eyeball Posted February 15 Report Posted February 15 24 minutes ago, CdnFox said: Blackbird is of the opinion that any plan that professes that it will significantly alter the climate by controlling Canadian emissions with today's technology is probably just virtue signaling. What say you @blackbird? Quote A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.
CdnFox Posted February 15 Author Report Posted February 15 6 minutes ago, eyeball said: 36 minutes ago, CdnFox said: You started off claiming that he had a super plan.... LMAO! Sigh, 14 hours ago, eyeball said: And PP says he has a real scam that actually will control the climate. Yeah I get it. If I sounded as stupid as you I'd lie all the time about what I said as well. It's always your little admission that you know you're wrong but you can't bring yourself to say it Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
eyeball Posted February 15 Report Posted February 15 9 minutes ago, CdnFox said: I'd lie all the time about what I said as well. Speaking of which where'd you find this horsehit? 46 minutes ago, CdnFox said: You started off claiming that he had a super plan that would save the world that he would implement as prime minister, 10 minutes ago, CdnFox said: It's always your little admission that you know you're wrong but you can't bring yourself to say it Say what, that PP has a super plan? That was you who said that. Quote A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.
herbie Posted February 15 Report Posted February 15 17 hours ago, blackbird said: A "climate plan" is the biggest scam in history. Get off it. Nobody can control the climate. That you think so proves exactly why your political stance is so blind, shallow and ignorant. You believe those who without evidence tell you what to believe. Quote
CdnFox Posted February 15 Author Report Posted February 15 (edited) 1 hour ago, herbie said: That you think so proves exactly why your political stance is so blind, shallow and ignorant. You believe those who without evidence tell you what to believe. Oh well that's easy then, just provide your evidence. Provide the actual scientific research which I've seen asked for for about a thousand times here on this forum. That should clear things right up. I'm sure you must have a document that shows how people can control the climate and that it's within our power to do so as Canadians No? Nothing? Not a single thing? If it was possible for candidates to affect climate we have done so in the last 10 years and we didn't. Climate change may be real but these climate plans are not Edited February 15 by CdnFox Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
blackbird Posted February 15 Report Posted February 15 2 hours ago, herbie said: That you think so proves exactly why your political stance is so blind, shallow and ignorant. You believe those who without evidence tell you what to believe. What's worse is people like you who believe man is like God and can control things like the climate. People that think they can change the climate have a hugely inflated ego that is ready to burst. What's worse is they think that taxing Canadians will somehow control the climate. Get real. Quote
Moonbox Posted February 15 Report Posted February 15 2 hours ago, CdnFox said: It made no sense for him to claim that putting more taxes on steel doesn't hurt consumers because consumers don't go out and buy steel. But he said that exactly. No, he didn't say that. That's how the National Post and the rest of Pierre Poilevre's fluffers frame what he said, panicking as they are after Trudeau's resignation. Their frenzied attempts to demonize Carney make them look silly and immature when they have a 10-year record of abject failure to campaign against. 2 hours ago, CdnFox said: Honestly, nobody calls legislation passed under the principle of pogg "emergency legislation" , they didn't even use that term in the 70's. Honesty? According to who? 2 hours ago, CdnFox said: Because he has chosen not to explain what he means we are left to guess and I suppose your guess is as valid as anyone else's but The use of that specific term in that specific way very strongly suggests that more serious emergency powers may be on the table. I have trouble seeing how it does. It seems like the least reasonable and least justifiable interpretation - the one that would serve no purpose and for which you probably can't explain any motivation. Quote "A man is no more entitled to an opinion for which he cannot account than he is for a pint of beer for which he cannot pay" - Anonymous
CdnFox Posted February 16 Author Report Posted February 16 5 hours ago, eyeball said: Speaking of which where'd you find this horsehit? You mean the quote of what you said? From your frikikin posts sparky Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
CdnFox Posted February 16 Author Report Posted February 16 1 hour ago, Moonbox said: No, he didn't say that. That's how the National Post and the rest of Pierre Poilevre's fluffers frame what he said, panicking as they are after Trudeau's resignation. Their frenzied attempts to demonize Carney make them look silly and immature when they have a 10-year record of abject failure to campaign against. It's literally word for word what he said. I watched the interview. CTV. Here's a clip. (2) Video | Facebook So i see we're at the point where you realize you're wrong and you start to have your mental melt down. What i said was 100 percent true. And you're having a hissy fit about some weird conspiracy to freak out on the right. They're Panicked!!!! They're Frenzied!!! He never said those things (which he totally said and there's video). Another almost interesting conversation ruined because you can't keep it together if the liberals aren't perfect. 1 hour ago, Moonbox said: Honesty? According to who? Sane people 1 hour ago, Moonbox said: I have trouble seeing how it does. That would be because you're blinded by hatred anger bigotry and tribalism. Anybody who doesn't have that problem can easily see how a statement that he will use the emergency powers must include the emergency act unless specifically excluded because that is the only national emergency powers that actually has that term in the name I mean it's just an !diotic thing to say "Derp!! I CAN"T POSSIBLY SEE HOW HIM SAYING HE"D USE THE GOV"TS EMERGENCY POWERS COULD REFER TO THE GOV"TS EMERGENCY POWERS LEGISLATION!!! ITS NON-THINKABLE!!" Sigh. It's really irritating that you go from being halfway sensible to a complete retarded tool in like one second the moment your tribalistic echo chamber nonsense gets challenged. Welp, i'll now wait for your usual 3 pages of trying to change what words actually mean and blaming your stupidity on my post count. What a shame. Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
eyeball Posted February 16 Report Posted February 16 2 hours ago, CdnFox said: You mean the quote of what you said? From your frikikin posts sparky And once again there squirt - where the frick did I say PP had a super plan? Quote A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.
