Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, Radiorum said:

No, there are checks and balances on a president's power, and Trump is trying to bypass it all. He thinks he is a king.

 

LOLOL  and you think YOU"RE one of those checks and balances!??!   I think you need to prepare yourself for disappointment :) 

Let trump do his job and evaluate his performance. That's what YOU can do. 

 

Quote

Let's follow your logic. I shouldn't speak. Maybe I should "know my place?" Maybe I shouldn't vote? 

That's not following my logic.  Thats whining and using an emotive argument in place of reason or logic to contort what i said because you can't make an actual reasoned or logical argument against it.

Quote

I am informed, and - 

The evidence you've presented here since your arrival (and then rearrival) suggests that's not accurate. 

 

Quote

‘Whenever the people are well-informed, they can be trusted with their own government.’ – Thomas Jefferson

I suspect i could change his mind. :) 

In any case, you're NOT qualified to pick trump's cabinet so at the end of the day while you're free to opine it's an uneducated and ill informed opinion, so why not focus on results? 

Posted
Just now, Radiorum said:

But should not all citizens have full participation in that society?

Normal citizens, the rest can go and eat cake.

  • Haha 1
Posted
1 minute ago, CdnFox said:

you think YOU"RE one of those checks and balances!??! 

God, no. Are you dense? I'm talking about the process of appointing Cabinet members.

2 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

ou're NOT qualified to pick trump's cabinet

And I surely will not. But in the final analysis, the only criterion for getting selected should not be blind loyalty to Trump.

3 minutes ago, Legato said:

Normal citizens, the rest can go and eat cake.

There is no normal, there is only natural, and we are all natural.

Posted
1 hour ago, Black Dog said:

 

Good thing there are plenty of other pedophiles in the Republican ranks for Trump to choose from.

I think Biden has a lot of time on his hands now.

Think of all the kids that can be saved if Trump keeps that old pedo busy. 

If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. 

"If it didn't come from CNN, it's heresy!" - leftist "intellectuals"

Posted
19 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

Your pro-sex pervert stance, already well established by your support for Trump, is noted.

Maybe if Matt Gaetz had decided to withdraw from that 17-year-old he took to the coke-fuelled sex party, none of this would have been an issue.

giphy.gif?cid=6c09b952bs882y8rh27jz4uqjj

Oh good, more shìt posting and delusional ac usations. Why don't you come post when you have something based on reality to say.

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted

I'm not surprised. I still think Gaetz is qualified but, Trump will just nominate another who will drain the justice swamp.

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted (edited)
37 minutes ago, Radiorum said:

Let's get to the bottom of this. "Woke" just means aware and attentive.

"Holy braindead arseholes, Batman. Where did that guy come from?" - everyone 

Edited by WestCanMan

If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. 

"If it didn't come from CNN, it's heresy!" - leftist "intellectuals"

Posted
20 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

1. Oh I never try and guess what you meant anymore.

2. You don't know how often I reply to you?

3. It's not THAT often.

 

1. Ok.  Yes, I was saying that this result goes against the doom-and-gloom predictions.
2. No, unless I unlock the whole thread to see all the replies as I did here.
3. OK.

Posted
4 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

Oh good, more shìt posting and delusional ac usations. Why don't you come post when you have something based on reality to say.

The reality is: the people in Trump's own party saw something in the ethics report that convinced them not to support this nomination, but rather than accept the possibility that where there's smoke there's a pedophile, you have to concoct a conspiracy theory about the deep state. 

Maybe if your party wasn't rife with sex pests and perverts, you'd have more luck, but alas, that's a feature and not a bug with you people.

Posted
30 minutes ago, Radiorum said:

God, no. Are you dense? I'm talking about the process of appointing Cabinet members.

And I surely will not. But in the final analysis, the only criterion for getting selected should not be blind loyalty to Trump.

There is no normal, there is only natural, and we are all natural.

Naturally you would say that, however it's not a normal thing to say.

  • Haha 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Radiorum said:

You really need to get out more.

Where do you think I am now.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
37 minutes ago, Radiorum said:

God, no. Are you dense? I'm talking about the process of appointing Cabinet members.

Ah so you'll have changed the subject from your opinion to the process which has absolutely nothing to do with you without actually mentioning you were changing the process and now it's my fault because I'm dense  :) 

You really not winning any points here you realize that right?

38 minutes ago, Radiorum said:

And I surely will not. But in the final analysis, the only criterion for getting selected should not be blind loyalty to Trump.

And where has it been said that that was the only criteria? Are you suggesting these are the only people in all of America that would be loyal to trump and that's why he chose them? Where is it possible that there is another Factor that you haven't mentioned which played into the decision?

39 minutes ago, Radiorum said:

There is no normal, there is only natural, and we are all natural.

There is in fact a normal. Has the case with all groups and subsets there is behavior and capabilities which are considered to be within the average and those that fall outside of the average.

Posted
20 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Because MAGA CULT depends on SLEEPING when it comes to recognizing REALITY.

Sounds like a yawn coming from Robo', go get some sleep little guy the sandman's not real.

Posted
14 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

The reality is: the people in Trump's own party saw something in the ethics report that convinced them not to support this nomination, but rather than accept the possibility that where there's smoke there's a pedophile, you have to concoct a conspiracy theory about the deep state. 

Maybe if your party wasn't rife with sex pests and perverts, you'd have more luck, but alas, that's a feature and not a bug with you people.

