Media "Fact Checkers" hard at work protecting Kamala Harris

[User]

This is exactly why I don't like these so-called "fact checkers"

They almost always turn out to be biased and skew the headlines to spin things. CBS is out "fact checking" Trump criticizing Harris for her support of the Minnesota Freedom Fund back during the BLM riots and violence. They were bailing out the criminal thugs engaged in the riots and continued on in their mission of helping bail out criminal thugs, like one who went on to murder someone. 

But the "fact checkers" are like, well, she didn't technically donate to the fund herself... with headlines like these:

https://www.cbsnews.com/minnesota/video/trump-falsely-accuses-vp-harris-of-donating-to-minnesota-freedom-fund/

"Trump falsely accuses VP Harris of donating to Minnesota Freedom Fund"

This is what they do, they ignroe the point, ignore everything else, and find some obscure way of "fact checking" here to say it was false. 

 

[Fluffypants]

27 minutes ago, User said:

This is exactly why I don't like these so-called "fact checkers"

They almost always turn out to be biased and skew the headlines to spin things. CBS is out "fact checking" Trump criticizing Harris for her support of the Minnesota Freedom Fund back during the BLM riots and violence. They were bailing out the criminal thugs engaged in the riots and continued on in their mission of helping bail out criminal thugs, like one who went on to murder someone. 

But the "fact checkers" are like, well, she didn't technically donate to the fund herself... with headlines like these:

https://www.cbsnews.com/minnesota/video/trump-falsely-accuses-vp-harris-of-donating-to-minnesota-freedom-fund/

"Trump falsely accuses VP Harris of donating to Minnesota Freedom Fund"

This is what they do, they ignroe the point, ignore everything else, and find some obscure way of "fact checking" here to say it was false. 

 

Fact check sites are completely useless. I have seen fact checks where they fact checked false but if you actually read the article below it, it literally should of been fact check true or they twist things to be like well its true if you look at it this way. Like they would take something Biden said that was false and then proclaim it mostly true because the administration corrected the record afterwards.

They put fact check in big font at the beginning of the article knowing that people aren't going to actually read the article and question their methods

[Deluge]

Rotten Tomatoes critics are more reliable than fact checkers.

I'm a little surprised that some leftoids still try to use them. 

Edited July 26, 2024 by Deluge

[CouchPotato]

What we need are fact checker checkers. And then fact checker checker checkers.

This is why you can't police misinformation and disinformation. The arbiters are human and just as biased as the media.

Edited July 26, 2024 by CouchPotato

[User]

I have run out of my like quota for the day... sorry gang. I would like your comments otherwise!

[sharkman]

And what about this obvious propaganda campaign in the MSM that Harris wasn’t the Border Czar?  They have absolutely no integrity, they were all reporting on her appointment back then.  Yesterday it was a full court press calling it a right wing conspiracy.

Anyone with a functioning brain can remember her appointment…

[Fluffypants]

Sick thing is that the same media who are now claiming she was never the border czar still have articles out there that names her the border czar.

[Rebound]

59 minutes ago, User said:

This is exactly why I don't like these so-called "fact checkers"

They almost always turn out to be biased and skew the headlines to spin things. CBS is out "fact checking" Trump criticizing Harris for her support of the Minnesota Freedom Fund back during the BLM riots and violence. They were bailing out the criminal thugs engaged in the riots and continued on in their mission of helping bail out criminal thugs, like one who went on to murder someone. 

But the "fact checkers" are like, well, she didn't technically donate to the fund herself... with headlines like these:

https://www.cbsnews.com/minnesota/video/trump-falsely-accuses-vp-harris-of-donating-to-minnesota-freedom-fund/

"Trump falsely accuses VP Harris of donating to Minnesota Freedom Fund"

This is what they do, they ignroe the point, ignore everything else, and find some obscure way of "fact checking" here to say it was false. 

 

They played video of Former President Shlthead saying what he said.  
 

Fact Check:  TRUE: Donald Trump is a shlthead. 

Edited July 26, 2024 by Rebound

[CdnFox]

3 hours ago, User said:

This is exactly why I don't like these so-called "fact checkers"

They almost always turn out to be biased and skew the headlines to spin things. CBS is out "fact checking" Trump criticizing Harris for her support of the Minnesota Freedom Fund back during the BLM riots and violence. They were bailing out the criminal thugs engaged in the riots and continued on in their mission of helping bail out criminal thugs, like one who went on to murder someone. 

