First a trickle....Now a flood

[Goddess]

(immuno)Bridge in Brooklyn, For Sale - by Adrian Gaty (substack.com)

Here is the trial data Pfizer and Moderna presented to the FDA

Pfizer:

Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee June 14-15, 2022 Meeting Briefing Document- FDA- Pfizer- COVID19 Vaccine for Pediatrics

Moderna:

Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee June 14-15, 2022 Meeting Briefing Document- FDA- COVID19 Moderna Vaccine For Use in Pediatrics

Long documents, here are four key takeaways:

There is no data on reducing risk of severe Covid, including hospitalization and death. You’d think that for a vaccine to get FDA approval for preventing you from getting really sick, you’d have to show it prevents you from getting really sick. That’s just the kind of narrow-minded person you are. Yet, in the Moderna trial, nobody got that sick. Not a single vaccinated child, true – but also not a single unvaccinated one! Thankfully, it remains incredibly rare for children to get severe Covid. From the Moderna document above, p.115: “There were no reports of severe COVID-19 cases in participants 2-5 years of age in this study as of the data cutoff.” And p. 154: “There were no reports of severe COVID-19 cases in participants 6-23 months of age in this study as of the data cutoff.”

Ok, that’s Moderna, how about Pfizer? Well, Pfizer got lucky. They did have some of their trial participants get severe Covid, and one even got hospitalized. Unfortunately, 6 of the 8 kids who got severe Covid were vaccinated, and the only hospitalized child was among them. Yes, the only child to be hospitalized out of the entire Pfizer and Moderna trials combined… was vaccinated. I’ve seen a lot of coverage of the FDA decision in the news, yet I don’t think they’ve mentioned that tidbit. Per the Pfizer document above, p.6: “Among all COVID-19 cases accrued from Dose 1 through the data cutoff of April 29, 2022, 1 placebo recipient 6-23 months of age and 7 participants 2-4 years of age (6 BNT162b2 recipients and 1 placebo recipient) met the protocol specified criteria for severe COVID-19 during both blinded and open-label follow-up. Only one of these severe COVID-19 cases (in a BNT162b2 recipient 99 days post-Dose 2) resulted in hospitalization[.]” Read the study more closely and even 8 severe Covid cases is overstating it because several of those children had other infections (parainfluenza, rhino/enterovirus) at the same time, so we don’t know if Covid caused their symptoms. In any case, neither the Pfizer nor Moderna study even attempts to argue that their shots reduce severe covid, including hospitalization and death. Yet whether or not the vaccine protects against severe covid is what parents want to know! The FDA, it seems, does not care.

---

The trials demonstrate no effectiveness against current variants. Remember, Pfizer and Moderna came up with this vaccine formulation during the Trump administration, several variants ago. They did not update the formulation for the pediatric trial. All the children in the trials thus got vaccinated against a variant that no longer circulates. Against that old variant, the data does look promising! However, unless mRNA also enables your toddler to time travel (I looked it up, that is not one of the listed side effects), it remains unclear how being vaccinated against a virus that no longer exists will be of use to her.

What does the Moderna trial say about the current variant, Omicron? Well, remember how they couldn’t study effectiveness against severe Covid, because none of their patients got severe Covid? They cleverly get around that by the magic of immunobridging. Immunobridging means that instead of showing the vaccine protects you against disease in real life, the trial just has to show the vaccine increases your antibodies against the disease. Ok, sounds a bit of a stretch, but let’s go with it. Surely, to get FDA approval, the Moderna trial showed robust ‘immunobridging’ protection against the current circulating Covid strain, right? There you go being naïve again! From Moderna p. 174: “Neutralizing antibody titers against the Omicron variant were compared to neutralizing antibody titers against the ancestral strain (D614G) measured using a validated PsVNA assay. Twenty participants from each age group were included in this analysis. At 4 weeks post Dose 2, compared to GMTs against D614G, neutralizing antibody GMTs against Omicron were 28.8-fold lower in adults ≥18 years, 11.8-fold lower in adolescents 12-17 years, and 22.1-fold lower in children 6-11 years.” Translated to English, this means that there is dramatically less antibody production against Omicron. Notice as well that they only tested children age 6 and over, not the younger kids, even though the younger kids are the entire focus of this discussion and this vaccine approval. So, when only the Omicron variant is circulating, and Moderna is asking for approval for their vaccine for young children based on immunobridging studies, Moderna did not actually study immunobridging against Omicron in young children. Solid work, Moderna.

