First a trickle....Now a flood

[Boges]

It's interesting you choose to highlight the AZ vaccine. 

The side effects were made very clear with this shot. . 

My first shot was the AZ vaccine as it was the only available for my age group. I had some anxiety about getting it it.  As an aside, the hysteria around this was really unfortunate in hindsight. I see my Facebook posts from the time and the media did really create a sense of dread of this disease. April 2021 was a crazy time. 

But regardless, the AZ shot was quickly done away with. The mRNA shots became the shots everyone would get going forward. The ones that your friends still call experimental gene therapy. But evidence shows they were clearly the safer shot. 

[Goddess]

I do think it's interesting that 2 of the 4 genetic therapy shots that were offered in the West have now been pulled from the market for safety issues.  Especially given that they all use the same technology.

And none of them have yet received anything other than Emergency Use authorization only to this day.

Edited May 24, 2024 by Goddess

[Goddess]

16 minutes ago, Boges said:

But evidence shows they were clearly the safer shot. 

These are not vaccines in the traditional sense.  They are genetic therapy.  

mRNA gene therapy was developed for diseases that involved gene abnormalities - either missing or damaged DNA.  It would replace or repair the DNA. 

These injections were given EU approval based on the regulations for traditional vaccines, but many are rightfully arguing that they should be subject to entirely different regulations.  The industry is, of course, balking at this.

There is a movie coming about about the technology, here's the trailer:

 It’s a real David & Goliath story about a whistleblower revealing Merck’s decades of fraud with the MMR vaccine. It’s been buried in the courts for the last 14 years but an appeal in June may kick it up to the Supreme Court. 

 

Based on real-life events, comes the corporate thriller, Protocol 7. Alexis Koprowski, a devoted mother and small-town family lawyer, Adrian Jay, a renegade doctor exiled from the medical profession, and Steve Schilling, a virologist at a prominent vaccine laboratory turned corporate whistleblower, work together to hold a large pharmaceutical corporation accountable for allegedly fraudulent test results behind a failing mumps vaccine. Protocol 7 takes us behind the corporate curtain, exposing a chain of command that devolves responsibility, prioritizes profits over people, and fosters an amoral mindset of “just following orders.”

[Goddess]

1 hour ago, Boges said:

2) Those who are still fighting the battles of 2021 and 2022.

A lot of people - the majority of the population - who were never at any risk, had damn near everything taken from them.  

I'm one of those people.

Walking on the beach was basically murder.  Kids playing ice hockey were roughed up by cops.  Small business owners were shut down, while WalMart was allowed to stay open and at their stores, unvaxxed people were herded into corrals to wait for security to escort them around the store, where they would only be allowed to buy certain items.  Telling people who were suicidal after losing their jobs and sanity from unnecessary lockdowns to "Shut up and wear your mask!"  Interrogating people about their vaccine status.

The media went on a 2 and half year bender of Covid fear porn that was about as subtle as a brick to the face.

For 2 years we were told to Sit Down!  Shut Up! Stop Killing Grannies!  It was a crime against humanity to have our suffering dismissed and trivialized and told we were racists and misogynists and white supremacists and Nazis.

And now we're told "What's the big deal?  Everything's open! Stop complaining about mandates that don't exist!"

You people were the real sociopaths.

The problem is - what are you going to do the next time?

 

 

[Goddess]

This is critically important evidence that our governments/institutions (particularly Fauci) deliberately harmed us by suppressing HCQ - hydroxychloroquine.

After SARS-1 occurred in 2002-2003, many nations’ scientists tried to find remedies for it. These Belgian scientists showed that the chloroquine drugs worked against SARS-1 in 2004, and recommended it for both prophylaxis (where it could potentially supercede the need for a vaccine) and treatment of SARS-1.

By 2005, scientists at CDC and in Canada, not to be outdone, showed exactly the same thing: it could be used for prevention or treatment. AND it stopped transmission, unlike the vaccines that Rochelle Walensky admitted in August 2021 “could no longer do.”

Let me repeat myself: the US CDC knew in 2005 that chloroquine worked to prevent or treat the SARS-1 coronavirus. They KNEW.

Scientists in Holland showed that 4 drugs, including the chloroquine (CQ and HCQ) drugs, worked against the related beta coronavirus that caused MERS in 2014.

The very next article in the same journal came from Tony Fauci’s NIAID, which has a branch adjacent to or inside of Fort Detrick, and the authors included several old Fort Detrick scientists. These NIH scientists found that 66 drugs had efficacy against MERS and/or SARS-1, and the 66 drugs included chloroquine (CQ) and its cousin hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), which worked against both viruses.

The critical information is that both the CDC and the NIH’s infectious disease branch already had many known treatments for beta coronaviruses, and they hid them from us as COVID ravaged the country. Most of the 66 drugs they found probably worked against SARS-2 as well; the chloroquine drugs certainly did.

There were several overdose trials I know of: the WHO’s Solidarity trial, the UK’s Recovery trial, and a multicenter trial in ICU patients called REMAP-COVID, all over dosed using HCQ. 

@eyeball  They did the same thing with Ivermectin trials.  Over-dosed the patients, so they died and the drug looked ineffective.

INTERESTING FACTOID:  the fact that Agnes Buzyn, Macron’s Minister of Health in France, began the process of ending HCQ’s status as an OTC drug in October of 2019.  Buzyn’s husband Yves Levy runs a vaccine research institute. The drug had to be suppressed to make way for a vaccine.

The disease escaped a lab by October and was immediately seen as an opportunity to test a new vaccine platform. In order to make that happen, ANY & ALL potential treatments had to be suppressed until at least a vaccine could be marketed. Those in the know would have had to be willing to let millions die without effective treatment, and quietly allow or promote ineffective treatments like remdesivir, ventilation, etc.

