As Kids, They Thought They Were Trans. They No Longer Do. (or why it's ok for parents to question)

[Moonbox]

21 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

OH - and speaking of obsessive it's hilarious you have a folder dedicated to little pictures and cut outs of me that you can post out of context to try to 'win' arugments   LOLOLOL   

What's out of context about it?  You spend a truly pathetic amount of time you here insisting to your debate opponents that they're losing (as you've done in this thread) but in your own words that probably means they won, right?   

If you had even a shred of self-awareness, these sorts of contradictions could be avoided.  Unfortunately, you have the emotional intelligence of a 12 year old, and like a 12 year old you find yourself compelled to spam your caps, exclamation marks and emojis like you do above here. 

LOLOLOL KID!  

[Guest]

2 hours ago, Legato said:

Weak.

Seriously. Could also mean they are government workers, or do jobs that provide them with time to post profusely. 

My line of work gives me limited time to post.

Plus the wife would get on my case if I tried to make up time during my downtime.

But to me such an insult is like losing an argument, and telling the poster they should "get laid".

Telling someone they aren't emotionally intelligent, then following this up with jokes that would make a 5 year old who giggles when they hear words like caca, is not something you should tell yourself you're above others on.

Also, who crops old posts to make a point vs using the existing ammunition an apparent low IQ post should have given you.

[CdnFox]

6 minutes ago, Moonbox said:

What's out of context about it? You spend a truly pathetic amount of time you here insisting to your debate opponents that they're losing

I actually spend almost no time here doing that at all   I"ll say things like "why do you freak out when you lose " and YOU"LL claim that's INNNNSSISTINGGGGGG to people they lost   LOL  - but it isn't.  It's just asking why you behave like this?

And not that many freak out like you do.'

So - point to where i insisted to you recently - you specifically -  that YOU LOST!!!!  Insisted!!!

Uhh ohhhh - you just realized you lied again and got busted right? Better go with your old stand by of "well you actually said this but what you REALLY meant"  or  "what these words ACTUALLY mean is'...

 

LOLOL - totally busted kid.

 

Quote

If you had even a shred of self-awareness, these sorts of contradictions could be avoided.  Unfortunately, you have the emotional intelligence of a 12 year old, and like a 12 year old you find yourself compelled to spam your caps, exclamation marks and emojis like you do above here.

LOLOL - sorry kid, there is nothing I can do about "contradictions' which only exist in your brain, and the 'caps' and such is simply mocking you.   After all - write for your audience  

So you didn't answer the question - why DO you behave like this every single time you lose a discussion? 

 

17 hours ago, eyeball said:

You, WestCanMan, Zeitgeist, goddess, Perspectiv, its everywhere you look in comments,

Ok - post where i actually called someone a nazi and meant it.  (hitler doesn't count )

[Zeitgeist]

This is an excellent article about the activist pressures putting kids at risk:

https://www.thefp.com/p/i-was-fired-after-blowing-the-whistle

[CdnFox]

2 minutes ago, Perspektiv said:

Seriously. Could also mean they are government workers, or do jobs that provide them with time to post profusely. 

My line of work gives me limited time to post.

Plus the wife would get on my case if I tried to make up time during my downtime.

But to me such an insult is like losing an argument, and telling the poster they should "get laid".

Telling someone they aren't emotionally intelligent, then following this up with jokes that would make a 5 year old who giggles when they hear words like caca, is not something you should tell yourself you're above others on.

Also, who crops old posts to make a point vs using the existing ammunition an apparent low IQ post should have given you.

Yeah.

I get stuck on hold and such quite a bit. A little voice software and i can push out most posts in a few seconds.

I save more detailed ones for when i take a break, but i'm not on a clock.  I get all my work done and  the bosses are happy and it doesn't' really matter when i do it.

Coming here, having a few intelligent discussions, laughing at and mocking the 1diots, it's a nice quick distraction from work and lets me refocus.