How does Pfizer compare? Well, since the majority of severe Covid cases in their study insisted on turning up among the vaccinated, Pfizer too needed immunobridging to do its heavy lifting. Oddly, just like Moderna, it completely slipped Pfizer’s mind to show that its vaccine significantly increased antibodies against Omicron. The people in charge were all probably too busy counting their profits, you know how time consuming that can get. From Pfizer p. 35: “The descriptive analyses indicate that post-Dose 3 in both age groups, neutralizing antibody GMTs against the reference strain and against the Delta variant were similar, while neutralizing antibody GMTs against the Omicron variant were notably lower.” Give Pfizer credit, though, at least they did test this out with the 6 month to 5 year old age group, so we do know definitively that vaccinating those children does not produce antibodies against current variants of concern. In short, unless Pfizer’s next big invention is a flux capacitor, the shots seem useless.

---

There is no data on children who have been previously infected. Your three year old had covid a few months ago, or a year ago, and recovered – should she get the vaccine? Considering that the vast majority of children have already had Covid – estimates range from 75 to 90% of them! – this would seem to be an important question for a trial evaluating covid shots in children. Which is why, naturally, the trials did not even attempt to answer it. Both Moderna and Pfizer deliberately enrolled an overwhelming percent of infection-naïve children, completely different from your nearest kindergarten. Pfizer pp.29-30 show roughly 90% of the trial participants did not have prior infection. Moderna too used a population that was 90% without prior infection (p 106 and p 146) and includes helpful statements like “in all pediatric age cohorts, there were insufficient COVID-19 cases among participants with evidence of prior SARS-CoV-2 infection at baseline to reliably estimate VE for this subgroup” (p.11). Notably, in the ages 2-5 trial, Moderna discloses on p.114 that 7 children with prior Covid infection got reinfected by Covid during the trial – and of those 7, 6 were in the vaccinated arm!

---

The companies have no confidence in their own data. I’m not reading their mind, I’m talking statistics. These types of studies use confidence intervals. The broader a confidence interval, the less faith one has in the result; the Pfizer and Moderna trials have some of the most comically broad confidence intervals I’ve ever seen. This is in large part because the trials were so very small (you may have noticed, in the discussion above, talk of one patient here, six patients there, instead of the tens of thousands or even millions from prior vaccine studies). On Pfizer p.39, for example, you see confidence intervals for vaccine efficacy ranging from -370% to +99%. This means that they can’t tell if the vaccine is 99% effective against Covid, or 370% effective against you. Moderna has similarly absurd numbers. My favorite little nugget is on Moderna p. 114, where the trial finds a vaccine efficacy of -15.4% in obese 2 to 5 year olds. That is, according to Moderna’s own data, overweight kids are more likely to get Covid with their vaccine than without it. I didn’t see that fact reported in the news. True, it likely does not mean anything, for the confidence interval for that finding ranges from -381% to +63%. If I was trying to talk you into an experimental medicine and told you, “Well, there’s anywhere from a 99% chance it will cure you to a 300% chance it will hurt you,” would you take it? Apparently, the FDA would.

Oh, and the news coming out from the trials that the vaccines are safe for that age group? Maybe they are, maybe they’re not… but would you trust a study to have conclusively ruled out all bad side effects when the trial size is so small it can’t come within 300% of a right answer? Pfizer p. 23 reveals that the number of children 6 months to 23 months of age in their safety study who received all 3 shots in the series was… 386. So if there’s a 1 in 400 chance of spontaneous combustion after the third Pfizer dose, the trial wasn’t big enough to detect it.