CdnFox Posted February 16 Author Report Posted February 16 26 minutes ago, eyeball said: And once again there squirt - where the frick did I say PP had a super plan? Yeah I've already quoted it. And it's from this thread. So you say it, I quote it, you demand I quoted again, and now you're demanding I quoted again It's always been true for you as I mentioned above that you realize you say something stupid and then try and lie about what you said. He has never suggested that he can control the climate as you claimed, he has never put forward a specific plan for climate change, you've basically just made up whatever as you went because you're big mad the left and supporters such as yourself have failed utterly and turned people off climate change by not giving a crap other than to use it to take money from people for 10 years. People are sick of the lies. People are sick of left-wing snake oil peddlers like yourself who can't even own what they said and demand that it be reposted again and again and again in the same thread You don't care about climate change, if you did you wouldn't have failed for 10 years. Pretending to care now isn't going to fly Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
eyeball Posted February 16 Report Posted February 16 19 minutes ago, CdnFox said: Yeah I've already quoted it. And it's from this thread. So you say it, I quote it, you demand I quoted again, and now you're demanding I quoted again No, you're the silly donkey who said super plan not me or Poilievre. 19 minutes ago, CdnFox said: He has never suggested that he can control the climate as you claimed, You're pretending facetiousness completely escapes you? Seriously? You're more disingenuous than stupid - which indicates that shits and giggles are your main motivation. I'm mocking the ridiculous notion that @blackbird often voices around here that action to address AGW will control the climate. You're just putting on your dumbass donkey act and pretending you don't get it. 19 minutes ago, CdnFox said: You don't care about climate change, if you did you wouldn't have failed for 10 years. Pretending to care now isn't going to fly Believing you're ever serious about anything is what never flies around here. Quote A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.
CdnFox Posted February 16 Author Report Posted February 16 2 hours ago, eyeball said: No, you're the silly donkey who said super plan not me or Poilievre. Sure kid. Quote You're pretending facetiousness completely escapes you? Oh so you did say it but now it was just a joke. Dude, you doubled down on it. When I pointed out he had no such thing you kept going on and insisting he did and then finally had to admit that he never said he had a plan but that he mentioned he liked carbon capture during an interview talking about the federal budget from the liberals. That's not being facetious. That's getting caught in your bullshit and now you're trying to pretend that it was all just a joke ha ha ha. Quote You're more disingenuous than stupid - which indicates that shits and giggles are your main motivation. Says the guy who just just got called out for lying and making shit up Quote I'm mocking the ridiculous notion that @blackbird often voices around here that action to address AGW will control the climate. You're just putting on your dumbass donkey act and pretending you don't get it. You're bullshitting about Polievre because you don't like him and trying to claim he said or did things he didn't. That's it. Quote Believing you're ever serious about anything is what never flies around here. It does all the time and people take me very seriously and they know when I'm joking. With you it's just lies and bullshit and when you get busted THEN "it was all a joke honest!" PP has never claimed to have a plan that would control the climate or even seriously impact the climate. That's all i said. And if you'd agreed with that you could have done so 10 posts or so ago but you kept on and kept on till you looked like an a55hole and now you'r e mad and you want it to be all my fault as usual. Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
eyeball Posted February 16 Report Posted February 16 10 hours ago, CdnFox said: Oh so you did say it but now it was just a joke. It was a joke then too. 10 hours ago, CdnFox said: PP has never claimed to have a plan that would control the climate or even seriously impact the climate. That's all i said. That's right, I said no one can control the climate. Blackbird said that and then you jumped in to back him up with your usual hee haw donkey act. PP is planning on virtue signalling. And you guys don't care if it costs you more money while having no impact on AGW. Quote A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.
