LinkSoul60 said:

I was talking about constant complainers like you and immigration.

So..... your claim was that you didn't attack anyone and now you're admitting you attacked someone. 

Sigh. Who helps you put your pants on in the morning?  It obviously is beyond YOUR skills. 

You say something stupid, i say something accurate and factual, you double down on the stupid.  Like i said. same as always

[Goddess]

Liberal supporters:  "Let's give these guys another chance!"  🤡

And somehow, this is all Trump's and the Conservatives fault. 🤪  You see the mental gymnastics here every day.

 

[CdnFox]

9 minutes ago, Goddess said:

Liberal supporters:  "Let's give these guys another chance!"  🤡

And somehow, this is all Trump's and the Conservatives fault. 🤪  You see the mental gymnastics here every day.

 

And Rogers just announced that it's laying off 25,000 people.

Our economic growth has been hovering just barely a millimeter above recession levels for almost 2 years. You've unemployment is absolutely unbelievable, it's practically criminal. Kids can't get a job. 

And from the way carney is talking and the US is replying it's quite obvious the Carney is aware that he will not be able to get a decent deal with America for trade. And he's trying to prep the Canadian public to make it sound like that's noble somehow. He will put his incompetence forward as being trump's fault and he is the savoir because he 'stood up to him' when in reality he's done everything wrong negotiation wise and was the wrong man for the job. 

[Goddess]

10 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

And he's trying to prep the Canadian public to make it sound like that's noble somehow.

YUP.

CBC just had a panel talking about some "poll" that shows the majority of Canadians don't even want a trade deal with the US now.

So when Carney doesn't get a deal, he can say, Canadians didn't want one.

13 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

in reality he's done everything wrong negotiation wise and was the wrong man for the job. 

He's sh!tting the bed all over the place.

[Goddess]

The Liberals are using their new power in committee meetings to move that meetings take place out of camera (which they call "in camera").

They did it last night in the Ethics Committee and now today at the Health Committee meeting.

That means the public and the press can't see the meetings.  And no parts of the meeting can be divulged by the members, nor are transcripts released.

The Liberal Party can now operate in complete secrecy and darkness.

 

1. What is an in camera meeting?

   Usually, a meeting or part of a meeting held in camera is confidential and only committee members, committee staff and invited witnesses may attend. Neither the public nor the media is permitted, the proceedings are not broadcast and the transcript is not released to the public. Minutes of in camera meetings are publicly available, but certain information usually found in the minutes of committee meetings is not included to preserve the confidentiality of the proceedings.

   On occasion, a committee may decide to hold an in camera meeting to deal with certain matters, consider a draft report or hear a confidential testimony. It is up to the committee to decide whether its proceedings should be held in public or in camera.

   Divulging any part of the proceedings of an in camera meeting may constitute a breach of parliamentary privilege.

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, Goddess said:

The Liberals are using their new power in committee meetings to move that meetings take place out of camera (which they call "in camera").

They did it last night in the Ethics Committee and now today at the Health Committee meeting.

That means the public and the press can't see the meetings.  And no parts of the meeting can be divulged by the members, nor are transcripts released.

The Liberal Party can now operate in complete secrecy and darkness.

 

1. What is an in camera meeting?

   Usually, a meeting or part of a meeting held in camera is confidential and only committee members, committee staff and invited witnesses may attend. Neither the public nor the media is permitted, the proceedings are not broadcast and the transcript is not released to the public. Minutes of in camera meetings are publicly available, but certain information usually found in the minutes of committee meetings is not included to preserve the confidentiality of the proceedings.

   On occasion, a committee may decide to hold an in camera meeting to deal with certain matters, consider a draft report or hear a confidential testimony. It is up to the committee to decide whether its proceedings should be held in public or in camera.

   Divulging any part of the proceedings of an in camera meeting may constitute a breach of parliamentary privilege.

Yup. And no surprise there. 

They can also shut down discussion and just vote how they want and the opposition can't do a thing about it. 

And they will run amuck and bleed this country for all it's worth and in the end blame trump (and possibly harper). 

By the time Canadians (well most canadians) realize how bad they've been screwed these people will be long gone and a new liberal leader will be saying "Sure the last gov't was crap but i just got here, can't blame me"

[I am Groot]

On 4/27/2026 at 5:49 PM, LinkSoul60 said:

We need immigration, period.  You should look harder.... which really wasn't hard to find;

Yes, I can see Google didn't put much effort into it.

These are stale arguments that never stood up to much inspection. A declining birthrate? Yeah? So what? Birth rates hae declined at other points in time. We have too many people in this country as it is. Shortage of workers? At the rate AI and robotics are going we're going to have a massive surplus of workers before too long. Especially among the unskilled and semi skilled that the Liberals are bringing in. Besides, stop the immigration, or massively cut it, and the cost of housing drops and wages rise, and presto, young Canadians have more economic security and are more likely to start families.