Speaking of safety concerns, if you would like to see what a study with narrow confidence intervals looks like, check this one out. Published just last week in a prestigious journal, it studied 32 million people (roughly 32 million more than were in the Pfizer and Moderna studies) and found, with narrow confidence intervals, “that vaccination with both mRNA vaccines was associated with an increased risk of myocarditis and pericarditis within the first week after vaccination.” Perhaps the FDA should look into that.

---

In summary, the trials tell us nothing about severe illness, nothing about current variants, and nothing about the previously infected - and they tell us all that nothing with no confidence!

Maybe one day the FDA will take a break from banning British baby formula in the midst of a formula shortage to investigate whether covid vaccines may be of use to children, but that day is not today.

[eyeball]

20 minutes ago, Goddess said:

No, those stories don't interest you, do they?  

No.  Had it gone the other would you have been interested in the tweets and such from the families of millions of dead people wondering why governments let them die instead of risking the lives of the 0.003% of people that might die from vaccine?

BTW, you do realize that not one official death from COVID vaccine has been documented in Canada right? Not a single one.

I suppose any day now we'll be dropping like flies right?  Any old time now...yup...any day now.

[Goddess]

10 hours ago, eyeball said:

you do realize that not one official death from COVID vaccine has been documented in Canada right? Not a single one.

I do know that.  But I find it odd that Canada is the only country in the world that claims NO deaths from the vaccine.  Especially after knowing Sean Hartman - 17 y.o. -  was found dead on his bedroom floor after the jab and an otherwise healthy woman in my own city dropped dead in Shopper's Drug Mart 7 mins after the booster.

Move along.  Nothing to see here, folks.  Get your 5th jabber.

[Goddess]

Another top doctor who previously endorsed the inoculations, does an about-face:

 

Dr Kerryn Phelps reveals Pfizer Covid vaccine injury, says doctors have been ‘censored’ | news.com.au — Australia’s leading news site

Quote

 

“This is an issue that I have witnessed first-hand with my wife who suffered a severe neurological reaction to her first Pfizer vaccine within minutes, including burning face and gums, paraesethesiae, and numb hands and feet, while under observation by myself, another doctor and a registered nurse at the time of immunisation,” the 65-year-old said.

“I continue to observe the devastating effects a year-and-a-half later with the addition of fatigue and additional neurological symptoms including nerve pains, altered sense of smell, visual disturbance and musculoskeletal inflammation. The diagnosis and causation has been confirmed by several specialists who have told me that they have seen ‘a lot’ of patients in a similar situation.”

She revealed she had spoken with other doctors “who have themselves experienced a serious and persistent adverse event” but that “vaccine injury is a subject that few in the medical profession have wanted to talk about”.

“Regulators of the medical profession have censored public discussion about adverse events following immunisation, with threats to doctors not to make any public statements about anything that ‘might undermine the government’s vaccine rollout’ or risk suspension or loss of their registration,” she said.

 

Quote

 

But Dr Phelps pointed to data from Germany’s pharmacovigilance body, the Paul Ehrlich Institute (PEI), which has “undertaken ongoing surveys of vaccine recipients … as opposed to the TGA which only accepts passive reports, or AusVaxSafety whose survey stopped at six weeks”.

“They have found that the incidence of serious reactions occurs in 0.3 per 1000 shots (not people),” she said.

“Considering that the majority of Australian adults have now had at least one booster, this suggests that the incidence of serious adverse reactions per vaccinated person could be more than 1-in-1000. PEI admits that under-reporting is a problem, and observers suggest that an order of magnitude of under-reporting is not unreasonable to consider (most estimates put underreporting at much worse than this).”

 

Quote

“The burden of proof seems to have been placed on the vaccine injured rather than the neutral scientific position of placing suspicion on the vaccine in the absence of any other cause and the temporal correlation with the administration of the vaccine.”

