Charlie Kirk shot!

[Shady]

3 hours ago, robosmith said:

Thanks for demonstrating YOUR IGNORANCE. PhDs KNOW so MUCH MORE THAN YOU, Mr. Dunning Kruger. LMAO

Videos

 

59:13

 

Dailymotion · CDh6

 

The Nine Months That Made You - video Dailymotion

Dailymotion · CDh6

May 4, 2019

A scientific project reveals the importance of the 9 months before birth in shaping our lives, health, and happiness.

A man dressing up as a woman, doesn’t actually become a woman.  You don’t need a PhD to understand how absurd and ridiculous that is.

[gatomontes99]

6 hours ago, CdnFox said:

LOL he's totallhy proved you wrong 100 percent,  and as always you try to deny the truth rather than cope with it

This is just like when you fully supported Clinton for his sex crimes and got mad at people who supported trump  

We should call you hypoChrissy   

You mean it was political. 

Yeah.  We know. 

 

6 hours ago, User said:

“There clearly was a leftist ideology with this — with this assassin,” he said, citing the suspect’s family and romantic partner as sources of that information.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/14/us/kirk-shooting-suspect-ideology-partner.html

FBI Director Kash Patel, on Fox & Friends: "His [the suspect's] family have collectively told investigators that he subscribed to left-wing ideology and even more so in these last couple of years."

https://www.newsweek.com/tyler-robinson-note-charlie-kirk-fbi-kash-patel-2129976

The reality we have to accept is the @Chrissy1979 is not going to accept reality. Since chrissy is not talking about reality, nothing she says is relevant and we don't need to address her fantasies. 

The violence continues:

 

 

[BeaverFever]

Here’s another peaceful Republican 

 

Fox News Host Proposes 'Lethal Injection' for Homeless

 

Fox News host Brian Kilmeade called for executing homeless individuals with mental health issues during a September 10 episode of Fox & Friends, suggesting "involuntary lethal injection" as a solution for those who refuse government assistance.

The controversial remarks went viral on social media Saturday morning, drawing widespread condemnation including a biblical response from California Governor Gavin Newsom.
 

https://www.newsweek.com/fox-news-host-proposes-lethal-injection-homeless-2129492

 

 

[WestCanMan]

2 hours ago, Chrissy1979 said:

I don’t politicize science. I trust the people who know what they’re talking about and don’t trust those who get their information from charlatans. But either way, that has nothing to go with being “left wing.”

OMG, Chrissy. The jig is up ffs.

When "the people you trust" were pretending to know that covid most likely came from a bat->pangolin->human intersection, they knew it was far more likely that it came from the lab nearby where they helped create a covid virus. 

When "the people you trust" were banning people from the internet for talking about the BSL4 lab, they knew that there was a BLS4 lab there that had already manufactured a covid virus. 

"The people you trust" started off at "The jabs will be safe and effective, and will get us to herd immunity" (as if they could somehow know that in advance, which is impossible), then went to "The jabs are safe and effective, and will get us to herd immunity" (but they lied about those test results), then went to "The jabs are safe and effective, and you don't have to worry about covid if you have it, and you don't have to worry about giving covid to granny" (which was known to be false when they said it, as per the lab test results), then "It's a pandemic of the unvaccinated", but almost 90% of the people who died of covid in Canada in 2022 were multi-vaxed. 

Nothing that they said was true when they said, and in fact, in most instances they weren't wrong, they knew that they were lying.

Listen to Rachel Maddow back then, and compare that to what happened in Canada: https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow/watch/maddow-set-your-concerns-aside-and-get-vaccinated-do-it-for-others-if-not-for-yourself-109959749614

More multi-vaxed people died of covid in Canada in 2022 than the total number of people who died of covid in 2021, and probably even 2020, but I can't say for sure because our gov't stopped giving out the stats for covid in 2022 when the unvaxed were approaching 90% of all covid deaths. That's how wrong she was. 

People spread covid like mofos after vaxing. People dropped like flies after vaxing. Covid deaths went down to dbl-digts/week in summer 2020 (zero vaxed) and 2021, (50% vaxed), but there were over 200 multi-vaxed covid deaths every week in summer 2022. 

The people you trusted are KNOWN liars, Chrissy. They lied about critical health information. Lied, 100%. You know that. 

[WestCanMan]

15 minutes ago, BeaverFever said:

Here’s another peaceful Republican 

 

 

Fox News Host Proposes 'Lethal Injection' for Homeless

 

 

Fox News host Brian Kilmeade called for executing homeless individuals with mental health issues during a September 10 episode of Fox & Friends, suggesting "involuntary lethal injection" as a solution for those who refuse government assistance.

