Charlie Kirk shot!

[CdnFox]

24 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Charlie Kirk fomented DEBATE.

This is the biggest thing. This is a man who always always make sure that the other side had a chance to get their two bits in and to share their thoughts and arguments. He was not some pontificator who stood on a podium and exposed only one viewpoint, he literally would not appear without giving the other side more of a chance to speak than his own side.

This is a direct assault on freedom of speech and the right to hold opposing views and is most pure form. This man was all about debate and discourse and they shot him.

[User]

13 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

Of course as a conservative, I feel safe in asking you this.

ROFL

"a conservative"

It never doesn't make me laugh when you say this about yourself. 

[CdnFox]

Just now, User said:

ROFL

"a conservative"

It never doesn't make me laugh when you say this about yourself. 

By 'Conservative' he means he's a hair right of castro. That's the definition of 'Conservative' on the left these days  

[Nationalist]

8 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

There are reports that Kirk is either in critical or stable condition in the hospital. God, I hope that is true. I really do. I'd never be more happy about being wrong about him passing instantly with that shot. 

That said, two attempts on Trump and now this on Kirk, plus older events like the Republican baseball team and you are starting to see this:

Crowder is not wrong. He is also very angry, and that is understandable.

 

Amen.

[WestCanMan]

55 minutes ago, Boges said:

=

I think Nationalist coined the term "You git what you pay for" or something. 

That's my sentiment here. No one deserves to get murdered, Well maybe Donald Trump does. But Kirk makes money being a troll and he uses Christianity as his shield. His conduct is pretty revolting to someone that's not brainwashed by the MAGA hivemind. 

Are you saying that Madonna should get shot? Johnny Depp? Maxine Watters? Joy Reid? Kathy Griffin? Hillary Clinton?

What about Justin Trudeau, the guy who said "the unvaxed are very often racists and misogynists" and then went on to ask Canadians "if the unvaxed should even be tolerated"? 

Are you saying that all of those people are just asking for a bullet? 

You're disgusting, Boges. 

FYI you're not supposed to kill people just for telling the truth, and/or having a different opinion. You're not even supposed to support that kind of thing, Boges. 

What level of violence do you support against your fellow Canadians (assuming you even are one)? Would it be awesome if some of us got shot? 

Edited September 10, 2025 by WestCanMan

[gatomontes99]

Please God, let this be a miracle:

 

 

[paxamericana]

4 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

Please God, let this be a miracle:

 

 

Looks like a shot to the neck with instant paralysis. I don’t think he is going to make it. 

Edited September 10, 2025 by paxamericana

[WestCanMan]

Sorry, Greg. I just saw your post now.

I deleted my reply to Boges' post. 

[gatomontes99]

You know they know this is probably a lwnj. Why else make excuses before we even know who it is. 

 

Edited September 10, 2025 by gatomontes99

[gatomontes99]

DJT has announced that Charlie passed.

[CouchPotato]

18 “If the world hates you, keep in mind that it hated me first. 19 If you belonged to the world, it would love you as its own. As it is, you do not belong to the world, but I have chosen you out of the world.

 

[CdnFox]

11 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

DJT has announced that Charlie passed.

Yeah. Looks like he didn't make it.  Shot to the neck, that's a hard one to survive.

Sounds like they got the bastard who did it though. 

RiP Charlie.  That was before your time. 

I'm 100 percent sure that as soon as they announce the name of the shooter the left will be hard at work creating fake social media accounts to insist he was a right winger 🙄🙄

 

Edited September 10, 2025 by CdnFox

[WestCanMan]

1 hour ago, Michael Hardner said:

Just a question: why do you only ban lefty-wing posters?

 

Lots of right wingers made fun of Pelosi's husband getting atta@cked as I recall.

 

Boges, Black Dog, waldo though...

 

Of course as a conservative, I feel safe in asking you this.

I don't speak for Greg, But:

1) This forum isn't a platform to advocate for murder, MH, which Boges clearly did in his post.

2) Regarding Black Dog, people are expected to post a certain amount of reasonable content and even some context to go along with whatever insults they feel are appropriate. You can't just write entire posts only to randomly accuse people of being pedophiles and whatnot just because you disagree with them. 

