Jump to content

First a trickle....Now a flood

Recommended Posts

ESC 365 - Myocardial Inflammation/Myocarditis After COVID-19 mRNA Booster Vaccination. (escardio.org)


Professor Christian Eugen Mueller, based in University Hospital Basel in Basel, Switzerland presented study results from the prospective investigation titled “Myocardial Inflammation/Myocarditis After COVID-19 mRNA Booster Vaccination.” The study results reveal the actual incidence of post-vaccination myocardial lesions is 2.8% vs 0.0035% of myocarditis in retrospective studies. Impacting women more in this research, this data is contrary to what has been described by the retrospective research and what has been captured by regulatory agencies such as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in mRNA vaccine package inserts. Why didn't the media in the West nor the medical trade press pick up this study result? The data, according to the principal investigator, the first such prospective data to be generated concerning mRNA vaccines and myocardial lesions, raises significant concern about the safety of the mRNA vaccines. The risk for myocardial lesions is far higher in women than men, running counter to data derived from retrospective data. This prospective data suggests females face higher risk for myocardial lesions associated with mRNA COVID-19 booster doses. The incidence of myocardial lesions is 2.8% or 800x higher than the usual incidence of myocarditis, and this afflicts more women than men, unlike viral myocarditis.

This evidence, suppressed in mainstream media and even trade press, raises the specter that repeated doses of mRNA vaccine in order to maintain protective coverage against SARS-CoV-2, especially with the predominance of Omicron (less severe generally; lower death rate), should be done so using great caution regarding the prospect of repeated myocardial lesions and their impact on possible cardiovascular complications. Put another way, this data would likely impact risk-benefit analysis for COVID-19 vaccination. Why wouldn’t this research result be more easily available?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The lab leak was real.

Of course it was.

As John Stewart attempted to explain to full-on pharma-stooge Stephen Colbert in the midst of all the silliness, “there was an explosion of chocolatey goodness in Hershey, Pennsylvania.”

But he forgot to account for the cardinal sin from those horrid two years where progressives took leave of their senses: Stewart was right too early.

That makes you a conspiracy theorist.

The right-too-early crowd lost friends and family members to that dreaded scarlet letter.

The powers that be were wrong on:

  • Covid origins

  • Community masking

  • Closed schools

  • Closed businesses

  • The usefulness of vaccine passports

  • Infection-acquired immunity

  • The efficacy of the vaccines

  • The safety profile for the young and healthy

But we were the crazy ones. In the eyes of many, we still are.

“A perfect record of anti-science failure,” says Stanford professor Jay Bhattacharya, who was perhaps more castigated than any for asking the right questions at the wrong time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"It is the responsibility of scientists never to suppress knowledge, no matter how awkward that knowledge is, no matter how it may bother those in power; we are not smart enough to decide which pieces of knowledge are permissible and which are not."

- Carl Sagan, a scientist that probably would not be afraid to debate someone

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I posted this paper before when it first came out, and it still has not been challenged:

Serious adverse events of special interest following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination in randomized trials in adults - ScienceDirect

Shows COVID vaccine has 1/800 severe adverse event rate.

Rotavirus vaccine was pulled from market for 1/10,000 adverse events

Swine flu vaccine was pulled for 1/100,000 - after only 50 deaths.

As far as vaccines go, the COVID vaccine adverse event rate is historically extremely, extremely high.


The egregious part was the government knew the AE rate was high (they had the most comprehensive and current data), and they mandated it for populations they knew weren’t at risk of severe outcomes.

The original risk analysis held true. Healthy young people were NEVER at serious risk. Generally speaking, healthy people were never at risk. That was true at the beginning, and it is still true today.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And this is why people like Eyeball keep falling back to "But I don't know anyone who had an adverse reaction, so therefore adverse reactions don't exist."

Privy Council advocated downplaying COVID vaccine injuries or deaths | Toronto Sun

The memo also suggested skewing stats to minimize the impact of vaccine-related deaths or injuries, such as stating the “chance of it happening to me is one in a million” rather than “it has happened five times.”


Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Goddess said:

And this is why people like Eyeball keep falling back to "But I don't know anyone who had an adverse reaction, so therefore adverse reactions don't exist."