The controversial remarks went viral on social media Saturday morning, drawing widespread condemnation including a biblical response from California Governor Gavin Newsom.
 

https://www.newsweek.com/fox-news-host-proposes-lethal-injection-homeless-2129492

 

 

Out of context it sounds pretty bad, but he's talking about "violent serial-offenders with mental health issues who refuse to take any meds and end up killing people", not just random "homeless" people, as your title suggests, you f'ing lying weasel.

It's even in the screenshot from your video. Duhhhhhh.

What you just said there is like saying that Obama did drone strikes on people just for having black hair.

Do us all a favour: next time you feel like running your stupid mouth, just stay in your mom's basement and talk whatever pet is unfortunate enough to be stuck there with you. 

Edited September 16, 2025 by WestCanMan

[BeaverFever]

29 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Out of context it sounds pretty bad, but he's talking about "violent serial-offenders with mental health issues who refuse to take any meds and end up killing people", not just random "homeless" people, as your title suggests, you f'ing lying weasel.

It's even in the screenshot from your video. Duhhhhhh.

What you just said there is like saying that Obama did drone strikes on people just for having black hair.

Do us all a favour: next time you feel like running your stupid mouth, just stay in your mom's basement and talk whatever pet is unfortunate enough to be stuck there with you. 

He doesn’t say anything about it only applying to “violent serial offenders”  and it’s not in the screenshot you dipshit. You’re hallucinating again 

Edited September 16, 2025 by BeaverFever

[BeaverFever]

43 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

OMG, Chrissy. The jig is up ffs.

When "the people you trust" were pretending to know that covid most likely came from a bat->pangolin->human intersection, they knew it was far more likely that it came from the lab nearby where they helped create a covid virus. 

When "the people you trust" were banning people from the internet for talking about the BSL4 lab, they knew that there was a BLS4 lab there that had already manufactured a covid virus. 

"The people you trust" started off at "The jabs will be safe and effective, and will get us to herd immunity" (as if they could somehow know that in advance, which is impossible), then went to "The jabs are safe and effective, and will get us to herd immunity" (but they lied about those test results), then went to "The jabs are safe and effective, and you don't have to worry about covid if you have it, and you don't have to worry about giving covid to granny" (which was known to be false when they said it, as per the lab test results), then "It's a pandemic of the unvaccinated", but almost 90% of the people who died of covid in Canada in 2022 were multi-vaxed. 

Nothing that they said was true when they said, and in fact, in most instances they weren't wrong, they knew that they were lying.

Listen to Rachel Maddow back then, and compare that to what happened in Canada: https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow/watch/maddow-set-your-concerns-aside-and-get-vaccinated-do-it-for-others-if-not-for-yourself-109959749614

More multi-vaxed people died of covid in Canada in 2022 than the total number of people who died of covid in 2021, and probably even 2020, but I can't say for sure because our gov't stopped giving out the stats for covid in 2022 when the unvaxed were approaching 90% of all covid deaths. That's how wrong she was. 

People spread covid like mofos after vaxing. People dropped like flies after vaxing. Covid deaths went down to dbl-digts/week in summer 2020 (zero vaxed) and 2021, (50% vaxed), but there were over 200 multi-vaxed covid deaths every week in summer 2022. 

The people you trusted are KNOWN liars, Chrissy. They lied about critical health information. Lied, 100%. You know that. 

Lol nobody believes your anti-vax conspiracy BS I can’t believe you’re still spouting that nonsense, totally off-topic as usual. 

[Chrissy1979]

44 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

OMG, Chrissy. The jig is up ffs.

When "the people you trust" were pretending to know that covid most likely came from a bat->pangolin->human intersection, they knew it was far more likely that it came from the lab nearby where they helped create a covid virus. 

When "the people you trust" were banning people from the internet for talking about the BSL4 lab, they knew that there was a BLS4 lab there that had already manufactured a covid virus. 

"The people you trust" started off at "The jabs will be safe and effective, and will get us to herd immunity" (as if they could somehow know that in advance, which is impossible), then went to "The jabs are safe and effective, and will get us to herd immunity" (but they lied about those test results), then went to "The jabs are safe and effective, and you don't have to worry about covid if you have it, and you don't have to worry about giving covid to granny" (which was known to be false when they said it, as per the lab test results), then "It's a pandemic of the unvaccinated", but almost 90% of the people who died of covid in Canada in 2022 were multi-vaxed. 

