Jump to content

NO COLLUSION! Jury finds Clinton lawyer not guilty of lying to FBI


Recommended Posts

When YOU can tell ME who had custodial control of YOU claim is H.B.'s laptop, then you can talk.  YOU know YOU cannot do that.

And that the YOUR problem and the problem CONS everywhere.  

Without a legal chain of  custody, all you have hot air along smoke and mirrors.

There is absolutely zero proof of any sort that the laptop in question did in fact belong to H.B.  Nor can you prove beyond a resonable doubt that the information on that laptop is proof of any wrong doing.  Nor can you prove the information on that laptop is proof of communications generated by H.B.  

A legal chain of custody is vital, all we know is that Ghouli claims he had, but he cannot or will not provide the name and or names of people who gave it to him.  

A piece of paper claiming to be a receipt for computer repair proves nothing if you cannot or will provide it for verification.  Verification of the signature(s) on the receipt, the date of the receipt, the ink used to print the receipt and the paper used to create the receipt need to compared and proven to be factual.  You cannot do that and you know it.

Nor is there any evidence to prove the laptop in question was and/or is the property of H.B.  Lots of hearsay, but no proof.

At no time was H.B. in the employ of or acted as an agent or repesentative of the Biden Campaign or the Biden Adminstration.  

I find rants somewhat amusing, but you aint go a pot to pee in.  

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, traveler52 said:

As for VOX.  For an individual who believed each and every fracking lie of

the 5-Deferment Draft Dodging Traitor, you have room to talk.  

 

Coming from a guy who believes "the Russians" are responsible for every legitimate criticism of NATO and the establishment's obsession with blowing up poor people in the middle east

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/7/2022 at 5:01 PM, West said:

Leftists be all like "NBC checked with Adam Schiff and thoroughly debunked anything bad about the Democrats" 

?

Righties be like:

 

“RT checked with Putin and thoroughly debunked anything bad about Russia”

and 

“Fox News checked with Trump and thoroughly debunked anything bad about Trump”

 

And considering Putin literally controls RT and Trump regularly appears on Fox news and Fox personnel regularly  texted with Trump White House staff, this is literally true unlike made up stories about democrats controlling MSM news 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Strike 2 for Trump conspiracists

 

Trump-Russia Steele dossier source acquitted of lying to FBI

18 October 2022, 21:47 BST
Updated 16 minutes ago
 

Mr Danchenko was charged with lying to the FBI on five counts in 2017, "regarding the sources of certain information that he provided to a UK investigative firm".

On Friday, a judge in Alexandria, Virginia, dismissed one of the charges against Mr Danchenko, saying that the government had failed to present sufficient evidence of a crime.

The jury declared him not guilty on the remaining four charges on Tuesday.

 

….

Tuesday's not-guilty verdict represented the second defeat in this investigation for special counsel Mr Durham, who personally argued much of the prosecution's case in court.

"While we are disappointed in the outcome, we respect the jury's decision and thank them for their service," Mr Durham said in a statement after the verdict.

In May, a Washington DC jury acquitted cyber-security lawyer Michael Sussmann of lying to the FBI and concealing his ties to Hillary Clinton's campaign….

 

https://news.google.com/articles/CBMiMWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jb20vbmV3cy93b3JsZC11cy1jYW5hZGEtNjMzMDUzODLSATVodHRwczovL3d3dy5iYmMuY29tL25ld3Mvd29ybGQtdXMtY2FuYWRhLTYzMzA1MzgyLmFtcA?hl=en-CA&gl=CA&ceid=CA%3Aen

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, BeaverFever said:

Strike 2 for Trump conspiracists

 

Trump-Russia Steele dossier source acquitted of lying to FBI

18 October 2022, 21:47 BST
Updated 16 minutes ago
 

Mr Danchenko was charged with lying to the FBI on five counts in 2017, "regarding the sources of certain information that he provided to a UK investigative firm".

On Friday, a judge in Alexandria, Virginia, dismissed one of the charges against Mr Danchenko, saying that the government had failed to present sufficient evidence of a crime.

The jury declared him not guilty on the remaining four charges on Tuesday.

 

….

Tuesday's not-guilty verdict represented the second defeat in this investigation for special counsel Mr Durham, who personally argued much of the prosecution's case in court.

"While we are disappointed in the outcome, we respect the jury's decision and thank them for their service," Mr Durham said in a statement after the verdict.

In May, a Washington DC jury acquitted cyber-security lawyer Michael Sussmann of lying to the FBI and concealing his ties to Hillary Clinton's campaign….

 

https://news.google.com/articles/CBMiMWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jb20vbmV3cy93b3JsZC11cy1jYW5hZGEtNjMzMDUzODLSATVodHRwczovL3d3dy5iYmMuY29tL25ld3Mvd29ybGQtdXMtY2FuYWRhLTYzMzA1MzgyLmFtcA?hl=en-CA&gl=CA&ceid=CA%3Aen

Just as I posted last week, Durhams's case against Danchenko was falling apart. And now the disintegration has materialized. :applause:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/5/2022 at 10:43 PM, West said:

Ya I noticed that scummy behavior from the leftists is passed off as "yeah but he's a good guy and Donnies a bad guy therefore he can be as much a scumbag as he wants"  

Bottom line, the collusion delusion was started based on fake Intel. Like those of us paying attention said from the start.. we were called names but have now been proven right.. just like we will in time on the crack-ine, Trudeau and the globalist scum

No, the Democrat response is:

All of Trump’s mega million dollar lawyering didn’t convict a single person, because Republican claims of wrongdoing were not true  

But all the investigations into Trump have jailed over a dozen people, because Trump is a criminal who associates with criminals. 
 

