What The Liberals Did To Canada

[eyeball]

46 minutes ago, Goddess said:

Hah, you'll do whatever the CBC and the Liberal government tells you to, just like you always do.

And you'll still obediently stop at red lights.

[Goddess]

10 minutes ago, Moonbox said:

I'm not interested in sitting around watching committees debate for countless hours.

Ya, we know.  It's why you're so uninformed.

 

11 minutes ago, Moonbox said:

I'm interested in the material you keep telling us you've seen, but can't actually cite.

You're a liar and everyone here can see it.

I've posted hundreds of snippets of committee clips here and you reject them all because they're on YouTube channels or MP X accounts.

I explained that most of these are official government channels - holy HELL, Carney just released his "fireside chat" on his YouTube channel!!  Some of them are media accounts, some accounts are the actual industries being discussed in the committee.

You still reject them.

So you can either watch the snippets I post or you can watch the entire proceeding.

I'm not here to wipe your a$$.

[LinkSoul60]

4 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

 If you disagree with her then it IS your job to support your own position. We've been over this.

Maybe he can do what you typically do.... pull it out of your äss, say it three times, then pretend it's real.

We've been over this...

[Goddess]

3 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

You sea lioning again there big guy

 If you disagree with her then it IS your job to support your own position. We've been over this. 

You should be able to find the info OR info to disprove it easily.  Use google, use AI, use whatever.  There's no excuse these days other than you're being a dishonest poster yet again. 

The fact is he doesn't WANT to be better informed.  None of them do.

And I'm tiring of the games.

There's too many of them now on this forum who contribute nothing and just post insults and garbage.  Pages & pages of it.  They are here every day just to follow me and you and a few others around, downvote every post, which refutes nothing.

In the last while, I've really been struck by how utterly stoopid some are here.  They know nothing about anything.  It's why they can't discuss.  They just follow the people around who DO know and muck up threads.

[CdnFox]

3 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

Maybe he can do what you typically do.... pull it out of your äss, say it three times, then pretend it's real.

 

Or perhaps he'll just ignore the fact it was posted several times and sea lion about it like you do. 

Quote

We've been over this...

Yes, you lie frequently so it comes up regular  

People frequently post links for you and then you ignore them. Hell i even used data from YOUR OWN LINKS THAT YOU POSTED and you claimed 

And your links are never relevant.  And when that's pointed out you simply ignore it, 

And this is a common tactic on the left. 

 

[LinkSoul60]

2 minutes ago, Goddess said:

n the last while, I've really been struck by how utterly stoopid some are here.  They know nothing about anything.  It's why they can't discuss.  They just follow the people around who DO know and muck up threads.

You're referring to your off topic replies yesterday about manufacturing, when the convo I was having was around the auto industry, or this morning when you posted links that had nothing to do with convo at hand about percentage of those born in Canada, right?

You speak from experience about mucking up threads...

[CdnFox]

5 minutes ago, Goddess said:

The fact is he doesn't WANT to be better informed.  None of them do.

And I'm tiring of the games.

There's too many of them now on this forum who contribute nothing and just post insults and garbage.  Pages & pages of it.  They are here every day just to follow me and you and a few others around, downvote every post, which refutes nothing.

In the last while, I've really been struck by how utterly stoopid some are here.  They know nothing about anything.  It's why they can't discuss.  They just follow the people around who DO know and muck up threads.

It can get frustrating if you don't just find it humorous

But this is why people are tending to refer to the left wing as a cult or cult like. It's the blind devotion to the talking point, that absolute insistence on defending the indefensible even if it means lying or dishonesty.

Back in the day I used to have all kinds of arguments with liberals but they stuck to the facts and they acknowledged when you made a factual statement and of course that courtesy was reciprocated. So you tended to argue about the philosophy and ideals and practical results of ideology and policy rather than arguing about the facts

Nowadays the left realizes that they can't win on that basis and they spend all their time arguing against the facts.  So you get nowhere. 

[LinkSoul60]

2 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Or perhaps he'll just ignore the fact it was posted several times and sea lion about it like you do. 

Yes, you lie frequently so it comes up regular  

People frequently post links for you and then you ignore them. Hell i even used data from YOUR OWN LINKS THAT YOU POSTED and you claimed 

And your links are never relevant.  And when that's pointed out you simply ignore it, 

And this is a common tactic on the left. 

 

LMAO... the little Fxx is still tripping over his own two little feet trying to justify his lack of awareness.

A common Fxx tactic...

[CdnFox]

5 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

You're referring to your off topic replies yesterday about manufacturing, when the convo I was having was around the auto industry, or this morning when you posted links that had nothing to do with convo at hand about percentage of those born in Canada, right?

You speak from experience about mucking up threads...

Dude you do that constantly. We were having a discussion about whether or not it was affordable to live in vancouver in 2015 and you posted housing prices that included everything right up to the richest mansions in the British properties rather than looking at a starter home.

And you do that all the time. And when that was pointed out you couldn't even address it

This is a chat for him and sometimes people post stuff that's not relevant to the immediate conversation for various reasons but you have absolutely no room to talk when it comes to posting things that aren't relevant

2 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

LMAO... the little Fxx is still tripping over his own two little feet trying to justify his lack of awareness.