Nothing that they said was true when they said, and in fact, in most instances they weren't wrong, they knew that they were lying.

Listen to Rachel Maddow back then, and compare that to what happened in Canada: https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow/watch/maddow-set-your-concerns-aside-and-get-vaccinated-do-it-for-others-if-not-for-yourself-109959749614

More multi-vaxed people died of covid in Canada in 2022 than the total number of people who died of covid in 2021, and probably even 2020, but I can't say for sure because our gov't stopped giving out the stats for covid in 2022 when the unvaxed were approaching 90% of all covid deaths. That's how wrong she was. 

People spread covid like mofos after vaxing. People dropped like flies after vaxing. Covid deaths went down to dbl-digts/week in summer 2020 (zero vaxed) and 2021, (50% vaxed), but there were over 200 multi-vaxed covid deaths every week in summer 2022. 

The people you trusted are KNOWN liars, Chrissy. They lied about critical health information. Lied, 100%. You know that. 

Exactly. I trust people who didn’t learn everything they know about science ftom Facebook.

[WestCanMan]

1 hour ago, BeaverFever said:

He doesn’t say anything about it only applying to “violent serial offenders”  and it’s not in the screenshot you dipshit. You’re hallucinating again 

Do you see the words "Brutal NYC Murder Highlights Soft-on-Crime Policies" somewhere there Beave? Nowhere? Does it just say "Homeless"?

Lying piece of shit. 

[CdnFox]

3 hours ago, herbie said:

They only have top SAY, the dupes believe....
Just as they insist it has nothing to do with the ingrained gun culture.
and now for something completely different:

You got that backwards -  that's what people with uteruses have been saying  

And funny story, the owner of the gun can use it for it's lawful purpose on their own but a unterus requires two people   So why wouldn't the second person get a say?

[WestCanMan]

1 hour ago, BeaverFever said:

Lol nobody believes your anti-vax conspiracy BS I can’t believe you’re still spouting that nonsense, totally off-topic as usual. 

If you don't know wtf is going on, that's your problem, Beave. Not mine. 

Stay in your little cultist bubble and believe whatever the F you want. Just don't come here acting like this is a cultist left4rd hive where everything you say is just gospel, as long as it's biased. 

Fauci is on camera talking - in congress of all places - about the research that he funded at the Wuhan lab to make the bat coronavirus transmissible among humans before covid got loose. IE, he funded research to make a covid virus.

When the covid virus got out, he never said "we made one of those just a few blocks away, but we're sure that the one that's infecting everyone came from the wetmarket". He just pretended that the wetmarket was the only real possibility.

And people did get banned from the social media giants - TNI members - just for talking about the Wuhan BSL4 lab. It was verboten. 

Quote

totally off-topic as usual. 

The dummy that you're defending was just talking about how much she trusted left4rd science you f'ing muppet. 

What makes you think that talking about Mr Science Incarnate himself is off the topic of left4rd pseudo-science? 

1 hour ago, Chrissy1979 said:

Exactly. I trust people who didn’t learn everything they know about science ftom Facebook.

So you still trust Fauci after all this time?

Can you please just say in your words how much you trust "Dr Fauci"? 

[WestCanMan]

1 hour ago, BeaverFever said:

Lol nobody believes your anti-vax conspiracy BS

Of course you don't believe it, cultist, because CNN didn't say it. 

You tell me what part of what I said is theoretically "BS" and I'll rub your nose in it, little boy.  

Edited September 16, 2025 by WestCanMan

[BeaverFever]

30 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

And funny story, the owner of the gun can use it for it's lawful purpose on their own but a unterus requires two people   So why wouldn't the second person get a say?

The uterus isn’t a shared resource that sits unused until a man comes along to give it meaning. It also performs an important function in women’s hormonal cycles and immune system

And using a gun for its lawful purpose also requires a second person….the one on the receiving end. Do they get a say?

 

 

[BeaverFever]

23 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Of course you don't believe it, cultist, because CNN didn't say it. 

You tell me what part of what I said is theoretically "BS" and I'll rub your nose in it, little boy.  

