First a trickle....Now a flood

[Goddess]

On 12/9/2022 at 8:35 AM, Infidel Dog said:

I imagine you heard about this one from the local news or what I call the 5 O'clock liars.

Quite a few children have died of Strep A now, too. ?

[Goddess]

Quote

"In a statement, the [Danish] Health Authority said on Thursday that Covid-19 is no longer considered to have any special status compared to other illnesses, and that isolation is therefore no longer required following a positive test."

Denmark’s health authority scraps isolation guidelines for Covid-19 (thelocal.dk)

[Goddess]

[Goddess]

22 hours ago, Goddess said:

Quite a few children have died of Strep A now, too. ?

Which is interesting, in light of this study from 2014:

 Live attenuated influenza vaccine enhances colonization of Streptococcus pneumoniae and Staphylococcus aureus in mice - PubMed (nih.gov)

[Goddess]

Importance of Vitamin D levels in covid outcomes:

(What the censored scientists have been saying for over 2 years....)

 

Association between vitamin D supplementation and COVID-19 infection and mortality - PubMed (nih.gov)

Quote

In the population of US veterans, we show that Vitamin D₂ and D₃ fills were associated with reductions in COVID-19 infection of 28% and 20%, respectively [(D₃ Hazard Ratio (HR) = 0.80, [95% CI 0.77, 0.83]), D₂ HR = 0.72, [95% CI 0.65, 0.79]]. Mortality within 30-days of COVID-19 infection was similarly 33% lower with Vitamin D₃ and 25% lower with D₂ (D₃ HR = 0.67, [95% CI 0.59, 0.75]; D₂ HR = 0.75, [95% CI 0.55, 1.04]).

It appears that keeping your vitamin D levels up is a greater protection than the inoculations.

[Goddess]

INSIDE THE CAPITOL HILL COVID FORUM - The HighWire

^^^^  A 9-minute compilation of some of the testimony from the Covid hearings ^^^

[eyeball]

1 hour ago, Goddess said:

Importance of Vitamin D levels in covid outcomes:

(What the censored scientists have been saying for over 2 years....)

Cite? Not that immune systems are boosted by vitamins, everyone knows that, but that scientists are being censored for saying so.

[eyeball]

1 hour ago, Goddess said:

It appears that keeping your vitamin D levels up is a greater protection than the inoculations.

Does it appear that way to the vast VAST majority of experts or just you?

[Goddess]

How Fauci Fooled America | Opinion (newsweek.com)

Quote

When the pandemic hit, America needed someone to turn to for advice. The media and public naturally looked to Dr. Anthony Fauci—the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, an esteemed laboratory immunologist and one of President Donald Trump's chosen COVID advisers. Unfortunately, Dr. Fauci got major epidemiology and public health questions wrong. Reality and scientific studies have now caught up with him.

Lied about and failed at:

• Natural immunity
• Protecting the elderly
• School closures 
• Masks
• Contact tracing
• Collateral public health damage

[Goddess]

 

On 12/11/2022 at 1:42 PM, eyeball said:

Does it appear that way to the vast VAST majority of experts or just you?

Well, the VAST majority of the experts you have been listening to have been liars, so.......

They sold $billions$ of inoculations based on a promised RRR of 95%, which we all know now was a total lie and the ARR (which is the more accurate stat) has always been less than 1% - that's from Pfizer's own data.  And yes, I've linked proof of that here in this thread.

That means you will taking shots multiple times a year for the rest of your life for a possible less than 1% reduction in risk.

Obviously this is true, since the inoculation isn't stopping spread, hospitalizations or deaths.

1% is less than 28%. 

It's less than 20%. 

It's less than 33%.

And it's less than 25%.

But you keep following your "experts."

The experts I follow have been saving lives since this started. Your "experts" sent people home to die.

One day, you'll see that the "vast majority" of experts disagree with and have disagreed with your Pharma-paid "experts" from the beginning.  Your experts have been wrong, wrong, wrong, repeatedly. 

And they'd still be lying if it hadn't become so OBVIOUS that they are lying.

95% efficacy and 100% safe.....ya right ?

[Goddess]

Not one, but TWO journalists "died suddenly" while covering the World Cup:

Second World Cup journalist 'died suddenly' after Grant Wahl passes away: report (msn.com)

[Goddess]

On 12/11/2022 at 1:42 PM, eyeball said:

Does it appear that way to the vast VAST majority of experts or just you?

Scientific consensus is reached through communication at conferences, the publication process, replication of reproducible results by others, scholarly debate and peer review.

None of which your "experts" have engaged in.  In fact, they have repeatedly refused to engage in scholarly communication or debate.

Scientific consensus is NOT reached through blacklisting and defunding everyone who disagrees with you, which is what your Pharma-paid "experts" have done.

So I don't care how many of them there are.  Lots of liars together - do not make something "truth".

I'll stick with the ones who haven't lied and aren't paid off by Pharma.

But you do you.  

Edited December 13, 2022 by Goddess

[eyeball]

1 hour ago, Goddess said:

Well, the VAST majority of the experts you have been listening to have been liars, so.......

The sheer scope of what you're suggesting alone makes it impossible to take any of it seriously.  Have you given ANY critical thought to what you're actually asking people to believe here?  This majority of lying experts you're taking about must number several hundreds of people in Canada, thousands in the US and 10's of thousands of co-conspirators world wide.

All of which you say are lying, knowingly, deliberately, criminally....lying.  For the benefit of Big Pharma and the hush money Big Pharma pays them.   

It's completely preposterous that's there are not hundreds of associates of these who are in credible whistle-blowing positions from which they could make this monstrous plot far far more credible and apparent to everyone then you've succeeded at doing.