Regardless of whether the SARS-2 virus leaked or was deliberately spread, there was already a plan in place to use the next pandemic to bring in digital vaccine passports. Everything points to a near-term plan to get rid of cash and bring in central bank digital currency or another form of digital money, and possibly a social credit system of sorts would soon follow.

To create the need for boosters and keeping track of them electronically, the disease had to last a very prolonged period of time. Lockdowns helped prolong it. Suppression of effectve treatment was also needed to prolong it.

Non-sterilizing vaccines, like the covid shots, are known to DRIVE VARIANTS, which also would have prolonged the pandemic.

The vigor with which the vaccines have been pushed and even mandated suggests intent to harm, at least starting in 2022, when their harms and lack of benefit became obvious. The mandates were only introduced after the vaccines were illegally licensed (but only EUA vaccine was made available) on August 23, 2021.

But Rochelle Walensky told the world in earlier August (6th, 8th or 9th) that they did not prevent spread—the only justification for a mandate being to prevent spread to others. So this was an intent to do harm as well.

The government and the FDA do not have the people's best interests at heart. It caters to its paying customers; Big Pharma is one of their best. HCQ is an older off patent drug and no longer brings in top revenue.

Before the vaccines could be rolled out they were actually telling people who had symptoms (fever, sore throat etc) to stay home and do nothing, but if they experienced difficulty breathing to go to the hospital. This was murderous advice, because they key to defeating Covid was EARLY medical treatment.

Dr. Chetty in South Africa and several others went public with treatment protocols based on the fact that the infection should be controlled in the first 8 days, or else the illness would enter a more dangerous (but still treatable) inflammatory phase. Simple measures in the first week using home remedies such as nasal sprays and gargles should have been advised by government agencies.

But nothing was allowed to stand in the way of the mantra (as expounded by Bill Gates) that only vaccines could save us.

[Goddess]

Note: during COVID-19, Fauci used a very similar playbook as he used with AIDS and the drug, AZT to protect the market for Remdesivir.

For example, despite the fact Fauci’s agency had found HCQ to be very effective (which led to numerous early studies being conducted that showed HCQ was an effective treatment for COVID-19), Fauci used a variety of lies to argue there was insufficient evidence for it (e.g., the data was anecdotal, there were no randomized trials, that the trials weren’t large enough etc.) that were almost identical to the same lines he used to bury the off-patent AIDS therapies.

The lies worked and allowed the media to paint HCQ’s proponents as “anti-science” and thereby not be allowed to debate the data.

Following this, the medical community pivoted to producing doctored studies (e.g., ones that deliberately administered HCQ too late in the disease process for it to help, one with overtly fabricated data, and one which deliberately gave toxic doses to the recipients) which were then used to argue HCQ (one of the safest drugs on the market) was actually unsafe and ineffective.

Fauci repeated these claims ad nauseam.

Conversely, the drugs he promoted (e.g., AZT or Remdesivir) were never held to those standards and instead zealously endorsed despite having minimal scientific evidence. But due to Fauci’s way with words, he was able to make the public believe each drug was in fact miraculous). 

INTERESTING FACTOID:  Many doctors and nurses on the frontlines now call Remdesivir - "Run, Death Is Near".

Interesting excerpt from this book by Peter Navarro:

Peter Navarro (Trump’s economic advisor) describes a confrontation he had with Fauci about HCQ in the White House helps to illustrate this dynamic:

I knew that Fauci would play the “there’s only anecdotal evidence” card and wanted to be ready to prove that that assertion was false.

When it was Fauci’s turn, right on cue, he immediately played his “there’s only anecdotal evidence” card. Just as immediately, I stood up from my backbench chair just behind Vice President Pence and walked straight toward Fauci.

"Tony, these are not anecdotes. That’s more than fifty scientific studies in support of hydroxy. Fifty! So stop spouting your crap about there only being anecdotal evidence because not only is it counterfactual,  you are going to kill people - just like you did during the AIDS crisis when you refused to approve medicines that everybody but you, knew worked."

Edited June 11, 2024 by Goddess

[Goddess]

Excerpt from Scott Atlas, MD, book regarding his confrontations with Fauci during covid:

(Dr. Atlas was asked to assist on Trump's Covid Task Force)

This situation inspired Dr. Atlas to write a series of editorials which argued we should instead be focusing on protecting the people who were vulnerable to COVID-19 (the elderly) and end the lockdowns (and mass testing) for everyone else, as the current policies were not preventing the elderly from dying, but WERE inflicting massive harm on the general population (who were not at risk of dying from COVID).

This attracted the attention of the White House, and before long, Dr. Atlas was brought in.

Once there he discovered, that the COVID-19 task force (including the Vice President) had essentially decided to defer to the judgment of three of the doctors on it, all of whom had been heavily involved in the AIDS response and wanted to use the approach they used for AIDS with COVID (even though the diseases were completely different and hence not applicable to the other).

NOTE: the three doctors were Fauci, Birx and Redfield. Of the three, Redfield was the most rational, but he was frequently overrun by Birx (who dominated the task force meetings) and Fauci (who continuously promoted their lockdown ideology in the media despite President Trump advocating for reopening the country).

Much of what Atlas observed Fauci and Birx doing was difficult to believe. Here are a few quotes about Fauci from his memoir:

A bigger surprise was that Fauci did not present scientific research on the pandemic to the group that I witnessed. Likewise, I never heard him speak about his own critical analysis of any published research studies. This was stunning to me.