Do you really want to go there? Fine

Al Franken? https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/sen-al-franken-embarrassed-ashamed-following-sexual-harassment-allegations-n824026

Joe Biden? https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/joe-bidens-daughter-ashley-confirms-legitimacy-of-the-showers-with-dad-diary-entry/ar-BB1pfCEm

Bobby Scott? https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/former-aide-accuses-rep-bobby-scott-sexual-misconduct-n830216

Ruben Kihuen? https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/katenocera/rep-ruben-kihuen-out

John Conyers? https://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/sexual-misconduct/john-conyers-announces-retirement-congress-endorses-son-amid-harassment-scandal-n826616

Andrew Cuomo? https://www.reuters.com/article/legal/factbox-prominent-us-political-figures-accused-of-sexual-misconduct-idUSKBN2B42TP/

Bill Clinton, obviously.

And this big ass list of lawmakers and democrats loving celebs: https://newstalk1130.iheart.com/featured/common-sense-central/content/2017-11-21-the-long-list-of-democrats-accused-of-sexual-misconduct/

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
5 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Ah so you'll have changed the subject from your opinion to the process which has absolutely nothing to do with you without actually mentioning you were changing the process and now it's my fault because I'm dense

Omg, I'm Lol, you're funny.

 

6 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Where is it possible that there is another Factor that you haven't mentioned which played into the decision?

Name it.

7 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Has the case with all groups and subsets there is behavior and capabilities which are considered to be within the average and those that fall outside of the average.

We're not talking test scores, we're talking people's lives. We come into this world so innocent, formed by the mysterious process of development in our mother's wombs. It's a whole entire spectrum, and we come out who we are. When two parents mate, there are more possible genetic combinations in the offspring than there are stars in heaven. I'm just into accepting people where they are. Life is tough enough.

 

Posted (edited)
14 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

I could pull a list that long just from Trump and his cabinet picks alone.

Christ, you guys had a pedophile as Speaker for almost a decade.

LOL i like how you lot have to expand that list to include "celebs" to pad the numbers.

Of course you could. Because, where ever there is money and power, there are people trying to get a piece. That includes women, many of whom are making false allegations in hopes of a pay day.

It's so bad, congress appropriates money to pay off the claims: https://www.newsweek.com/why-are-congressmen-using-taxpayer-funds-buy-sex-abuse-claims-725958

Edited by gatomontes99

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
14 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

Of course you could. Because, where ever there is money and power, there are people trying to get a piece. That includes women, many of whom are making false allegations in hopes of a pay day.

It's so bad, congress appropriates money to pay off the claims: https://www.newsweek.com/why-are-congressmen-using-taxpayer-funds-buy-sex-abuse-claims-725958

Many? How many, exactly?

Posted
11 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

Many? How many, exactly?

Enough to siphon off 17 million from Congress in a handful of years.

Name one celebrity or athlete that doesn't have some allegation of sexual assault against him? Even Peyton and Eli Manning had one.

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted (edited)
17 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

Enough to siphon off 17 million from Congress in a handful of years.

I asked which ones were fake and you're implying it's all of them when you also don't know how much of that was paid our for sex harassment claims? Boy you're all over the shop.

Also: $17 million over 10 years isn't that much money.

Quote

Name one celebrity or athlete that doesn't have some allegation of sexual assault against him? Even Peyton and Eli Manning had one.

I see you're going with "it happens to everyone" but hundreds if not thousands of politicians, celebrities and athletes don't have sex allegations against them. I'm somewhat surprised you think that's the case, but given you swim in MAGA waters, maybe it's normal in your circles?

Edited by Black Dog
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Radiorum said:

Omg, I'm Lol, you're funny.

 

well laughter is one of the many coping behaviors we see with radical lefties when they are called out for bad behavior so perfectly understandable :) 

1 hour ago, Radiorum said:

Name it.

I wouldn't have any idea, but what I can tell you is that there are many possible other factors. Which is my point. I don't know all of the specific factors that were important to trump, and your post suggests that there is no possible other component that was important to trump which is false.

What grade are you in again?

1 hour ago, Radiorum said:

We're not talking test scores, we're talking people's lives.

Nobody even mentioned a test scores. And I was a specifically referring to population groups. Try to keep up, I realize you may still be in school but not everything is about test scores

Quote

We come into this world so innocent, formed by the mysterious process of development in our mother's wombs. It's a whole entire spectrum, and we come out who we are. When two parents mate, there are more possible genetic combinations in the offspring than there are stars in heaven. I'm just into accepting people where they are. Life is tough enough.

LOL, no wonder you're a kamala supporter, Your word salads are almost as bad as hers :) That was an awful lot of words to say absolutely nothing intelligent whatsoever.

Regardless of the factors involved, probabilities are involved and the vast majority of people will fall within a standard group with a few outliers.  We see this kind of thing repeated throughout nature, for example passing away form through two slits in the old double slit experiment, The interference pattern shows the vast majority of hits congregated in a relatively tight group with smaller number of outliers based on probability. It's not an even distribution.

So to keep it simple there is a bracket in which the probability say the vast majority of people will fall, with a handful falling outside of the most probable outcomes. That's just how are universe works

Edited by CdnFox

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,896
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    postuploader
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Akalupenn earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • User earned a badge
      One Year In
    • josej earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • josej earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Dave L went up a rank
      Contributor
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...