And still there is nothing but a trickle...and a pathetic warning that 'one day you'll see'.

?

 

Edited December 13, 2022 by eyeball

[eyeball]

 

1 hour ago, Goddess said:

I'll stick with the ones who haven't lied and aren't paid off by Pharma.

How does this work anyway, some expert gets wind of the Big Plot and emails Pfizer with what they've got plus a demand for cash or else?

[Goddess]

17 minutes ago, eyeball said:

 

How does this work anyway, some expert gets wind of the Big Plot and emails Pfizer with what they've got plus a demand for cash or else?

I'm guessing it's happening in the same way they have always committed medical fraud.  

[Goddess]

21 minutes ago, eyeball said:

 

How does this work anyway, some expert gets wind of the Big Plot and emails Pfizer with what they've got plus a demand for cash or else?

Well, their application for the EUA was attached to a $2.3 million cheque to the FDA.

And I have said before - not everyone is "in on it."

Some are just useful idjits.  Like you.

[eyeball]

23 minutes ago, Goddess said:

I'm guessing it's happening in the same way they have always committed medical fraud.  

Which is how precisely, especially at the scale you're talking about?

[eyeball]

20 minutes ago, Goddess said:

Well, their application for the EUA was attached to a $2.3 million cheque to the FDA.

So the FDA was happy with a measly 2.3 million?  

 

Quote

 

And I have said before - not everyone is "in on it."

Some are just useful idjits.  Like you.

 

You've never said how many or who or how you know and what direct evidence you have that would incriminate them of criminal fraud.

How many people do you think pulled this off? How deep did Big Pharma and the government have to go to ensure everyone that needed to be paid off was covered?  These have nothing to do with vaccine or side effects but you should still have answers to all of these questions.

I had no part in it, I'm amongst the billions of other idjits that we're scammed.

[Goddess]

For  instance, @eyeball, there's this paper:

COVID-19 Vaccine Boosters for Young Adults: A Risk-Benefit Assessment and Five Ethical Arguments against Mandates at Universities by Kevin Bardosh, Allison Krug, Euzebiusz Jamrozik, Trudo Lemmens, Salmaan Keshavjee, Vinay Prasad, Martin A. Makary, Stefan Baral, Tracy Beth Høeg :: SSRN

The authors include:

• Dr. Stefan Baral - epidemiology professor at Johns Hopkins
• Dr. Martin Makary - a surgeon and professor at Johns Hopkins
• Dr. Vinayak Prasad - hematologist/oncologist at UCSF and a professor in the Epidemiology & Biostatistics department, author of over 350 academic and peer reviewed studies
• Dr. Salmaan Keshavjee, M.D., Ph.D - current Director of the Harvard Medical School Center for Global Health Delivery, and professor of Global Health and Social Medicine at Harvard Medical School

Not to mention also - the now many countries around the world that have stopped the inoculations in children and younger adults, because ALL THE LITERATURE IS SAYING THE RISK/BENEFIT IS NOT GOOD.

Yet, you stick with the lying "experts" who are still - not only saying young children and adults HAVE TO get injected repeatedly - but that BABIES should be injected repeatedly.

And your whole "the VAST majority!"  the VAST majority!"

You have no fuqin' clue what - or who - you're talking about.

Seriously.  WTF is the matter with you?  You can't even name ONE "expert" that you are following.

Because you don't follow the science.  You follow the TV.

Edited December 13, 2022 by Goddess

[Goddess]

27 minutes ago, eyeball said:

Which is how precisely, especially at the scale you're talking about?

Educate yourself.  Please.  

One of the doctors of the above paper, Dr. Martin Makary, has written a few books on the medical malfeasance going on in the medical industrial complex. 

Check out his book, “Unaccountable: What Hospitals Won’t Tell You and How Transparency Can Revolutionize Heath Care”.

The issues are well documented.

Check out "The Real Anthony Fauci".  Say what you want about Kennedy Jr., (I don't' agree with everything he touts, either) but the book is an excellent read on the issue of why Big Pharma and the alphabet entities can no longer be entrusted with the public health.  There are pages and pages of documentation to prove what is being said and Kennedy is not the only one who has tried to fight Fauci's power-grabbing.

Sorry, but I've had enough of your constant fact-absent denials based on nothing but CTV headlines while you continue to remain willfully ignorant.

I've proved all this documentation, studies, opinion pieces, papers, data from all the world and you continue to come here and just say "horseshit" and offer NOTHING, NADA to support your position.  Some un-named and unknown "vast majority".

Wake. TF. Up.

[Goddess]

Here's another cardiologist, Dr. Dean Patterson from S. Africa, who is speaking out against the inoculations, too.

 

 

 

 

 

[Goddess]

 

A LOT of doctors are speaking out.  But you won't hear about it from CTV.

[Goddess]

 

 

[Goddess]

 

 

[Goddess]

Autopsy-based histopathological characterization of myocarditis after anti-SARS-CoV-2-vaccination | SpringerLink

Quote

"Overall, autopsy findings indicated death due to acute arrhythmogenic cardiac failure. Thus, myocarditis can be a potentially lethal complication following mRNA-based anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination.”

 

Reevaluation of antibody-dependent enhancement of infection in anti-SARS-CoV-2 therapeutic antibodies and mRNA-vaccine antisera using FcR- and ACE2-positive cells | Scientific Reports (nature.com)

Quote

They show that sera from some individuals who are jabbed with mRNA exhibits: 1) No neutralization of Omicron. 2) Antibody Dependent Enhancement (ADE) of infection.

ADE is a process where the presence of the antibodies actually amplify the infection rather than neutralize it.