The Lawsuits

[Boges]

1 hour ago, sharkman said:

I’m just wondering why she doesn’t resign her seat, almost like she’s not sure about the Election result? 

Or maybe she wants to be there when Congress accepts the EC results. 

There's already a debate on who should replace her. I'm sure she's not hedging her bets. 

[BubberMiley]

2 hours ago, sharkman said:

I’m just wondering why she doesn’t resign her seat, almost like she’s not sure about the Election result? 

Almost. Or almost like it isn't January 20th yet.

Glad to hear you're not done assaulting western democracy based on your sad feelings about losing and your gullibility to snake oil salesmen. It's been fun so far.

[sharkman]

4 minutes ago, BubberMiley said:

Almost. Or almost like it isn't January 20th yet.

Glad to hear you're not done assaulting western democracy based on your sad feelings about losing and your gullibility to snake oil salesmen. It's been fun so far.

Well I’m glad that you’re glad!

[Infidel Dog]

I like this tweet on a James Woods Twitter thread.

Quote

Besides the video footage, voice recordings, data analysis, statistical impossibilities, sworn affidavits and eyewitness testimony there is absolutely no evidence of voter fraud.

 

[Infidel Dog]

Speaking of an assault on democracy though, the hard left, their corporate and Globalist allies and the "useful idiots" that bumble and bubber around following them need to know that even if this third stage of a coup through an election fix is successful the fight goes on.

Edited December 15, 2020 by Infidel Dog

[Boges]

 

11 minutes ago, Infidel Dog said:

Speaking of an assault on democracy though, the hard left, their corporate and Globalist allies and the "useful idiots" that bumble and bubber around following them need to know that even if this third stage of a coup through an election fix is successful the fight goes on.

 

45 minutes ago, Infidel Dog said:

I like this tweet on a James Woods Twitter thread.

 

You'd think Courts would be completely convinced then. 

The "fight" will prove to divide the Conservative movement in two. 

Actual Conservatives who have ideals and an agenda.

And Trump Conservatives who pledge fealty to Trump and everything he wants. 

[Michael Hardner]

1 hour ago, Boges said:

The "fight" will prove to divide the Conservative movement in two. 

Ya think ?  With a poster here referring to the hard-left corporate agenda ?    

Seriously this kind of cognitive dissonance can't go on.  At some point they have to cauterize Trump and his foaming legions or they will be forced to campaign forever on cartoon fantasy stuff.  We saw how well that worked when the pandemic hit, ie. not well.

I'm not sure if we're going to go back to mushy centralism, which is what Uncle Joe represents, or whether the lawsuits, the unrequited rage and poorly-spelled comments section people are going to push (North) America to one side or the other. 

I sure have come to appreciate our conservatives, though, even the populist ones.  They would never try to get this far.  Maybe because our country is constantly at threat of ACTUALLY dividing so they take it seriously.  The Texan snowflakes who lost the absolutely ridiculous lawsuits are now strutting around in their succession panties again... 

I don't really care, but it's an embarrassing spectacle in a different way from OUR embarrassing spectacles  

[Infidel Dog]

4 hours ago, Boges said:

 

 

 

You'd think Courts would be completely convinced then. 

The "fight" will prove to divide the Conservative movement in two. 

Actual Conservatives who have ideals and an agenda.

And Trump Conservatives who pledge fealty to Trump and everything he wants. 

It always makes me smile when Progressives (even when they pretend they're moderates) claim expertise on what a "real' Conservative is.

[Infidel Dog]

3 hours ago, Michael Hardner said:

Ya think ?  With a poster here referring to the hard-left corporate agenda ?    

I believe I said the hard-left's "corporate allies."

Why? Are you saying you didn't notice what side Silicone valley, Network media, Hollywood and the corporate woke support?

That would go beyond cognitive dissonance.  That would be choosing ignorance and thinking it makes you superior to do so.

Or are you just crossing your fingers and hoping that maybe others won't notice that it doesn't.

[BubberMiley]

7 hours ago, sharkman said:

Well I’m glad that you’re glad!

Perhaps when this is all said and done, you will have more empathy for the schmucks in al Qaida and ISIS now that you can relate to the effects of mind control tricks smarter people than you use to radicalize and control others.

[Michael Hardner]

1 hour ago, Infidel Dog said:

Or are you just crossing your fingers and hoping that maybe others won't notice that it doesn't.

What.  

Look, I just don't get it.  If I did, I don't think it would believe it anyway....

[Infidel Dog]

Tell ya what, Mike. Here's another one for folks like you and Beave to ignore in your quest for greater ignorance.