This post took 18 seconds.  Except this last line.  I'd stopped the watch by then

Moon box types with two fingers so he thinks this is a REAAAAAALLLY long post  

[eyeball]

27 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Ok - post where i actually called someone a nazi and meant it.  (hitler doesn't count )

No that's not how it works. It's up to you to prove you're not a conspiracy tard. It should be really easy, just stop acting like one.

[Nationalist]

45 minutes ago, Moonbox said:

What's out of context about it?  You spend a truly pathetic amount of time you here insisting to your debate opponents that they're losing (as you've done in this thread) but in your own words that probably means they won, right?   

If you had even a shred of self-awareness, these sorts of contradictions could be avoided.  Unfortunately, you have the emotional intelligence of a 12 year old, and like a 12 year old you find yourself compelled to spam your caps, exclamation marks and emojis like you do above here. 

LOLOLOL KID!  

🤡

[Moonbox]

40 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

LOLOL - sorry kid, there is nothing I can do about "contradictions' which only exist in your brain, and the 'caps' and such is simply mocking you.   After all - write for your audience  

The contradiction's there in plain site.  Every keystroke you waste lamely insisting that someone's lost an argument to you (which is dozens of times a day), we can go back to where you said that means they probably won.  

The fact that it's egg on your face is the problem you have with it, and no amount of emoji spam or keyboard pounding changes it.  

 

[CdnFox]

34 minutes ago, Moonbox said:

The contradiction's there in plain site.  Every keystroke you waste lamely insisting that someone's lost an argument to you (which is dozens of times a day), we can go back to where you said that means they probably won. 

but as noted I don't actually do that.   Which is why you couldn't come up with a single example that I asked for

In fact I spend my time predicting what you will do when you lose And then later asking why you behave that way when in fact you do.

Quote

The fact that it's egg on your face is the problem you have with it, and no amount of emoji spam or keyboard pounding changes it.  

It's not egg on my face kiddo. Sorry to disappoint but when people see that they think that you're being desperate. And weak. And they frequently comment on it. It doesn't make me look bad in the slightest. I know that you are desperately Hoping that it does but it does not.

For others it's a sign that you think of yourself as a failure. For me, it's just another excuse to make some popcorn   🍿🍿🍿

[Black Dog]

19 hours ago, CdnFox said:

We? You mean the voices in your head and you?

No you don't. You're a lying childish m0r0n on the internet - I already know i'm correct, the law is already in place, and you deserve nothing.  I'm not here to try to fix your stupid.  The cops show up ALL THE TIME where kids are at risk,

See, you cant follow simple logic, it's pathetic.

Quote

I admitted it was a fake list you made and posted     But of course with that mental health issue you have going on as a leftie it's to be expected you'd have comprehension issues  

Still lying. Again, here's a few things you've invented in this thread:

• the claim that "next to zero" trans kids get abused by their parents when they come out
• that I said conservative homes weren't supportive when I didn't even mention cosnervative households till you brought it up.
• that "it's the lefties who are making the claim that no right wing home is supportive."

No cites for any of these and you're crying about some quote you think I claimed you said? Bizzare.

2 hours ago, CdnFox said:

You - ***Says something stupid****

me -  Thats stupid.

You - BUT BUT BUT BUT BUT BUT you talk a lot!!!!! b   

And where did i insist anyone lost to me?  I talk about what your actions are when you lose - you freak out.    And i said you were going to do this very thing - and you are    So i guess YOU are the one insisting you lost

LOlL!!!!!   Kid - if you're going to be stupid, at least try not to be so predictably stupid

OH - and speaking of obsessive it's hilarious you have a folder dedicated to little pictures and cut outs of me that you can post out of context to try to 'win' arugments   LOLOLOL   

 

[CdnFox]

Just now, Black Dog said:

See, you cant follow simple logic, it's pathetic.

I"m sure the voices SOUND logical to you but they're not really.

 

• Quote

   

  • the claim that "next to zero" trans kids get abused by their parents when they come out
  • that I said conservative homes weren't supportive when I didn't even mention cosnervative households till you brought it up.
  • that "it's the lefties who are making the claim that no right wing home is supportive."

   

• No invention, the intervention stats from child services seems to prove that,
• Sorry but you did kiddo  (more or less - you're twisting what i said a bit but close enough i guess)
• And the third one is the same as the second one it would seem

So - fake list and full of shit as usual.  Yawn.

