Jump to content

TUCKER CARLSON AND THE JAN. 6 VIDEO


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, WestCanMan said:

You'll never hear an intelligent counter-point from that corner, just outright denial of everything that wasn't on CNN.

CNN's opinions outweigh video evidence, don't ya know...

It's not worth dignifying the trolls here with a response.

 

Evidence: There was a riot. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Rebound said:

Evidence: There was a riot. 

1) What you saw on CNN had a soundtrack added to it. How do you feel about that?

2) I don't think anyone is saying there was no riot, it's a question of whether or not it was a violent insurrection, only comparable to 9/11 and Pearl Harbour, as per the comments by Kamala and others. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

1) What you saw on CNN had a soundtrack added to it. How do you feel about that?

2) I don't think anyone is saying there was no riot, it's a question of whether or not it was a violent insurrection, only comparable to 9/11 and Pearl Harbour, as per the comments by Kamala and others. 

It was most definitely not comparable to 9/11 or Pearl Harbour.  No ships were sunk, no buildings were demolished, and the death toll was far, far fewer in number.  Anybody who compares the events of Jan 06 to either is indulging in some pretty excessive hyperbole.

What it was, was an attempt, by predominantly clueless people, to prevent the completion of an election at the behest of the crybaby who lost.  About the only comparison to the two aforementioned events that might be justified is that all three events were unthinkable to sane people prior to them happening.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

1) What you saw on CNN had a soundtrack added to it. How do you feel about that?

CNN was NOT the only source showing the SAME VIDEOS.

16 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

2) I don't think anyone is saying there was no riot, it's a question of whether or not it was a violent insurrection, only comparable to 9/11 and Pearl Harbour, as per the comments by Kamala and others. 

Doesn't NEED to be "comparable" to ANY HYPERBOLE.

Attempting to PREVENT the certification of the election by VIOLENCE is MORE THAN ENOUGH to be a INSURRECTION.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, bcsapper said:

What it was, was an attempt, by predominantly clueless people, to prevent the completion of an election 

Still drinking from the TNI urinals, I see. 

FYI it was a riot, or even partial riot, at best. TBH it was more like a peaceful protest with a modest number of violent loonies, maybe 50. For all we know, the ones who smashed their way into the buildings were all/mostly all FBI or Dem plants. 

The "violent insurrection" that Pelosi, Kamala, Biden, CNN et al told you about never happened. The people inside those buildings weren't "blood-crazed lunatics intent on killing their way to a Trump presidency". 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tucker Carlson is a seething mound of human garbage, and anyone who believes him at this point is a hopeless fool. And this thread is exactly what was expected.

1. He shows "peaceful" footage as if that will erase the footage of chaos and violence. Again, like showing footage of the 99.9% of the time Jeffrey Dahmer wasn't killing and eating people. He must be peaceful! Forget about the other stuff!

2. He says there is dispute about how Chansley got into the Capitol, but Chansley is on video with a throng of window smashing a-holes as they break in. Do we see him specifically smash his way in from that camera angle? Nope, but there is no mystery about how he got in and whether he thought he was allowed. He didn't leave when police told him to and he didn't "accidentally" leave a threatening note to Mike Pence.

3. He shows footage of officers in proximity to Chansley and implies that they are essentially tour guides. You don't think their "escort" has any other purpose? Jeebus.

4. He asks why the police didn't stop or arrest these people? Because they were already farking overrun and vastly outnumbered. After the initial violence what officer is going to escalate against a mob like that? They were literally beaten and threatened and warned against impeding the mob. There's footage of that too. There's sworn testimony from the officers who actually lived through it. 

5. AND THIS IS THE WORST. He has the unmitigated gall to say that the rioters were there "Because they thought the election was stolen" when what he SHOULD be saying is "They were there because my colleagues and I lied to them for months about the election being stolen. Sorry!"

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Still drinking from the TNI urinals, I see. 

FYI it was a riot, or even partial riot, at best. TBH it was more like a peaceful protest with a modest number of violent loonies, maybe 50. For all we know, the ones who smashed their way into the buildings were all/mostly all FBI or Dem plants. 