A common Fxx tactic...

LOL oh dear, and just the other day i said you don't usually have little meltdowns.    How rude of you to prove me wrong  

Go have your cookie and your nap little guy, you'll be fine.  But sadly the truth will be the same when you wake up so maybe brace yorself. 

Edited April 29 by CdnFox

[Goddess]

Just now, CdnFox said:

Nowadays the left realizes that they can't win on that basis and they spend all their time arguing against the facts.  So you get nowhere.

I agree that's how it is these days.  Although I have a couple of lefty friends with whom we have good discussions on things.

I think the other issue is that, deep down, they KNOW the vast majority of the leftist ideologies that have been forced on society have been an utter failure.  It's in your face now.  And they're still denying and defending it.

[Legato]

22 minutes ago, eyeball said:

And you'll still obediently stop at red lights.

Yup another Liberal invention, when the majority of intersections are crying out for a roundabout.

[LinkSoul60]

2 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Dude you do that constantly. We were having a discussion about whether or not it was affordable to live in vancouver in 2015 and you posted housing prices that included everything right up to the richest mansions in the British properties rather than looking at a starter home.

And you do that all the time. And when that was pointed out you couldn't even address it

This is a chat for him and sometimes people post stuff that's not relevant to the immediate conversation for various reasons but you have absolutely no room to talk when it comes to posting things that aren't relevant

LOL oh dear, and just the other day i said you don't usually have little meltdowns.    How rude of you to prove me wrong  

Go have your cookie and your nap little guy, you'll be fine.  But sadly the truth will be the same when you wake up so maybe brace yorself. 

Sure little guy...  just show me the links so we can put this to bed. You can't though, can you... 

Otherwise, you're irrelevant... both in content and common sense.  

 

[Moonbox]

29 minutes ago, Goddess said:

I've posted hundreds of snippets of committee clips here and you reject them all because they're on YouTube channels or MP X accounts.

Show me one saying what you say it does.  

You make a claim, someone asks you to verify it, and then you provide your verification.  That's how this works.  You don't get to just wave your hands and refer vaguely to the thousands of twitter links etc. that you've puked all over the forum.  

[Goddess]

I'm also flabbergasted by the gullibility of the lefties here.  It's off the charts.

They want to argue about what words mean, because the gov't and the media change the meanings and they just mentally go along with the propaganda, like they never read or comprehended the warning of "1984".

Like, everything is "investment" now.

Spending is investment.  Subsidies are investment.  Bureaucracy is investment.  Political favor-trading is investment.  Borrowing & printing money is investment.

Real people can't live this way.  You can't call every expense an investment and hope the bank manager is dazzled by your inventive language and economics degree.

The bill doesn't vanish because you rename it "investment".

 

[Goddess]

12 minutes ago, Moonbox said:

Show me one saying what you say it does.  

It was actually in a CBC article, too.  And a bunch of other news sources.

You really are amazingly stupid and intellectually lazy.  This is the last time I'm going to wipe your a$$ for you because this has been posted multiple times before.  I'm not your mommy and I'm not your b1tch to order around.

Grow up.

2.1 million temporary residents will have expired or expiring permits this year. But will they leave Canada? | CBC News

According to the data shared by Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC), 1.49 million temporary residents had their permits expire last year. Another 1.4 million will expire this year, for a total of 2.9 million over two years.

 

“Little is known about the undocumented population in Canada, and gathering data is very challenging as this population generally tries to stay undetected due to their fear of removal,” IRCC said. 

“However, research indicates that there may be 200,000 to 500,000 undocumented migrants in Canada.”

Lou Janssen Dangzalan, a Toronto-based immigration lawyer, said IRCC is working on the assumption that people with expiring permits will return home.

“It assumes too much of a good faith behavior from everyone that everyone's going to simply follow the rules as it is,” he said.

[CdnFox]

38 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

Sure little guy...  just show me the links so we can put this to bed.

 

Done so many times and they're still in that thread.

And it'll never be put to bed because you'll continue to ask. I can show you right now and you'll ask again in 15 minutes and I can show you then and you'll ask in 15 minutes more

As I said some of the links were even yours

Lie harder, cry harder   It's the liberal way  

[Moonbox]

40 minutes ago, Goddess said:

It was actually in a CBC article, too.  And a bunch of other news sources.

You really are amazingly stupid and intellectually lazy. 

I'm not asking about CBC articles.  I'm asking you to cite the committees you referenced. 

What you're calling intellectual laziness is actually intellectual scrutiny.  Every time you reference info you refuse to cite, and every time you offer an anonymous social media post to support one of your claims, your credibility drops further.  

Did you ever take calculus?  I'm thinking that's doubtful...

The more " information" you refer to but refuse to cite, the more your credibility goes down.  People are less and less willing to give you the benefit of the doubt, and as your credibility approaches zero, nobody's paying attention to anything you have to say.  That's why you have a mega thread where you mostly talk to yourself about vaccines.  