 

Edited December 20, 2022 by Goddess

[Goddess]

And another doctor who previously was trotted out to the public to encourage the inoculations, changes his tune after seeing reality:

I Have Tried Sounding the Alarm About the Vaccines Causing Cancer Relapse But the Mainstream Media Don't Want to Know – The Daily Sceptic

Quote

I was rapidly reminded that I had written an article, published in the Daily Mail in the middle of 2021, which encouraged people to get vaccinated, particularly younger people. This was a very thorough article, written under my name but essentially conducted by interview, for the purpose of condoning the vaccine rollout at the time. Although I had started to have concerns, the overwhelming push by the Government and the medical community was that this would be in everyone’s best interest. So the environment at that time was completely different to what it is now. Indeed, my own take on this was soon to change very dramatically when my own son developed myocarditis after having a jab he did not want but that he needed for work and travel purposes. I also then found out that one of his friends in his early 30s had suffered a stroke and that a niece of my close colleague had a fatal heart attack at the age of 34, having had the vaccine for her occupation as a nurse! I began to be highly alarmed that it was the vaccines causing these symptoms, 

Quote

 

In late 2021 it was becoming manifestly evident too that the vaccines were anything but safe and effective and that the disease was not nearly as problematic as it was at the beginning of 2020 when it was being rendered much worse with what I believed at the time to be ludicrous responses. These included both lockdown and the refusal to treat Covid as a respiratory airborne virus with consensus mechanisms but instead pushing patients on to a randomised trial, known as RECOVERY, which ended up showing what everyone knew: that if there is an acute inflammation in the lungs patients need dexamethasone. The early responses also included putting patients on ventilation, which now is known to be the last thing that should have been done as it seemed to encourage early death.

When the facts change, or new facts emerge, the position of all those in authority directing mandates should change but unfortunately, they did not.

I tried desperately to point out that all the evidence that vaccines might have been useful in helping to curtail the pandemic was changing; that it was becoming very clear that there were highly significant side-effects to the vaccine programme that Pfizer had gone to great lengths to cover up, and that it was only a court case in the U.S. that led to them becoming available. At this stage the whole vaccine programme should have been stopped but nobody seemed to want to address this, neither the Government, the medical authorities or the media. 

 

 

[Goddess]

 

 

[Goddess]

Huh.....interesting:

Quote

“Moderna Vaccine will no longer be available in Australia from Mid December 2022.”

Service Finder (healthdirect.gov.au)

[Goddess]

Thread by @ScienceWDrDoug on Thread Reader App – Thread Reader App

In layman's terms:

The jab makes your cells synthesize the Spike protein. Spike then binds to a protein found in cardiovascular and neural tissue called Neuropilin, which blocks other molecules from binding to Neuropilin. This interference can cause abnormal function and growth of these tissues.

 

 

[Goddess]

Another scientist's take on the above article:

A Mechanism for Spike Protein Damage - by Cody Porter (substack.com)

 

I have to say - it is really great seeing all the doctors and scientists debating and discussing these things again. ?

On Twitter, anyways.  Still banned and censored on other platforms.

[Goddess]

9 minutes ago, Goddess said:

I have to say - it is really great seeing all the doctors and scientists debating and discussing these things again. ?

I don't know how many of you are aware of this, but pre-covid, it was common for doctors and scientists to go on YouTube, Twitter, etc and share/discuss studies, ask for insight from fellow professionals on specific cases, discuss and debate.

After covid, if a doctor or scientist didn't sing the tune the government wanted or tried to discuss something not allowed to be discussed, they were banned and censored from most platforms and threatened with loss of medical license and funding.  So most have been on platforms like Rumble, etc where they are free to discuss and debate and share info with each other.

Of course, governments and alphabet entities knew the lemmings in the public would turn their noses up at these platforms, as evidenced by many on this forum who have openly said, they will not read anything contrary to what the government tells them.

This is why you think there is "consensus" and the "vast majority" of experts endorse the inoculations.

[eyeball]

6 hours ago, Goddess said:

After covid, if a doctor or scientist didn't sing the tune the government wanted or tried to discuss something not allowed to be discussed, they were banned and censored from most platforms and threatened with loss of medical license and funding.

So what exactly motivated governments to do this after COVID? Did they just come up with their plan on the fly or did they have the plan ready to go on the shelf beforehand and were just waiting for a galvanizing event?