One depressing commonality was that none of them showed detailed knowledge of ongoing scientific literature on the pandemic. As opposed to what I had experienced with my colleagues in academic research centers, I never witnessed any of them provide any detailed critique of any journal publication.

Unlike scientists with whom I had worked for decades, I never saw them voice any critical assessment, methodological or otherwise, of the pitfalls of any published studies. That analytical process is an extremely important part of evaluating medical research. Likewise, none of the three ever brought scientific publications into the meetings that I attended. And unlike other doctors I had worked with, none showed familiarity with clinical medicine or had any clinical perspective on medical journal publications or any facility with clinical terminology in meetings I attended during my time in Washington. 

Meanwhile, the Task Force, particularly Dr. Fauci in his media appearances, kept focusing on what MIGHT happen, stressing what we didn’t know with absolute certainty, rather than underscoring what we did know about the virus based on months of evidence, including the most fundamental biology. The Task Force was failing to communicate any clinical “medical perspective, never clarifying that rare complications are just that—rare. Even worse, the media was sensationalizing every new piece of information. The panic itself had become another contagion.

I felt burned out, simply unable to muster the energy to yet again correct something so unmistakably wrong. That happened most commonly when selective correlations were assumed to be cause and effect, like a non-scientist might conclude.

It did not matter that their policy was failing to save lives while simultaneously destroying lower-income families. Dr. Fauci himself called it simply “inconvenient,” seemingly without any self-awareness that he spoke as a member of an elite class. 

There was no articulation of what we knew, what the scientific studies and the world’s evidence had shown. On the contrary, Fauci repeatedly emphasized in his occasional Task Force comments, as he did in his frequent media interviews, what we did not know with certainty, just as a layman without any medical perspective would do. For instance, the issue of risk to children, or spread from children to adults, was always, “Well, we don’t know for sure,” despite repeated studies from all over the world elucidating that we did know. That pattern of highlighting uncertainties while minimizing decades of fundamental immunology and virology was alarmist and contrary to the expected behavior of a public health leader. It created massive fear inside and outside the White House, and it drove on-the-ground lockdowns and mandates.

We then spoke about kids and schools, and he asked what I thought “about the risk to children.”… I went through a fairly thorough discussion of the international literature to date on the remarkably low risk to children for serious illness or death…Fauci listened. He offered no other studies, no other data, and nothing in dispute, other than commenting, “Well, what if we aren’t totally sure?”

Near the start of the next Task Force meeting, Dr. Fauci excitedly exclaimed, “Scott, this may interest you,” from across the table. “There is a report about myocarditis in these patients.” This was truly remarkable, in one sense. It was the only time I can recall during my entire four months in the White House that Anthony Fauci spoke up about a research study. 

Fauci began by explaining that an MRI study showed myocarditis in people after COVID. From his vague description of it, I assumed that he got his information from a summary, rather than the entire research report. I had read this study. I knew the methodology and the results in detail. I had already discussed it with cardiologists and infectious disease physicians who took care of patients.

I politely listened as Dr. Fauci spoke about the study. He quickly jumped to what he often did—the alarmist interpretation of “how dangerous this virus is.” He then moved to other things “we don’t know,” speculating about potential problems from this virus. He then garbled out something that was almost unrecognizable. He had grossly mispronounced a medical term. 

I leaned forward, struck by what I heard. I interrupted. “What did you just say?” He stopped immediately, frozen. No reply. 

I repeated my question. “What did you just say? What are you trying to pronounce?” Fauci just looked at me. The room was silent. Then I said, “Are you trying to say encephalomyelitis?” 

This was an uncommon inflammation of the brain or spinal cord that could occur after a viral infection. Uncommon, but well known to doctors with clinical medical expertise. I had published and taught about encephalomyelitis for decades. 

I needed to clarify the meaning of the findings, since I was concerned that Fauci would issue his usual alarmist proclamations on cable news. I spoke for ten straight minutes, explaining the study design and the data…This small report of four entirely asymptomatic individuals with an MRI finding after COVID was absolutely not a cause for alarming the public. 

As often happened, Fauci spoke up to support Dr. Birx’s concerns, saying people need to be warned even more strongly about the dangers of the virus spreading, about wearing masks and distancing. He claimed Americans didn’t think the virus was serious, and that was the reason cases spread. I was honestly surprised. I thought people were already panic-stricken. Normal life had virtually ceased to exist, even eliminating serious medical care or last visits with dying family. Meanwhile the media were on-message 24/7, instructing the public about masks and social distancing; there were signs and announcements demanding masks and diagrams about distancing everywhere; healthy young people were outside riding bicycles or driving their cars alone, wearing masks. Indeed, surveys showed that most adults perceived grossly exaggerated risks, particularly but not only younger people; and yes, a high percentage were obeying the edicts, distancing and wearing masks, according to virtually every published survey. 

I challenged him to clarify his point, because I couldn’t believe my ears. “So you think people aren’t frightened enough?” He said, “Yes, they need to be more afraid.”

So to recap, that’s America’s “best” scientist we continually hear people in the media deify.

NOTE:  since Fauci could not refute Atlas at task force meetings, he instead recruited the media to attack Atlas and frequently made demonstrable lies over what transpired there (e.g., this national headline was a blatant lie) Worse still, each time Atlas (who was working with a team of premier researchers around the country) began making progress towards convincing the Task Force to adopt a more sane evidence-based approach to handling COVID-19, someone there (who was almost certainly Fauci) leaked it to the media so that a hysteria could be created that overturned his suggested policy. This in turn, illustrates the cancel culture Fauci instilled within American science, which during the pandemic often reached the point where it was simply not possible for self-evident truths that went against the narrative to be publicly debated.

