85.7% of Covid Deaths in Canada Were Among the Multi-Vaxed from Aug to Sept of 2022. Jabbing 85% of the Population Didn't Reduce Deaths

[WestCanMan]

37 minutes ago, eyeball said:

The PMO just gave out $700 billion.  It gave money to everybody.  Didn't you get any or something?  The CBC has been getting hundreds of millions from governments for decades because it's a freaking public broadcaster.

After the CBC made an election issue out of 2012 Duffygate in 2015, and Trudeau won that election, he immediately gave the CBC a $675M per year raise. 

What kind of value do Canadians get from all that money? We get LPOC propaganda, Coronation St and the Great British Baking Show. Yay. 

Quote

Yes, you would need lots of meetings to deliberately plan, coordinate and implement the brainwashing and deceiving of millions of people through multiple new outlets to the degree you imagine.

Nope. You just need CBC producers who are sympathetic to the cause in charge of the different broadcasts. 

That's why, for example, Trudeau got to sum up the whole We Charity scandal by saying "I merely should have recused myself from the selection process" and no one at CBC has ever mentioned it since. The last time they referenced it was after the 2021 election, when they said "Geez, O'Toole couldn't even beat Trudeau after all his scandals". Huh? What scandals? Were they just randomly referring to the scandals that they haven't talked about at all in the last 3 years? 

Quote

No one can really see much of what our government does behind a wall of secrecy at all actually.  So they make stuff up to fill the void and choose to believe that instead.  Some is valid on occasion but in your case its almost always ridiculous.

We know some of what's going on, as does the media, they just choose to ignore it. 

The SNC scandal is a perfect example. Trudeau created a law for the criminal entity known as SNC Lavalin, tried to force the AG to use it on their behalf, and when she refused based on proper legal (and moral and ethical principles) she was turfed. The media was completely aware of SNC's court-documented history of bribing politicians, but they just chose to let the whole story slide. 

Edited December 21, 2022 by WestCanMan

[ironstone]

1 hour ago, eyeball said:

I can't see what goes on behind the government's closed doors and neither can you. I don't have any evidence of a quid pro quo do you?  I can ceratinly see the potential for corruption but without evidence we got squat. 

Cite? For what you just said - like a recording of officials from the PMO requesting the exchange of services for money.

You can't do that can you?  I know, it's why I keep reiterating the need for process guardians to guard our interests and try to prevent people from going crazy for conspiracies in the absence of transparency.

Perhaps you think the CBC is fair and balanced, I do not. 

It's naïve to think that the Trudeau Liberals hand out hundreds of millions to news outlets with absolutely no strings attached. It's done with a knowing wink between both sides.

If you were a journalist working for a struggling media outlet, wouldn't you tend to want to support the political party that will guarantee your job is secure with a massive infusion of cash?

Katie Telford was sounding very confident when she suggested it was not a problem to get favorable op-eds written up immediately by a few phone calls. 

[Goddess]

2 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

The PMO gave hundreds of millions of dollars to CBC and other "select media outlets" over the last 3 elections.

 

Exactly what happens in banana republic dictatorships.

Which is why so many immigrants are becoming alarmed. They recognize the "buying of the media" as one of the most important steps towards totalitarianism.

[Goddess]

1 hour ago, eyeball said:

but without evidence we got squat. 

The evidence is the biased coverage.

My boss pays me to do what he asks and not bad-mouth him to people. If I don't do those things, he won't pay me and I lose my job.

How hard is this to understand?

[Goddess]

1 hour ago, eyeball said:

Cite? For what you just said - like a recording of officials from the PMO requesting the exchange of services for money.

This belief you have - that criminals tell everyone what they're up to - is quite bizarre.

[WestCanMan]

4 hours ago, Moonbox said:

This is something that I've been saying since joining this forum back in 2008.  The CBC's pro-Liberal bias is notorious and well-documented, and as a MSM news outlet it's commonly been polled as one of the most biased in Canada. 

That bias perhaps damages the integrity of the organization and makes it difficult to trust if you're looking for balanced journalism, BUT (and this is a big BUT), it is still a reliable source of fact-based news.  They don't just make crap up, and you can generally report on things that are true.  Where they fail is in their editorializations, which do not provide balanced perspectives or viewpoints whatsoever and are highly subjective anyways (IMO). 