There about a million doctors in North America.  How many people do you think it would take to monitor all these doctors and then how many would it take to do all the banning, censoring, threatening etc etc not to mention actually take things like licences and funding away? Apparently this is being coordinated around the world meaning millions of doctors.  How many thousands upon thousands of public officials do you honestly think it would take to pull this off and where is your evidence they're doing so?

As always your claims are so extraordinary they'll require forensic evidence to be taken seriously.

[Goddess]

8 minutes ago, eyeball said:

So what exactly motivated governments to do this after COVID? Did they just come up with their plan on the fly or did they have the plan ready to go on the shelf beforehand and were just waiting for a galvanizing event?

There about a million doctors in North America.  How many people do you think it would take to monitor all these doctors and then how many would it take to do all the banning, censoring, threatening etc etc not to mention actually take things like licences and funding away? Apparently this is being coordinated around the world meaning millions of doctors.  How many thousands upon thousands of public officials do you honestly think it would take to pull this off and where is your evidence they're doing so?

As always your claims are so extraordinary they'll require forensic evidence to be taken seriously.

Yes. A coordinated effort.

They even named it - Operation Lockstep.

[Goddess]

Also, I have posted links for everything I've said about censorship of doctors and scientists and it's obvious they have been censored. You obviously don't or won't read them and you post no links to support anything you say.

I understand you feel the government and Big Pharma would never lie to citizens or do anything for self-serving interests, but I feel you are extremely naive in that view. And that seems to be your only argument here - that nobody would ever in a million years deceive the public for power or profit.

[eyeball]

1 hour ago, Goddess said:

Yes. A coordinated effort.

They even named it - Operation Lockstep.

Bwahahahahaha!

[eyeball]

1 hour ago, Goddess said:

I understand you feel the government and Big Pharma would never lie to citizens or do anything for self-serving interests, but I feel you are extremely naive in that view. And that seems to be your only argument here - that nobody would ever in a million years deceive the public for power or profit.

So why do you think I keep talking about things like stopping the practice of in-camera lobbying?  Of course people deceive the public for power and profit, but not on the scale and scope of what you're suggesting.

The corruption evidenced by things like the SNC Lavalin Affair is very real but petty compared to what you're imagining.  That said I think years and years of a scandal here and a scandal there plus the usual evasiveness of our governments has eaten away at public trust to a very dangerous degree and now people's imaginations are racing away from them.

I'd say get a better grip, but how is the rub..

[dialamah]

1 hour ago, Goddess said:

Also, I have posted links for everything I've said about censorship of doctors and scientists and it's obvious they have been censored. You obviously don't or won't read them and you post no links to support anything you say.

I understand you feel the government and Big Pharma would never lie to citizens or do anything for self-serving interests, but I feel you are extremely naive in that view. And that seems to be your only argument here - that nobody would ever in a million years deceive the public for power or profit.

I don't think that's the argument.  The argument is that the widespread conspiracy you claim is unlikely given the many organizations, countries and individuals that would have to be involved.

More seriously, some of your concerns are valid and some sources you provide are worth considering.  It's the hyperbole along with many of your much less credible sources that removes you from the sphere of believable to the sphere of nutcase. 

[Goddess]

15 minutes ago, dialamah said:

It's the hyperbole along with many of your much less credible sources that removes you from the sphere of believable to the sphere of nutcase. 

Yes, I'm a "nutcase" for seeing that doctors and scientists are being censored and it's being done by all the governments, Big Pharma, MSM and the alphabet entities.

Yet - serious adverse events are being denied as happening, despite social media groups of hundreds of thousands being shut down.  And no one is allowed to talk about them.  And MSM will not cover them or the people being injured.

Why do you think that is happening?  Should it be happening?  Discussion and debate is the heart of scientific breakthroughs, not censorship and blacklisting.  The whole point of publishing studies and data is having your fellow colleagues pick it apart, so you can repeat the experiment or study to glean additional information or improve results.

Are all these doctors and scientists "nutcases", too?

Because they are wondering the same thing I am - why is this happening?  If there is no conspiracy of silence between all these entities, as you claim, what is going on?