You know what MAGA stands for?

Make Attorneys Get Attorneys

When Trump hires criminal attorneys, he hires criminals who are attorneys. 

Edited by Rebound
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/7/2022 at 6:53 PM, traveler52 said:

When YOU can tell ME who had custodial control of YOU claim is H.B.'s laptop, then you can talk.  YOU know YOU cannot do that.

And that the YOUR problem and the problem CONS everywhere.  

Without a legal chain of  custody, all you have hot air along smoke and mirrors.

There is absolutely zero proof of any sort that the laptop in question did in fact belong to H.B.  Nor can you prove beyond a resonable doubt that the information on that laptop is proof of any wrong doing.  Nor can you prove the information on that laptop is proof of communications generated by H.B.  

A legal chain of custody is vital, all we know is that Ghouli claims he had, but he cannot or will not provide the name and or names of people who gave it to him.  

A piece of paper claiming to be a receipt for computer repair proves nothing if you cannot or will provide it for verification.  Verification of the signature(s) on the receipt, the date of the receipt, the ink used to print the receipt and the paper used to create the receipt need to compared and proven to be factual.  You cannot do that and you know it.

Nor is there any evidence to prove the laptop in question was and/or is the property of H.B.  Lots of hearsay, but no proof.

At no time was H.B. in the employ of or acted as an agent or repesentative of the Biden Campaign or the Biden Adminstration.  

I find rants somewhat amusing, but you aint go a pot to pee in.  

 

 

 

Whether the contents of the laptop are true or not, the laptop and its contents are inadmissible as evidence in a court. 

I give the FBI a laptop and claim that it belonged to Donald Trump, would you believe that it’s Trump’s laptop?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

The Durham Probe Was Barr’s Witch Hunt A shockingly unethical and failed crusade to vindicate Trump.

 

Quote

There is an enduring pattern in American conservatism in which the right first develops a paranoid interpretation of the liberal Establishment, and then reverse engineers its own version of the monster it has imagined. Conservatives convinced themselves that the mainstream media and universities were mere propaganda organs, then created institutions like the Heritage Foundation and Fox News, warped reflections of their own overheated critique. The January 6 insurrection was, of course, in the mind of its participants, a “response” to the imagined vote-fraud conspiracy and its antifa/BLM shock troops.

John Durham’s investigation is a classic episode in this tradition. The American right first convinced itself that Robert Mueller and the deep state, using the cover of dispassionate professionalism, had launched a partisan witch hunt to smear Donald Trump. In response, it created a right-wing mirror image, as fervently partisan and unhinged as they believed their enemies to be.

The New York Times has a deeply reported narrative showing how Durham’s counter-investigation of the Russia probe, cooked up by William Barr at Donald Trump’s urging, was just as abusive, partisan, and unhinged as Trump’s defenders made Mueller out to be.

The paranoid style of American conservatism is imprinted upon the institutions it creates. The Durham probe will go down in history as a monument to the right’s fever-dream defenses of Trump’s corruption.

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/20/2022 at 12:00 PM, Rebound said:

I give the FBI a laptop and claim that it belonged to Donald Trump, would you believe that it’s Trump’s laptop?

Of course not, but that has nothing to do with this scenario. The FBI had Hunter's laptop for 11 months by Oct of 2020, and they knew that the information leaked was 100% legit. They just chose to lie about it because they knew it had serious ramifications for their presidential candidate: "It's Russian disinformation!"

Then the TNI members, CBC and Twitter included, had to follow the script.

For the purposes of "Can Hunter be charged criminally for evidence of things like gun crimes or drug crimes that were on his computer?", no, he can't be charged for that.

For the purposes of espionage, treason, sedition, etc, the US would absolutely use that against him if there were military-level secrets on his laptop. Privacy laws wouldn't shield him from illegal storage and sharing of that type of information - he'd be a dead man - but there's no reason to believe that his crimes and sleaziness went that far.

The kinds of things he did would no doubt be of concern to other countries that trade with the US, definitely to other American companies, maybe the SEC, but I don't think the Bidens were selling their country out totally.

 

It's weird how every member of the Biden family is just such an oozing pustule of sleaze and grift. Their daughter left her diary behind to be discovered with evidence of her involuntary & sexy showers with her dad, Hunter left his laptop behind to be discovered with evidence of all his depravity and his underhanded leverage of his father's position, Joe's quid pro quo is right there on tape along with all of his various lies about his knowledge of Hunter's nefarious deals with foreign powers, the photos of kid-sniffer Joe smooching and sniffing little kids.... Their family is a genetic cesspool. 

If they were a foreign family or American conservatives the comedians and the late night shows would be having a hay-day with it all, but because they're powerful leftists SNL and the rest leave them alone. 

Wanna do a little experiment? Walk up behind your wife and slowly slide your hands over the top of her shoulders and then just sneak a 1-second long sniff of her hair. I'm telling you, it's creepy AF, even with your own wife. If you don't let her know it's coming, she'll be revolted. 

Edited by WestCanMan
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Then the TNI members, CBC and Twitter included, had to follow the script.

Why, they were directed to under threat of punishment of some sort for not complying?

Following this how do executives of these companies pass these directives down to their reporters and researchers and such?

There must be a paper or email trail of some sort not to mention whistle blowers. Do you have anything like these to corroborate what you just said here?

An actual copy of the script would be best but if all you have is one of these, never mind.

image.thumb.png.2edcbaf51885e92b6d682466fe60d909.png

Edited by eyeball
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,712
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    nyralucas
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Jeary earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Venandi went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Gaétan earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Dictatords earned a badge
      First Post
    • babetteteets earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...