If you go back and read BD's posts, you'll find that 95% of his posts here were just insults, and devoid of on-topic commentary. He was way over the line for months before he crossed it entirely. 

3) I have no idea about Waldo. 

4) Can you point to a post that you think should have gotten a conservative poster here banned? Can you point to a conservative poster who contributes nothing here but slander 95% of the time? 

Quote

Of course as a conservative, I feel safe in asking you this.

That's quite a snotty little insult to direct at a mod, MH.

Unless you wanna throw down some instances of posts by conservatives that should have resulted in bans then you have no reason to act like you might be arbitrarily banned just for being a hard-core leftist.  

Grow up.

Edited September 10, 2025 by WestCanMan
fixed incorrect name spelling

[Nationalist]

19 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

You know they know this is probably a lwnj. Why else make excuses before we even know who it is. 

 

More disgusting lies.

Incredible.

[CdnFox]

44 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

Just a question: why do you only ban lefty-wing posters?

 

Lots of right wingers made fun of Pelosi's husband getting atta@cked as I recall.

 

Boges, Black Dog, waldo though...

 

Of course as a conservative, I feel safe in asking you this.

He stepped way over a line.  I think even you know that. 

Exflyer is still here, robo is still here, soul is still here, even chrissy is still here. You're still here too   So lots and lots of left wingers who go hard on insults and have low contributions and such allowed to stay. 

But that was over the line.  Frankly i think there's a few who should have been given a damn good talking to when they cheered the med exec being shot.  And i don't recall ANYONE saying it was acceptable to beat up old men during the pelosi incident. Hell i and others on the right spoke out against being happen biden was sick, never mind attacked. 

Don't defend the indefensible 

[WestCanMan]

18 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

You know they know this is probably a lwnj. Why else make excuses before we even know who it is. 

There's just not enough actual news content, nor enough truth or accuracy in MSNBC's broadcasts, for it to pose as a news channel in Canada.

I'm not saying that MSNBC should be banned in Canada, but it should be labelled more accurately if they want their tripe to be broadcast here. Maybe "The Racist Disinformation Network", or CBC Sawwth".  

[Moonlight Graham]

59 minutes ago, Boges said:

Such a reasoned and thought out take. 

I wonder what Kirk's thoughts on the 2nd amendment are. . . 

Kirk said (paraphrase) that school shooting deaths are the unfortunate cost of the rightful preservation of the 2nd amendment.  He didn't deserve to get murdered and this is terrible, but he's a victim of the society he advocates for.  Live by the sword, die by the sword.

[WestCanMan]

2 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

And i don't recall ANYONE saying it was acceptable to beat up old men during the pelosi incident.

It's impossible not to see any humour in the Pelosi incident, especially when you find out that he was ok at your initial introduction to the story. 

If he was seriously or permanently injured it wouldn't be funny at all, but the old man in his tighty whities pretty much won that fight. 

[Chrissy1979]

My thoughts and prayers are with him.

[WestCanMan]

Just now, Moonlight Graham said:

Kirk said (paraphrase) that school shooting deaths are the unfortunate cost of the rightful preservation of the 2nd amendment.  He didn't deserve to get murdered and this is terrible, but he's a victim of the society he advocates for.  Live by the sword, die by the sword.

It's a central theme of 2nd amendment rights proponents that the cost of having guns is outweighed by the danger of living in a society where a small group of people has all the guns and the populace is entirely at their mercy, but at the same time he wasn't a terrorist supporter, and this is first and foremost another act of left-wing terrorism, not an act of gun violence. 

You gotta admit, it's better that the terrorist who attacked him used a gun than a moving truck, a bomb, or some other incendiary device. The body count was one, not 230.

[Greg]

55 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Maybe you want to take that back

He can't, I banned him, and boy did I had fun doing it.

[CouchPotato]

Fox reporting that the assassin is still on the loose.

[Greg]

1 hour ago, Michael Hardner said:

Just a question: why do you only ban lefty-wing posters?

Cause they consistency say asinine / borderline illegal things.

Why do you bitch and complain about things you know to be true?

[WestCanMan]

Charlie Kirk passed away. It's a very sad day for America. 

[paxamericana]

1 hour ago, gatomontes99 said:

As someone that has shot my share of game

Instant paralysis, definitely a cns shot.