"Wokeness" Has Replaced Socialism as the Great Conservative Bogeyman

[robosmith]

1 minute ago, CdnFox said:

SORRY but making EVERY few WORDS use caps DOESN'T actually change ANYTHING either. 

And logic and reason is in fact valid evidence.  Of course - you being a leftie you might not have ever heard that before

And lets face it - you know i'm right or you would have made a counterargument and presented your own facts.

I mean seriously - how thick do you have to be to make an assertion that an assertion without providing facts is meaningless without providing facts?

(yes - the previous sentace does in fact make sense. Read it again. Deep breaths, take a break part way through if you need to).

Logic and reason is ONLY evidence when there is FACTUAL EVIDENCE as INPUT, not YOUR OPINIONS.

[CdnFox]

Just now, robosmith said:

How would YOU KNOW that?

Intelligence. try it sometime.

Just now, robosmith said:

 

Seems like you ONLY consume right wing media and you are just biased against "left wing media" trying to justify your prejudice.

It would seem like that to an !diot i suppose.

Just now, robosmith said:

No $1.6B lawsuits showing LYING against any but Fox.

Oh shit kid, there's been TONNES of lawsuits about media lying in the states and even a few in Canada. The MSM's lie ALL THE TIME.  Remember when the convoy was funded by radical americans?

But really this isn't about lying - this is about defamation which is different. So you were wrong there as well.

[CdnFox]

Just now, robosmith said:

Logic and reason is ONLY evidence when there is FACTUAL EVIDENCE as INPUT, not YOUR OPINIONS.

WHY do you THINK that CAPS make A LIE you TELL more TRUE somehow? IT'S really WEIRD.

And no. Logic and reason don't require facts. There's entire branches of that world that exist without it in fact - like Philosophy.

I see your education still needs some work.

In any case we do have facts and evidence to work with here. We have the fact of the lawsuit and the fact of Fox's current leadership position in viewership which i mentioned and their income and their behavior with the lawsuit and a bunch of other things.

Soooo   ....  Ya done being wrong?

[eyeball]

38 minutes ago, OftenWrong said:

Woke is a word in the past tense. Woke already happened a while ago. But to say one is "woke", meaning a state of being in the present tense, is not a word. Better to say, they have awoken. They are awake.

The whole thing infers to reaching the end of childhood, and the shock of discovering what the adult world is all about. No more mommy and daddy to hold you tight, and clean up after you.

No. Now, when you go out into the world, like to the grocery store, you must do so alone. And then you will encounter me. I might not look at you very nicely. I might even be a little rude. Oh the angst of it, to be awoked.

Ok, so you're also inferring that you adults prefer to sleep. Do you expect the kids to just put you through a range of motion and turn you three times a day for the rest of your lives? I suspect what's likelier is that you'll only be setting yourselves up for a rude awakening instead.  Oh the angst of it indeed...

[Deluge]

15 hours ago, robosmith said:

Nothing "stupid" about equal rights for minorities. What's stupid is if you believe that is illegitimate.

Equal rights for everyone. 

Prove me wrong. 

[Rebound]

2 hours ago, Deluge said:

Equal rights for everyone. 

Prove me wrong. 

Equal right to do what?

[CdnFox]

4 minutes ago, Rebound said:

Equal right to do what?

yeah, i didn't get that either.

[robosmith]

11 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Intelligence. try it sometime.

Intelligence MEANS NOTHING in the absence of KNOWLEGE.

11 hours ago, CdnFox said:

It would seem like that to an !diot i suppose.

You should know.

11 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Oh shit kid, there's been TONNES of lawsuits about media lying in the states and even a few in Canada. The MSM's lie ALL THE TIME.  Remember when the convoy was funded by radical americans?

No REASON to believe ^this OPINION. Show the FACTS which prove LIES like those which have SHOWN FOX LIES.

11 hours ago, CdnFox said:

But really this isn't about lying - this is about defamation which is different. So you were wrong there as well.

Defamation is ONLY A VALID OFFENSE when FALSE. AKA LIES. 

[robosmith]

11 hours ago, CdnFox said:

WHY do you THINK that CAPS make A LIE you TELL more TRUE somehow? IT'S really WEIRD.

You DON'T KNOW what I think. I use CAPS so you don't MISS KEY WORDS. 

I find that's very often a PROBLEM with people who want to IGNORE the MESSAGE.

11 hours ago, CdnFox said:

And no. Logic and reason don't require facts. There's entire branches of that world that exist without it in fact - like Philosophy.

That has NOTHING to do with the subjects of YOUR OPINIONS.

11 hours ago, CdnFox said:

I see your education still needs some work.

You ARE BLIND.

11 hours ago, CdnFox said:

In any case we do have facts and evidence to work with here. We have the fact of the lawsuit and the fact of Fox's current leadership position in viewership which i mentioned and their income and their behavior with the lawsuit and a bunch of other things.

Soooo   ....  Ya done being wrong?

Never started "being wrong," and YOU'VE PROVEN NOTHING with your OPINIONS.

[robosmith]

5 hours ago, Deluge said:

Equal rights for everyone. 

Prove me wrong. 

First prove you're right instead of just posting OPINIONS.

[robosmith]

3 hours ago, CdnFox said:

yeah, i didn't get that either.

See, you ARE BLIND. So BLIND you don't see how minorities don't get equal rights.

Until very recently, LGTBQ did not have the right to marry who they love.

And now those rights are UNDER ATTACK, AGAIN.

[CdnFox]

33 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Intelligence MEANS NOTHING in the absence of KNOWLEGE.

