"Wokeness" Has Replaced Socialism as the Great Conservative Bogeyman

[taxme]

On 4/14/2023 at 8:43 PM, CrakHoBarbie said:

Realistically, when has the World ever gone "back"? I have nostalgic feelings for the past as well. But I certainly do not ever make the mistake of thinking were ever going to go back. We won't ever stop "progressing".... Which, whether one likes it or not, makes us all "progressives".

O, how I long for the fifties. They were good old conservatism days. Those were the good old years when leftist liberalism was not around all that much and causing all the problems like we have and see today. 

But, I must agree with you now. The Marxist social justice progressives of today are nothing more than a bunch of Marxist fools.They have turned what use to be decent and normal and moral many decades ago, into an indecent, immoral and abnormal society where everybody is now fighting with one another. There was once peace in the land many decades ago. Now we live in a world of Marxist bull chit.  ?

[taxme]

On 4/14/2023 at 8:08 PM, CrakHoBarbie said:

I disagree. There's Gutfeld who's very popular.... And Tuckers ratings are off the charts. The alt-right victim card is very "in" now since popularized by dear Donald. 

I watch Gutfeld every night. He is one funny dude. He is enjoyable to watch because he always enjoys attacking and mocking liberalism and the democrats among other things going on in the world. Gutfeld is the #1 talk show on late night TV. Tucker does know best. ?

[CrakHoBarbie]

14 hours ago, taxme said:

 Marxist fools.They have turned what use to be decent and normal and moral many decades ago, into an indecent, immoral and abnormal society where everybody is now fighting with one another. 

I appreciate the nostalgia, but, you do realize that we cannot, and never will go back.

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, CrakHoBarbie said:

I appreciate the nostalgia, but, you do realize that we cannot, and never will go back.

The way things are going, we can't go forward either. When it comes to civilizations historically this is near the end of the book where you know how it's going to end.

[CrakHoBarbie]

1 hour ago, CdnFox said:

The way things are going, we can't go forward either. 

Time always moves forward, regardless of how much you long for your youth. 

Edited April 20, 2023 by CrakHoBarbie

[CdnFox]

24 minutes ago, CrakHoBarbie said:

Time always moves forward, regardless of how much you long for your youth. 

It doesn't actually - but of course nobody thought you were a physics student.

in any case - while time may move forward that is not always true of people or cultures or even countries. Most of them will come to a point where they can no longer move forward.

 

[CrakHoBarbie]

8 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

It doesn't actually - 

 

Oh? So tell me genius... When, in the annals of human history, has time ever stood still?

Edited April 20, 2023 by CrakHoBarbie

[CdnFox]

1 minute ago, CrakHoBarbie said:

Oh? So tell me genius... When has time ever stood still?

It does for every particle that travels at the speed of light. Including light for starters.

This is way over your head. I can see this turning into a 5 hour educational discussion and you'll still be confused.

Further, time technically stops at the event horizon of a black hole, but that gets REALLY seriously complicated.

go take a few physics courses if you want to understand more.  Time relative to the observer - time is not a 'fixed' thing that moves at the same rate every where. In fact - gravity itself is a temporal distortion - when you are standing your feet are moving at a slower time than your head.

To quote the good doctor - time is more of a big ball of wibbly-wobbly-timey-whimey things.

We percieve the 'arrow of time' due to the process of entropy, and it's believed that we percieve the 'present' due to the effect of local quantum decohesion that turns the future from probability packets called wave functions into actually existing particles.

Any other questions?

[CrakHoBarbie]

36 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

It does for every particle that travels at the speed of light. Including light for starters.

This is way over your head. I can see this turning into a 5 hour educational discussion and you'll still be confused.

Further, time technically stops at the event horizon of a black hole, but that gets REALLY seriously complicated.

go take a few physics courses if you want to understand more.  Time relative to the observer - time is not a 'fixed' thing that moves at the same rate every where. In fact - gravity itself is a temporal distortion - when you are standing your feet are moving at a slower time than your head.

To quote the good doctor - time is more of a big ball of wibbly-wobbly-timey-whimey things.

We percieve the 'arrow of time' due to the process of entropy, and it's believed that we percieve the 'present' due to the effect of local quantum decohesion that turns the future from probability packets called wave functions into actually existing particles.

Any other questions?

When was the last time that your clock ran backwards?

Edited April 20, 2023 by CrakHoBarbie

[CdnFox]

19 minutes ago, CrakHoBarbie said:

When was the last time that your clock ran backwards?