Quote

No cites for any of these and you're crying about some quote you think I claimed you said? Bizzare.

Plenty of cites which you've even noted.

And you still can't produce that quote you claimed i made   AND you haven't provided a SINGLE cite for any of your garbage.  ANd you tried for several hours to claim that 'imminent' means something already happened   lol

 

ANd i notice you've given up on trying to lie your way out of your dumbassed position and are trying to win on 'technicalities' somehow    Lets recap

Parents need to know

It's safer for kids to talk to their parents rather than lie to them and have them find out later

If there's genuine fear for a child's safety the authorities will help out,

Black dog is a bit of a biatch  

[Black Dog]

3 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

I"m sure the voices SOUND logical to you but they're not really.

• No invention, the intervention stats from child services seems to prove that,
• Sorry but you did kiddo  (more or less - you're twisting what i said a bit but close enough i guess)
• And the third one is the same as the second one it would seem

What a shock no cites for any of these. Strike One.

Quote

 

Plenty of cites which you've even noted.

I noted you've posted grand total of three links in this entire thread, none of which address any of the above claims. Strike two.

Quote

And you still can't produce that quote you claimed i made   AND you haven't provided a SINGLE cite for any of your garbage.  ANd you tried for several hours to claim that 'imminent' means something already happened   lol

And here's another falsehood with no citation. Strike three, you're out. You've always been out, you've been out since the day you were born, loser.

Edited February 15, 2024 by Black Dog

[CdnFox]

2 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

What a shock no cites for any of these.

What a shock cites provided and acknowledged by you but you think 'imminent' means it already happened  

And none from you still.  Can't find that quote you claimed i made? Nothing even close? No?

Amazing isn't it, how you can whine for hours demanding cites already given despite the fact you refuse to give any     Why it's ALMOST like you're entirely full of crap

Hows' those mental health struggles going?

[Black Dog]

3 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Yeah.

I get stuck on hold and such quite a bit. A little voice software and i can push out most posts in a few seconds.

I save more detailed ones for when i take a break, but i'm not on a clock.  I get all my work done and  the bosses are happy and it doesn't' really matter when i do it.

Coming here, having a few intelligent discussions, laughing at and mocking the 1diots, it's a nice quick distraction from work and lets me refocus.

This post took 18 seconds.  Except this last line.  I'd stopped the watch by then

Moon box types with two fingers so he thinks this is a REAAAAAALLLY long post  

Extremely funny to argue "I'm not a loser for posting 40+ times a day, i'm just a loser with a dead-end job!"

[CdnFox]

47 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

Extremely funny to argue "I'm not a loser for posting 40+ times a day, i'm just a loser with a dead-end job!"

Yeah - really didn't say that.    I make lots more than the average, control my hours and can take on more or less work if I want.  Just because YOU got promoted to manager at mcdonals last month doesn't mean my job is 'dead end'  

To be honest - it's extremely funny to be arguing that the number of posts says whether a person is a loser or not, rather than the quality.  You and moonbox manage to be losers all the time with far far fewer posts - i guess you're just more efficient  

[Black Dog]

1 minute ago, CdnFox said:

Yeah - really didn't say that.    I make lots more than the average, control my hours and can take on more or less work if I want.  Just because YOU got promoted to manager at mcdonals last month doesn't mean my job is 'dead end'  

To be honest - it's extremely funny to be arguing that the number of posts says whether a person is a loser or not, rather than the quality.  You and moonbox manage to be losers all the time with far far fewer posts - i guess you're just more efficient  

What does it say about you that you pump out so many posts and every one is pure dogshit? Maybe you should get a more challenging job instead taking out your failures on this board.

Edited February 15, 2024 by Black Dog

[CdnFox]

3 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

What does it say about you that you pump out so many posts and every one is pure dogshit? Maybe you should get a more challenging job instead taking out your failures on this board.

This from the guy who's job involves asking if people would like fries with that  

And  i love that having had all your other points fully refuted you're reduced to trying to argue based on post count

[Guest]

11 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

What does it say about you that you pump out so many posts and every one is pure dogshit?

