Jump to content

First a trickle....Now a flood


Recommended Posts

14 hours ago, myata said:

11 fatal outcomes attributed to Covid in the age group 0-11 in close to two years,

And we don't know how many of those 11 were already terminally ill.  There was the case in Alberta that made headlines, of a young boy with brain cancer who was tested for covid on his deathbed and then was announced as the province's first child death from covid.  I believe he was older than 11, but it calls into question other child deaths attributed to covid.

14 hours ago, myata said:

Followed by 36 more in just over a year after vaccines

I have posted studies that show the more jabs, the greater your chance of death from covid.  This would include children.  Also, there is the issue of vaccine induced myocarditis in children.

Dr. William Makis, here in Canada, is tracking child deaths post-vaccine.  There were quite a few from RSV which is not generally fatal in children, but the inoculations also lower immune systems, so.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Goddess said:

I have posted studies that show the more jabs, the greater your chance of death from covid.  This would include children.  Also, there is the issue of vaccine induced myocarditis in children.

The difference is that for this age group, the risk of a serious Covid disease was minuscule, virtually non existent compared to other causes. There was no rational reason to recommend and promote special treatment in this age group; especially with not very well understood short and longer term effects.

Prescribing unnecessary treatment with potential risks to the patient is a violation of the medical oath. In some countries professionals actually remember and understand the meaning of the medical ethics code and the absolutely did not recommend "vaccines" for children, under 18. This country is on a mindless, dangerous trek ready to jump on any reckless bandwagon by a hand wave of some clueless guru.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, eyeball said:

Do you have a number?  I'd like to verify who's on the other end.

Thanks.

I'm sure you have the number.  I'm sure you've called to snitch.  You're definitely the type.

Toronto snitch lines lighting up with COVID-19 complaints | Toronto Sun

Should we tattle on people breaking the COVID-19 rules? 2 differing sides debate | CBC News

Mixed opinions on Pallister’s snitch line | The Star

Edited by Goddess
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Goddess said:

I linked another article but it was about how to report "covidjits" and that word gets flagged here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

EXCLUSIVE: Jessica Sutta, Former Pussycat Dolls Member: ‘I Was Severely Injured by the Moderna Vaccine’ (theepochtimes.com)

In the interview, the courageous girl-band singer speaks eloquently (and often tearfully) about her devastating experience, including the pressure not to speak out, her agonizing muscle spasms, the bizarre gaslighting by her doctors, her excruciating small-fiber neuropathy, her multiple hospital experiences (“I won’t step foot in another hospital ever again”), her spinal lesions, having MS symptoms without the disease, her terror at how her condition is getting progressively worse, and described how her former friends think she’s doing something morally wrong by talking about it all.

Tellingly, after begging for months, when Jessica finally got her doctor to approve seeing a neurologist, Jessica said the first thing the new doctor asked her was “when did you get the vaccine?” She broke down in tears of relief. And after reviewing her case, the neurologist told her, “I think you’ve had an adverse reaction.”

He was the first doctor in a long string of doctors who was even willing to consider the possibility the new mother had been vaccine injured.

Jessica’s interview is candid, poignant, and personal. She described the pressure in Hollywood from other celebrities and industry players to get the vaccine “for the community,” the pressure from her beloved, trusted doctor to vaccinate during her pregnancy and how she resisted until after her son was born, and what it means for her career to speak out (“it’s one of the worst things I could ever do”).

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

One thing I noted in the NCI Day 1 testimony - The claim in the media that you were 4X more likely to die of covid if you were un-vaxxed, was an outright lie.  The actual Health Canada data and stats  show that if you are vaxxed with 3 or more doses, your chance of dying of covid was actually DOUBLE that of the unvaxxed, as of Sept. 2022.  And that rate is going up continually.

This is why I don't get my science from CBC headlines.

Edited by Goddess
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

It's worth watching Dr. Laura Braden - her testimony starts at about 8 minutes in.  She goes over all the science I've posted for you here.  Jordan Peterson also makes a statement on Day 3 - his statement is at about 6:20 in.