Privy Council advocated downplaying COVID vaccine injuries or deaths | Toronto Sun

The memo also suggested skewing stats to minimize the impact of vaccine-related deaths or injuries, such as stating the “chance of it happening to me is one in a million” rather than “it has happened five times.”


How about this little beauty:


A secret Privy Council office memo recommended that any COVID vaccine-related injuries or deaths be carefully managed with “winning communication strategies” as to not “shake public confidence,” according to Blacklock’s Reporter.

They're literally talking about glossing over deaths

That may have been the most successful propaganda campaign in the history of the earth because the pseudovaxes have been injuring/killing people for two years now and if you talk about it the vaxtards will stick their head so far into the sand that they come out in a wetmarket (not a BSL4 lab - there is no BSL4 lab!!!!!) on the other side. 

The 'winningest' communication strategy was telling people that "young people should vax because the benefit far outweighs the risk".

Nothing could be further from the truth: healthy kids don't die from covid, period, but they do die from the vax.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/28/2023 at 6:41 AM, Goddess said:

And this is why people like Eyeball keep falling back to "But I don't know anyone who had an adverse reaction, so therefore adverse reactions don't exist."

I know people who've had adverse reactions, I get a sore arm too.

What makes me go hmmm is the number of people in anti-vaxxing circles who claim to know dozens of people who've been maimed and killed by vaccine. I mean you must be up over a hundred yourself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's 4 from June 2023 for you:
Imagine how many "unfamous" deaths there are.
Katarina Pavelek, a 41-year-old actress who decided to take her own life after suffering from vaccine side effects. She chose to end her life in Switzerland on the 2nd of June after being diagnosed with an untreatable chronic neurological illness caused by the booster jab.  Her last message on Instagram:
The Gold Coast Marathon just concluded yesterday, and reports are that two marathon runners collapsed, and one has died in the hospital.
Let's examine the data from a study conducted by the American Heart Association that examines the number of cardiac arrests experienced by marathon runners.
The study analyzed long-distance race records in the United States from January 1, 2001, to May 31, 2010. According to the findings, there was an incidence of 0.54 cardiac arrests per 100,000 runners, meaning approximately 1 in 180,000 marathon runners experienced cardiac arrest:

In yesterday's Gold Coast Marathon, which had approximately 6,500 participants, two incidents of cardiac arrest were reported. This translates to a ratio of 1 in 3,250.

The disparity between 1 in 3,250 and 1 in 180,000 is significant.


So, did Oscar Cabrera die because of the vaccines?



Let the man speak for himself:

This was his post on Facebook, translated into English: (I had to adjust the swears so this would post.)

“I got a d**m Myocarditis from putting a fuquing vaccine. (I got 2 doses of Pfizer) And I knew it! Many people warned me. But guess that? It was compulsory or I couldn't work. I am an international professional athlete and I am playing in Spain. I have no health problem, nothing, not hereditary, no asthma, NOTHING! I suddenly collapsed to the ground in the middle of a match and almost died. I'm still recovering and I've had 11 different cardiology tests done and guess? They find nothing. I have no cholesterol, no fat, nothing! 7% body fat 93% muscle. When they give me the diagnosis, they tell me that I won't be able to play for at least 5 months until my heart goes down again and they can't give me that medicine"


The death of Joesthetics, also known as Jo Linder, sent shockwaves through the bodybuilding and fitness community yesterday. He was only 30 years old.

However, the main point wasn't about steroids at all. Joe conducted an interview 2-3 weeks prior to his sudden death, in which he described his personal health anomalies after receiving the vaccines. This included discussing his blood work and other related details. Essentially, he has all the evidence to support the presence of blood anomalies after vaccination. What more could you ask for? 
According to the National Cancer Institute, plasmapheresis is commonly performed to eliminate excessive antibodies, abnormal proteins, or other harmful substances from the blood.
Today on MSM, there was a photo gallery of almost 200 famous people who have died recently. I noted many heart attacks in 20-30 year olds and many "died suddenly at homes".
The excess mortality is not slowing down.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

For anyone who is emerging from the brainfog of 3 uesrs of induced fear and paranoia, do you ever wonder why the "conspiracy theorists" have been consistently right through all this and the "experts" consistently wrong? 

It's because we follow science and you follow "The Science".

Link to comment
Share on other sites


The dam holding back vaccine injury data was broken open yesterday when the world’s premier medical journal dipped a toe into the vaccine injury pool.

