Jump to content

Transgender commits hate crime by shooting up a Christian school


West

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Aristides said:

You started this thread by spouting hateful ideology.

I did no such thing. I simply stated THE FACTS that far left ideology is the cause of this HATE CRIME. Leftists should own their inflammatory rhetoric and do better

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Contrarian said:

In answer to a question as to whether the suspect's transgender status might have any bearing on a motive, The Chief of Police said: “There is some theory to that. We’re investigating all the leads and once we know exactly, we will let you know.”

---> Yes, this idea of access to automatic and semi-automatic weapons for fighting Uncle Sugar (government), is something which in 2023, good luck fighting the Federal Government if they come after you. With a virus they will shut your power off for the night. Not sure why anyone is allowed to buy such weapons, the CONSTITUTION, right. Please, do not need a lesson on it. 

---> Anger, isolation, and social media. I am sure of it, if they investigate the social media activity of this specimen that committed the murders, they will find violence in words and trolling over the internet against the other side, "us" vs "them" type of views. It all goes back to mob politics. 

You CANNOT legally purchase a fully automatic weapon in the US and haven't been able to do so for quite some time. The NRA and REPUBLICANS were the ones to ban that. 

The true debate is on GUN REGISTRY which does absolutely nothing to stop these types of things and is just another tax on law abiding gun owners. 

The VAST MAJORITY of mass shootings in the US are related to drug cartels and organized crime, many of whom cannot legally carry anyway, but get their supply from an open southern border smuggled from places like Brazil which the DEMOCRATS don't wish to do anything about. 

We need to do a better job of educating why leftist ideology is a cancer to society and is creating hostility

Edited by West
  • Like 1
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, West said:

Assault rifle is just a lefty term.

Its a semi automatic rifle. Its not the type of weapon that belongs in civilians hands. 

I had an M 16 as had a property in the Philippines and it was mostly safe, but picked an area that was not .

Let's not kid ourselves. I didn't have the weapon as wanted to go easy on someone breaking in.

They are insanely deadly weapons. It would take a SWAT team to match your firepower.

A firearm will do just fine.

There is no business with such a weapon, as in the wrong hands, you have the US problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Perspektiv said:

Its a semi automatic rifle. Its not the type of weapon that belongs in civilians hands. 

I had an M 16 as had a property in the Philippines and it was mostly safe, but picked an area that was not .

Let's not kid ourselves. I didn't have the weapon as wanted to go easy on someone breaking in.

They are insanely deadly weapons. It would take a SWAT team to match your firepower.

A firearm will do just fine.

There is no business with such a weapon, as in the wrong hands, you have the US problem.

The kind of gun that belongs in the hands of civilian IN A COUNTRY WHERE THE RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS  IS A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT is none of your fcking business. Only a NAZI would make a statement like you just made.

Then again maybe your type should be restricted to the type of FREE SPEECH you currently enjoy, maybe restricting you to only statements friendly to one side. After all, you people incite RIOTS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, reason10 said:

And you STILL have gun murders in Socialist shitholes like Canada, where there are NO gun rights.

You have no fcking room to talk

Cnn talking points are really dumbing down the conversation on firearm ownership in the US

  • Like 1
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, reason10 said:

The kind of gun that belongs in the hands of civilian IN A COUNTRY WHERE THE RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS  IS A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT is none of your fcking business. Only a NAZI would make a statement like you just made.

Then again maybe your type should be restricted to the type of FREE SPEECH you currently enjoy, maybe restricting you to only statements friendly to one side. After all, you people incite RIOTS.

Your rights mean more to you than common sense. That's fine. Doesn’t make me a nazi to notice that when your constitution was written, you likely didn't have the type of weapons that you currently do. I will go on a hunch with that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Perspektiv said:

Your rights mean more to you than common sense. That's fine. Doesn’t make me a nazi to notice that when your constitution was written, you likely didn't have the type of weapons that you currently do. I will go on a hunch with that. 

Now I'm starting to  think Canadians are the dumbest carbon based life forms on the earth.

EARTH TO GOOSE STEPPER: The flintlocks that existed at the time of the Second Amendment's ratification WERE THE WEAPON OF WAR. THEY WERE USED TO FIGHT THE REVOLUTIONARY WAR.

But if you want to stick with this !DIOTIC LIE, then you shouldn't be allowed to post your opinions in cyberspace, because IT DIDN'T EXIST AT THE TIME THE FIRST AMENDMENT WAS WRITTEN.

(You really are getting your STUPID on.)

  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, West said:

Cnn talking points are really dumbing down the conversation on firearm ownership in the US

This place is starting to remind me about that one sub assignment I took at a charter school that catered mostly to Downs Syndrome students. It's very similar. A few educated teachers there (kinda like the educated conservatives here) versus the vast mob of  potato head Downs Syndromers, most of which had to be wanded at the front door in search for weapons. (Yes, they can get violent.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

I challenge you to show you where I explicitly stated anything about banning guns. Show some character now... 

You won't solve ANYTHING without proper border control is A WALL. 

Everyone knows walls work

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...