ROFLMAO - ahhh now it's not just time 'stopping' - it has to run backwards! 

So you basically aren't done looking stupid yet i take it?

Time does run backwards and forwards in the interior of a black hole. In regular spacetime you can move any direction in space but only one direction in time, but inside a black hole that's reversed and you can only move one direction in space but you can move any directions in time.

So if you thought you 'had' me there, sorry  

Also as i noted time is an act of entropy - but entropy is statistical, So it is actually possible that time can run backwards on it's own. It's just outrageously statistically unlikely.  Time running backwards is not a problem for physics at all in and of itself, it's the information issue that gives us the arrow of time.

And then there's the quantum eraser of course - which strongly suggests the future can affect the past. Which is basically  a clock running backwards.

THe thing is - you wouldn't notice. It would be the same as if time had never happened in the first place, and then it would move forward normally.

Any other questions? Maybe a hard one or something? I know these are beyond your ability to undrestand but they're kind of simplistic for me.

 

[CrakHoBarbie]

Just now, CdnFox said:

ROFLMAO - ahhh now it's not just time 'stopping' - it has to run backwards! 

So you basically aren't done looking stupid yet i take it?

Time does run backwards and forwards in the interior of a black hole. In regular spacetime you can move any direction in space but only one direction in time, but inside a black hole that's reversed and you can only move one direction in space but you can move any directions in time.

So if you thought you 'had' me there, sorry  

Also as i noted time is an act of entropy - but entropy is statistical, So it is actually possible that time can run backwards on it's own. It's just outrageously statistically unlikely.  Time running backwards is not a problem for physics at all in and of itself, it's the information issue that gives us the arrow of time.

And then there's the quantum eraser of course - which strongly suggests the future can affect the past. Which is basically  a clock running backwards.

THe thing is - you wouldn't notice. It would be the same as if time had never happened in the first place, and then it would move forward normally.

Any other questions? Maybe a hard one or something? I know these are beyond your ability to undrestand but they're kind of simplistic for me.

 

Do you really think that dissecting my statement about time always moving forward has won some imaginary battle for you? 

Grow up

[CdnFox]

Just now, CrakHoBarbie said:

Do you really think that dissecting my statement about time always moving forward has won some imaginary battle for you? 

Grow up

ROFLMAO!!!!! YOU were the one who pushed it!!!  

I really think you're an !diot who's no where nearly as smart as she thinks I think you thought you made a good point and i pointed out it wasn't accurate and you tried to double down

And i think when you wind up "losing" a point you just fall back on insults and pretending you didn't care in the first place. when you clearly did.

Like i said - don't hate me just because i'm smarter than you - you're going to wind up hating most of the planet at that rate ':)

[taxme]

On 4/20/2023 at 7:30 AM, CrakHoBarbie said:

I appreciate the nostalgia, but, you do realize that we cannot, and never will go back.

i am always trying to be an optimistic like guy that believes that we can bring back some of the good old days. We just need to try and get rid of liberalism, socialism, communism and environ-mental-ists that keep trying to turn North America into a third world communist hell hole.

Conservatism is the only way to go. Conservatives always will believe in more freedom, less government and less taxes. Those mentioned above do not believe in those ideas. They are the problem, and never the solution. They must go. ?

[CrakHoBarbie]

1 hour ago, taxme said:

 They are the problem,  They must go. 

It warms my heart to see a guy like you, so eager to compromise in order to reach an agreement that might be amiable for all sides.

There you have it.

 

[CdnFox]

2 hours ago, CrakHoBarbie said:

It warms my heart to see a guy like you, so eager to compromise in order to reach an agreement that might be amiable for all sides.

There you have it.

 

You claim all conservatives and republicans are scum in dozens of threads

Pot - meet kettle. Kettle, pot.

now - if hypocrisy could solve the problem you'd be the worlds greatest hero

[WestCanMan]

On 4/17/2023 at 2:47 PM, CdnFox said:

I recall just fine and so do you.

So at the end of the day that's what you are - the kind of person who would fake quotes deliberately and then attempt to cover the fact up when called on it.

You get to live with that, and the fact that people know that about you now.

He has the pride of a bot. He can get caught lying all day and not even blink. 

[CdnFox]

8 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

He has the pride of a bot. He can get caught lying all day and not even blink. 

Well we were talking about how there had to be a few around.

