Anti-Wife Poilievre

[August1991]

 

".... le couple Poilievre Galindo n’est pas novice en politique. Tous les deux y baignent depuis la jeune vingtaine. 

Arrivée sur la colline parlementaire en 2008, à 21 ans, M^me Poilievre Galindo a notamment été directrice des politiques au bureau du sénateur Carignan et conseillère du député conservateur antiavortement."

TVA

 

 

[August1991]

BTW, her first name is not Spanish - it's Portuguese.

And apparently the two eloped to Portugal.

====

His French is OK. Her French is like an immigrant from, uh, la Pointe-de-l'Iisle - Pointe aux Trembles. We're sorta laughing - then she switches to Spanish. Then English.

Montreal is a difficult place. She's one smart cookie.

 

 

Edited September 13, 2022 by August1991

[Michael Hardner]

6 minutes ago, August1991 said:

BTW, her first name is not Spanish - it's Portuguese.

And apparently the two eloped to Portugal.

And that's makes him ANTI wife?

[betsy]

I googled for English because I can't read French. Their romance bloomed on the Hill, with her being a Parliamentary aide.

 

 

 

From immigrant background to two-person wedding, Anaida Poilievre a distinct Tory wife

“It was the best decision we could have made,” Anaida wrote in a 2019 article for Pretty and Smart Co., the online women’s magazine she co-founded. “We wanted to make sure that our special day was truly just about us and our commitment to each other.”

 

https://nationalpost.com/news/from-immigrant-background-to-two-person-wedding-anaida-poilievre-a-distinct-tory-wife

Edited September 13, 2022 by betsy

[betsy]

20 minutes ago, August1991 said:

 

".... le couple Poilievre Galindo n’est pas novice en politique. Tous les deux y baignent depuis la jeune vingtaine. 

Arrivée sur la colline parlementaire en 2008, à 21 ans, M^me Poilievre Galindo a notamment été directrice des politiques au bureau du sénateur Carignan et conseillère du député conservateur antiavortement."

TVA

 

 

Please, explain what you mean with your title.

[Nationalist]

Sounds romantic.

[August1991]

Anaida is not Spanish - it is Portuguese. (But what do I know.)

==

In 2008, at 21, she worked for a Conservative MP and Senator who opposed abortion.

======

Betsy, there will soon be many more of such articles. They will be Anti-Wife.

[blackbird]

1 hour ago, August1991 said:

Anaida is not Spanish - it is Portuguese. (But what do I know.)

==

In 2008, at 21, she worked for a Conservative MP and Senator who opposed abortion.

======

Betsy, there will soon be many more of such articles. They will be Anti-Wife.

If she opposes abortion, she must be pro-wife, pro-motherhood.  This is one of the main purposes of marriage but it is being denigrated today by society.   But I have not seen anything about her beliefs on it.  Sadly I think Pierre Poilievre has said he is pro choice; a poor belief to have.  That is the wrong position to have.  The slaughter of the babies must be stopped.  I noticed Pierre was proudly carrying his little toddler around.  Babies, not yet born, are a priceless treasure and their life is sacred.  I am not sure how anyone could be ok with that little toddler Pierre is carrying being aborted earlier.

[DogOnPorch]

2 minutes ago, blackbird said:

If she opposes abortion, she must be pro-wife, pro-motherhood.  This is one of the main purposes of marriage but it is being denigrated today by society.   But I have not seen anything about her beliefs on it.  Sadly I think Pierre Poilievre has said he is pro choice; a poor belief to have.  That is the wrong position to have.  The slaughter of the babies must be stopped.  I noticed Pierre was proudly carrying his little toddler around.  Babies, not yet born, are a priceless treasure and their life is sacred.  I am not sure how anyone could be ok with that little toddler Pierre is carrying being aborted earlier.

 

Abortion is very similar to the issue of slavery...I note.

 

[Queenmandy85]

11 minutes ago, blackbird said:

she must be pro-wife, pro-motherhood.  This is one of the main purposes of marriage but it is being denigrated today by society. 

The purpose of a traditional marriage is to enhance a man's wealth and the father-in-law's status...or to enhance a man's status and his father-in-law's wealth. The issue of an heir and a spare is secondary, but important if the heir is male.

[betsy]

2 hours ago, August1991 said:

Betsy, there will soon be many more of such articles. They will be Anti-Wife.

But I don't understand what is "anti-wife" about their romance and elopement?  Can you please explain.

[August1991]

3 minutes ago, Queenmandy85 said:

The purpose of a traditional marriage is to enhance a man's wealth and the father-in-law's status...or to enhance a man's status and his father-in-law's wealth. The issue of an heir and a spare is secondary, but important if the heir is male.

QM,

You kinda miss the point of the thread.

Do you live in Canada? Are you autistic?

[August1991]

10 minutes ago, betsy said:

But I don't understand what is "anti-wife" about their romance and elopement?  Can you please explain.

Betsy,

Are you autistic?

=====

Very soon, there will be many articles in the MSM attacking Pierre Poilievre. 

These articles will attack his wife in particular - these articles will claim that she was rich in Venezuela, her father has secret money, etc, etc.

Gawd knows what the MSM/CBC will say about her. They'll say she's a gold-digger, like Melania.

====

Fortunately,

Her husband (and she too) know a thing or two about modern communications.

Edited September 13, 2022 by August1991

[blackbird]

If Pierre Poilievre said he is pro-choice (women choosing abortion if they wish), yet he got married and his wife had a baby, who he is proudly carrying in the focus of the cameras and apparently loves.  He has a mental contradiction.  He loves this baby, but would he have approved of his wife aborting the baby earlier if that had been her wish?  He has a problem and a serious mental conflict. 