And A KEYBOARD means NOTHING without CAPSLOCK!!!!   apparently.

33 minutes ago, robosmith said:

You should know.

Of course i should know - i have you to observe so i can see it clearly   Bud-da-boom!

33 minutes ago, robosmith said:

No REASON to believe ^this OPINION.

Well YOU have no reason - people with brains will.

Quote

Defamation is ONLY A VALID OFFENSE when FALSE. AKA LIES. 

Nope. It can be quite true and still be defamation. It just has to be maliciuos. Look it up kid - don't you EVER get tired of being wrong?

Edited April 16, 2023 by CdnFox

[CdnFox]

26 minutes ago, robosmith said:

You DON'T KNOW what I think.

I don't think you think at all. 

26 minutes ago, robosmith said:

 

I use CAPS so you don't MISS KEY WORDS. 

So YOU find that YOU don't READ entire SENTENCES and you SOMETIMES miss KEY WORDS if htey're not CAPS?

I usually just read everything.  Mind you - it's easier for me, i don't have to say the words out loud when i read them like you do.

26 minutes ago, robosmith said:

I find that's very often a PROBLEM with people who want to IGNORE the MESSAGE.

Dumb ones maybe. I can see why you've struggled with it.

26 minutes ago, robosmith said:

That has NOTHING to do with the subjects of YOUR OPINIONS.

It proves you were wrong with what you said. So that's proof of my opinion you're an !diot.

26 minutes ago, robosmith said:

You ARE BLIND.

EVERYONE can see you're being stupid. No blindness here

26 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Never started "being wrong," and YOU'VE PROVEN NOTHING with your OPINIONS.

You've never started being right - and i've proven you're a bit of a dolt that's for sure   Your parents must be so proud.

[CdnFox]

29 minutes ago, robosmith said:

See, you ARE BLIND. So BLIND you don't see how minorities don't get equal rights.

No, you're illiterate and didn't realize you never said anything like that.

29 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Until very recently, LGTBQ did not have the right to marry who they love.

If by recently you mean like almost 20 years ago sure. But... that was 20 years ago. They have it now.

29 minutes ago, robosmith said:

And now those rights are UNDER ATTACK, AGAIN.

AHhh no.  no, those rights are safe and sound and nobody will be attacking them at all LOL 

I've told you before, it's best NOT to listen to the voices in your head. They're not your friends.

[Deluge]

2 hours ago, robosmith said:

First prove you're right instead of just posting OPINIONS.

What's there to prove? They're all listed below. We all have the same rights under the law, so why are you still crying?

https://www.ushistory.org/documents/amendments.htm

[Deluge]

6 hours ago, Rebound said:

Equal right to do what?

We all have the the same rights. Check it out:

https://www.ushistory.org/documents/amendments.htm

So why are you also still crying?

[Deluge]

6 hours ago, CdnFox said:

yeah, i didn't get that either.

Of course you didn't. You're a Canadian, and you're also a moderate. 

[CdnFox]

16 minutes ago, Deluge said:

Of course you didn't. You're a Canadian, and you're also a moderate. 

Ahhhh - so you're saying i don't speak stupid, so i wouldn't get it. Gotcha.

[OftenWrong]

19 hours ago, eyeball said:

Ok, so you're also inferring that you adults prefer to sleep. Do you expect the kids to just put you through a range of motion and turn you three times a day for the rest of your lives? I suspect what's likelier is that you'll only be setting yourselves up for a rude awakening instead.  Oh the angst of it indeed...

Strangely, all I hear is flies buzzing of late.

[OftenWrong]

On 4/12/2023 at 1:44 PM, Nationalist said:

I am working at a large firm right now. I have to take regular security lectures and pass their little tests to see if you actually read the stuff. Except one. A course on "Equallity, Equity and Inclusion". That's a very interesting course with some rather...shall we say "new" ideas on management. This is one of the questions...to the best of my recollection:

You are a Hiring Manager. You are interviewing a group of applicants for a certain position. Of them, 2 are an excellent fit for the position. Of the 2, one is white and one is black. The white person happens to be the superior fit of the 2 top choices.

Question: which applicant do you hire?

I'll leave you all to answer yourselves.

At that point with all other things being equal, I'd hire the one that I "feel" would best fit into the team in terms of their personal attributes. Maybe the black person came across as a little abrasive or aggressive. If I don't want that personality I'd go with the other one.

Of course I can guess what the "right" answer on your test has to be. What I said is not even an answer available on the test. It's just skin colour, A or B. Literally, black and white thinking. That's why it's completely flawed thinking that perpetuates racism. As an employer I don't have time for that. No sir. I'm agin it.  

[Michael Hardner]

7 minutes ago, OftenWrong said:

At that point with all other things being equal, I'd hire the one that I "feel" would best fit into the team in terms of their personal attributes. 

Do you really think that this actually happened?

[OftenWrong]

11 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

Do you really think that this actually happened?

Which happened? That they are instructed to hire by skin colour?

Sure, why not. Most HR dept.s are full of i d i o t s .

[Michael Hardner]

54 minutes ago, OftenWrong said:

Which happened? That they are instructed to hire by skin colour?

Sure, why not. Most HR dept.s are full of i d i o t s .

Then why would the policy makers of the company give them the power to make decisions?

 

This is training material.... The company would be at huge risk if there was something with impactful controversy there.

[eyeball]

2 hours ago, OftenWrong said:

Strangely, all I hear is flies buzzing of late.

Sleeping in more often?

[Deluge]

8 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Ahhhh - so you're saying i don't speak stupid, so i wouldn't get it. Gotcha.

You speak invertebrate, which is so much worse.