First a trickle....Now a flood

[eyeball]

27 minutes ago, Goddess said:

Yes, I know you've said before - they are all liars.

How would you know?  

By the evidence I see on the ground with my own eyes everyday. I've lived in the same small town of a couple thousand people for 50 years now. According to the sort of stats you throw around I should know dozens of people by now who've been killed and injured. I have friends and acquaintances who work in the local health care industry. Crickets there too.

I'm not aware of one single injury or death as a result of vaccine. I don't think I know anyone who's even died of COVID for that matter 

[eyeball]

35 minutes ago, Goddess said:

Are you saying all the people (evidence on the ground) are lying and the studies are lying the datasets are lying because YOU haven't seen anyone injured (that you know of)? 

I don't know why I wouldn't. 

It's virtually impossible to be taken seriously.

How many people do claim to have known who've been injured and killed?

[CdnFox]

2 hours ago, eyeball said:

Hmmm, 3 years and 6-7 vaccinations later and I've had little more than one two day bout of the sniffles that I fought off without so much as a fever.

I also hear this routinely from friends and family.

Still seems like way more trickle than flood.

Look at your posts and your inability to form a reasoned argument.  Tell me all about how there's no side effects   (unless your argument is that you were that way all along?)

[Political Smash]

I could get further into it but this pretty much sums it up ...

(Funny it wouldn't allow me to quote the OP as apparently it contains terms that have now been banned likely long after the OP was created FYI. That's these WEF POS for you, try and hide their guilt or what describes them and their groomed sock puppets for being called out for what they prove to be as well)

Edited August 25 by Political Smash

[Goddess]

Vaccines, like all drugs, have side effects. This should not be controversial.

No vaccine is “safe and effective” for everyone. This should not be controversial.

Drawing attention to the serious side effects listed on every vaccine insert should not be controversial.

Advocating for individuals who have been injured by vaccines should not be controversial.

Making vaccines safer should not be controversial.

Holding vaccine companies accountable for their products should not be controversial.

Preventing pharmaceutical companies from influencing regulatory bodies that approve drugs should not be controversial.

Ensuring that the regulatory system is not  weaponized against the public while safeguarding pharmaceutical companies should not be controversial.

Instead, for the last number of years, individuals, scientists and doctors with valid concerns have been disparaged, censored, and labeled as “anti-vaxxers” or “conspiracy theorists.” This behavior is detrimental to the public interest and contributes to a lack of trust in public institutions and officials.

Time to ensure that the actions of public agencies truly serve the public interest. This should not be controversial.

Edited August 25 by Goddess

[Goddess]

From Dr. Vinay Prassad's substack RE: the booster shots for this Fall:

Years ago, a famous scientist told me “I am going to have a problem when they recommend 23 boosters over 22 boosters without a randomized study”

I laughed. No one would ever do that, I thought.

Yet, that day steadily approaches.

This week, the FDA authorized a new fall COVID booster. This was done without any studies measuring the impact on severe disease or hospitalization or death. Worse, the viral target was chosen by Peter Marks, against advice, and is already out of date.

First, let me highlight the most honest, decent scientist on the topic. My UCSF colleague:

Next. Here is data on the target’s frequency:

 

It's simply bad medicine to recommend a medical product to people, many of whom have just had COVID, without evidence that benefits exceed harms and worse without ongoing studies to answer open questions. It's especially bad if the target is out of date. I consider such recommendations to verge on malpractice, even if sanctioned by captured ‘authorities’.

Now consider some of the most shameful tweets promoting this product. First, the CDC director:

Cohen has the temerity to recommend that little children get this shot— which is inconsistent with most European nations. Moreover, even though she has the clout to demand or even run a randomized study, she does not. Mandy Cohen has joined Rochelle Walensky as two of the worst CDC directors since the agencies inception. Vaccine mistrust is in part due to people like her.

Here is a link to the full tweet that falsely claims the booster reduces severe disease. The FDA has no data for that claim. I encourage all readers of this post to community note this claim and cite this post. The FDA should not be allowed to engage in false statements.

 

Now look at how doctors extrapolate. This is Ashish Jha former Biden COVID Czar:

Jha has the audacity to invent the best time to get a booster. A data free recommendation on timing for a data free vaccine. Dr Akkad, an ID doctor agrees this is damaging to public trust. I think it is inconsistent with being a scientist, who would want better studies.

But it gets even worse.

This is Dr. Vin Gupta, the MS/NBC correspondent:

He recommends this out of date booster for a woman who just had an actual infection. This claim is problematic, both because her future risk is low…

And worse, adverse events appear higher when doses are given after infection.