Edited by Goddess
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not cross posting, but for completeness of this thread, an earlier response to the raccoon theory. Isn't it a bit unusual that three-year old China samples are hitting the fan exactly as the public's attention is brought to an alternative theory? Well so many mysteries here. Cheers to scientists who already know the truth or at least something compatible with it, just couldn't prove it. There were earlier precedents of the kind that made Galileo deeply unhappy.

--

Viruses that just made it across the species have low and hard transmission in the new species. They need much time to adjust. This doesn't explain neither high transmission rate nor why it wasn't detected earlier, like SARS and MERS.

The samples were taken in January 2020, while the epidemics began in late November 2019 and possibly earlier. Covid-contaminated samples were already reported earlier but of course they don't prove much because by the time they were taken the epidemics was in full swing. And of course all of them are coming from China, and as the researcher noted many more right now, as an alternative theory theory is gaining attention. Why right now?

China had more than three years to release these samples so what the.. is happening here? Just another innocent coincidence?

Coincidence of genetic material of animals with Covid proves, at best that they were at the same place at the same time. 1) The market was a hotspot of the developing epidemics and 2) animal traders were there daily talking to many, many customers with 3) zero (back then) precautionary measures.

No seriously: without an attempt to answer an obvious question: is there any indication if the infection was passed to the animals or from them, can this even be called "science", in the old, Galileo, sense of the word?

 

Edited by myata
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, myata said:

the raccoon theory. Isn't it a bit unusual that three-year old China samples are hitting the fan exactly as the public's attention is brought to an alternative theory?

The whole thing is odd, to me.

The "racoon dog" evidence doesn't exist yet.  Not even on a pre-print server.  Yet there are already 2 major publications trumpeting this news.

The same thing happened with the supposed Ivermectin trial.  It was trumpeted all over the place that IVM was useless against covid, and it wasn't until 6 months LATER that the paper was finally published, so no one could look at the methodology for 6 months, and in the meantime the public was fooled into rejecting IVM and calling it "horse de-wormer."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Goddess said:

The "racoon dog" evidence doesn't exist yet.  Not even on a pre-print server.  Yet there are already 2 major publications trumpeting this news.

For me, it would be interesting to see it for one, mainly reason: is there any serious attempt to trace the direction of transmission, animal to human or the other way, in January 2020 i.e. well after the epidemics began to spread? Without an attempt to answer this obvious and glaring question, it would be worse than nothing: in my view, a near absolute professional self-discreditation. Couldn't imagine why would anyone want to do that to their reputation.

Edited by myata
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Vaccines don't work, masks don't work: Everything government told us about COVID-19 was wrong - Washington Times

It wasn't wrong.  It was lies.

‘We Failed’: Danish Newspaper Apologizes For Its COVID Coverage - Foundation for Economic Education (fee.org)

A Danish newspaper has apologized to its readers for not questioning the government’s data and narratives more throughout the first two years of the pandemic.

The Ekstra Bladet, founded in 1904, said it should have done more due diligence in examining the government’s data and conclusions before reporting them.

The apology is an important reminder that the traditional role of journalism has been “an independent monitor of power,” not a mouthpiece for power.

“Journalism has an unusual capacity to serve as watchdog over those whose power and position most affect citizens,” the American Press Institute (API) explains. “It may also offer voice to the voiceless.”

For this reason, the API says, it is imperative that journalists not become “seduced by sources” or “intimidated by power.” This means not simply regurgitating the data and words of politicians and bureaucrats, but analyzing them critically.

Throughout the pandemic, this often has not happened—and it’s a problem that goes well beyond Denmark.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ed Dowd, author of "Unknown Causes" interview where he goes over some of the research and data in his book:

https://rumble.com/v2ailv0-tucker-carlson-interview-ed-dowd.html

Yes, I know it's Tucker Carlson.  Watch it anyways.

Ed figured out early on that excess deaths and vax injuries/deaths would not be reported on by the media or government, but it WOULD show up in insurance actuary data so he's been on top of this for quite a while.

Edited by Goddess
Link to comment
Share on other sites

News today from the Missouri v. Biden court case:

Court Denies Motion to Dismiss Censorship Case Against Fauci and Other Biden Officials – RedState

 

Important update in Missouri v. Biden case. The judge denied government defendants' motion to dismiss the case (except for claims against President, which are generally disfavored by the court). Upshot: the case will now move to trial. 
 