 

9 hours ago, Goddess said:

I tried desperately to point out that all the evidence that vaccines might have been useful in helping to curtail the pandemic was changing; that it was becoming very clear that there were highly significant side-effects to the vaccine programme that Pfizer had gone to great lengths to cover up, and that it was only a court case in the U.S. that led to them becoming available. At this stage the whole vaccine programme should have been stopped but nobody seemed to want to address this, neither the Government, the medical authorities or the media.

 

25 minutes ago, dialamah said:

some of your concerns are valid and some sources you provide are worth considering. 

.....and you wouldn't even be aware of any concerns doctors and scientists have had since the beginning of this, because you've been told there is "consensus" and the "vast majority" agree with the narrative.  Yet, the inventor of mRNA technology has spoken out from the beginning that his technology is being used wrongly, that it was never perfected and had serious flaws that needed to be corrected before it should EVER have been used on humans. And he's gotten censored and banned. Same for the guy who invented the PCR test - he screamed from the rooftops that the test was never designed to do what they want it to do and that it would mostly give false positives, especially at the high rotations they were running it at.  He got banned and censored, too.

Frontline doctors who were actually treating covid patients, who were meeting up on Zoom, YouTube and Twitter to discuss what was working, in what amounts and how early, also got banned and censored and booted from the platforms they relied on to treat people.  Hell, they even banned IVM which was an over-the-counter med prior to this.  They could say it "wasn't" working, but it certainly wasn't hurting anyone, unlike the stupid ventilators and Fauci's Remdisivir which killed thousands.  And the doctors who said the ventilators were killing people were then banned!  Early treatment - banned and withheld from people.

All of these people - tops in their fields - banned and censored.

All "nutcases" according to you.  Yet whatever "experts" and "science" you claim to follow has been dead fuquing wrong from the beginning and literally KILLED people for no reason other than greed, money, power. 

IMO - THEYRE the nutcases.  And so is anyone who follows them.

Your narrative is falling apart.

The inoculations are neither safe or effective. 

A court had to force Pfizer to release the real data, and it looked really, really bad.  To the point that many countries are starting to investigate fraud - from a company FAMOUS for fraud - to get recompense.  

Covid deaths and cases were counted in VERY shady ways and exaggerated.  Whole countries and public health officers have gotten caught fudging the numbers.

Injuries and deaths are being covered up and ignored.  Victims are being silenced, banned and censored.

Which part of any of this says to you "NOTHING TO SEE HERE!" ???

[Goddess]

3 hours ago, eyeball said:

How many people do you think it would take to monitor all these doctors and then how many would it take to do all the banning, censoring, threatening etc etc not to mention actually take things like licences and funding away? 

You do understand that all they have to do is ban or censor some doctors, boot them off forums for discussing adverse events and how to help patients, take away their license to practice medicine and it sends a very strong message to the rest - don't say anything.  Good gawd, California is trying to make it LAW that doctors NOT inform patients of SAE following the jabbers.

Is this what you want from your doctor?  Too afraid of losing his license to inform you properly?  Is this what you want from your government?

If it's YOU in Shopper's Drug Mart dropping dead minutes after yet another booster, do you want your family silenced, do you want public health to not investigate? Do you want the government to ignore it and force others to do the same?

[Goddess]

 

 

[Goddess]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

@eyeball

Deaths from the vaccines are being (under)reported all over the world, yet here in Canada - not one.

Is it possible we're being lied to?

[Goddess]

 

#NoAmnesty

[Goddess]

These are the real misinformation spreaders

[Goddess]

 

 

[Goddess]

Here, eyeball:  This is how they do it.  They tried to turn swine flu into a "pandemic" too, but people were a little smarter in 2009, I guess and didn't fall for it.

 

 

 

[Goddess]

Dr Kevin Stillwagon gives the rationale for why 85% of recipients have not been injured yet. Cohesive with Zogby 2022 survey. Vials are not inspected for quality or purity by EUA contract. Good rationale to quit while ahead.

Orange County Commissioners Meeting 12/13/2022

 

 

Edited December 21, 2022 by Goddess