Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 minutes ago, Aristides said:

I have been critical of his opinions and will continue to be. No one deserves what happened to him.

No, you have outright lied and continue to push lies. 

Of course, Hardner likes that... 

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1

 

 

Posted
35 minutes ago, Aristides said:

I was doing the opposite of deminishing it. You have a national holiday named after King. 

No, you were doing what woketards do. You were infusing DEI into it. It's not enough to honor the memory of Charlie Kirk on his own, you had to add a person of color into the mix to be politically correct - and for that you get an ESG score of 90. Your score would have been 100 had you brought a black lesbian into it. ;) 

Posted
16 minutes ago, Deluge said:

No, you were doing what woketards do. You were infusing DEI into it. It's not enough to honor the memory of Charlie Kirk on his own, you had to add a person of color into the mix to be politically correct - and for that you get an ESG score of 90. Your score would have been 100 had you brought a black lesbian into it. ;) 

Sorry you took it that way but that's your problem.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Aristides said:

Sorry you took it that way but that's your problem.

You're not sorry, because it was intentional. Just admit that you whore for DEI approval, and we'll move on. ;) 

  • Sad 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, Deluge said:

You're not sorry, because it was intentional. Just admit that you whore for DEI approval, and we'll move on. ;) 

Why does everything have to be a fight to the death with you !diots? Your country is going to hell in a hand basket and you just keep the accelerator floored.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Aristides said:

Why does everything have to be a fight to the death with you !diots? Your country is going to hell in a hand basket and you just keep the accelerator floored.

I'm not the one whoring for high ESG scores. Why couldn't you have honored Charlie Kirk on his own? The answer is obvious: because you think it would be racist. In your f*cked up mind, bringing MLK up was mandatory. 

Posted
1 minute ago, Deluge said:

I'm not the one whoring for high ESG scores. Why couldn't you have honored Charlie Kirk on his own? The answer is obvious: because you think it would be racist. In your f*cked up mind, bringing MLK up was mandatory. 

 

Carry on crazy. I give up.

  • Like 1
Posted

For politicians down there, genuine, spontaneous encounters with random members of the public are going to become less frequent. In the short term their handlers will like that but over time it will undercut their credibility. If nobody can meet them, maybe they’re all AI-generated or at the very least immune to the concerns of ordinary people? 

‘How small we make our worlds. Gather them in, tighten them up into little castles of fear.’

Posted
24 minutes ago, Aristides said:

Why does everything have to be a fight to the death with you !diots? Your country is going to hell in a hand basket and you just keep the accelerator floored.

You just spent the last day pushing lies to demonize a man just brutally murdered in front of thousands of people...

The question is, WTF is wrong with you. 

 

 

Posted

Patel went too far with his announcement about the killer being in custody. The head of the FBI needs to be very careful with such claims. People are depending on that person to be conservative in any statement they make. 

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/09/11/kash-patel-charlie-kirk-shooting-fbi-00559165

 

 

 

 

‘How small we make our worlds. Gather them in, tighten them up into little castles of fear.’

Posted
7 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Just what is wrong with you? Was the zucchini crop a bust this year?

Are you seriously saying there were not some fine folks on both sides that day?

Are you seriously ^this dense?

The TWO sides were the neo-Nazis (torch marchers) and those protesting neo-Nazis.

Fine people ON BOTH SIDES means neo-Nazis were find people. Duh

It's no wonder you don't understand the issue, because I wasn't talking TO YOU.

Posted
1 minute ago, robosmith said:

Are you seriously ^this dense?

The TWO sides were the neo-Nazis (torch marchers) and those protesting neo-Nazis.

Fine people ON BOTH SIDES means neo-Nazis were find people. Duh

It's no wonder you don't understand the issue, because I wasn't talking TO YOU.

No, that's incorrect.  You're still falling for the lies I see.

  • Like 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Are you seriously ^this dense?

The TWO sides were the neo-Nazis (torch marchers) and those protesting neo-Nazis.

Fine people ON BOTH SIDES means neo-Nazis were find people. Duh

It's no wonder you don't understand the issue, because I wasn't talking TO YOU.

And Trump was never calling the people marching as neo-Nazis fine people... that is the lie you and others keep pushing. 

  • Like 1

 

 

Posted
4 minutes ago, User said:

And Trump was never calling the people marching as neo-Nazis fine people... that is the lie you and others keep pushing. 

Exactly.  He was referring to the people that were protesting statues being removed.

  • Like 1
Posted
5 hours ago, CouchPotato said:

Right. And that is a lot different from saying 'black women do not have the brain processing power'. Now, I know it's not just a coincidence that all those women were black, but he was talking about DEI. 

Kirk was talking about black women who were tops in their field. Since he thought they needed affirmative action or DEI due to "not having the brain processing power," then the SAME applies to all those with lesser abilities. AKA black women in general.

You're welcome.

Posted
Just now, robosmith said:

Kirk was talking about black women who were tops in their field. Since he thought they needed affirmative action or DEI due to "not having the brain processing power," then the SAME applies to all those with lesser abilities. AKA black women in general.

You're welcome.

This is a lie. First, he never said "black women" and it is YOUR stupid conclusion that his comments must apply to all those with lesser abilities or black women in general. 

Since that is YOUR reasoning, you must be the racist. 

 

 

Posted
5 hours ago, CouchPotato said:

I don't think most people go around assuming someone was a DEI hire.

The only thing that really matters is that Trump believes that of blacks and that's why he and Hegseth are cleaning the military environment of ALL recognition of black achievement.

Posted
1 hour ago, Michael Hardner said:

Is this directive for a specific person or ?

Primarily a group. Not to say people of my ilk don't use name calling, but the left has been calling all of us racist and sexist since I can remember (all the way to the 80s) and lately they have added white supremacy, neonazi, fascists, Hitler, Goebbels, etc etc etc. They've been justifying killing us for over 40 years. 

Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it? 

 

 

Posted
7 minutes ago, robosmith said:

The only thing that really matters is that Trump believes that of blacks and that's why he and Hegseth are cleaning the military environment of ALL recognition of black achievement.

Another pathetic lie. 

 

 

Posted
Just now, Aristides said:

What?

 

You are justifying the Kirk shooting by mischaracterizing the MN shootings as a "they do it to" shooting. What you are doing is sick. 

Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it? 

 

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      11,015
    • Most Online
      2,945

    Newest Member
    agackibal
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...