@Michael Hardner:

Above posts illustrate why many understand Fauci to be a mass murderer.

[Goddess]

Well, some good news - it appears that Pfizer is cleaning up some of the DNA contamination in its covid injections.

Readers of this thread would be familiar with the discovery of billions of DNA fragments that were left over during the manufacturing of Pfizer and Moderna mRNA covid-19 vaccines.

Cancer genomics researcher Kevin McKernan first made the discovery and published his findings in April 2023:

OSF Preprints | Sequencing of bivalent Moderna and Pfizer mRNA vaccines reveals nanogram to microgram quantities of expression vector dsDNA per dose

Phillip Buckhaults then confirmed there were billions of DNA fragments that weren’t supposed to be there.  (Remember - it's replication of tests that is important, not so much peer-review.  Can the findings be replicated?)

Last year, Buckhaults testified about his findings under oath during a South Carolina Senate hearing.

Since then, the results have been corroborated by Speicher et al who found unacceptable levels of residual DNA in bivalent vaccines from Canada, and more recently, in monovalent vaccines from Australia.

Buckhaults recently tested the new batch of unopened vials that had been manufactured in 2023, and compared them to the original batches from 2020.

He was stunned to see that Pfizer’s 2023 vials were significantly ‘cleaner’ than the 2020 vials. Specifically, the 2023 vials (purple bars) had about 10 times less DNA fragments, than the 2020 vials (pink bars).

Buckhaults also compared Pfizer and Moderna vials.

Moderna vials from 2023 were 20,000 times cleaner than Pfizer’s 2023 vials - Buckhaults says it may be because Moderna has always been aware of the DNA contamination issue in mRNA vaccines.

In one of Moderna’s mRNA vaccine patents, the manufacturer points out the importance of “the removal of DNA from a sample during the mRNA production process” and acknowledges the oncogenic (THAT MEANS CANCER-CAUSING) risks of failing to do so.

 Buckhaults is now testing human tissue samples for evidence of DNA fragments that may have integrated into the genome and caused mutations that lead to cancer.

“We’re checking tissue samples with perhaps 10 or 15 different primer pairs. That way, we have a much greater chance of detecting DNA integration into people’s genome,” said Buckhaults.

So.......YAY?

 

[Goddess]

So, here is just one picture of the strange fibrous clots embalmers have been finding in bodies since the rollout of the jabs:

Embalmers were finding it difficult to drain bodily fluids in preparation for embalming and that's how these were found.

Embalmer Richard Hirschman has been trying to find out what they are. 

@Venandi  When these clots first showed up, Dr. Jessica Rose postulated they were indicative of amyloidosis.  You can check out her substack, if you're interested in knowing more.

Anyhooooooo, the clots have finally been analyzed and here is the breakdown of the top 21 proteins found in them, although they contain over 500 proteins:

The X Space discussions with scientists about these clots have been really interesting to listen to.  And most are saying what Dr. Rose initially suspected - amyloidosis, based on the peptide profiles.

Here's the amino acid breakdown:

What is postulated now is that the jobs have caused some kind of novel PRION disease.  Interesting, since one of the top PRION diseases is Jakob-Creutzfeldt disease, which is extremely RARE and almost always fatal and a horrific way to die, but there are a BUNCH of new diagnoses of it in VAERS since the jab rollout.

There's also speculation that it's the remnants of delaminated healthy vessels, delamination initiated by spike pathology.

No thrombin was detected, also interesting since the polymerisation formation pathway does NOT rely on thrombin or thrombospondin for ‘normal’ blood-clotting pathways.

This is also being tied to numerous cases of Lewy Body Dementia being reported - which is an abnormal accumulation of a protein called alpha-synuclein in the brain. And as we know now - the spike and LNPs DO cross the blood/brain barrier.

I find all this fascinating.

And sad.

What a shitty experiment the jabs have been.  😟

 

 

[Goddess]

@Venandi

At first,  I was thinking, "I hope someone writes a paper on this."

But then I remembered the "official narrative" is that these clots do not exist. 😟

Like vax injuries "did not exist".....until they did.

And myocarditis "did not exist"....until it did.

And menstrual issues "did not exist"....until they did.

If we could get Fauci out of everyone's way, maybe we could make some headway on these issues and find a way to help people.

[Goddess]

In the biggest, broadest study yet, they still can’t prove the lockdowns improved anything.

The authors conducted a “multiverse analysis” of nearly a hundred thousand different computer models. The models compared government mandates like lockdowns, school shutdowns, and mask mandates, against local covid outcomes in cases, deaths, and excess mortality. They crunched data from 181 countries.

The result: 42% of the comparative models suggested stricter government responses improved covid outcomes, while 58% suggested that outcomes got worse after mandates.  In other words, they would have gotten better results by flipping a coin.

Epidemic outcomes following government responses to COVID-19: Insights from nearly 100,000 models | Science Advances

Data don't support strong claims for Covid-19 pandemic responses | STAT (statnews.com)

 

If you have to look very closely to distinguish between various alternatives, the tiny difference between the outcomes presented by exercising various options isn’t worth agonizing, or changing your life, over.

While making decisions, one always weighs benefits against costs. During Coronamania, tens of millions of Americans failed to weigh the costs of lockdowns, school closures, masking, testing and “vaxxing” against these measures’ purported—but actually insignificant—benefits. Most people fundamentally erred by uncritically accepting the government and media’s phony Covid data and conceptual framework, instead of relying on direct observation and applying basic biology principles and logic.