Besides, if you think the only way to expand the economy is to jam in more people that's just a ponzi scheme that is doomed to faile eventually. This is a great time to get off that track as AI and robotics improve dramatically.

On 4/27/2026 at 5:49 PM, LinkSoul60 said:

I've never said things are "peachy' but do believe a lot, or most Canadian's are also mature enough not to refer our country as Canuckistan.

The majority of people in this country now were not born here. As the Liberals continue to pour in more people from places in the world with Low IQs and backward social habits and values, things are only going to get worse. Two thirds of the people in public housing are foreign born. Most of those showing up at food banks are foreigners. I wouldn't be surprised if most of those on welfare are foreign born too. We are importing poor people, giving them quicky citizenship, and watching them vote in great numbers for whatever political party offers them the most free stuff.

Which is how the Liberals keep getting elected.

Edited April 28 by I am Groot

[eyeball]

4 hours ago, Goddess said:

The Liberals are using their new power in committee meetings to move that meetings take place out of camera (which they call "in camera")

Which means in chambers.

In private, secret, just the way politicians like it.

[Goddess]

Everything the Liberals were warned about when they announced they were lowering standards and opening up the CAF to permanent residents.

LINK won't embed for some reason, sorry guys......you can read the article if you google it but the leaked document is behind a paywall.

From the leaked document, authored by Lt. Col. M.R. Kieley, titled “Initial Observations — Impact of Changes to Canadian Armed Forces Recruiting Policies at Basic Training Over 2025.” , the report details a Quebec Officer Training platoon with 83% permanent residents (some had only been in Canada for 3 months) that was a disaster in training etiquette, expectations and processes.  Inability to communicate due to low language level skills, lack of respect for superiors and cultural incompatibility.  

 

The Quebec platoon saw fewer than one in two recruits graduate, while allegations of racial discrimination were made in multiple directions, from candidates against staff and between candidates of opposing ethnic blocs themselves. Additionally, command saw “challenges” in training permanent residents as they lacked “respect towards women” peers and superiors.

“For many candidates it is the first time they have lived with members of a different sex, and for some it is also the first time they have been expected to treat women as their peers,” explained the confidential report.

“Platoons are also reporting inter-candidate cultural frustrations, with lack of respect towards women being the most common concern.”

[Goddess]

I hope all you Liberal pom-pom wavers really love the New World Order you voted for, because you won't be able to say 💩 about it soon.

 

EXCLUSIVE: CBC archived negative responses to its Humboldt coverage, forwarded them to security specialist

ATIP records reveal CBC staff archived abusive and critical X replies and escalated them to senior editors and security personnel. Internal records also show executives discussed “flagging” an independent creator after he interviewed a grieving parent critical of the public broadcaster.

[eyeball]

2 hours ago, Goddess said:

I hope all you Liberal pom-pom wavers really love the New World Order you voted for,

Speaking for myself, I'm finding the good ol' disordered world is way more entertaining.

2 hours ago, Goddess said:

...because you won't be able to say 💩 about it soon.

Hah, just watch me.

[LinkSoul60]

6 hours ago, I am Groot said:

Yes, I can see Google didn't put much effort into it.

These are stale arguments that never stood up to much inspection. A declining birthrate? Yeah? So what? Birth rates hae declined at other points in time. We have too many people in this country as it is. Shortage of workers? At the rate AI and robotics are going we're going to have a massive surplus of workers before too long. Especially among the unskilled and semi skilled that the Liberals are bringing in. Besides, stop the immigration, or massively cut it, and the cost of housing drops and wages rise, and presto, young Canadians have more economic security and are more likely to start families.

Besides, if you think the only way to expand the economy is to jam in more people that's just a ponzi scheme that is doomed to faile eventually. This is a great time to get off that track as AI and robotics improve dramatically.

Not stale arguments...it's fact. A 15 year declining birthrate means we will have less Canadian born people to fill job vacancies as we age.  If we don't have enough people to fill jobs then we need immigration. AI isn't going to solve the worker shortages that we have in healthcare and skilled trades, but do agree... AI has and will eliminate jobs, and likely a lot of them. Which ones, how many and when remain to be seen. Immigration was cut and will be lower for the next 3 years. The numbers re smaller but it can't, and won't go to zero.

6 hours ago, I am Groot said:

The majority of people in this country now were not born here. As the Liberals continue to pour in more people from places in the world with Low IQs and backward social habits and values, things are only going to get worse. Two thirds of the people in public housing are foreign born. Most of those showing up at food banks are foreigners. I wouldn't be surprised if most of those on welfare are foreign born too. We are importing poor people, giving them quicky citizenship, and watching them vote in great numbers for whatever political party offers them the most free stuff.