Yesterday — the 5th of July — the Lancet published a preprint titled “A Systematic Review of Autopsy Findings in Deaths after COVID-19 Vaccination.” The review’s nine authors included Harvey Risch of the Yale School of Public Health, Paul Alexander, who worked at the Department of Health and Human Services during the pandemic, and top-published cardiac researcher Peter McCullough.

Researchers reviewed 678 individual studies — all of the published autopsy reports they could find — collapsing those into 44 papers describing 325 autopsy cases and one tissue study. To make the final cut, three physicians independently reviewed each death to determine whether it would have been the safe and effective covid vaccination that killed the patient.

Of those 325 cases, 73.9% were determined by a majority of the three reviewing doctors to have been caused by the shots in full or in part. Timing was critical to the diagnosis: folks in the study group killed by the jabs died on average two weeks following the first shot, three weeks after the second shot, and one week after the third shot.

Unsurprisingly, the two largest groups of organs injured by the shots were the heart (the cardiac organ) and the blood (hematological systems), which includes strokes, clotting, and so forth. 

They concluded that the evidence strongly suggested a causal link between the jabs and the deaths:

The consistency seen among cases in this review with known COVID-19 vaccine adverse events, their mechanisms, and related excess death, coupled with autopsy confirmation and physician-led death adjudication, suggests there is a high likelihood of a causal link between COVID-19 vaccines and death in most cases.
… Criteria of causality from an epidemiological perspective have been met, including biological plausibility, temporal association, internal and external validity, coherence, analogy, and reproducibility with each successive report of death after COVID-19 vaccination.

By necessity, this paper only looked at acute (sudden) deaths that occurred soon enough after vaccination to provoke an autopsy. Because of the authors’ desire to firmly link jabs to deaths by “temporal proximity” (closeness in time), their review excluded longer-term causes like turbo cancers or delayed strokes and heart attacks.

That may be why, at the end of their paper, the authors brought up the large, unexplained numbers of baffling excess deaths, as additional evidence shoring up their conclusions:

The large number of COVID-19 vaccine induced deaths evaluated in this review is consistent with multiple papers that report excess mortality after vaccination. Pantazatos and Seligmann found that all-cause mortality increased 0-5 weeks post-injection in most age groups resulting in 146,000 to 187,000 vaccine-associated deaths in the United States between February and August of 2021.
With similar findings, Skidmore estimated that 278,000 people may have died from the COVID-19 vaccine in the United States by December 2021. These concerning results were further elucidated by Aarstad and Kvitastein, who found that among 31 countries in Europe, a higher population COVID-19 vaccine uptake in 2021 was positively correlated with increased all-cause mortality in the first nine months of 2022 after controlling for alternative explanations.
Furthermore, excess mortality from non-COVID-19 causes has been detected in many countries since the mass vaccination programs began, suggesting a common deleterious exposure among populations. Pantazatos estimated that VAERS deaths are underreported by a factor of 20. If we apply this underreporting factor to the May 5th, 2023, VAERS death report count of 35,324, the number of deaths in the United States alone becomes 706,480. If this extrapolated number of deaths were to be confirmed, the COVID-19 vaccines would represent the largest medical failure in human history.

Between shrinking estimates of covid deaths (because of over-diagnosis many countries are now deleting supposed "covid" deaths), and increasing evidence of jab-caused mortality, we are now well on the way to proving that the jabs killed more people than covid.

I’d like to remind you of what Eric Rubin said in 2021, just before voting to approve the shots for kids. Rubin is the editor of the New England Journal of Medicine, a professor at Harvard, and sits on the FDA’s Vaccine Advisory committee. In October of 2021, to persuade his committee colleagues to vote in favor of shots for kids, Rubin infamously said:

“We’re never going to learn about how safe this vaccine is [for children] unless we start giving it. … I do think we should vote to approve it.”

Dr. McCullough explained, “That statement will go down as the most reckless, as the most reprehensible scientific statement in the history of medical bioethics."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/5/2023 at 6:04 PM, Goddess said:

For anyone who is emerging from the brainfog of 3 uesrs of induced fear and paranoia, do you ever wonder why the "conspiracy theorists" have been consistently right through all this and the "experts" consistently wrong? 