I am concerned Vin Gupta is spreading dangerous medical advice with the false legitimacy of being a TV pundit. Per his biography he works at the University of Washington. I tried to find him on open payments and found he takes payments from Pfizer.

How is it possible for a doctor to make recommendations for an unproven vax, appear on NBC and not disclose payments from Pfizer?

Across the board, I believe the physicians recommending this shot are dishonorable. None of them are advocating for randomized studies. Many of them are promoting Pfizer's interests. Some may even be paid by the company. A few weeks ago, I discussed a new paper showing trust in medicine is on the decline. It isn't low enough. These doctors mean you don't distrust doctors enough.

We live in concerning times where drug companies push unproven products, the FDA rubber stamps them, and sell outs promote them. It's sad times for evidence based medicine when the sellouts get promoted.

Edited August 26 by Goddess

[Goddess]

Provisional Deaths in Canada Dashboard (statcan.gc.ca)

There are more weekly deaths in Alberta now (blue line) than at the height of the pre-vaccine COVID epidemic (orange). In fact, there are 15-25% more deaths in Alberta than in 2018, even though our population only increased by 9% in that period and only aged slightly. The body bags are piling up, and the morgues are overflowing, but no one is panicking.

They started rolling out the  "vaccines" in December 2020 and that orange line goes up like a rocket.

The cure was more deadly then the disease. Post-pandemic excess deaths make that clear. A casual look at http://ourworldindata.org reveals the nearly every country that engaged in extreme genetic vaccine coercion is still recording high excess death 2.5-yrs later.

There were 'experts' pushing each other out of the way to analyze everything about covid. They came up with every impossible scenario and shoved it down our throats for years. Where are the experts NOW on this massive increase in deaths?

 

If one looks at the purple line of 2020 it’s shows the normal and anticipated Gompertz Curve rise and fall in March/April then a return to normal. If we had done nothing further, no lockdowns, no masks, no ventilators that would have been the end of it. All other increases in deaths is directly due to all the political and pharmaceutical malpractices and malfeasance mandates, and vax deaths.

Look at the Under 44s, and compare "the height of the pandemic raging w/o measures in place, early 2020" & then AFTER the young people are "PROTECTED" by the "safe and effective", so generously mandated for participation in society.

 

Canada-wide, it's about 1000/week. Oddly, the media is silent, and there's no apparent effort to examine it, at any level of govt. Too many people are curiously incurious.

[Goddess]

The US distribution of covid vaccines was marked with nothing but errors. They pursued two doses in fewer people rather than one dose in more people. A simple randomized study would have sorted this out, but this was opposed. They pursued vaccinating young, frontline workers over older people even though the risk of gradient for being older was 10,000 fold, and the risk gradient for being a frontline worker was at about 2.

As initial doses were given out, concerning safety signals emerged. The Israelis documented myocarditis in young men as early as February of 2021.

This administration denied the safety signal initially, and only admitted to it after it was reported in multiple countries and clearly undeniable.

Many at the time suggested strategies to reduce the risk, such as separating the doses, or testing lower doses. But these were ignored.

Then the government administration pressured social media companies to remove even satirical content critical of vaccination, AND they removed content critical of vaccine safety.

By the fall of 2021 it was clear that vaccines could not halt transmission, ergo mandates were prima facia unjust. Anything that was critical of passports and mandates, was cracked down on - HARD. Especially in Canada, where the Emergencies Act was invoked against protesters of the mandates.

The administration went forward with mandates in the 3rd quarter of 2021. This was a bone-headed decision, instead of debating this decision in academic conferences, they chose to coordinate with social media companies to suppress criticism.

[Goddess]

 

[Goddess]

 

Because it's very effective......at something.

[Goddess]

Former New York Governor Andrew Cuomo will testify publicly before Congress for the FIRST TIME regarding his COVID-19 nursing home policies at a hearing on September 10, 2024.

 

[Goddess]

A bit more on the SV40 promoter used in the covid jabs.

Refresher - SV40 is an abbreviation for simian vacuolating virus 40 or simian virus 40, a polyomavirus that is found in both monkeys and humans. Like other polyomaviruses, SV40 is a DNA virus that sometimes causes tumors in animals, but most often persists as a latent infection. SV40 has been widely studied as a model eukaryotic virus, leading to many early discoveries in eukaryotic DNA replication and transcription. 

"Eukaryotic" cells have a membrane-encased nucleus.