YOU ARE THE CULTIST by any definition of that word. I know words mean nothing to you uneducated chumps you just started saying it to copying us bu “cultist doesn’t mean “I don’t agree with whatever you believe”

Let’s start by just addressing the ridiculous conspiracy theory about why all of the healthcare amd government organizations are encouraging people to get the vaccine if it’s as deadly as you say

Then explain the fact that >80% of the population is vaccinated in USA amd Canada and yet no massive die-off occurred   I know that in the early days of the pandemic you nuts were claiming that the government was secretly hiding a million billion vaccine deaths from the public and we would all find out as soon as the lockdowns were lifted But now you need a new explanation 

 

The dumbass statistics you keep trying to flout about their being more vaccinated covid deaths than unvaccinated is simply because almost the entire population is vaccinated.  There are also far more sober drivers killed in accordance than drunk drivers so by your dropout logic that means drunk driving is safer than sober driving, right?

 

[BeaverFever]

47 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Fauci is on camera talking - in congress of all places - about the research that he funded at the Wuhan lab to make the bat coronavirus transmissible among humans before covid got loose. IE, he funded research to make a covid virus.

Well as point of fact Fauci testified that the NIH did NOT fund “gain of function” experiments that make the virus more transmissible. 
 

But your batshit I was referring to is your vaccine conspiracy nonsense. 

[User]

5 hours ago, herbie said:

and now for something completely different:

Nope. The day you do something other than a strawman would be different. 

[CdnFox]

4 hours ago, BeaverFever said:

The uterus isn’t a shared resource that sits unused until a man comes along to give it meaning.

That's nice. Completely irrelevant but  nice.

However when discussing reproductive systems and decisions about abortion (which is the uterus reference in case you were too dense to get it) the fact is that it DOES require a man to come along one way or another and make that process happen

Quote

It also performs an important function in women’s hormonal cycles and immune system

And?

Quote

And using a gun for its lawful purpose also requires a second person….the one on the receiving end.

??????  WHAT?!!   

Umm.. obviously you have zero experience with guns.  I've sent literally hundreds of thousands of rounds downrange over my life time lawfully and there was never any person on the 'receiving end'.  Are my guns all broken or something?

What a stupid thing to say. 

Quote

Do they get a say?

These fictional non existent people who you made up in your head?

Sure, why not.  They're talking to you after all, they might as well talk to the rest of us i guess  

 

[User]

13 hours ago, BeaverFever said:

Here’s another peaceful Republican 

You are so pathetically desperate. 

 

10 hours ago, BeaverFever said:

Well as point of fact Fauci testified that the NIH did NOT fund “gain of function” experiments that make the virus more transmissible. 
 

But your batshit I was referring to is your vaccine conspiracy nonsense. 

Well, he played some semantic games with not calling it gain-of-function... even though by any practical meaning of the term, that is what they were engaged in doing. 

I presume you know this, which is why you put it in quotes like that. 

 

[LinkSoul60]

So now that this is in the rear view mirror, when are they going to release the full Epstein files?

[Chrissy1979]

2 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

So now that this is in the rear view mirror, when are they going to release the full Epstein files?

Careful. Charlie was asking the same question and look what happened to him.

[LinkSoul60]

13 minutes ago, Chrissy1979 said:

Careful. Charlie was asking the same question and look what happened to him.

Merely a coincidence I'm sure....   What a great way for his admirers like Trump to honour him.... respect his wishes and release them.

[Venandi]

21 hours ago, robosmith said:

Where/when did you get your PhD in physiology?

IOW you don't know your ASS from a hole in the ground because you don't understand the role that the BRAIN plays in GENDER.

 

Are you suggesting that it's a form of mental illness then?

If so, I'd tend to agree, I don't think the "identify with" caveat should apply to such things as those seeking amputations because they identify with amputees or surgical eye removal because they identify with the blind either. Logically, if you support the idea of gender reassignment surgery for minors you should support that as well.

Otherwise, as a wise man once said:

"You keep demonstrating YOU KNOW NOTHING about SCIENCE."

- Does a Playboy Bunny become a rabbit and need to hide during hunting season simply because she wears bunny ears, a bunny tail and actually identifies as a "Bunny" on her resume?"

- Can I self identify as a native woman and hunt deer anytime I want? If not why?

- Can I rejoin the military after retirement age because I indetify as 25 years old? If not why?

If you can extend your train of logic to the end of the tracks I might buy into your theory...

Otherwise, as you've previously said:

"Thanks for confirming you STILL GOT BUPKIS LMAO."