I wonder what he would say if a reporter asked him if he would have been ok with his wife aborting the baby during her pregnancy. This is a fair question for anyone who said they are pro choice to the world.  You can't have it both ways.

Edited September 13, 2022 by blackbird

[Nationalist]

10 minutes ago, Queenmandy85 said:

The purpose of a traditional marriage is to enhance a man's wealth and the father-in-law's status...or to enhance a man's status and his father-in-law's wealth. The issue of an heir and a spare is secondary, but important if the heir is male.

You might wanna try living within at least the last 150 years.

[DogOnPorch]

Just now, Nationalist said:

You might wanna try living within at least the last 150 years.

 

Yeah...I missed out on the dowry.

[betsy]

35 minutes ago, blackbird said:

If she opposes abortion, she must be pro-wife, pro-motherhood.  This is one of the main purposes of marriage but it is being denigrated today by society.   But I have not seen anything about her beliefs on it.  Sadly I think Pierre Poilievre has said he is pro choice; a poor belief to have.  That is the wrong position to have.  The slaughter of the babies must be stopped.  I noticed Pierre was proudly carrying his little toddler around.  Babies, not yet born, are a priceless treasure and their life is sacred.  I am not sure how anyone could be ok with that little toddler Pierre is carrying being aborted earlier.

 

Unfortunately, yes.  He's said to be pro-choice.   That's a big lump in my throat.  He's a social progressive.

But if we need a change, and for the sake of Canada's economy -  and other non-social direction - it's something I just have to pinch my nose, and pray for.

Edited September 13, 2022 by betsy

[Queenmandy85]

I do live in Canada and the jury is still out on my intellectual faculties.

I interpreted your point was that the Poillievres are anti-wife because she worked for an anti choice politician. I will risk using an cultural stereotype by speculating she is Roman Catholic and anti-choice. I don't see that as necessarily being anti-wife, but tat is just speculation.

[betsy]

13 minutes ago, August1991 said:

Betsy,

Are you autistic?

=====

Very soon, there will be many articles in the MSM attacking Pierre Poilievre. 

These articles will attack his wife in particular - these articles will claim that she was rich in Venezuela, her father has secret money, etc, etc.

Gawd knows what the MSM/CBC will say about her. They'll say she's a gold-digger, like Melania.

====

Fortunately,

Her husband (and she too) know a thing or two about modern communications.

Oh - so, it's not Poilievre who's being anti-wife.  Okay.

Edited September 13, 2022 by betsy

[DogOnPorch]

2 minutes ago, betsy said:

 

Unfortunately, yes.  He's said to be pro-choice.   That's a big lump in my throat.  He's a social progressive.

But if we need a change, and for the sake of Canada's economy -  and other non-social direction - it's something I just have to pinch my nose, and pray for.

 

You gotta figure that this is a pile most politicians would rather not step-in. It sets to divide right off the bat. Sort of like US slavery in the 1850s and 60s.

"You're a little bit for slavery? Which parts?"

[August1991]

5 minutes ago, Queenmandy85 said:

I do live in Canada and the jury is still out on my intellectual faculties.

I interpreted your point was that the Poillievres are anti-wife because she worked for an anti choice politician. I will risk using an cultural stereotype by speculating she is Roman Catholic and anti-choice. I don't see that as necessarily being anti-wife, but tat is just speculation.

Do you understand sarcasm?

Autistic people have problems with it.

=====

Anyone who saw the PDA on Saturday evening knows that the MSM/CBC will attack his wife. Even in the nationalist Quebec press, this is an obvious target. Hence my OP.

[betsy]

18 minutes ago, blackbird said:

If Pierre Poilievre said he is pro-choice (women choosing abortion if they wish), yet he got married and his wife had a baby, who he is proudly carrying in the focus of the cameras and apparently loves.  He has a mental contradiction.  He loves this baby, but would he have approved of his wife aborting the baby earlier if that had been her wish?  He has a problem and a serious mental conflict. 

I wonder what he would say if a reporter asked him if he would have been ok with his wife aborting the baby during her pregnancy. This is a fair question for anyone who said they are pro choice to the world.  You can't have it both ways.

Good point you got there.  Expect media to jump on that.

FREEDOM, is big on his campaign.  He can't run on it if he isn't pro-choice though.

[Queenmandy85]

9 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

You might wanna try living within at least the last 150 years.

 

8 minutes ago, DogOnPorch said:

 

Yeah...I missed out on the dowry.

You would be surprised at the number of arranged marriages taking place in Canada. The idea of marrying for love is recent...ie. the last 150 years, but only became common since the Great War. Considering traditional marriage has been around for thousands of years, 150 years is modern times. 

 

[August1991]

1 minute ago, betsy said:

Good point you got there.  Expect media to jump on that.

FREEDOM, is big on his campaign.  He can't run on it if he isn't pro-choice though.

Betsy,

They will find any way to attack his wife. Abortion? The MSM wants to make this about his wife and women.

Edited September 13, 2022 by August1991

[Nationalist]

1 minute ago, Queenmandy85 said:

 

You would be surprised at the number of arranged marriages taking place in Canada. The idea of marrying for love is recent...ie. the last 150 years, but only became common since the Great War. Considering traditional marriage has been around for thousands of years, 150 years is modern times. 

 

YOU live in this century Mandy. Jump in with both feet. The water's ok.