Discussion of this paper:

Nuclear Targeting of Plasmids and Protein-DNA Complexes - Research Projects - Dean Lab - University of Rochester Medical Center

Note the stated goal of this research:  

Quote

Our long term goals are to develop gene therapy approaches to the treatment of a variety of human diseases by focusing on the development of novel non-viral intra- and extracellular delivery methods. 

In this paper, Dean shows that particular parts/sequences of the SV40 have a function of transporting DNA into the cell nucleus. And modern sequencing tools label those automatically, but they were missing in the sequencer results manufacturers provided. Why?

The "FUNCTION" of putting the SV40 promoter in the injections is so the DNA gets right into the cell nucleus.  

Remember when they told us that the DNA in the shots DEFINITELY DOES NOT get into your cell nuclei?  😬

And don't say "They didn't know!"  Here's just one paper from 1999:

Sequence requirements for plasmid nuclear import - PubMed (nih.gov)

Got that?  "facilitates maximal transport."

Going back to WHY this was in the injections.  This seems a likely explanation:

Simian virus 40 in humans | Infectious Agents and Cancer | Full Text (biomedcentral.com)

So, it's interesting that Big Pharma is now shifting their business model from covid jabs to.........mRNA jabs for CANCER.

Just sayin'

 

[Goddess]

A year ago last September, Florida’s outstanding Surgeon General Joe Ladapo advised against mRNA vaccines in anyone under 65. Yesterday, the Florida Department of Health —one of the largest state-level public health agencies in the country— became the very first government health agency to advise against the shots regardless of age.

Updated Guidance for COVID-19 Boosters for the Fall and Winter 2024–2025 Season (govdelivery.com)

It advised Florida doctors against giving covid injections to anybody, not even medical fetishists:

The FDOH continued by listing seven different categories of safety and efficacy concerns, including things like

• negative efficacy  (making patients more likely to get covid),
• increased risk of an autoimmune disease,
• myocarditis,
• persistence of mRNA spike protein in the body (AKA long covid)

Each category provided hyperlinks to the specific scientific studies.

In related news:

Moderna Stock Hits Lowest Since 2020. What’s Behind the Tumble. - Barron's (barrons.com)

Moderna, is a mysterious multinational company that appeared out of nowhere in 2010, went public in a spectacular IPO in December 2018, setting the all-time biotech IPO record, with zero products, but several vaccine candidates in clinical trials, such as for flu, zika, cytomegalovirus, cancer, and coronavirus ( 🤔I know). Just as mysteriously, it then won one of the federal government’s three massively lucrative covid contracts a little over a year later, despite never getting a single product through clinical trials.

The public explanation of how Moderna got a multi-billion dollar covid contract without any track record is, well.....ODD.  Also ODD: Moderna had an “existing working relationship” with the NIH, particularly with..........Tony Fauci.

None of Moderna’s other products in development in December 2018 have passed clinical trials.

Not one.

For some reason.

Anyhooooooo, Moderna's plan to market mRNA cancer drugs is also receiving some backlash from scientists and researchers because the whole thing sounds fishier than the covid jabbers.

"We’re going to force your cells to make tiny bits of cancer, all over your body, to teach your immune system to target any real cancer if it does come, which it might not."

 

[Goddess]

One of the documented adverse effects from the jabbers is auto-immune illnesses, demyelination, small fiber neuropathy , which can often involve burning pain.  Seeing reports of vax-injured people who experienced auto-immune issues, finding relief with IVM.

This study looks at the impact of ivermectin on wound healing and the positive impacts peripheral nerve healing.

NOTE:  Study is from 2018, BEFORE the widely held and unscientific misinformation peddled by eyeball, robo, FakeFlyer and MoonFace, Hardner and others here that IVM is nothing but "horsepaste."

 

Ivermectin Promotes Peripheral Nerve Regeneration during Wound Healing | ACS Omega

 

The in-vitro experiments demonstrated ivermectin converts dermal fibroblasts into a glial-like phenotype, supporting neuronal growth. The scientists then used a dermal wound healing model in mice to show nerve repair with ivermectin.

Ivermectin-treated wounds improved healing compared to controls. Additionally, the researchers researched the effects of ivermectin’s action on various ion channels and receptors, its potential for enhancing peripheral nerve repair, and its application in clinical settings.

In co-culture experiments, hiNSCs exposed to ivermectin-treated fibroblasts showed increased proliferation and migration.

In in-vivo studies, ivermectin-treated wounds demonstrated significantly smaller sizes compared to controls at days 8–9 and 11–12, indicating enhanced healing.