 

Edited September 16, 2025 by Venandi

[WestCanMan]

11 hours ago, BeaverFever said:

YOU ARE THE CULTIST by any definition of that word. I know words mean nothing to you uneducated chumps you just started saying it to copying us bu “cultist doesn’t mean “I don’t agree with whatever you believe”

Let’s start by just addressing the ridiculous conspiracy theory about why all of the healthcare amd government organizations are encouraging people to get the vaccine if it’s as deadly as you say

I never made any claim about the vax being completely lethal for everyone. I just said that it isn't safe, because it isn't safe, and that is a fact. 

It is known to kill a small amount of people. It is known to cause debilitating injuries to a small amount of people. It is known to cause myocarditis and pericarditis to a small amount of people. And if you're being honest, you know people who were injured by it. 

The odds above would be acceptable if covid was more lethal than the jab but it isn't, for a lot of people.

Healthy kids and young adults definitely didn't need to risk taking an untested vax to fight off covid, and that is a fact has remained unchallenged even by the rabid cultists here.

Fauci and the science profiteers LIED about the expected safety of the jabs. There was no reason to expect that they would be safe.

Fauci and the science profiteers LIED about the actual safety of the jabs after they were known to be killing and injuring people. It was widely reported that people were being severely injured by the jabs while mainstream science was flatly denying any serious risks at all.

That is ok by your standards, but not by mine. I don't accept Carney/Fauci-level lying but you do. It's where you live. 

Don't expect me to abide by your ultra-low standards of honesty, Beavey boy. 

Quote

Then explain the fact that >80% of the population is vaccinated in USA amd Canada and yet no massive die-off occurred   I know that in the early days of the pandemic you nuts were claiming that the government was secretly hiding a million billion vaccine deaths from the public and we would all find out as soon as the lockdowns were lifted But now you need a new explanation 

Bullshit you goddamned liar. 

The vax absolutely WAS injuring and killing people at a time when the vax-cultists in our gov't were flatly denying any dangerous side-effects whatsoever. I never said it was "millions", you lying piece of shit. 

Why is it that if you look up vax side-effects you always see "95% of the adverse effects are just inflammation at the injection site..." at the start of every article? That's basically saying "we're gonna waste your time", because no one gives a F about itchyness when it comes to taking "possibly life-saving medicine".

And FYI it's not up to the gov't to determine the acceptable risk level of the jab. People get to determine that for themselves before it goes in their body. We needed accurate info about covid risks and vax side-effects and that was all kept from us. 

Do you know that when vaxed people started dropping like flies, the excuse was "but it's mostly elderly and people with co-morbidities"? Buddy, that was the case in May 2020, before there was a pseudovax. It is the same with every single "covid death" on record. So our medical professionals even lied about that by misrepresentation.  

Even if covid was really lethal to everyone, and there were no side-effects, NO ONE EVER SHOULD HAVE BEEN FORCED TO TAKE THE JAB. NO ONE. But if that was really the case then it would have been obvious to everyone that they needed to take it. 

NO ONE EVER SHOULD HAVE LIED TO US ABOUT THE SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF THE JABS. 

You know they f'ing lied. They lied over and over, about almost everything covid-related. Try to tell me one thing about covid that wasn't lied about?

Do you know how many thousands of multi-vaxed people "died of covid" before I could get eyeball to believe that even one of them had died? How is it possible that Canadians who followed the covid saga so closely could be so desperately out of touch with the most relevant facts? 

 

Beave, people who were less credulous than you, and smarter than you (which is honestly a full 50% of the country) and paid attention to who was dying of covid and who wasn't, knew that they had no need of a jab, period. And that's even if the jabs were as safe as advertised, which was clearly not the case.

You were lied to. Almost exclusively. Any yet you still have blind trust.

[WestCanMan]

12 hours ago, BeaverFever said:

Well as point of fact Fauci testified that the NIH did NOT fund “gain of function” experiments that make the virus more transmissible. 
 

But your batshit I was referring to is your vaccine conspiracy nonsense. 

That is 100% wrong you illiterate POS. Holy F you are stupid.

HE DID NOT DENY FUNDING RESEARCH to make the virus transmissible among humans, he admitted to it. His only argument was that "making the virus more transmissible among humans did not constitute GoF research". That's it. 

And then Rand Paul said "that's only because you changed the definition of GoF research yourself... increasing transmissibility used to be included as GoF".

DO YOU UNDERSTAND ME BEAVE?  

[CouchPotato]

1 hour ago, Chrissy1979 said:

Careful. Charlie was asking the same question and look what happened to him.

I thought you said it was because some groyper who once complained that Charlie Kirk was 'hateful' was upset that he wasn't hateful enough.