This is the problem with the "MSM fake news" narrative.  The news is generally not fake.  The editorials and opinions are just not balanced, with some far worse than others.  Because the editorials and opinion pieces annoy certain people, they go and find alternatives like Alex Jones, Joe Rogan, Russel Brand or Tucker Carlson etc, who are 100% editorialists and peddling their own brand of highly biased bullshit, but from a different angle.

TLDR:  Fox News journalists can be reliably expected to report on factual news (filtered and catered though it may be), but Tucker Carlson is a pure editorialist and peddles little more than BS.  

 

Editorialization is another way of saying "lying by omission". 

CBC passed along all of the covid fear porn, all the pro-vax propaganda, they passed along the false message of the "pandemic of the unvaccinated" and they have never once mentioned that 86% of our covid deaths each month are among the multi-vaccinated. 

When there were 300 deaths per week in Sept of 2020 CBC was talking about how we desperately needed a vaccine before we could end the lockdowns, and they ran the covid fear porn death tolls every day.

When there were 600 deaths per week in April of 2022 after 85% of the country was vaccinated, those 600 deaths were no big deal. The covid fear porn death tolls were gone.

Covid deaths were at less than 50 per week from Jun 2020 right through Aug of that year. This year we averaged over 200 covid deaths per week during those months. Over 4x as many. How much covid fear porn did you see this summer? Nothing but "pandemic of the unvaccinated" BS no doubt. 

CBC is absolute BS and that's no word of a lie. 

How important is it for Canadians to know that almost 90% of covid deaths are among the vaccinated?

TBH, if I wanted to, from a mathematical POV I could walk around saying "90% of Canadian covid deaths are among the multi-vaxed." An educated person would understand that number is rounded off to the nearest ten percent, it would be a factually correct statement. 

It's more accurate, and still quite ok for me to say that "86% of Canadian covid deaths are among the multi-vaxed" because again, educated people understand that doesn't mean "86.0%". Only 86.0% means 86.0%. The number is 85.7% and people don't deal with that level of accuracy in casual conversation. 

Ask yourself "Why do I get more accurate covid info from a random poster on Repolitics than I get from my state-run media outlet?" TBH I don't know for sure what the most truthful answer is, I just know it's bad. 

Quote

TLDR:  Fox News journalists can be reliably expected to report on factual news (filtered and catered though it may be), but Tucker Carlson is a pure editorialist and peddles little more than BS.  

For sure that's what you've been told, but it's not true and you never checked for yourself or you'd know it. You just took the word of the people who lie to you all the time.

If you look back on all of Sean Hannity's "lies" about the Russian collusion fiasco you'll find they were not lies at all, everything he said turned out to be nearly 100.0% correct. He predicted McCabe's firing. The FBI's crimes, a massive prediction at the time, were verified in court. What about CNN's collusion porn? The bombshell evidence never came. Actual crimes by the FBI were barely mentioned. It turns out that no one ever proved the DNC server was hacked, so that was another CNN lie, and they never mentioned that the data wasn't leaked until after Bernie got the shaft. How many Bernie supporters had access to that server? There's a really good chance that one of those guys leaked the truth, and wikileaks said their source was from "a leak", not a hack.

That was 3 years of unashamed lying from CNN, all the while they were talking about how bad Fox News is.... Gimme a break. 

 

Edited December 21, 2022 by WestCanMan

[WestCanMan]

2 hours ago, Goddess said:

This belief you have - that criminals tell everyone what they're up to - is quite bizarre.

TBH I'm flabbergasted whenever emails surface revealing things like Donna Brazille giving Hillary debate questions, the payment details for Hunter and his cohorts from China, etc, etc. 

I wouldn't even talk about those things if I was within earshot of a smart device, let alone make a permanent record on an email server that other people have access to.

"Duh, hey Frank, wanna rob the bank again on Friday at noon?"

"Jim, don't send emails about our bank robberies to my private email, my wife sees these sometimes. Send them to my work email. It's way safer." lol.

[eyeball]

1 hour ago, ironstone said:

Perhaps you think the CBC is fair and balanced, I do not. 

Why do you keep back-peddling? You talk as if the CBC the Liberal Party's private property. BTW why have you toned down the CTV complicity in the PMO? Another sign of your back-peddling is my guess, you know the whole notion of PMO/CTV/CBC Triad is nonsense.

I think the CBC/CTV do as good a job as any at reporting news. I've certainly seen Liberals being looked at unfavourably enough on things like At Issue and Power Play to know they're not the compromised licksplttles you people make them out to be.