Whats it say about you replying incessantly to dogshit?

Its like watching a dog chasing its tail, growing angrier by the minute and then staring at it in utter disgust, as they feel pain every time they bite into it, to let them know how pathetic that they are.

You're the dog, for the record.

[Guest]

On 2/13/2024 at 2:15 PM, Black Dog said:

Because if the kid wants their parents to know they would tell them

Or are scared to tell them.

Doesn't mean they didn't want them knowing.

I didn't want mother knowing I was smoking weed. I felt she would get mad.

The fear was unfounded. She found out. Didn't get mad.

Kids sometimes can exagerrate things inside their heads.

Ever see siblings fighting?

[Michael Hardner]

8 minutes ago, Perspektiv said:

Whats it say about you replying incessantly to dogshit?

Hey @CdnFox Perspektiv just called your posts dogshit...

[CdnFox]

3 minutes ago, Perspektiv said:

Or are scared to tell them.

Doesn't mean they didn't want them knowing.

I didn't want mother knowing I was smoking weed. I felt she would get mad.

The fear was unfounded. She found out. Didn't get mad.

Kids sometimes can exagerrate things inside their heads.

Ever see siblings fighting?

Well this is the thing.

It is completely common for kids to grossly exaggerate the negative reaction of a parent in their minds

And there's lots of things they don't want parents to know about - ever hear of a kid hiding a report card? That does NOT mean parents shouldn't know if their kid is struggling with a subject.

Sometimes in life you have to have difficult conversations and deal with the outcomes and that applies to everybody. That's just part of life and it doesn't change the fact parents need to know about important medical issues.

8 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

Hey @CdnFox Perspektiv just called your posts dogshit...

He has very high standards.  He only have steve hawking's papers a d+.

[Black Dog]

1 minute ago, Perspektiv said:

Or are scared to tell them.

Doesn't mean they didn't want them knowing.

I didn't want mother knowing I was smoking weed. I felt she would get mad.

The fear was unfounded. She found out. Didn't get mad.

Kids sometimes can exagerrate things inside their heads.

Ever see siblings fighting?

Or maybe some kids have good reason to be afraid of what might happen if their parents find out, for example if they were coming from an ultra religious household. 

For someone who doesn't seem to have a lot of trust in the competency of teachers, you're expecting them to make a pretty big judgement call about whether a kid's safety and well-being is truly at risk or not here.

 

[CdnFox]

9 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

Or maybe some kids have good reason to be afraid of what might happen if their parents find out, for example if they were coming from an ultra religious household.

Or maybe they don't.  Or maybe their parents are secretly space aliens!!!!! dun dun duuuuuuuun!

If there's a genuine concern for safety call the authorities, they will intervene. It's that simple.

Schools could also engage councellors and be involved in approaching the parents to help ease the shock and start the conversation positively.  But - they do have to tell the parents. 

[Guest]

21 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

Hey @CdnFox Perspektiv just called your posts dogshit...

My 5 year old nephew does this like a pro, then finishes with "he hit me first!", at acting like he is above it all, while sticking his tongue out at his siblings.

 

 

[Guest]

12 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

Or maybe some kids have good reason to be afraid

Not a teachers business to make that determination unless it is rather blatant, to where one needs intervention.

13 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

if they were coming from an ultra religious household. 

So, not only they overstep their boundaries, but withhold info because Mahmoud is Muslim, so therefore unable to care for a child, even though they have until that point.

15 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

For someone who doesn't seem to have a lot of trust in the competency of teachers

Its not competence. Its simple boundaries. If I want medical care or advice, I seek it from a professional who specializes in such care.

Just like my wife doesn't ask questions about her vagina to a librarian. 

Just because the librarian is eager to help because of some Google links she read, doesn't mean that the breach of protocol should take place.

Me asking her what was she thinking shouldn't be refuted by: "I asked her for help. I was feeling pain, and my doctor wasn't booking for 3 weeks".

We will never see eye to eye. I like government officials staying out of my business as much as possible.