Scamdemic governments imposed an absurd array of rules ostensibly designed to “stop the spread” of some purportedly universally lethal virus. Most people obeyed these silly rules. A subset of these rule followers became indignant when others refused to conform.

But these rules were simply theater. Washing hands, disinfecting groceries, staying six feet apart, locking down, closing schools, parks, churches and other places, face-covering, PCR testing and injecting mRNA resembled basketball teams playing games with close scores; there weren’t significantly different outcomes between heavy-handed nations and states and those who were more lenient, nor between extremely cautious and nonchalant individuals.

Jurisdictions who intervened most zealously, seemed to have done worse than did the less restrictive. 

The most fervent Covid rule followers nonetheless got sick. People don’t need much human contact to transmit some virus or other. Unimaginably tiny viruses escaped around, or through pore spaces in, masks.

And if you needed a test to tell you were sick, how sick were you, really? If tests had multi-day analytical lag times and delivered 90% false positives, were they worth taking, or believing?

Despite the near absence of observable differences regarding Covid cases and deaths in various places and periods, governments, newspapers and TV stations bombarded the public with stats, graphs and death and case tickers to build fear and spread the pro-NPI narrative, ultimately to build market demand for “vaccines.”

When VaxxFest began, it soon became clear that the miracle shots not only didn’t stop infection and spread, but that the most injected became sick more often than did the unvaxxed. All the jabbed people I know got The Virus multiple times. Jab-driven immune suppression seemed clearly to have occurred.

ADE and OAS mechanisms have been discussed in this thread.

Whether vaxxed or not, only a tiny fraction of the population was ever said to be dying of Covid. When 99.8% of those under 60 were known to survive infection without injection, the shots had only microscopic potential upside. Even using Pharma’s self-serving data, the shots’ absolute risk reduction was less than one percent. Whether you took the shots or not, you were extremely unlikely to die from Covid. Thus, why inject an experimental shot?

The vast majority of the overall population was always at near zero risk of dying of Covid. Therefore, though it received much government, media, institutional and societal focus, the jab status of those under 65 was a distinction without a real-world difference. To most, the vaxx presented only a downside; it was all risk, no reward.

The shots seem to have needlessly killed or injured healthy people via, e.g., heart attacks, strokes, cancers and neurological disruption.

Additionally, since 2021, there have been millions of cumulative excess deaths in highly-vaxxed nations. Hundreds of thousands of these were in the US. Yes, temporal correlation doesn’t, by itself, prove causation. But it’s an important data point.

One thing is certain: the shots didn’t meaningfully extend the lives of those who died within a year of injecting.

And while most injectees report no lasting secondary effects, the vaxx injury story is open-ended. Long-term vaxx effects are unknowable.

The burden of proof is always on the party seeking to change the status quo.

 

The non-pharmaceutical interventions (“NPIs”): lockdowns, school closures, masking and testing, plus vaxxing and giving away trillions of dollars didn’t visibly, markedly improve Covid outcomes. Nor, despite all of the data distortion and spin, did the NPIs and shots “save millions of lives.”

By October, 2023, at least fifty studies had corroborated what was obvious to the naked eye: NPIs and shots hadn’t significantly lessened ostensible Covid deaths.

However, the NPIs plainly, visibly did widely damage mental health, spur weight gain, deprive young people of education, social development and memories, and devalue savings. Neither the NPIs nor shots were worth the problems they’ve predictably, observably caused.

Be smarter next time, people.

[Goddess]

On Fauci's recent attempts to make MONEYPOX into something:

Dr Anthony Fauci's department hid plans to create mutant monkeypox virus that 'could've started pandemic,' bombshell Congress report finds | Daily Mail Online

 

In 2015, the NIH (Fauci) schemed to engineer a highly infectious, highly fatal version of the, mostly African, disease that was long called ‘monkeypox.’  But the worst part of 2022’s worldwide epidemic of horrid sores afflicting delicate body parts, which terrified the world’s gay community, was the pox’s triggering, intolerant name. So alert public health authorities narrowly avoided disaster by promptly re-defining the disease as the nonsense word ‘mpox.’

Whew! That was a close one.

This week, following a painful 1.5-year probe, the House Energy and Commerce Committee released its results: the HHS, NIAID and the NIH repeatedly “obstructed and misled the committee” about whether the risky experiments were approved and actually carried out, describing the agency’s deceptive lack of cooperation with the probe as “unacceptable and potentially criminal.”

Keep things in perspective. It’s not like a brand-new, never-before-seen version of a virus popped up simultaneously in ten different cities worldwide seven years after the NIH experiments started or anything.

Oh, wait.

Nevermind....... 🙄

During the investigation, the HHS and the NIH repeatedly promised the Committee that the dangerous mpox experiments had NEVER EVER EVER EVER EVER been formally proposed, planned, approved, or conducted, and were never even under serious consideration.

But the House report concluded those “repeated assertions were false.”

MPVX_Interim_Staff_Report_and_Appendices_final_844c87e06f.pdf (d1dth6e84htgma.cloudfront.net)

According to the Committee report, it revealed that the human cockroach Fauci’s agency, the NIAID, is a law unto itself:

 

I don't know who exactly who needs to hear this, but a “culture of secrecy and obfuscation” is just what you DON'T want in a public health agency. 

I feel like my posts are starting to look like @betsy's  🤣

[Goddess]

Hmmm, well this will be interesting:

Criminal referral requests against Anthony Fauci and other public health officials have been submitted to District Attorneys in Louisiana.