The court ruled that, contrary to the government's claims, we the plaintiffs (both the states of MO and LA and the private plaintiffs) have standing to bring the case: "The Court finds that the Plaintiffs have satisfied Article III’s standing requirements." 
 
The court ruled, "Because Plaintiffs have adequately alleged injury-in-fact, traceability, and redressability, Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is DENIED on the grounds of Article III standing." 
 
As to the government's claim of sovereign immunity, the court found, "Sovereign Immunity does not bar Plaintiffs’ First Amendment claims... Defendants have ignored the basic principle that parties may seek to enjoin federal officials from violating the Constitution." 
 
In other words, the judge reminded the federal government that the U.S. Constitution remains the highest law of the land. Who would have thought? 
 
Furthermore, the ruling explained, "parties are entitled to sue for injunctive relief against federal officials in their official capacity for actions beyond their statutory authority." For these reasons, "Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is DENIED on sovereign immunity grounds." 
 
Regarding the merits of our Complaint, "the Court finds that Plaintiffs have stated plausible claims on the merits in all counts of the Complaint." 
 
Crucially, "The Court finds that the Complaint alleges significant encouragement and coercion that converts the otherwise private conduct of censorship on social-media platforms into state action, and is unpersuaded by Defendants’ arguments to the contrary." 
 
"Further, while the Government may certainly select the messages it wishes to convey, this freedom is limited by the more fundamental principle that a government entity may not employ threats to limit the free speech of private citizens." 
 
"Accordingly, the Court finds that Plaintiffs have plausibly alleged state action under the theory of significant encouragement and/or coercion." 
 
"Plaintiffs have plausibly alleged joint action, entwinement, and/or that specific features of Defendants’ actions combined to create state action." 
 
"Combined with other factors such as the coercive statements and significant entwinement of federal officials and censorship decisions on social-media platforms... this serves as another basis for finding government action." 
 
"Because the Complaint alleges state action, Plaintiffs plausibly state a claim for violation of the 1st Amend. via government-induced censorship... Plaintiffs have plausibly alleged prior restraints and viewpoint discrimination, which are clear violations of the 1st Amend." 
 
The court explains, "The First Amendment, subject only to narrow and well-understood exceptions, does not countenance governmental control over the content of messages expressed by private individuals." 
 
The court found, "Plaintiffs have clearly and plausibly alleged that Defendants engaged in viewpoint discrimination and prior restraints." 
 
In conclusion, the judge ruled, "Because Plaintiffs have adequately alleged each claim in the Complaint, Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is DENIED on Rule 12(b)(6) grounds." 
 
In summary, the court accepted virtually all of our arguments in the case and rejected virtually all of the government's counter-arguments.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Biden declassified U.S. intelligence on Covid origins. It is important now to find out the truth, as it is, objective and impartial; as opposed to prophesies of a powerful cabal of pseudo science, massaged and machinated science suppressing all other views. The latter path to the betterment of humanity never worked, whatever the intentions. And then, we could learn something about ourselves that we didn't want to know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In EcoHealth Alliance's research grant from the NIH which spanned 2014-2019, they report the following in their progress report: "In collaboration with Ralph Baric (UNC), we used the SARS-CoV reverse genetics system to generate a chimeric virus with a mouse-adapted SARS-CoV backbone expressing SHC014 S protein with 10% sequence divergence from SARS-CoV S. This chimera replicated in primary human airway epithelium, using the human ACE2 receptor to enter into cells."

AKA - "We made a corona virus that attacks human ACE2 receptors with a S type protein."

Source document:

understanding-risk-bat-coronavirus-emergence-grant-notice.pdf (documentcloud.org)

Screenshot of above portion, on page 161:

smokinggun.thumb.jpg.cac81a1d84fe3eadf4a63e8e2830f8a5.jpg

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,712
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    nyralucas
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Jeary earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Venandi went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Gaétan earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Dictatords earned a badge
      First Post
    • babetteteets earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...