The trouble with you guys is that you've somehow come to expect that your outrage should be reflected in the news every night and when it isn't it's because they're hiding something or under-reporting whatever it is that has your ginch knotted up at the moment.  I've had a sense of that myself when I've seen reporting of fisheries issues for example, but I also know the issues are just to big and complex to be encapsulated in a brief news story.

Quote

It's naïve to think that the Trudeau Liberals hand out hundreds of millions to news outlets with absolutely no strings attached. It's done with a knowing wink between both sides.

You need to show the actual winking that's going on don't you think? Something like this at a policy meeting between CBC/CTV/PMO officials would be nice.

 

Quote

If you were a journalist working for a struggling media outlet, wouldn't you tend to want to support the political party that will guarantee your job is secure with a massive infusion of cash?

No if I was that shallow I'd want a bag of cash too.

Quote

Katie Telford was sounding very confident when she suggested it was not a problem to get favorable op-eds written up immediately by a few phone calls. 

Op-ed as I said isn't news.

It's always hilarious when you people trust the confirmation of your bias when it comes from the people you trust the least.

[eyeball]

2 hours ago, Goddess said:

The evidence is the biased coverage.

Biased coverage in your case is all to often something you think is being under-reported or not being reported at all. This is not evidence of anything other than your own bias.

Quote

 

My boss pays me to do what he asks and not bad-mouth him to people. If I don't do those things, he won't pay me and I lose my job.

How hard is this to understand?

 

I have a boss too.

What's harder to understand is how the CBC/CTV/PMO Triad has been able to operate for so long on every issue that affects the Liberals without a single insider blowing the whistle on it.

It would be the story of the century.

 

[eyeball]

2 hours ago, Goddess said:

This belief you have - that criminals tell everyone what they're up to - is quite bizarre.

What crimes and what criminals exactly?  Calling people criminals without evidence is known as liable. OTOH keeping knowledge of criminal activity to yourself is criminal.

Takes one to know one does it?

[eyeball]

4 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

The SNC scandal is a perfect example. Trudeau created a law for the criminal entity known as SNC Lavalin, tried to force the AG to use it on their behalf, and when she refused based on proper legal (and moral and ethical principles) she was turfed. 

It's funny how people seems to remember and describe this differently.

Quote

The media was completely aware of SNC's court-documented history of bribing politicians, but they just chose to let the whole story slide.

To bad there's never a public record when you really need one.

[ironstone]

1 hour ago, eyeball said:

It's funny how people seems to remember and describe this differently.

To bad there's never a public record when you really need one.

The Freedom Convoy and the Coastal Gaslink stories were given very different kinds of coverage. Millions of dollars in damage from vandalism on the Coastal Gaslink, but very little coverage. Environmental terrorism is acceptable in the eyes of the CBC?

Raymond J. de Souza: CBC bias on full display in coverage of Freedom Convoy, Coastal GasLink protests (msn.com)

Barbara Kay columnist and writer focusing on political subjects

Have you ever heard of anyone calling the CBC out for right-wing bias?

My main beef with the CBC isn't bias, it's the fact that my hard earned tax dollars have to pay for them.

I briefly listen to CBC radio on my way to work, until I can pick up better stations as I get closer to Ottawa. Every bloody morning, Covid Covid Covid, nothing but Covid and the latest numbers and how life threatening it is.

Bias in crosswords: how women, people of colour and LGBTQIA+ communities are overlooked | CBC Television

What kind of a news network would have a story about bias in crossword puzzles concerning LGTBQ++ and people of colour?  Answer: A left-leaning, woke news network.?

[eyeball]

31 minutes ago, ironstone said:

My main beef with the CBC isn't bias, it's the fact that my hard earned tax dollars have to pay for them.

Well heck I can grok that.  I feel the same way about DFO.  Especially when Ihave to submit to their electronic digital monitoring program when I go fishing.  The bill for that is in addition to the taxes I pay, about $1200 per trip.

[WestCanMan]

16 hours ago, eyeball said:

It's funny how people seems to remember and describe this differently.

How would you describe it differently?

You weren't aware that Trudeau created the DPA law, and tucked it into page 5-hundred something of a 600+ page omnibus bill? 

You weren't aware that the AG had concluded that the nature and evidence of SNC's crimes was too serious to allow them to escape justice based on the provisions of Trudeau's new law? 

You weren't aware that the PMO was applying pressure on her to change her mind? 

You weren't aware that she was turfed in favour of an AG who did his master's bidding? 

Just exactly wtf don't you know, eyeball? 

Quote

To bad there's never a public record when you really need one.