No, because that's a delusion.  

On 7/5/2023 at 6:04 PM, Goddess said:

It's because we follow science and you follow "The Science".

You don't know anything about science.  😆

Link to comment
Share on other sites


The article described two substantial new analyses of near-universal lockdown policies enacted in every country but one (Sweden, the control group). Both reports concluded lockdown policy made little or no difference in saving lives, but had massive destructive effects.

The first analysis was published in book form, after researchers reviewed over twenty thousand separate studies. Think about that number, twenty thousand. That is a LOT of lockdown studies. The book, authored by three respected economists and published last month, was simply titled, “Did Lockdowns Work?”

The answer is no.

Sadly, mainstream media, having sold its soul for twenty pieces of silver during the pandemic, largely remains silent. For now. 

And the CDC is suicidally sticking to its lockdown guidance, along with the W.H.O., which is still pushing them, hard, in its odious new “pandemic treaty.”

Which means the next time they try this - and they will - we must not comply.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



Covid Censorship Proved to Be Deadly - WSJ

The author sensibly pointed out that forbidding doctors from recommending effective alternative treatments and hiding the fact of recovered immunity is not only unethical and droolingly moronic but led to countless preventable deaths:

Legions of doctors stayed quiet after witnessing the demonization of their peers who challenged the Covid orthodoxy. A little censorship leads people to watch what they say. Millions of patients and citizens were deprived of important insights as a result… Excess mortality in most high-income nations was worse in 2021 and 2022 than in 2020, the initial pandemic year. Many poorer nations with less government control seemed to fare better. Sweden, which didn’t have a lockdown, performed better than nearly every other advanced nation.

The article quoted Nobel Prize-winning physicist Richard Feynman, who in 1969 famously said “Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts.” Truer words were never spoken. 

So I guess all us of contrarians were doing science all along.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Moonbox said:


You don't know anything about science.  😆

Apparently I know more than you because, BASED ON SCIENCE STUDIES, I've said from the beginning that the jabs would not prevent transmission or infection, that lockdowns would be far more harmful than covid, etc.

Feel free to share the scientific studies you've found that say lockdowns were great and the jabs prevent transmission and infection. 

Good luck.

You're going to need it.

And you're 67 pages of science BEHIND.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guillain Barré Syndrome: Explained: Peru declares health emergency after rise in Guillain-Barré Syndrome cases; here are the signs of this neurological disorder | The Times of India (indiatimes.com)
A run-away "neurological" disorder.....   Huh.  
And the #2 adverse event after vaccination (cardiac issues being #1) is........neurological disorders.
On July 8th, the Peruvian government declared a nationwide health emergency after an explosion in cases of Guillain-Barré Syndrome. The state of emergency will last for 90 days as officials tackle the “unusual increase” in cases.
Good luck, Peru!  Pfizer thanks you for your patronage!


Link to comment
Share on other sites

England & Wales (UK ONS Data)

Week 27 - Excess deaths

14,163 in 2019

63,825 in 2022

41,757 in 2023 (So far....)


Media - silent.

Politicians - silent.

Everyone here who screeched covid deaths every 15 minutes for the last 3 yrs - silent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/18/2023 at 9:19 AM, Goddess said:

Media - silent.

Politicians - silent.

Everyone here who screeched covid deaths every 15 minutes for the last 3 yrs - silent.

There are still 2,000,000 Canadians who refuse to get vaccinated.

While Moriarty says deaths from COVID-19 are likely the biggest cause of excess mortality, there could be other reasons, such as toxic drugs. Based on preliminary data, the province believes there were 63 deaths in 2022 from opioid overdoses. That number is not unusually high — there were a higher number of opioid toxicity deaths in Nova Scotia in 2012, 2014 and 2017.



I won't be surprised if authorities are being tight-lipped simply because the medical systems they run are overloaded and can't keep up with things like the aging population, opioid use and the high number of unvaccinated people still catching and dying from COVID or complications.

The idea that these deaths are the result of vaccine is ridiculous and dangerous misinformation and that's what is killing most of the people caught up in the excessive category.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
    • Most Online

    Newest Member
  • Recent Achievements

    • CDN1 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Darrin earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • MikhailinNorthBay earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • CDN1 earned a badge
      First Post
    • DUI_Offender went up a rank
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Create New...