"The criminal referrals accuse Dr. Fauci, current and former federal officers, and hospital systems providing care within Louisiana of committing crimes per Louisiana criminal code, including:

 Terrorism – by Causing Intentional Killing or Infliction of Serious Bodily Injury, La. R.S. 14:128.1(A)

 First Degree Murder, La. R.S. 14:30

 Second Degree Murder, La. R.S. 14:30.1

 Manslaughter, La. R.S. 14:31(A)(3)

 Human Trafficking, La. R.S. 14:46.2 2

 Prohibited Racketeering Acts, La. R.S. 15:1353

 Cruelty to Persons with Infirmities, La. R.S. 14:93.3

 False Imprisonment, La. R.S. 14:46

 Second Degree Kidnapping, La. R.S. 14:44.1

 Battery, La. R.S. 14:33

 Simple Battery of Persons with Infirmities, La. R.S. 14:35.2"

 

 

 

[Goddess]

How interesting!

Small study (189 patients), but I did not know about these properties of spirulina.

Frontiers | Effect of high-dose Spirulina supplementation on hospitalized adults with COVID-19: a randomized controlled trial (frontiersin.org)

 

Objective: Spirulina (arthrospira platensis) is a cyanobacterium proven to have anti-inflammatory, antiviral, and antioxidant effects. However, the effect of high-dose Spirulina supplementation on hospitalized adults with COVID-19 is currently unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of high-dose Spirulina platensis for SARS-CoV-2 infection.

 

Results: Within seven days, there were no deaths in the Spirulina group, while 15 deaths (15.3%) occurred in the control group. Moreover, within seven days, there was a greater number of patients discharged in the Spirulina group (97.7%) in non-ICU compared to the control group (39.1%) (HR, 6.52; 95% CI, 3.50 to 12.17). Overall mortality was higher in the control group (8.7% non-ICU, 28.8% ICU) compared to the Spirulina group (non-ICU HR, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.97; ICU, HR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.05 to 0.48). In non-ICU, patients who received Spirulina showed a significant reduction in the levels of IL-6, TNF-α, IL-10, and IP-10 as intervention time increased. Furthermore, in ICU, patients who received Spirulina showed a significant decrease in the levels of MIP-1α and IL-6. IFN-γ levels were significantly higher in the intervention group in both ICU and non-ICU subgroups as intervention time increased. No side effects related to Spirulina supplements were observed during the trial.

Conclusion: High-dose Spirulina supplements coupled with the standard treatment of COVID-19 may improve recovery and remarkably reduce mortality in hospitalized patients with COVID-19.

[eyeball]

On 6/11/2024 at 10:39 AM, Goddess said:

@eyeball  They did the same thing with Ivermectin trials.  Over-dosed the patients, so they died and the drug looked ineffective

They? You mean Fauci and his handful of psyop dudes or the people they psyoped into committing mass murder for them?

How exactly did they psyop so many apparently intelligent and competent researchers around the world?

[Goddess]

15 minutes ago, eyeball said:

How exactly did they psyop so many apparently intelligent and competent researchers around the world?

They didn't.

The fake study was debunked and shown to be a fraud.

You and Fauci are pretty much the only ones who accept the fraudulent, Pharma-paid-for study.

[eyeball]

25 minutes ago, Goddess said:

They didn't.

You very clearly said they over-dosed the patients in the context of mass murder.

You're clearly insane.

[Goddess]

12 minutes ago, eyeball said:

You very clearly said they over-dosed the patients in the context of mass murder.

You're clearly insane.

Listen dumbass - you knew this was an experimental injection with no long-term studies, so everything they told you at the beginning was a guess, a guess based on "hope."  Birx admitted it - it was all based on "hope".

It's been several years now and the short-term studies are coming in.  Long-term studies will be in 5-15 years.

You wanna keep spouting the hopeful guesses from 3-4 years ago as truth - they never were truth.

The truth is in the studies and datasets that have been produced NOW, SINCE THE ROLLOUT OF THE JABS.

The insane one is you - who rejects the more up-to-date data and studies in favour of all the MSM hopeful guesses from years ago.

It's amazing that you don't grasp this.

 

 

[Goddess]

Seriously - @eyeball

When Thalidomide came out, it was hoped it would relieve morning sickness in pregnant women.

Turns out it actually killed and created devastating birth defects in babies.

This is like you saying Thalidomide is great because it cures morning sickness and ignoring all the studies and data and real-life babies with no arms and legs.

Fuque!!! - how stoopid are you????

[Goddess]

You and the rest of the roving band of lunatic trolls here who reject recent up-to-date data and studies - just flabbergasting.  It's just beyond stupid and bizarre.

[Goddess]

Lawyer, Aaron Siri, has been involved in vaccine injury litigation for years and never more so than during the covid jab rollout.

He has been making great strides in holding Pharma and their paid shills to account.

Now, Stanley Plotkin, the world’s leading vaccinologist, and his disciples, have just capitulated.

After decades of claiming vaccine safety is robustly studied, they just admitted it is not, neither before nor after licensure.

See this article:  Funding Postauthorization Vaccine-Safety Science | New England Journal of Medicine (nejm.org)

And Mr. Siri's commentary:

It is amazing that after decades of Dr. Stanley Plotkin and his vaccinologist disciples insisting vaccines are the most well studied products on the planet, they just penned an article admitting precisely the opposite.

 

They just admitted vaccines are not properly studied—neither pre-licensure nor post-licensure. They admitted, for example, “prelicensure clinical trials have limited sample sizes [and] follow-up durations” and that “there are not resources earmarked for postauthorization safety studies.”

 

That is an incredible reversal. But let me provide context so nobody is fooled at what they are clearly up to:

 

For decades, the medical community insisted vaccines are the most thoroughly studied product ever; for example, Dr. Paul Offit said, "I think we should be proud of vaccines as arguably the safest, best tested things we put in our body.”

