West Posted February 17, 2022 Author Report Share Posted February 17, 2022 Just now, blackbird said: That's not true. A court has issued an injunction against the occupation. It is illegal. Against the horns.. Jeeze you people are so lost its not even funny.. I guess it's to be expected from uneducated low iq ctv viewers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dougie93 Posted February 17, 2022 Report Share Posted February 17, 2022 no law can overturn your Charter rights to peaceful assembly not even the Emergencies Act Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goddess Posted February 17, 2022 Report Share Posted February 17, 2022 2 minutes ago, blackbird said: That's not true. A court has issued an injunction against the occupation. It is illegal. Cite? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dougie93 Posted February 17, 2022 Report Share Posted February 17, 2022 1 minute ago, West said: Against the horns.. Jeeze you people are so lost its not even funny.. I guess it's to be expected from uneducated low iq ctv viewers the Liberals were seeking an injunction to stop the protests altogether the judge refused to give them one the reason that it was a peaceful assembly under Charter rights any use of force under the rubric of the law, which violated your fundamental Charter right ; is unconstitutional 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aristides Posted February 17, 2022 Report Share Posted February 17, 2022 (edited) 10 minutes ago, West said: Against the horns.. Jeeze you people are so lost its not even funny.. I guess it's to be expected from uneducated low iq ctv viewers It was just about the horns, the ruling had nothing to do with the legality of the protest. Doesn't really matter because the "law abiding" protesters ignored it anyway. Edited February 17, 2022 by Aristides Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blackbird Posted February 17, 2022 Report Share Posted February 17, 2022 12 minutes ago, West said: Against the horns.. Jeeze you people are so lost its not even funny.. I guess it's to be expected from uneducated low iq ctv viewers No, there was an injunction against the horns a week or so ago, but there has also been a more recent injunction against the occupation. Keep up with it. Our capital city is under occupation by anarchists and they are a threat to our democracy. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blackbird Posted February 17, 2022 Report Share Posted February 17, 2022 (edited) 24 minutes ago, Goddess said: Cite? I thought there had been an injunction a week or so ago that made the occupation illegal, but I can't find it right now. However, the Emergencies Act was declared Monday and that made the occupation illegal. There were difficulties between police departments and authorities which the Emergency Act solved. quote Federal Government declares a public order emergency under the Emergencies Act to end disruptions, blockades and the occupation of the city of Ottawa Unquote Federal Government declares a public order emergency under the Emergencies Act to end disruptions, blockades and the occupation of the city of Ottawa - Canada.ca Edited February 17, 2022 by blackbird Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goddess Posted February 17, 2022 Report Share Posted February 17, 2022 5 minutes ago, blackbird said: I thought there had been an injunction a week or so ago that made the occupation illegal, but I can't find it right now. However, the Emergencies Act was declared Monday and that made the occupation illegal. There were difficulties between police departments and authorities which the Emergency Act solved. quote Federal Government declares a public order emergency under the Emergencies Act to end disruptions, blockades and the occupation of the city of Ottawa Unquote Federal Government declares a public order emergency under the Emergencies Act to end disruptions, blockades and the occupation of the city of Ottawa - Canada.ca That is not a court injunction from a judge against the convoy calling it an illegal occupation, like you said. You are a liar. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
West Posted February 17, 2022 Author Report Share Posted February 17, 2022 27 minutes ago, Aristides said: It was just about the horns, the ruling had nothing to do with the legality of the protest. Doesn't really matter because the "law abiding" protesters ignored it anyway. The judge repeatedly said they have a legal right to be there. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
West Posted February 17, 2022 Author Report Share Posted February 17, 2022 (edited) 13 minutes ago, blackbird said: I thought there had been an injunction a week or so ago that made the occupation illegal, but I can't find it right now. However, the Emergencies Act was declared Monday and that made the occupation illegal. There were difficulties between police departments and authorities which the Emergency Act solved. quote Federal Government declares a public order emergency under the Emergencies Act to end disruptions, blockades and the occupation of the city of Ottawa Unquote Federal Government declares a public order emergency under the Emergencies Act to end disruptions, blockades and the occupation of the city of Ottawa - Canada.ca Yes Trudeau issued it ?. Just because the coward of the cottage says it's illegal doesn't make it so. That's what makes this so ridiculous. The Prime Minister has taken it upon himself to freeze bank accounts for the crime of disagreeing with him. If you are comfortable with a politician being able to freeze accounts simply because he disagrees with your views, you need to examine yourself Edited February 17, 2022 by West 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