Ivermectin-treated hDFs caused a significant increase in neuronal migration compared to the control group. This suggested that the treated fibroblasts were influencing the surrounding environment in a way that promoted neuron movement, which is essential for nerve repair.

This is really something that could help people, and it looks like for burning pain with autoimmune nerve pain and damage, this could be what is helping people with long covid and covid injection injury.

I've been posting some of the on-going research here with IVM in the hopes that ones like @eyeball will STOP promoting de-bunked anti-science lies.  Astonishing that the FDA was legally forced to stop the lying but eyeball still persists.......

Imagine his rage if he ever gets a condition or travels somewhere and is given a Rx for ivermectin!!   🤣

 

[eyeball]

1 hour ago, Goddess said:

I've been posting some of the on-going research here with IVM in the hopes that ones like @eyeball will STOP promoting de-bunked anti-science lies.

That'll remain impossible in light of your retarded core assertion that this is all so much evidence of premeditated mass murder.

 

[Goddess]

3 minutes ago, eyeball said:

That'll remain impossible in light of your retarded core assertion that this is all so much evidence of premeditated mass murder.

 

So....you're just going to keep disseminating your anti-science lies on IVM?

[Goddess]

19 minutes ago, eyeball said:

That'll remain impossible in light of your retarded core assertion that this is all so much evidence of premeditated mass murder.

 

What a strange reason to continue lying......

[eyeball]

4 hours ago, Goddess said:

So....you're just going to keep disseminating your anti-science lies on IVM?

What do these have to do with the premeditated mass murder of millions of people?

You're astoundingly oblivious to just how kooky this assertion of mass murder is and why it'll forever outshine anything else you could ever possibly say about COVID aren't you?

Are you wishing you'd never made it, or that'll it'll be overlooked and forgotten? 

[Goddess]

On 9/13/2024 at 7:35 PM, eyeball said:

What do these have to do with the premeditated mass murder of millions of people?

You're astoundingly oblivious to just how kooky this assertion of mass murder is and why it'll forever outshine anything else you could ever possibly say about COVID aren't you?

Are you wishing you'd never made it, or that'll it'll be overlooked and forgotten? 

I'm not sure what my claim that people have died from the jab has to do with ivermectin use.

Or why my claim prevents you from admitting you're wrong.

[eyeball]

3 hours ago, Goddess said:

I'm not sure what my claim that people have died from the jab has to do with ivermectin use.

Or why my claim prevents you from admitting you're wrong.

I've told you multiple times now - your claim that these people were victims of premeditated mass-murder. It's outlandishness eliminates at a stroke every single other claim you've made or could ever possibly make.

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, eyeball said:

I've told you multiple times now - your claim that these people were victims of premeditated mass-murder. It's outlandishness eliminates at a stroke every single other claim you've made or could ever possibly make.

Translation: I"m going to take one element of your argument and pretend that it's logical and reasonable to discount every other element of your arugment because i'm stupid enough to believe that if i think you're wrong in one claim you MUST therefore be wrong in everything you say. That's how logic works right?" 

[Goddess]

21 hours ago, eyeball said:

I've told you multiple times now - your claim that these people were victims of premeditated mass-murder. It's outlandishness eliminates at a stroke every single other claim you've made or could ever possibly make.

Still doesn't explain your rejection of over 80 studies on ivermectin use in humans for covid or your insistance that's it's nothing but horsepaste.

 

[eyeball]

27 minutes ago, Goddess said:

Still doesn't explain your rejection of over 80 studies on ivermectin use in humans for covid or your insistance that's it's nothing but horsepaste.

Oh, that's easy. It's because my doctor says it's horsepaste too.

[Goddess]

3 minutes ago, eyeball said:

Oh, that's easy. It's because my doctor says it's horsepaste too.

Sounds like he doesn't keep up with medical science.

It won a Nobel Prize in medicine for humans in 2015 and is on the Who's list of essential medicines for humans.

I'm not sure why that's a "plus" in choosing a doctor for you.

Edited September 18 by Goddess

[eyeball]

32 minutes ago, Goddess said:

Sounds like he doesn't keep up with medical science.

As I've said I have 4 doctors who advise me. None of them have expressed any doubt about the path I've been prescribed to follow.

32 minutes ago, Goddess said:

It won a Nobel Prize in medicine for humans in 2015 and is on the Who's list of essential medicines for humans.

Not for COVID.

32 minutes ago, Goddess said:

I'm not sure why that's a "plus" in choosing a doctor for you.

I was dealing with cancer, not parasites.

Edited September 18 by eyeball