CdnFox Posted February 16 Author Report Posted February 16 1 hour ago, eyeball said: It was a joke then too. Which is why you went on to defend it and attempts to deny that it was a joke when I pointed out that it was inaccurate. You're such a pathetic liar. You got so emotional that you made a False claim about what PP said so that you could argue with that. And you do that constantly. And then i pointed it out and you doubled down, tried to twist around it and still claim he said something like that and when i proved that to be false THEN you're all "uummm.. er,... just kidding!" Then only joke here is you. You had 10 years to take meaningful action on climate change and you utterly failed. I'm sure that PP will do something to address emissions and pollution (harper did, and that actually worked), but it will be low effort low cost things because the public is completely DONE with "Climate change" fakery from you and your kind that makes them poor and does nothing. 1 Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
eyeball Posted February 16 Report Posted February 16 1 hour ago, CdnFox said: Which is why you went on to defend it and attempts to deny that it was a joke when I pointed out that it was inaccurate LMAO! Quote A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.
herbie Posted February 16 Report Posted February 16 Well what we DO know about PP's climate plan is Deny there is a problem at all, do more to ignore and reverse any policy that does admit it and remove any regulations that stop corporations from from increasing CO2 emissions, pollution, or the consent of those locally affected. Quote
CdnFox Posted February 16 Author Report Posted February 16 1 hour ago, eyeball said: LMAO! Oh yes, your usual admission of defeat always love to see it Next time don't say stupid things, don't defend the stupid things you have said, and then don't pretend that you are being stupid for humor sake even if we are laughing at you Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
Moonbox Posted February 17 Report Posted February 17 On 2/15/2025 at 7:44 PM, CdnFox said: It's literally word for word what he said. I watched the interview. CTV. Here's a clip. (2) Video | Facebook So i see we're at the point where you realize you're wrong and you start to have your mental melt down. What i said was 100 percent true. And you're having a hissy fit about some weird conspiracy to freak out on the right. They're Panicked!!!! They're Frenzied!!! He never said those things (which he totally said and there's video). Another almost interesting conversation ruined because you can't keep it together if the liberals aren't perfect. Sane people That would be because you're blinded by hatred anger bigotry and tribalism. Anybody who doesn't have that problem can easily see how a statement that he will use the emergency powers must include the emergency act unless specifically excluded because that is the only national emergency powers that actually has that term in the name I mean it's just an !diotic thing to say "Derp!! I CAN"T POSSIBLY SEE HOW HIM SAYING HE"D USE THE GOV"TS EMERGENCY POWERS COULD REFER TO THE GOV"TS EMERGENCY POWERS LEGISLATION!!! ITS NON-THINKABLE!!" Sigh. It's really irritating that you go from being halfway sensible to a complete retarded tool in like one second the moment your tribalistic echo chamber nonsense gets challenged. Welp, i'll now wait for your usual 3 pages of trying to change what words actually mean and blaming your stupidity on my post count. What a shame. It's really awkward that you write that bolded part as you spiral out into another juvenile tirade. You lasted more than 2 posts though, so that's probably a record for you. Good job little buddy! 😉 Quote "A man is no more entitled to an opinion for which he cannot account than he is for a pint of beer for which he cannot pay" - Anonymous
Zeitgeist Posted February 17 Report Posted February 17 Interesting interview with Bannon about the Trump rhetoric on Canada:: Quote
CdnFox Posted February 18 Author Report Posted February 18 5 hours ago, Moonbox said: It's really awkward that you write that bolded part as you spiral out into another juvenile tirade. You lasted more than 2 posts though, so that's probably a record for you. Good job little buddy! 😉 Blah blah blah I lost and I'm butthurt and i'm so mad he posted proof i was wrong and so i'll just make an angry attack to salvage my ego then follow him around and attack him at random later " - Moonbox Whatever gets you through your nights kiddo. Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
Moonbox Posted February 18 Report Posted February 18 16 hours ago, CdnFox said: Blah blah blah I lost and I'm butthurt and i'm so mad he posted proof i was wrong and so i'll just make an angry attack to salvage my ego then follow him around and attack him at random later " - Moonbox Whatever gets you through your nights kiddo. 🤡🤡🤡 Quote "A man is no more entitled to an opinion for which he cannot account than he is for a pint of beer for which he cannot pay" - Anonymous
Nationalist Posted February 18 Report Posted February 18 WHAT TRADE WAR??? Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
xul Posted February 18 Report Posted February 18 Good. Canadian voters has already had the name of a Canadian variant of Trump printed on their ballot sheet. Now they have the Canadian version of Chancellor Palpatine. Just wait to see who will be Jar Jar Brinks to give this power to the winner of the election.😜 Quote
CdnFox Posted February 18 Author Report Posted February 18 (edited) 4 hours ago, Moonbox said: 🤡🤡🤡 it's like when dogs roll over and whimper after a bigger dog roughs them up, that's the first thing i always think when you try to blame your stupidity on my post count "Snif! You're right but ...but... but.... POST COUNT! waaaaaah!!" LOL Never change big guy 4 hours ago, Nationalist said: WHAT TRADE WAR??? The one currently happening between Canada and the united states. It would be rather silly of you to pretend you hadn't heard of it. United states has launched a trade war with many nations including Canada. New tariffs are in place threats of additional tariffs if any action is taken are in place, So on and so forth. This is what a trade war looks like Edited February 18 by CdnFox 1 Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.