Jump to content

Harvard professor needs armed protection


Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, ironstone said:

What are the examples of Trump making death threats to his opponents?

What are the examples of you being able to read?

15 minutes ago, robosmith said:

When did YOU EVER object to the death threats fomented by Trump against EVERYONE who opposes HIM?

This is ONE EXAMPLE. There are hundreds of examples of MAGA CULT issuing death threats. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Your cite says "peer reviewed" but there is no pointer to a peer review published article.

Your cite references a working paper, not published and no reference to peer reviewed.

So cite the PUBLISHED DOCUMENT and JOURNAL or admit you LIED.

According to his CV he submitted the paper to two different academic journals but it is listed as "forthcoming" and neither journal has any reference to it almost eight years later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, robosmith said:

What are the examples of you being able to read?

 

You really get triggered easily don't you?😉

Business as usual for a leftist.

Maybe you'll get your points across better if you use EVEN MORE CAPS. (Please don't lol)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, ironstone said:

You really get triggered easily don't you?😉

Business as usual for a leftist.

Maybe you'll get your points across better if you use EVEN MORE CAPS. (Please don't lol)

Nobody parrots left-wing nonsense louder than roboshill - he's a spewer, that's for damn sure. lol

Edited by Deluge
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, Moonbox said:

If they're saying peer-reviewed = infallible and unquestionable, then they're wrong as well, especially in the social sciences.  Peer-reviewed just adds credibility, and mainly depending on the quality and standards of the publishing journal/board/group.   

In the case of Roland Fryer, he had a working paper that was not subjected to peer-review but the New York Times picked it up and published it anyways, and this was back in 2016.  The methodology and conclusions of the study have since been picked apart and refuted as flawed by other experts, including by the university he worked for.

Many of the people who liked the conclusions he drew, however, have elevated him to mythical/martyr status, just like the anti-vaxx crowd did with the odd dissenter.  They revere the experts that tell them what they want to hear, and ignore everyone else.  

 

 

You bate "uppity" blacks too just like all leftists. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

According to his CV he submitted the paper to two different academic journals but it is listed as "forthcoming" and neither journal has any reference to it almost eight years later.

As i just posted it was published.

You lefties are hilarious :)  you can't cope with the facts, you can't provide alternate research which offers different findings or different explinations for the findings in this paper, i guarantee you haven't READ the paper, your ONLY THOUGHT (and i'm being generous calling it that) is to defend your ideology at all costs.

This is why nobody takes you seriously. You're a joke,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

No one said that. Are you gonna make up another quote for that too you f*cking loser?

You're the one who's acting like whether or not the professor's study is accurate is the only consideration.

FYI that's not even the side dish here. The entree is the fact that PEOPLE ARE THREATENING TO KILL HIM BECAUSE THEY DON'T LIKE THE FACT THAT THEIR NARRATIVE IS BEING DEBUNKED, child.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

lol nice deflection dipshit.

That's actually the point of this whole thread.  YOU were the one who tried to deflect :)  

LOL - you forgot didn't you.  You literally forgot what we were talking about in your rush to cover up the facts and pretend it's not true. :)

That's just sad. I mean - we're still on the first page.

So - you seem pretty ok with the idea he got death threats for his work. Is that because you don't like it or because you think others shouldn't like it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

That's actually the point of this whole thread.  YOU were the one who tried to deflect :)  

LOL - you forgot didn't you.  You literally forgot what we were talking about in your rush to cover up the facts and pretend it's not true. :)

That's just sad. I mean - we're still on the first page.

So - you seem pretty ok with the idea he got death threats for his work. Is that because you don't like it or because you think others shouldn't like it?

LOl you suck so hard at this, it's remarkable. Everything you halfwits argue depends on fabricating positions from whole cloth. I have never encountered a more delusional group of dummies.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Yakuda said:

No it's all part of the same idea wingnut. The article is secondary to the "tolerant" response of leftists. It's not my fault you're too stupid to catch that. Maybe slao your mother. 

 

1 minute ago, Black Dog said:

LOl you suck so hard at this, it's remarkable. Everything you halfwits argue depends on fabricating positions from whole cloth. I have never encountered a more delusional group of dummies.

 

Why would a professor need armed protection from leftist mongrels like yourself if you were so tolerant? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

Because there's lots of crazies in the world, I dunno what to tell you, were you born yesterday?