The "violent insurrection" that Pelosi, Kamala, Biden, CNN et al told you about never happened. The people inside those buildings weren't "blood-crazed lunatics intent on killing their way to a Trump presidency". 

"Hang Mike Pence! Hang Mike Pence!," chanted MANY in the MOB in response to the Trump tweet denouncing Mike Pence for DOING HIS JOB. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Hodad said:

Tucker Carlson is a seething mound of human garbage, and anyone who believes him at this point is a hopeless fool. And this thread is exactly what was expected.

1. He shows "peaceful" footage as if that will erase the footage of chaos and violence. Again, like showing footage of the 99.9% of the time Jeffrey Dahmer wasn't killing and eating people. He must be peaceful! Forget about the other stuff!

2. He says there is dispute about how Chansley got into the Capitol, but Chansley is on video with a throng of window smashing a-holes as they break in. Do we see him specifically smash his way in from that camera angle? Nope, but there is no mystery about how he got in and whether he thought he was allowed. He didn't leave when police told him to and he didn't "accidentally" leave a threatening note to Mike Pence.

3. He shows footage of officers in proximity to Chansley and implies that they are essentially tour guides. You don't think their "escort" has any other purpose? Jeebus.

4. He asks why the police didn't stop or arrest these people? Because they were already farking overrun and vastly outnumbered. After the initial violence what officer is going to escalate against a mob like that? They were literally beaten and threatened and warned against impeding the mob. There's footage of that too. There's sworn testimony from the officers who actually lived through it. 

5. AND THIS IS THE WORST. He has the unmitigated gall to say that the rioters were there "Because they thought the election was stolen" when what he SHOULD be saying is "They were there because my colleagues and I lied to them for months about the election being stolen. Sorry!"

 

We (and McCarthy) KNEW ^this is what would happen when Carlson was given the videos. ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Americana Antifa said:

Those of you who still think it's hyperbolic to say that the modern right-wing establishment is fascist, remember that Tucker Carlson is the most popular right-wing pundit.

No one really says that "it's hyperbolic to say that the modern right-wing establishment is fascist", because it's not even a topic. 

On the subject of fascism, the only topic is "How fascist are Canada and the US under the Trudeau/Biden administrations, and is their a path back to democracy?"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Sooo...Chubaka guy was peacefully escorted around the capital and the police even opened the doors for him. That baaad ol' dangerous guy...

Start at around 10 minutes.

The great "insurrection".

What horseshit.

Tucker also posted a film of Kennedy's motorcade to prove it was mostly violence free.

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, robosmith said:

You must be joking.

It makes perfect sense. There is ZERO history of patriots doing anything akin to Jan 6. 

Antifa, on the other hand, LIVES for that kind of shit. It's nowhere near a stretch to think some of those a$$holes went covert and triggered the violence. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Deluge said:

It makes perfect sense. There is ZERO history of patriots doing anything akin to Jan 6. 

Antifa, on the other hand, LIVES for that kind of shit. It's nowhere near a stretch to think some of those a$$holes went covert and triggered the violence. 

The 1/6 prisoners are patriots being held by a corrupt government, but they're also Antifa. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Americana Antifa said:

The 1/6 prisoners are patriots being held by a corrupt government, but they're also Antifa. 

I'm not saying that some of the weak minded patriots weren't involved. I'm just saying that it was probably triggered by leftist a$$holes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Deluge said:

It makes perfect sense. There is ZERO history of patriots doing anything akin to Jan 6. 

Antifa, on the other hand, LIVES for that kind of shit. It's nowhere near a stretch to think some of those a$$holes went covert and triggered the violence. 

Whaaaaaaat? You have to be joking. History is replete with examples of self-styled "patriots" attempting to protest against--or outright end--their existing form of government through violence. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,721
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    paradox34
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Fluffypants earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • User went up a rank
      Explorer
    • gatomontes99 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • paradox34 earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • User went up a rank
      Apprentice
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...