Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
24 minutes ago, robosmith said:

How about you read it again (and again) until you understand it?

I did and did and did and it's biased, so it sits at your level.

Now I ask, which 66% is not biased.

Put down the Zucchini and deliver facts please, not twisted opinions.

Posted
29 minutes ago, robosmith said:

How about you read it again (and again) until you understand it?

Lol...speaketh the anti-credible...

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted

The problem is many people have a bad habit of defining fascism as how mussolini behaved, rather than the actual tenants of fascism. Frankly looking at the wikipedia entry virtually every model of government has exhibited the vast majority of those principles one time or another and they're not really part of fascism.

In the early 19th century the world was flirting with concepts like communism, socialism in general under several models, and that included things like market socialism like the Nazis or the fascists.

And if we're being honest those same models are being revisited today. There is a stark similarity between some of those models and democratic socialism for example as it's described in Europe.

Neither the Nazi model nor the fascist model actually calls for a supreme leader, that's kind of just how it played out. The same is true of Communism and Stalin. The vast majority of socialist models inevitably wind up with one person in control at the top running the show and not being excited about anybody else getting to run the show. China, north Korea, Russia, cuba, venezuela.... 

Honestly both Fascism and Nazism for the most part would be seen as legitimate models today by many on the left if you took away the racism and imperialism at the particular leaders of those parties subscribe to.

But because they are considered horrible words and terrible things to be as a result of world war II, the left pulls its' usual game of twisting the meaning of any 'bad' word and uses it everywhere without regard for it's actual meaning to refer to things they don't like. 

Everyone right of Castro is "far right" and "Nazi" and "facist" and "dunning kruguer".  (ok , that last one might just be robo but still) . 

Math can be racists, Everything is a genocide (except actual genocide), etc etc. 

 

 

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
1 hour ago, Legato said:

I did and did and did and it's biased, so it sits at your level.

Now I ask, which 66% is not biased.

Put down the Zucchini and deliver facts please, not twisted opinions.

I quoted the facts from gnat girl's link for you, but you didn't understand what it means, so you need to read it AGAIN. Duh

Let us know when you understand the RELATIVE BIAS described.

1 hour ago, Nationalist said:

Lol...speaketh the anti-credible...

You don't understand how you ARE WRONG either nor how you destroyed your credibility. LMAO

Posted
15 minutes ago, robosmith said:

I quoted the facts from gnat girl's link for you, but you didn't understand what it means, so you need to read it AGAIN. Duh

Let us know when you understand the RELATIVE BIAS described.

You don't understand how you ARE WRONG either nor how you destroyed your credibility. LMAO

Lol..."RELATIVE BIAS"...

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
6 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Lol..."RELATIVE BIAS"...

That's where you think your mother is nuts but no one else does right?

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
2 hours ago, robosmith said:

I quoted the facts from gnat girl's link for you, but you didn't understand what it means, so you need to read it AGAIN. Duh

Let us know when you understand the RELATIVE BIAS described.

You don't understand how you ARE WRONG either nor how you destroyed your credibility. LMAO

Don't know a gnat girl, is she Bat girls sister and rides a Barley Soupidson?

  • Haha 1
Posted
3 hours ago, CdnFox said:

That's where you think your mother is nuts but no one else does right?

It's silly. And I mean that in the most literal way.

The guy is silly.

  • Thanks 1

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
2 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Wrong again, but it's all you got when you've LOST. LMAO

You have no idea what anyone's talking about, do you :) 

  • Like 1

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
20 hours ago, robosmith said:

Your cite compares Britannica to wikipedia, but conservapedia is CLEARLY an AGENDA DRIVEN site. Duh

You have your sources confused.

YOUR sources are what's agenda driven.

Conservapedia only has one agenda and that is the truth. ;) 

12 hours ago, robosmith said:

Wrong again, but it's all you got when you've LOST. LMAO

robowoke projects with the best of them. ;) 

Posted
16 minutes ago, Deluge said:

robowoke projects with the best of them. ;) 

I hear universal studios has offered him 6 figures and a massive signing bonus. :) 

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
16 hours ago, robosmith said:

Let us know when you find a source which is 100% unbiased. LMAO

You're 100% biased, but you're not a source - you're just some confused a$$hole who supports illegal immigration. 

Posted
14 minutes ago, Aristides said:

MAGATs should remember it is much easier to become a fascist dictatorship than it is to get rid of one.

Well, Conservatives support a strong Second Amendment and a more limited Federal Government, and folks on the left mock them when they bring up tyranny. 

So... 

  • Like 1

 

 

Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, User said:

Well, Conservatives support a strong Second Amendment and a more limited Federal Government, and folks on the left mock them when they bring up tyranny. 

So... 

Ya, all those “patriots” will stand around, watch and do nothing. They will probably cheer as it happens because he (whoever it is) is their guy.

Edited by Aristides
  • Thanks 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, Aristides said:

Ya, all those “patriots” will stand around, watch and do nothing. They will probably cheer as it happens because he (whoever it is) is their guy.

That is your problem of perception. Can't help you there if you want to believe a bunch of BS. 

 

3 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

This applies to pretty much 90% of all people at this point. 

Unity is gone, tribalism rules, and objective knowledge is dead.

This is rich coming from you. Just rich. 

 

  • Like 1

 

 

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, User said:

That is your problem of perception. Can't help you there if you want to believe a bunch of BS. 

No, it's YOUR PROBLEM of FAILURE to perceive all the authoritarian moves that the current admin is making.

You don't even know that all the safeguards put in place after Nixon's crimes have been OBLITERATED BY Trump.

Like all the IG's were just summarily and ILLEGALLY fired by Trump (without the required Congressional notification).

Feb 12, 2025  The IGs allege that Trump failed to notify Congress about the firings at least 30 days before they occurred and did not provide a "substantive, ...
 
Edited by robosmith
Posted
47 minutes ago, robosmith said:

No, it's YOUR PROBLEM of FAILURE to perceive all the authoritarian moves that the current admin is making.

Like what?

48 minutes ago, robosmith said:

You don't even know that all the safeguards put in place after Nixon's crimes have been OBLITERATED BY Trump.

Like all the IG's were just summarily and ILLEGALLY fired by Trump (without the required Congressional notification).

*GASP* Oh no! Not the inspector generals. 

Is this a joke or something? 

How does that make us a fascist dictatorship? That was the assertion here. 

Also, the idea that Congress can tell the executive branch how to do anything with executive branch employees like the IG's is suspect and will ultimately fail. 

Even the Judge on the lawsuit was like... eh. She didn't try to reinstate them because it was pointless, because Trump has the ultimate authority over the executive branch and would just remove them again. The notion that Congress can demand a 30 day notice on the President would almost certainly be found Unconstitutional if this ever gets that far. 

 

 

 

Posted
19 hours ago, Aristides said:

MAGATs should remember it is much easier to become a fascist dictatorship than it is to get rid of one.

Which is why the majority voted for Trump and not Harris. 

  • Like 2

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,916
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    Раймо
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • LinkSoul60 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Раймо earned a badge
      First Post
    • Раймо earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • MDP went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • MDP earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...