But the "fact checkers" are like, well, she didn't technically donate to the fund herself... with headlines like these:

https://www.cbsnews.com/minnesota/video/trump-falsely-accuses-vp-harris-of-donating-to-minnesota-freedom-fund/

"Trump falsely accuses VP Harris of donating to Minnesota Freedom Fund"

This is what they do, they ignroe the point, ignore everything else, and find some obscure way of "fact checking" here to say it was false. 

 

Yeah, or its the 'needs context' excuse.  "well what they said was absolutely true but you need to understand the context".   And the context is always that trump sucks. 

[User]

2 hours ago, Rebound said:

Fact Check:  TRUE: Donald Trump is a shlthead. 

Fact Check:

Kamala Harris advocated for folks to give money to a fund to bail out the rioters who engaged in violence, vandalism, and destruction of property. That same fund went on to bail out a dude who then committed murder. She has never denounced that fund and refused to comment now. 

 

[CouchPotato]

2 hours ago, sharkman said:

And what about this obvious propaganda campaign in the MSM that Harris wasn’t the Border Czar?  They have absolutely no integrity, they were all reporting on her appointment back then.  Yesterday it was a full court press calling it a right wing conspiracy.

Anyone with a functioning brain can remember her appointment…

We have always been at war with Eurasia!!!

[Rebound]

23 minutes ago, User said:

Fact Check:

Kamala Harris advocated for folks to give money to a fund to bail out the rioters who engaged in violence, vandalism, and destruction of property. That same fund went on to bail out a dude who then committed murder. She has never denounced that fund and refused to comment now. 

 

FACT: Harris made one Tweet. One. 
FACT: Two years later, the fund bailed out a guy for indecent exposure.  
 

FACT: Kamala Harris is a prosecutor

FACT: Donald Trump is a 34-time felon.  Trump is a criminal.  And he slept with porn stars. And his wife refuses to be seen with him in public.  And he got convicted for over $450 million in fraud. And he’s a rapist.  He had five kids with three different women and cheated on all three of his wives.  

Edited July 26, 2024 by Rebound

[QuebecOverCanada]

4 hours ago, Fluffypants said:

Fact check sites are completely useless

For you, totally.

But they are funded, and bigly. It's not for nothing. They work as intended, as the pedantic upper class Democrats refer to them as a source as these websites are as pretentious as them. Pure appeal to narcissism. It mobilizes them and gives them a sense as they have the 'true' opinion, whether or not these fact checks are right or wrong. The tone of all the fact checks is to make the reader think they are above everyone.

Who fact checks the fact checkers by the way?

Oh yeah... nevermind. We don't have to fact check those fact checkers as they only state facts, right?

[QuebecOverCanada]

59 minutes ago, Rebound said:

And his wife refuses to be seen with him in public

FACT CHECK

Rebound pretends that Donald Trump's wife, Melania Trump, refuses to be seen in public with him.

PANTS ON FIRE PANTS ON FIRE PANTS ON FIRE

As you may watch in this video, Melania Trump has had a major appearance at the last RNC, with Donald Trump.

Please donate for my foundation for fact checking. I am a TOP JOURNALIST FACT CHECKER.

 

[QuebecOverCanada]

1 hour ago, Rebound said:

And he’s a rapist

FACT CHECK

Rebound pretends that Donald Trump is a rapist.

PANTS ON FIRE PANTS ON FIRE PANTS ON FIRE.

In reality, Donald Trump was convicted of defamation for calling a rape accuser a crazy woman. He never was accused of rape in his civil lawsuit in New York.

Plus, a federal judge in Florida allowed Trump's defamation claim against ABC and George Stephanopoulos to proceed, based on the anchor's use of the term "rape" to describe the jury's verdict.

SOURCE: https://www.msnbc.com/deadline-white-house/deadline-legal-blog/trump-defamation-abc-e-jean-carroll-verdict-rcna163499

So not only is Rebound wrong, but he could be sued for defamation for this statement in the State of Florida.

Please donate for my foundation for fact checking. I am a TOP JOURNALIST FACT CHECKER.

[QuebecOverCanada]

2 hours ago, Rebound said:

FACT: Kamala Harris is a prosecutor

FACT CHECK

Rebound pretends that Kamala Harris is a prosecutor.

PANTS ON FIRE PANTS ON FIRE PANTS ON FIRE

She is in fact the Vice-President and not a prosecutor. She was in fact an Attorney until 2017.

SOURCE: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kamala_Harris

Please donate for my foundation for fact checking. I am a TOP JOURNALIST FACT CHECKER.