Who said that there's not a public record? 

You must be retarded to call me out directly like that, while knowing my record for accuracy and honesty here.

Here's CBC reporting on the criminal charges against Michel Fournier from before he pleaded guilty:

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/fournier-charged-snc-lavalin-1.3657923

Here's CTV reporting on the criminal charges against Michel Fournier from after he pleaded guilty:

https://montreal.ctvnews.ca/former-bridge-official-admits-guilt-in-accepting-snc-lavalin-bribes-1.3559824

So, as usual, everything that I said was 100% true and verifiable, and you're just running your mouth while you have no clue  what's going on, or you're just blatantly lying. 

CBC and CTV were both 100% aware of the fact that SNC has a court-documented history of bribing Canadian politicians/bureaucrats to get what they want because you can clearly see that they reported on it. 

Why didn't you know about it eyeball? You gobble up all of CTV and CBC's news (propaganda). There's nothing that they broadcast on CBC that you don't instantly regurgitate far and wide, so how were you completely unaware that the criminals that our PM went to bat for had a court-documented history of bribing Canadian officials with millions of dollars to get what they want?

[eyeball]

1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

How would you describe it differently?

I actually recall events much the way you do.  I'm using the affair an example of why we need to have public interest monitors attending meetings between public officials and lobbyists from outfits like SNC.  Pfizer comes to mind too.  You're either too dense or bedazzled by your own brilliance to notice I often use the SNC affair to underscore why we need to change the relationship between us and the government throughout several other overlapping threads in this forum.

You don't pay much attention though do you?

Others may note how greater transparency in our governance might have helped suppress the conspiratorial nonsense that captured the minds of so many people during COVID.

Quote

Who said that there's not a public record? 

You say there's a public record of all the discussions SNC and the government had?  I don't think so.

Quote

You must be retarded to call me out directly like that, while knowing my record for accuracy and honesty here.

I should have added that I was thinking about the difference between your recollection and Queenmandy's the other day.  Hence my saying it's too bad there isn't a public record of things so everyone could be on the same page.

I guess I must be retarded for imagining you might be able to juggle a couple thoughts at a time in here. My bad.

Edited December 22, 2022 by eyeball

[WestCanMan]

2 hours ago, eyeball said:

I actually recall events much the way you do. 

That wasn't the impression I got, but if you say so, then my bad.

Quote

You say there's a public record of all the discussions SNC and the government had?  I don't think so.

I said there was a court-documented history of SNC bribing officials and our MSM chose to keep that from the public. 

I can promise you that if Trump had come to the rescue of a criminal entity like SNC Lavalin the CBC would have shown us all the results of Michel Fournier's colonoscopy. But this was Trudeau's scandal, no one even knows who Michel Fournier is. 

[WestCanMan]

https://health-infobase.canada.ca/covid-19/vaccine-safety/

So there were over 10,000 serious adverse events that were officially pinned on the vaccine, plus God knows how many others that weren't, for various reasons. 

1) lots of things happened to people which their doctors refuse to categorize as 'vax-related'. Eg, one of the girls that works for my wife got two rapidly growing blobs on her chest right after the second vax and she feels like the vax was to blame but it's officially 'not related to the vaccine'. They're not malignant, which is good, but that means that she has to pay for the surgery to remove them herself. Thank God my wife didn't encourage her employees to vax.

It seems like more women than not experience serious menstrual irregularities after vaxing but it's not always recognized as being the cause.

2) Then there are cases of people like Bieber and his wife whose symptoms are likely related to the jab but they pimped the vax so hard that they can't admit that their stroke and facial paralysis might be vax-induced. 

In any event, there are millions of Canadians who were healthy enough that they knew they didn't need the vax, but our gov't forced them to take it anyways.

I hope that some people, or groups of people, who were forced to vax when they didn't want to, successfully sue our vax-Nazi gov't for a lot of money. I really don't care how much it costs us, it has to hurt, because our government hurt a lot of Canadians needlessly. 

 

(Update: Health Canada has apparently put an end to tallying the number of vaxed vs unvaxed deaths. @eyeball and @Hodad get to believe whatever they want (as if that was ever gonna change) about vax efficacy from here on out because the gov't is keeping it a secret. Yay!!!)

Edited December 23, 2022 by WestCanMan

[Hodad]

1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

https://health-infobase.canada.ca/covid-19/vaccine-safety/

So there were over 10,000 serious adverse events that were officially pinned on the vaccine, plus God knows how many others that weren't, for various reasons. 