[WestCanMan]

On 4/19/2023 at 4:51 PM, taxme said:

I watch Gutfeld every night. He is one funny dude. He is enjoyable to watch because he always enjoys attacking and mocking liberalism and the democrats among other things going on in the world. Gutfeld is the #1 talk show on late night TV. Tucker does know best. ?

I watch Gutfeld sometimes. Fridays are good because he starts off with Greg's Leftovers and there are always 1 or 2 good ones there.

"This is the dress worn by Lizzo to the MTV awards. It was previously worn by Wrigley field during a rain delay." ?

Hannity was clearly the most well-informed of the bunch during the Russian witch hunt. His sources predicted a lot of things quite accurately while the whole MSM was dead wrong 24/7 for 3 years. 

Tucker is usually good but sometimes the tone is a bit high-pitched for me. 

I like the 5 sometimes, but sometimes their leftist guests get carried away. 

Jessi is always good on the 5 but I don't like him on his own show as much, I almost never watch it. Like, zero minutes in the last year. 

[robosmith]

On 4/20/2023 at 10:53 AM, CdnFox said:

It does for every particle that travels at the speed of light. Including light for starters.

This is way over your head. I can see this turning into a 5 hour educational discussion and you'll still be confused.

Further, time technically stops at the event horizon of a black hole, but that gets REALLY seriously complicated.

go take a few physics courses if you want to understand more.  Time relative to the observer - time is not a 'fixed' thing that moves at the same rate every where. In fact - gravity itself is a temporal distortion - when you are standing your feet are moving at a slower time than your head.

To quote the good doctor - time is more of a big ball of wibbly-wobbly-timey-whimey things.

We percieve the 'arrow of time' due to the process of entropy, and it's believed that we percieve the 'present' due to the effect of local quantum decohesion that turns the future from probability packets called wave functions into actually existing particles.

Any other questions?

So you learned about physics from a fictional TV character? LMAO

Don't ever again PRETEND to know anything about physics.

[Moonlight Graham]

On 4/6/2023 at 3:03 PM, Michael Hardner said:

They utterly defeated socialism, or it defeated itself.  In any case we are left without an opponent in pursuit of our perfect political economy where everyone is thriving.

Gotta whine about something i guess.  For the wokesters its anything not PC.  Besides drugs use and bourgie fashion trends was our culture really that bad pre-woke?

[CdnFox]

35 minutes ago, robosmith said:

So you learned about physics from a fictional TV character? LMAO

Sure kid why not    

Beats learning things from the voices in your head like you do

35 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Don't ever again PRETEND to know anything about physics.

Awww muffin -  i can understand where people using big words and talking about things you don't understand is intimidating for you. I get that for you, who can't even understand simple things like economics, this is just frightening.

But don't let other people's intelligence upset you. I mean, lets be honest - if you get frightened every time someone is smarter than you then you'll never leave the house

[Michael Hardner]

6 hours ago, Moonlight Graham said:

Gotta whine about something i guess.  For the wokesters its anything not PC.  Besides drugs use and bourgie fashion trends was our culture really that bad pre-woke?

Well we used to teach about racism in schools but that's not allowed in some areas, and getting cancelled.

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, Michael Hardner said:

Well we used to teach about racism in schools but that's not allowed in some areas, and getting cancelled.

Well the thing is, racism used to be about racism.  Now the word really doesn't mean anything anymore.   Only whites can be racist, it's not racism if any other colour is racist. If you believe in canada you're racist. If you believe in MATH you're a racist. Everything is racist unless it's about white people, then it's not.

So when a word means everything and nothing at the same time, how can you teach about it?

[robosmith]

12 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Sure kid why not    

Beats learning things from the voices in your head like you do

Awww muffin -  i can understand where people using big words and talking about things you don't understand is intimidating for you. I get that for you, who can't even understand simple things like economics, this is just frightening.

But don't let other people's intelligence upset you. I mean, lets be honest - if you get frightened every time someone is smarter than you then you'll never leave the house

Of course ALL YOU HAVE is ^these gratuitous insults. LMAO

Only a CHILD learns about physics from a FICTIONAL TV character.

Maybe someday you'll go to college and get a real education.

[Nationalist]

4 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Well the thing is, racism used to be about racism.  Now the word really doesn't mean anything anymore.   Only whites can be racist, it's not racism if any other colour is racist. If you believe in canada you're racist. If you believe in MATH you're a racist. Everything is racist unless it's about white people, then it's not.

So when a word means everything and nothing at the same time, how can you teach about it?

Does the average teacher even wanna touch the subject?