[QuebecOverCanada]

2 hours ago, Rebound said:

FACT: Harris made one Tweet. One. 

FACT CHECK

CLAIM: Rebound says that Kamala Harris only tweeted once.

THE FACTS: In fact, this isn't true.

It is false as she posted way over one tweet. She has hundreds, and has joined the social network since April 2009.

RATING: This statement from Rebound ends up as 5 Pinocchios out of 4.

Please donate for my foundation for fact checking. I am a TOP JOURNALIST FACT CHECKER.

[CdnFox]

28 minutes ago, QuebecOverCanada said:

FACT CHECK

CLAIM: Rebound says that Kamala Harris only tweeted once.

THE FACTS: In fact, this isn't true.

It is false as she posted way over one tweet. She has hundreds, and has joined the social network since April 2009.

RATING: This statement from Rebound ends up as 5 Pinocchios out of 4.

Please donate for my foundation for fact checking. I am a TOP JOURNALIST FACT CHECKER.

You are quickly becoming my personal hero. 

[User]

6 hours ago, Rebound said:

FACT: Harris made one Tweet. One. 

Fact Check:

Kamala Harris advocated for folks to give money to a fund to bail out the rioters who engaged in violence, vandalism, and destruction of property. That same fund went on to bail out a dude who then committed murder. She has never denounced that fund and refused to comment now. 

[Rebound]

7 hours ago, User said:

Fact Check:

Kamala Harris advocated for folks to give money to a fund to bail out the rioters who engaged in violence, vandalism, and destruction of property. That same fund went on to bail out a dude who then committed murder. She has never denounced that fund and refused to comment now. 

Fact Check: Donald Trump is a racist who cheated on all three of his wives.  And Kamala sent one Tweet.  Yeah. Got it. She sent a Tweet.

[Rebound]

11 hours ago, QuebecOverCanada said:

FACT CHECK

Rebound pretends that Kamala Harris is a prosecutor.

PANTS ON FIRE PANTS ON FIRE PANTS ON FIRE

She is in fact the Vice-President and not a prosecutor. She was in fact an Attorney until 2017.

SOURCE: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kamala_Harris

Please donate for my foundation for fact checking. I am a TOP JOURNALIST FACT CHECKER.

ldiot, before she was Vice President, she was a U.S. Senator. And before that, she was a District Attorney and then Attorney General… i.e., a Prosecutor.  
 

Donald Trump is a rapist.  A fraud.  A stealer of national security documents.  A cheat. A scumbag. A disgusting human being in every sense. 

[Nationalist]

Here are some "facts" for y'all Libbies.

1. The Democrats cheated on many levels to put Brandon in the Whitehouse. Proof: Illegally changing election rules in many states. The claim that Hunter Biden's laptop was a Russian plant.

2. Kamala Harris was named Border Czar. Proof:

 

3. Kamala Haris is an id1ot. Proof:

 

🤣

 

[Guest]

1 hour ago, Rebound said:

(One) Donald Trump is a rapist.  (Two) A fraud.  (Three) A stealer of national security documents. (Four) A cheat. (Five) A scumbag. (Six) A disgusting human being in every sense. 

Where do we start.

(One) - there is literally no irrevocable proof of this. 

(Two) Fully your opinion. To those who voted for him, he has come as advertised.

(Three) There literally is no strong case against him on this. Purely political. 

(Four) Bill Clinton should also factor in your books, especially since he abused of his power against an employee of his.

(Five) Again, purely opinion. People vote for him for what he can do for them, not based on moral grand standing.

(Six) Again, purely opinion. He comes across as a counter puncher who is quite likeable in proper context to literally half of America.

[WestCanMan]

They also fact-checked Kamala's dad's statement that his great grandmother was a slave-owner in Jamaica. 

He is/(was?) a professor at Stanford, so I'm pretty sure that he's capable of saying who his own GG was, and he has no reason to lie about something like that, but it's deemed "unverified" because medical records don't exist to back up his claim. 

[CdnFox]

6 hours ago, Rebound said:

Fact Check: Donald Trump is a racist who cheated on all three of his wives.  And Kamala sent one Tweet.  Yeah. Got it. She sent a Tweet.

She sent a tweet calling for money for criminals to be released from jail. 
Probably raised hundreds of thousands. 

That's like saying "She only murdered one guy. ONE GUY.  Are we really going to make a big deal over one murder?"

YES - it's a big deal.  She helped raise money for criminals because she supported them and god knows what else she did to support them.  People have been fired for "One tweet" many times.