1) lots of things happened to people which their doctors refuse to categorize as 'vax-related'. Eg, one of the girls that works for my wife got two rapidly growing blobs on her chest right after the second vax and she feels like the vax was to blame but it's officially 'not related to the vaccine'. They're not malignant, which is good, but that means that she has to pay for the surgery to remove them herself. Thank God my wife didn't encourage her employees to vax.

It seems like more women than not experience serious menstrual irregularities after vaxing but it's not always recognized as being the cause.

2) Then there are cases of people like Bieber and his wife whose symptoms are likely related to the jab but they pimped the vax so hard that they can't admit that their stroke and facial paralysis might be vax-induced. 

In any event, there are millions of Canadians who were healthy enough that they knew they didn't need the vax, but our gov't forced them to take it anyways.

I hope that some people, or groups of people, who were forced to vax when they didn't want to, successfully sue our vax-Nazi gov't for a lot of money. I really don't care how much it costs us, it has to hurt, because our government hurt a lot of Canadians needlessly. 

 

(Update: Health Canada has apparently put an end to tallying the number of vaxed vs unvaxed deaths. @eyeball and @Hodad get to believe whatever they want (as if that was ever gonna change) about vax efficacy from here on out because the gov't is keeping it a secret. Yay!!!)

Gosh, I think maybe you totally accidentally left a little something out of your screenshot. Lemme help:

(0.011% of all doses administered)

Boy, that's a teeny, tiny percentage. You're also incorrect when you say that those numbers are "officially pinned on the virus." That's false  They are simply reports and have not even necessarily been investigated, let alone linked to vaccination.

Post hoc, ergo propter hoc.

And the report also specifically says "no new safety signals." What is a safety signal? "Information indicating a new and potentially causal association between a vaccine and an event that could affect health." 

 

I think if it weren't for misinformation you wouldn't have any information at all.

[Goddess]

8 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

I said there was a court-documented history of SNC bribing officials and our MSM chose to keep that from the public. 

MSM only reports something when the general public becomes too aware of it.  Then they report it, with their own slant on it and never mention it again.  Buried.

[CITIZEN_2015]

I believe vaccines are effective. I had my bivalent booster one month ago and I caught Covid 19 last week (tested positive with two big red lines on Antigen rapid test) but it was mild. I had cold and flu in the past much more severe and I believe it was the vaccine which trained my immune system to fight off the virus which has caused so many severe cases and deaths in the world. I don't have a strong immune system otherwise and I am not in my 20's or 30's . I was over it in 4 days again thanks to vaccine.

[eyeball]

On 12/22/2022 at 2:29 PM, WestCanMan said:

That wasn't the impression I got, but if you say so, then my bad.I said there was a court-documented history of SNC bribing officials and our MSM chose to keep that from the public.

Maybe it was all-of-a-sudden news to you but SNC has been on the public's radar for decades.  I suppose it would be easy enough to miss in all the other things cluttering up the screen.

[WestCanMan]

On 12/22/2022 at 10:04 PM, Hodad said:

Gosh, I think maybe you totally accidentally left a little something out of your screenshot. Lemme help:

(0.011% of all doses administered)

Boy, that's a teeny, tiny percentage.

Boy, that's a much, much, much smaller percentage than the number of healthy people between 5 and 50 who died of covid. 

FYI 0.011% is a lot more than 0.0000001%.

Healthy people under 50 don't have to worry about dying from covid at all. They absolutely have to worry about taking the jab that doesn't work.

And when they say "serious adverse effects" that doesn't include things like massive changes to women's menstrual cycles, which is pooh-poohed by health Canada. How serious is it actually? Why is it happening? If your wife or your daughter starts getting 3 extra-heavy periods per month is that just a nuisance or is it a sign that something serious is happening to their reproductive system? 

When people sprout fast-growing benign tumours is that really no big deal? You know that you have to pay to get those removed, right? It's not covered by medicare. 

So why would you force someone to take a drug that doesn't work, which they don't need, knowing that it will hurt tens of thousands of people?

And just remember when you reply to this, I can show you the graph that shows covid deaths in Canada didn't change at all after 85% of us vaxed, and other graphs that show that 86% of covid deaths come from the multi-vaxed. 

People should absolutely have a choice whether or not they take that useless, dangerous medicine. 

Quote

You're also incorrect when you say that those numbers are "officially pinned on the virus." That's false  They are simply reports and have not even necessarily been investigated, let alone linked to vaccination.