Which is how the Liberals keep getting elected.

No way... the majority of Canadian's were born in Canada, not elsewhere. In another 10 - 15 years I'll agree with you.  Do you have any facts or data that says it's all foreign born people who are poor and living off our social programs, or is it just a guess? 

The conservatives thought the same during their time so all is equal. 

[I am Groot]

9 hours ago, LinkSoul60 said:

Not stale arguments...it's fact. A 15 year declining birthrate means we will have less Canadian born people to fill job vacancies as we age.

You are assuming those jobs will even be there. I have no such confidence. Robots and AI will soon take over all retail jobs, just to start, from stocking shelves to watching over people and recording their purchases. They'll be able to take over a lot of construction jobs, too. To say nothing of driving and delivery jobs. And that's just at the low end. They're already displacing accountants and software engineers. They're doing away with a lot of junior lawyers and even more administrators.

9 hours ago, LinkSoul60 said:

 AI isn't going to solve the worker shortages that we have in healthcare and skilled trades,

Neither is immigration. We need to train our own. There are more than sufficient qualified applicants for every nursing school and medical school opening. We need to expand the schools.You know what most of those coming in under the skilled trades are 'skilled' at? Cooking.

9 hours ago, LinkSoul60 said:

No way... the majority of Canadian's were born in Canada, not elsewhere. In another 10 - 15 years I'll agree with you.

I said the majority of people here. I'm counting the foreign workers/students and the millions who overstayed their visas who are not leaving and who I expect the government to eventually just give permanent resident status to.

9 hours ago, LinkSoul60 said:

 Do you have any facts or data that says it's all foreign born people who are poor and living off our social programs, or is it just a guess? 

You  know our government does its best not to give us any information like that. But t he people coming here are largely the same as those coming into Europe, and the data from places like the UK, Norway, Denmark, Sweden, Germany, etc., are pretty damned clear, especially for those who arrived from Muslim countries.

Every now and then some data does get out from Canada, though.

This is way out of date. And the quality of those coming to Canada plummeted in the last fifteen years, but even so, it does demonstrate it's not just a guess.

 

[I am Groot]

This is from Toronto's public housing. Only a quarter of those in public housing are white. According to Stats Canada, based on the 2016 census, 80+% of visible minorities are immigrants. Most of the remainder are their children. That number is certainly higher now.

 

 

Edited April 29 by I am Groot

[LinkSoul60]

1 hour ago, I am Groot said:

You are assuming those jobs will even be there. I have no such confidence. Robots and AI will soon take over all retail jobs, just to start, from stocking shelves to watching over people and recording their purchases. They'll be able to take over a lot of construction jobs, too. To say nothing of driving and delivery jobs. And that's just at the low end. They're already displacing accountants and software engineers. They're doing away with a lot of junior lawyers and even more administrators.

Yes jobs are going to be there in retail, hospitality, manufacturing, healthcare and trades. Robots aren't going to be taking over trades, construction or a number of other labor intensive jobs in our lifetime.  Maybe at some point but not in the foreseeable future.  Again, I don't disagree that AI will have a profound effect on labour, but that's not across every sector.

1 hour ago, I am Groot said:

I said the majority of people here. I'm counting the foreign workers/students and the millions who overstayed their visas who are not leaving and who I expect the government to eventually just give permanent resident status to.

Are there stats to back that up?  I don't think that's the case and would be very surprised if it were fact.  

1 hour ago, I am Groot said:

You  know our government does its best not to give us any information like that. But t he people coming here are largely the same as those coming into Europe, and the data from places like the UK, Norway, Denmark, Sweden, Germany, etc., are pretty damned clear, especially for those who arrived from Muslim countries.

Every now and then some data does get out from Canada, though.

This is way out of date. And the quality of those coming to Canada plummeted in the last fifteen years, but even so, it does demonstrate it's not just a guess.

 

That chart is from 16 years ago.  So, no facts to back those comments up, just believing our government isn't straight up.  

AI Overview

Based on 2023 Statistics Canada data, the overall employment rate for core working-age immigrants (aged 25-54) in Canada was approximately 82.6%. Employment rates vary by duration of residency, with 77.8% of recent arrivals (5 years or less) employed, rising to 84.5% for those in Canada over 10 years, indicating strong labour market integration over time.

• Recent Immigrant Employment: Recent immigrants often see rapid employment gains; 42.5% of working-age immigrants not employed at arrival found work within three months.
• Job Quality Challenges: While employment rates are high, over-education is common. In 2021, only 44% of immigrants who arrived within the previous decade worked in jobs matching their education level, compared to 64% of Canadian-born workers.
• Economic Contribution: Immigration has been crucial to labor growth, contributing to 79.9% of the growth in Canada's labour force between 2016 and 2021.
• Sector Representation: Immigrants are heavily represented in key sectors, accounting for 34.1% of professionals in scientific/technical services and 37.8% in transportation/warehousing.