 

For decades, parents of vaccine injured children, vaccine injured adults, and other stakeholders contested these claims only to be shunned and attacked by the medical community and health agencies.

 

In 2018, I had the unprecedented opportunity to depose the architect of our vaccination program and the Godfather of Vaccinology, Dr. Plotkin, and lay bare the evidence that showed what these authors are now finally admitting about the utter lack of vaccine safety trials and studies. See https://thehighwire.com/ark-videos/the-deposition-of-stanley-plotkin/….

 

After this deposition is made public, Dr. Plotkin goes on a tirade, making demands that FDA add “missing information on safety and efficacy” in vaccine package inserts and that CDC exclude harms from its Vaccine Information Sheets, “lobbying the Gates Foundation to support pro-vaccine organizations,” working to have WHO list vaccine hesitancy as a global threat, lobbying AAP, IDSA and PIDS to “support training of witnesses” to support vaccine safety, etc. See https://icandecide.org/article/dr-stanley-plotkin-the-godfather-of-vaccines-reaction-to-being-questioned/….

 

The problem is, it doesn't work. It doesn’t work because, at bottom, there are no proper safety studies. So, there is no safety data to add to the FDA package inserts, and hiding harms by removing them from CDC inserts doesn’t make them go away. Parents and other adults don’t simply stop believing what they have seen with their own eyes because CDC, WHO, the Gates Foundations, etc., won’t acknowledge them, or worse, they attack them.

 

That brings us to the present in which Plotkin and his disciples realize they can’t cast voodoo on the public. They can’t hide the truth. So, their only option is to try and co-op the truth they have lied about for decades by now admitting that the studies to show vaccines are safe do not exist. But in making that admission, they conveniently fail to admit that for decades they lied, gaslit, defrauded (and I don’t use that word lightly) the public by claiming that vaccines are probably the most thoroughly safety tested products on the planet and that people should rest assured, no stone on vaccine safety was left unturned.

 

Thus, in their article just published, they pretend they never lied about vaccine safety. They pretend they are now just pointing out vaccine safety has never really been conducted, as if that was not known to them before.

 

Don’t be fooled. Their real agenda is plain, and it is not to study vaccine safety, but rather to confirm that which they already believe. This is crystal clear from the fact that, while their article admits the studies have not been done, they write in the same breath that serious vaccine harms are “rare.” But if the studies have not been done, how do they know that? The answer is, they don’t, and they don’t care to know the truth. Their goal is to protect the products they have spent their careers defending and worshipping and that have brought them fame and riches.

 

They also ignore the mountain of studies and data which already exist that clearly show serious vaccine harms. Just take a moment to review the large body of science around one of the adjuvants used in vaccines which multiple studies show can cause serious harm. See https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38788092/.

 

Finally, just look at their proposed solution. After making the a priori conclusion that harms are “rare,” ignoring all the existing studies showing harm, these folk have the audacity to want to raid the federal vaccine injury compensation fund to presumably pay themselves and their compatriots hundreds of millions of dollars to conduct the studies that would, no doubt, seek to confirm their prior conclusion that vaccine harms are “rare,” while ignoring the studies that already show serious harm.

 

So, with that in mind, and sorry for the long wind-up, here are the things they admit in this article for maybe the very first time:

 

“[T]he widespread vaccine hesitancy observed during the Covid-19 pandemic suggests that the public is no longer satisfied with the traditional safety goal of simply detecting and quantifying the associated risks after a vaccine has been authorized for use.”

 

Comment: The parents of vaccine injured children, vaccine injured adults, and others were never “satisfied” with seeking to assess “risks after a vaccine has been authorized.”

 

“Postauthorization studies are needed to fully characterize the safety profile of a new vaccine, since prelicensure clinical trials have limited sample sizes, follow up durations, and population heterogeneity.”

 

Comment: Let me translate: the clinical trials relied upon to license childhood vaccines are useless with regard to safety since they virtually never have a placebo control, typically review safety for days or weeks after injection, and often have far too few participants to measure anything of value, just see http://icandecide.org/no-placebo; amazingly, I just had a dispute with a Plotkin disciple not long ago in which they were clearly still not ready to admit the above truth https://x.com/AaronSiriSG/status/1673483027618623489….

 

“It is critical to examine adverse events following immunization (AEFIs) that have not been detected in clinical trials, to ascertain whether they are causally or coincidentally related to vaccination.”

 

Comment: No shit and you have been claiming for decades this was being done!

 

“When they are caused by vaccines (vaccine adverse reactions), the risk attributable to vaccination and the biologic mechanism must be ascertained. That science becomes the basis for developing safer vaccines, if possible, and for determining contraindications to vaccination and the compensation that should be offered for AEFIs.”

 

Comment: Again, no shit, and you have also been claiming for decades this was being done!

 

“Currently in the United States, when the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommends a new routine vaccine, the only automatic statutory resource allocations that follow are for vaccine procurement by Vaccines for Children (VFC) and for the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP). Although the ACIP acknowledges the need, there are currently no resources earmarked for postauthorization safety studies beyond annual appropriations, which must be approved by Congress each year.”

 

Comment: Again, no shit! But nice of you to finally admit it after decades of gaslighting.

 

“Progress in vaccine-safety science has understandably been slow — often depending on epidemiologic evidence that is delayed or is inadequate to support causal conclusions and on an understanding of biologic mechanisms that is incomplete — which has adversely affected vaccine acceptance.”