You're incorrect.

They are all medical conditions which have been judged by qualified medical professionals to be side-effects of the virus, the actual problem with this system is that it under-reports serious side-effects. 

Furthermore, you've never questioned the "covid death count", which is mainly comprised of octogenarians who are either on palliative care or close to it. The vast majority of "covid deaths" are actually people who died with covid, not of covid. 

I know lots of people who have had loved ones on palliative care who were getting their noses swabbed daily. Why do they do that? It's their 751st Tuesday and they're not going to live to see their 752nd Tuesday whether they get covid or not. They don't even have to be coughing or have a fever. So why swab them? They do it because apparently there was just a mad rush to get them lumped into the "covid death" category. 65% of Canadian covid deaths are among people over 80 (4% of the population). 96% of covid deaths have one or more co-morbidities listed with them, an avg more than 2.

Instead of questioning the legitimacy of vax side-effects you should be questioning the legitimacy of bloated covid death estimates. 

Quote

I think if it weren't for misinformation you wouldn't have any information at all.

Duh, OK George...

In case you've forgotten, I'm the guy who looks at the weekly death toll during the same months of the 2 covid years and points out the fact that covid deaths didn't go down after the massive vax rollout. That's a pretty important thing to take note of, don't you think?

We went from "OMG 50 people are dying each week from covid in June-Aug, we can't open up the economy until we get a vaccine!!!!" to ""Everything is cool now that we have a vaccine. Only 200 people are dying every week in Jun-Aug 2022." 

Can you do basic math Hodad? Is 200 more than 50?

Why was 50 = "OMG PANDEMIC!!!!" and 200 = "EUREKA! WE HAVE A VAX!"

That's Health Canada's own graph. They're the ones who shriek things like "WE NEED A VAX" and who now seem to think it's all good. 

I'm also the guy who extracts the monthly death tolls among the vaxed and unvaxed from Health Canada's own stats which show that 86% of covid deaths come from among the multi-vaxed.

Did you not want to know what percentage of covid deaths came from among the ranks of the multi-vaxed? I'm pretty sure that given your massive love for the vax you woulda guessed that it was some kind of "PANDEMIC OF THE UNVACCINATED!!!!" Am I right? Did you ever bat an eye when Trudeau and Biden made that bogus claim to their respective electorates? 

Of course you didn't. You cherish alt-left propaganda and you never question anything. You're one of the sheeple. A useful idjit. Bidn and Trudeau could say anything and if it turns out to be wrong you'll just ignore it.

Oh yeah, and what "stats" do you post?

You post Pfizer's own claims of vax efficacy, from their labs, and your favourite stat is some BS about how "way more vaxed people get infected but they die at the same rate, so it's a massive success" lol. 

I quote the most serious and pertinent stats imaginable, you post kindergarten pretzel logic. 

Edited December 24, 2022 by WestCanMan

[WestCanMan]

3 hours ago, eyeball said:

Maybe it was all-of-a-sudden news to you but SNC has been on the public's radar for decades.  I suppose it would be easy enough to miss in all the other things cluttering up the screen.

That's not the point at all.

At a time when it became clear that the Trudeau gov't was right in bed with SNC, to the point where he was creating new laws for them and illegally forcing the AG to use them on SNC's behalf, the media was hiding the fact that SNC has a court-documented history of bribing Canadian officials. 

It's one thing to get caught working that hard for a criminal, it's another thing when that criminal is known to bribe politicians with millions of dollars. 

[eyeball]

55 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

That's not the point at all.

At a time when it became clear that the Trudeau gov't was right in bed with SNC, to the point where he was creating new laws for them and illegally forcing the AG to use them on SNC's behalf, the media was hiding the fact that SNC has a court-documented history of bribing Canadian officials.

Nonsense. Everyone's known for years SNC is a dodgy outfit. The media couldn't have hid that if it had tried.

[WestCanMan]

21 hours ago, eyeball said:

Nonsense. Everyone's known for years SNC is a dodgy outfit. The media couldn't have hid that if it had tried.

You're sick. You need help.

Of course it makes a difference to Canadians that SNC has a court-documented history of bribing elected officials. But for the 1% of Canadians who don't care, they should have at least been exposed to the information so that they could say "I don't care". 

Our media takes 5 minutes of airtime to do features things like a guy who puts up plexiglass between tellers and the customers they serve. They had plenty of time to say "The SNC execs with their balls in Trudeau's mouth have a court-documented history of bribing politicians." Easy peasy.