[Goddess]

12 hours ago, eyeball said:

Hah, just watch me.

Hah, you'll do whatever the CBC and the Liberal government tells you to, just like you always do.

[Goddess]

10 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

AI Overview

AI scans media reports, so you only get government propaganda.

AI tools like ChatGPT and Gemini include a disclaimer that the information they find scanning the internet may not always be accurate. If someone was researching a topic that they didn’t know anything about, how would they know how to confirm the information as truth? As AI tools become smarter and gain more widespread use in daily life, so do the stakes for the accuracy and dependability of using this evolving technology.

 

Understanding AI Reliability

AI systems, particularly large language models (LLMs), generate responses by analyzing vast datasets and identifying patterns within the data. While this allows AI to provide information quickly and efficiently, accuracy in AI does not guarantee truthfulness. AI predictions or outputs may align with the data it has seen but can still be misleading or incomplete due to missing context, biases, or unforeseen external factors. 

15 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

Are there stats to back that up?

 

Watch the committee meetings.

Groot is correct.

Canadian visas for 2.9 million temporary residents expire in 2025 and 2026

This has cost us over $3 billion in the last few years.

This has all been posted here before. 

 

[Moonbox]

4 minutes ago, Goddess said:

Watch the committee meetings.

Ah yes, the committee meetings you can't reference, post or source for us.  🫠

[LinkSoul60]

2 minutes ago, Goddess said:

AI scans media reports, so you only get government propaganda.

AI tools like ChatGPT and Gemini include a disclaimer that the information they find scanning the internet may not always be accurate. If someone was researching a topic that they didn’t know anything about, how would they know how to confirm the information as truth? As AI tools become smarter and gain more widespread use in daily life, so do the stakes for the accuracy and dependability of using this evolving technology.

 

Understanding AI Reliability

AI systems, particularly large language models (LLMs), generate responses by analyzing vast datasets and identifying patterns within the data. While this allows AI to provide information quickly and efficiently, accuracy in AI does not guarantee truthfulness. AI predictions or outputs may align with the data it has seen but can still be misleading or incomplete due to missing context, biases, or unforeseen external factors. 

 

Watch the committee meetings.

Groot is correct.

Canadian visas for 2.9 million temporary residents expire in 2025 and 2026

This has cost us over $3 billion in the last few years.

This has all been posted here before. 

 

You're a wealth of information.... but rarely stay on topic in your quest to show 'look what the liberals did!'

2.9M people isn't going to change the fact the majority of Canadian's are born in Canada, and certainly doesn't confirm they're all in low income housing, at food banks and syphoning off our social programs.

I have better things to do than watch committee meetings so will rely on you for those updates 👍

[Goddess]

12 minutes ago, Moonbox said:

Ah yes, the committee meetings you can't reference, post or source for us.  🫠

I already told you to find the specific government channels on YouTube or CPAC.  It's not rocket science.

MPs from both parties post snippets of committee meetings on their personal channels, as well.  Pick an MP you like and follow them.

If you can't figure out how to do that, I don't really know what to tell you.

Pick any committee and watch it.  Or don't.  Fuque you people are lazy.

List of Committees

Edited April 29 by Goddess

[Moonbox]

8 minutes ago, Goddess said:

I already told you to find the specific government channels on YouTube or CPAC.  It's not rocket science.

I'm not interested in sitting around watching committees debate for countless hours.  I'm interested in the material you keep telling us you've seen, but can't actually cite.  It's not my job to back up your claims.  It's yours.  🙃

[CdnFox]

22 minutes ago, Goddess said:

I already told you to find the specific government channels on YouTube or CPAC.  It's not rocket science.

MPs from both parties post snippets of committee meetings on their personal channels, as well.  Pick an MP you like and follow them.

If you can't figure out how to do that, I don't really know what to tell you.

Pick any committee and watch it.  Or don't.  Fuque you people are lazy.

List of Committees

I'll be able to do that anymore with the liberals taking all of the important ones in camera

[CdnFox]

13 minutes ago, Moonbox said:

I'm not interested in sitting around watching committees debate for countless hours.  I'm interested in the material you keep telling us you've seen, but can't actually cite.  It's not my job to back up your claims.  It's yours.  🙃

You sea lioning again there big guy

 If you disagree with her then it IS your job to support your own position. We've been over this. 

You should be able to find the info OR info to disprove it easily.  Use google, use AI, use whatever.  There's no excuse these days other than you're being a dishonest poster yet again.