There are a lot of crazies and apparently they're all leftist nitwits that can't stand a black man questioning the moronic leftist narrative. No I've been around long enough to know rabid leftist mongrels when I seen them. 

Edited by Yakuda
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

LOl you suck so hard at this, it's remarkable.

 

You've confused me with your mother.

Quote

Everything you halfwits argue depends on fabricating positions from whole cloth.

No, it's fact. The problem is your only defense is to deny simple facts and the truth. It's stunning how often you have to 'unsay' things and renounce things you've said.

Sorry kiddo - the problem is yourself not anyone else

Quote

I have never encountered a more delusional group of dummies.

If you buy 2 mirrors you can have an infinite number  :) 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Yakuda said:

There are a lot of crazies and apparently they're all leftist nitwits that can't stand a black man questioning the moronic leftist narrative. No I've been around long enough to know rabid leftist mongrels when I seen them. 

You have brain worms, get help.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

You've confused me with your mother.

No, it's fact. The problem is your only defense is to deny simple facts and the truth. It's stunning how often you have to 'unsay' things and renounce things you've said.

Sorry kiddo - the problem is yourself not anyone else

If you buy 2 mirrors you can have an infinite number  :) 

I've never done that. What I have to do is explain in painful detail what what I said means the way i'd explain something to a very stupid toddler because that's about the level you function at. Again, not my problem.

Edited by Black Dog
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Black Dog said:

You have brain worms, get help.

I'm not the one that had a problem with what the professor learned. That's your species. Rabid wing nuts with brains shriveled by hatred for anything that contradicts leftist dogma. You things claim to be tolerant and progressive until you aren't. Pathetic zombies. 

3 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

I've never done that. What I have to do is explain in painful detail what what I said means the way i'd explain something to a very stupid toddler because that's about the level you function at. Again, not my problem.

Why do you hate black people that won't stay on the leftist plantation? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

I've never done that.

You do it regularly.  To the point where everyone's noticing and calling you out as a result.

Here's your problem.  You're deciding that you like a position or argument wihtout arriving at that conclusion logically. Then you attempt to come up with all kinds of arguments to defend that position. And whenever people do that they wind up making little logic mistakes, painting themselves into corners and having to backtrack and retcon their arguments to make sense.

It's actually pretty common and while i make fun of you for being a leftie with 'mental health issues' it's actually prevelant in a lot of humans. It requires training to get out of that habit for most, you see it in children a lot till they learn better and for some it's a harder habit to break.

Joking aside - you need to start thinking of your arguments from the other way, working towards a conclusion and then you can share them here and see if they stand up to the acid test or need more work.

But right now you're just coming across  as a bit of a kook who gets a thought in his head and runs with it instead of thinking it out, and that's probably not what your goal is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Free Speech Union

'The organisation was founded to counter cancel culture,[4] and was "established to counter Twitter mobs that drown out opinions they dislike", according to The Times. Its directors say it will be the beginning of a solution to the "censorship problem". Young said that it should take on the "witch-finder generals" and the "enforcers of intellectual conformity and moral dogma"'

yep, when people have a preconceived answer they desire... there's always a place to find it on the internet.

more black people are shot and locked up by police every year because... they lazy and violent creatures. right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, godzilla said:

Free Speech Union

'The organisation was founded to counter cancel culture,[4] and was "established to counter Twitter mobs that drown out opinions they dislike", according to The Times. Its directors say it will be the beginning of a solution to the "censorship problem". Young said that it should take on the "witch-finder generals" and the "enforcers of intellectual conformity and moral dogma"'

yep, when people have a preconceived answer they desire... there's always a place to find it on the internet.

more black people are shot and locked up by police every year because... they lazy and violent creatures. right?

You realize don't you, that a black male is more likely to be killed by another black male than by either a cop or a white person,right? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

You do it regularly.  To the point where everyone's noticing and calling you out as a result.

You say this as you're engaged in probably a half a dozen similar arguments, where each opponent in their own way is  calling you out for your belligerent stupidity and your toddler-level self awareness.  🤣🤣🤣

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,744
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    John Wilson
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • exPS went up a rank
      Explorer
    • Fluffypants went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • exPS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • gatomontes99 went up a rank
      Proficient
    • phoenyx75 earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...