 

Comment: More gaslighting because had a proper clinical trial been conducted pre-licensure, we would know the safety before it is unleashed on babies and we wouldn’t need to rely on confounded-biased-conflicted-post-authorization “epidemiological” studies you now want to conduct which you make clear you only suggest because you want to avoid “public concern and consequent decreases in immunization coverage,” not because you actually care about safety.

 

“In 234 reviews of various vaccines and health outcomes conducted from 1991 to 2012, the IOM found inadequate evidence to prove or disprove causation in 179 (76%) of the relationships it explored, illustrating the need for more rigorous science.”

 

Comment: Again, no shit, and I would appreciate if you would please properly cite to the ICAN white paper from 2017 from which you have plainly lifted this point https://icandecide.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/VaccineSafety-Version-1.0-October-2-2017-1.pdf….

 

“Identifying the biologic mechanisms of adverse reactions — how and in whom they occur — is critical for developing safer vaccines, preventing adverse reactions by expanding contraindications, and equitably compensating vaccinees for true adverse reactions.”

 

Comment: Shameless to pretend you have not for decades ignored or attacked those calling for these studies while pretending a mountain of such studies showing the foregoing don’t already exist.

 

“[T]he budget for vaccine-safety monitoring at the CDC (which is responsible for the majority of U.S. federal efforts) has remained stagnant … at about $20 million per year” which they write is an “inadequate level of funding.”

 

Comment: Again, shameless to pretend parent groups have not been yelling about this issue for decades only to be ignored and attacked.

 

“The public [now] also wants public health authorities to mitigate and prevent rare but serious adverse events – which no longer seem rare when vaccines are given to millions or billions of people.”

 

Comment: They have always been given to millions or billions of people, and the studies showing the harms they cause are not rare and they already exist, but you don’t really care about that reality as vaccine safety is not really the goal.

 

If they are really interested in the truth about what injuries vaccines cause and the rate at which these injuries occur, then they should welcome convening a bipartisan panel which could first review all the very concerning studies and hard data that already exists on this topic (often by scientists not on pharma’s dole) and we could design additional studies together and have them run in the open so everybody has to live with the result.

 

(Among other reasons to demand the study be conducted in the open is that I have witnessed firsthand what happens when a study comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated children in large multi-million person datasets, using historical insurance data, showed vaccinated children had multiple times the rate of numerous chronic diseases – the study gets buried hence the need to do it in the open.)

 

Plotkin and company should welcome studies which can show vaccines have not contributed to the rise in chronic childhood disease (many of which are immune mediated diseases) from 12% of children in the early 1980s (when CDC recommended 7 routine childhood injections) to over 50% of children now (when CDC recommends over 90 routine childhood injections).

 

And I think they do welcome such studies if they can assure that the outcome would show vaccines do not cause these harms. Alas, the reality is that (as they know) studies showing vaccines contribute to this rise already exist. But their goal, in any event, is not to really study safety. Rather it is to prove their prior assumption that vaccines are safe and harms are “rare.” This approach is how they designed VAERS, V-SAFE, VSD, and every other “safety” system.

 

As is transparent from their article, the only reason they even pretend to care about vaccine safety is that they want to avoid reduction in vaccine uptake – not actually assure safety.

 

That all said, if they are really well-meaning, I would welcome collaborating. To be fair, I will email all four of them to request a meeting to review existing science and design studies mutually agreed upon. If they are really interested in vaccine safety, they should welcome that (I have no hard feelings despite their attacks on me and I hope they can rise above any hard feelings they have for the sake of protecting children).

 

Most importantly, I'm willing to live with the results of those studies. Are they?

 

[Goddess]

DNA mismatch repair pathways are altered by cytosolic DNA and RNA:DNA hybrids.

Spike protein alone is known to influence this pathway.

NEW STUDY - mRNA COVID-19 injections are associated with deficient DNA mismatch repair (dMMR) non-metastatic colon cancer.

Types and Rates of COVID-19 Vaccination in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Microsatellite Stable and Instable Non-Metastatic Colon Cancer - PMC (nih.gov)

The authors note, "mRNA-based vaccine may cause damage to the MMR system of the tumor cells."

"Patients who received the BNT162b2 vaccine and have dMMR colon cancer had higher levels of CRP and sedimentation and lower levels of lymphocyte/CRP ratio, which suggest an inflammatory and immune relationship between mRNA-based vaccine and dMMR status."

Connects to this previous study regarding the N1 methyl Pseudo U that creates all types of dsRNA. :

Structural and thermodynamic consequences of base pairs containing pseudouridine and N1-methylpseudouridine in RNA duplexes | bioRxiv

 

 

[eyeball]

3 hours ago, Goddess said:

Listen dumbass -

Listen to your self you freakin' moonbat.

You're the one using the words mass murder, Mengele and Nazis to describe your version of reality with regards to COVID.

These are just nothingburger words to you?

What about you @WestCanMan @CdnFox etc etc is this a narrative you disavow or, like, thank, nod and wink at etc etc?

Seriously?

 

[CdnFox]

3 minutes ago, eyeball said:

Listen to your self you freakin' moonbat.

You're the one using the words mass murder, Mengele and Nazis to describe your version of reality with regards to COVID.

These are just nothingburger words to you?

What about you @WestCanMan @CdnFox etc etc is this a narrative you disavow or, like, thank, nod and wink at etc etc?

Seriously?

 

I'm sure you think you're interesting enough to pay attention to, but honestly i haven't' been watching much.   What stupidity have you come up with now that i'm supposed to be for or against?

Edited July 11, 2024 by CdnFox

[Goddess]

4 minutes ago, eyeball said:

Seriously?

I've been right about everything and you've been wrong about everything.

Don't get pissed at me.

Do better.