If you're actually trying to convince anyone but yourself and the people who already agree with you, you need to have some standards on the information you post.  

Edited April 29 by Moonbox

[Goddess]

7 minutes ago, Moonbox said:

every time you offer an anonymous social media post

They're not anonymous.

The government and all its bureaucracies, committees and individual MPs and individual political parties and the Canadian Senate and individual Senators all have social media accounts.

This is your circular argument.

"I refuse to accept any social media accounts, even official government accounts and I am also too lazy to watch the entire committee meetings, QP, etc on CPAC.  I'm content to just be spoon-fed headlines on CBC and pretend I'm more informed than the people who do watch them."

[Moonbox]

2 minutes ago, Goddess said:

They're not anonymous.

The anonymous social media posts you've been regularly citing here for years are anonymous.  It's f*cking ridiculous that anyone has to tell you that they're not useful sources, but you keep doing it anyway. 

The fact that this is obviously how you get your "news" is equally ridiculous, because it's literally an algorithm drip-feeding the content it knows you engage with, creating your own personal little Karen echo chamber. 

As for the committees, you keep referring to them, and you keep refusing to provide citation.  If you say you saw something or read something from a committee, we need you to cite specifically what you're claiming.  This:

2 minutes ago, Goddess said:

The government and all its bureaucracies, committees and individual MPs and individual political parties and the Canadian Senate and individual Senators all have social media accounts.

is gobblygook.  It's uselessly vague and demonstrates nothing. 

[Goddess]

10 minutes ago, Moonbox said:

they're not useful sources

Then find your own source of committee clips or watch the entire proceedings.

This stupid game of "I can't refute the facts so I reject the source" is getting ridiculous.

One of you retards on another thread posted yesterday that a post from someone else was "bullshit" because of the source.  I posted 3 or 4 links from other sources saying the same thing and you know what the person did?

F*cking ran away, just like you all do.

This demanding of only sources and cites that YOU approve of is just a way for you to avoid FACTS.

 

[CdnFox]

43 minutes ago, Moonbox said:

I'm not asking about CBC articles.  I'm asking you to cite the committees you referenced. 

What you're calling intellectual laziness is actually intellectual scrutiny.  Every time you reference info you refuse to cite, and every time you offer an anonymous social media post to support one of your claims, your credibility drops further.  

Did you ever take calculus?  I'm thinking that's doubtful...

The more " information" you refer to but refuse to cite, the more your credibility goes down.  People are less and less willing to give you the benefit of the doubt, and as your credibility approaches zero, nobody's paying attention to anything you have to say.  That's why you have a mega thread where you mostly talk to yourself about vaccines.  

If you're actually trying to convince anyone but yourself and the people who already agree with you, you need to have some standards on the information you post.  

Oh look @Goddess, you looked up the information for him and amazingly that's not good enough and he wants you to look up more!!!  Wow who'd have thunk it  

 

You have to understand Moonbox's thinking to really grasp why this is. 

Here's a graphic representation of how his thought processes work 

 

[Goddess]

17 minutes ago, Moonbox said:

is gobblygook.  It's uselessly vague and demonstrates nothing. 

To you.  Because you don't want facts.

Remple-Garner is the shadow minister for Immigration and Diab is the minister of Immigration.

I post a committee clip from one of their official government accounts and you call it anonymous.

I give you the link for all the committees and you refuse - "I'm too lazy to watch them."

You won't watch the entire proceedings and you won't watch clips unless they're on a CBC social media account and the CBC doesn't cover committee meetings.

You've painted yourself into a corner for information.

You asked for a link regarding the immigration thing, I gave it to you. You didn't even look at it.

You don't say "Oh, I guess you were right, after I called you a liar for 3 pages".

GTFO, you dishonest, lazy, retarded, brain-dead, zombie poster.

[Moonbox]

3 minutes ago, Goddess said:

Then find your own source of committee clips or watch the entire proceedings.

It's not my job to prove your point or provide evidence that you can't. 

You've made such a fool out of yourself over the years regurgitating the rubbish the algorithm feeds you that there's no reason for anyone to take you seriously.  Karens with zero credibilitty get mocked and ignored, and pouting about it doesn't change anything.  Providing valid sources could repair that, and show you're at least capable of higher reasoning, but most of us have given up on you by now.  Insisting that anynomous social media posts are valid sources (as you have countless times on this forum) shows how badly your brain has rotted  🙃.

[Goddess]

1 minute ago, CdnFox said:

You have to understand Moonbox's thinking to really grasp why this is. 

Here's a graphic representation of how his thought processes work 

the demand for sources and cites is only a distraction from the facts for them.

You give them the links, they don't even acknowledge it.  The discussion is over for them.  They disappear.

A week later, they ask for links to the same info.

[CdnFox]

2 minutes ago, Moonbox said:

It's not my job to prove your point or provide evidence that you can't. 

 

She provided the evidence and now it's your job to refute the evidence if you don't like the evidence she provided

And once again everyone gets to see that you're nothing more than a lying tard.

She provided evidence you can't refute it she's right you're wrong you're a twat. If you don't like that go find your own evidence