myata Posted February 17, 2022 Report Share Posted February 17, 2022 It's not Trudeau who's going off the rails. It's the system that let's any dictatorial aficionado go off the rails in almost any way he or she would like as long as they sit in a PM chair. It's truly astounding that we see nothing wrong with it, in this century. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aristides Posted February 17, 2022 Report Share Posted February 17, 2022 2 minutes ago, myata said: It's not Trudeau who's going off the rails. It's the system that let's any dictatorial aficionado go off the rails in almost any way he or she would like as long as they sit in a PM chair. It's truly astounding that we see nothing wrong with it, in this century. What is exactly you want because you never say, you just bitch. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
West Posted February 17, 2022 Author Report Share Posted February 17, 2022 So what will determine if your bank account is frozen or not is if you engage in thought crimes such as supporting a specific political candidate. Tell me how this isn't 1930s nazi Germany type stuff going on here 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
myata Posted February 17, 2022 Report Share Posted February 17, 2022 It's in the word: dictate-orship. It is not about bullets, repressions, terror no it does not say it so stop distracting. It's about dictate, one way communication no explanation given and no questions answered. Now, did we have anything but it, the dictate in the last two years and counting? Here you go. The answer is right on the surface. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aristides Posted February 17, 2022 Report Share Posted February 17, 2022 1 hour ago, West said: The judge repeatedly said they have a legal right to be there. The injunction asked for was about the horns. That is what he ruled on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
West Posted February 17, 2022 Author Report Share Posted February 17, 2022 19 minutes ago, Aristides said: The injunction asked for was about the horns. That is what he ruled on. His words matter. He said they have a legal right to protest. Trudeau is trying to say it's "terrorism". We all know he's just a little bitch Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blackbird Posted February 17, 2022 Report Share Posted February 17, 2022 (edited) 1 hour ago, Goddess said: That is not a court injunction from a judge against the convoy calling it an illegal occupation, like you said. You are a liar. No, you do not understand the laws and Emergency Act. Do you really think an injunction is needed? What the occupiers were doing was totally illegal even before a court issues an injunction. The police could have cleared them out but because of problems and lack of resources they did not. The Emergency Act is a higher authority than an injunction and declared the occupation illegal (even though it was already illegal). The police have issued written warnings and are issuing another written warning (the second one) today to make it clear the occupation is ILLEGAL. The laws are clearly against the occupation of the streets. The Emergency Act has declared it is illegal and they must leave now. There is no further need for injunctions or anything else. The government has the legal power and is exercising it. Now the police will move in and remove the illegal blockaders, likely within the next few days. Edited February 17, 2022 by blackbird Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aristides Posted February 17, 2022 Report Share Posted February 17, 2022 1 hour ago, West said: His words matter. He said they have a legal right to protest. Trudeau is trying to say it's "terrorism". We all know he's just a little bitch Of course people have a legal right to protest as long as they protest legally but that wasn't what he ruled on Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dialamah Posted February 17, 2022 Report Share Posted February 17, 2022 3 hours ago, blackbird said: thought there had been an injunction a week or so ago that made the occupation illegal, It was to put a stop to the incessant noise from the horns. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeitgeist Posted February 18, 2022 Report Share Posted February 18, 2022 (edited) 7 hours ago, dialamah said: It was to put a stop to the incessant noise from the horns. Well the injunction against the horns was fair enough. That was a reasonable response by the authorities. Edited February 18, 2022 by Zeitgeist Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
myata Posted February 18, 2022 Report Share Posted February 18, 2022 Dictate engenders repressions. A natural, tried progression. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.