It tells you who (or what) is really in charge of what's going on. You hear the word "Corporate" and are trained to believe they could never have any influence left of Trump. It's written into your programming now that you must divert and ignore from any knowledge to the contrary. However...if you were ever brave enough to click the video below Black Pigeon Speaks would explain to you how wrong you are:

 

Edited December 16, 2020 by Infidel Dog

[Michael Hardner]

46 minutes ago, Infidel Dog said:

Tell ya what, Mike. Here's another one for folks like you and Beave to ignore in your quest for greater ignorance.

It tells you who (or what) is really in charge of what's going on. You hear the word "Corporate" and are trained to believe they could never have any influence left of Trump. It's written into your programming now that you must divert and ignore from any knowledge to the contrary. However...if you were ever brave enough to click the video below Black Pigeon Speaks would explain to you how wrong you are:

 

I made it 30 seconds... That irritating sound design... What's the point?

 

And of course corporations support the Democrats.

 

I'm not here to pull you out of your echo chamber by trying to convince you that Biden is a centrist.  Please just believe what you believe.

[Guest]

46 minutes ago, Infidel Dog said:

Tell ya what, Mike. Here's another one for folks like you and Beave to ignore in your quest for greater ignorance.

It tells you who (or what) is really in charge of what's going on. You hear the word "Corporate" and are trained to believe they could never have any influence left of Trump. It's written into your programming now that you must divert and ignore from any knowledge to the contrary. However...if you were ever brave enough to click the video below Black Pigeon Speaks would explain to you how wrong you are:

 

I don't think it takes bravery.  Curiosity, perhaps, but mainly, just an overpowering desire for vindication.

[sharkman]

1 hour ago, BubberMiley said:

Perhaps when this is all said and done, you will have more empathy for the schmucks in al Qaida and ISIS now that you can relate to the effects of mind control tricks smarter people than you use to radicalize and control others.

I've got plenty of empathy right now, pal!!  Plenty!!!

Edited December 16, 2020 by sharkman

[Michael Hardner]

I think what I'm starting to realize is that the odd-right is getting so hard to understand that I won't be able to talk to them about anything.

A bunch of them were ridiculing me for being unaware that Barr was protecting Hunter Biden and Geraldo Rivera was paid off by China.

 

It's like they're talking about some show I don't watch.

[sharkman]

2 hours ago, Michael Hardner said:

I think what I'm starting to realize is that the odd-right is getting so hard to understand that I won't be able to talk to them about anything.

A bunch of them were ridiculing me for being unaware that Barr was protecting Hunter Biden and Geraldo Rivera was paid off by China.

 

It's like they're talking about some show I don't watch.

That is exactly, and I mean exactly, right.  You are being informed by a media that wanted Trump to lose this election in the worst way.  These media outlets in the US are legally considered entertainment venues.  They are not bound by the fetters of journalist integrity anymore.

And it’s the exact same for the media outlets on the right.  So there are two completely different realities being reported.   That’s why we can’t understand each other.

For an example I give you the Steele Dossier.  Not one word of it was verified as of January 17, 2017, according to Wikipedia..  No corroboration, no witnesses.   There used to be a time when the news organizations would not touch something like that.  But in 2016, because they wanted to throw an election for Hilary, they went with it wall to wall, 24/7.

Can you admit that they were wrong to report on something that was not verified?  Can you put your feelings aside for Trump, and just analyze that objectively?

[Infidel Dog]

3 hours ago, Michael Hardner said:

I made it 30 seconds... That irritating sound design... What's the point?

 

And of course corporations support the Democrats.

 

I'm not here to pull you out of your echo chamber by trying to convince you that Biden is a centrist.  Please just believe what you believe.

See that's the problem with choosing ignorance. It took you 30 seconds to figure out you didn't understand but it's going to take you a lifetime to understand there's more to learn.

Very well, I can at least help you to understand the first 30 seconds of that particular video.

This guy at the beginning...

is something called an NPC meme. NPC stands for Non Player Character:

Quote

The concept of the NPC first appeared on 4chan on July 7, 2016.^[6] The post by an anonymous user who initiated the NPC meme, titled "Are you an NPC?", detailed the behavior of individuals acting similarly to non-player characters in video games by repeatedly using phrases such as "JUST BE YOURSELF",^[8] and ended the post with the following description of people the NPC meme intends to depict.^[6]

If you get in a discussion with them it's always the same buzzwords and hackneyed arguments. They're the kind of people who make a show of discomfort when you break the status quo like by breaking the normie barrier to invoke a real discussion. it's like in a video game when you accidentally talk to somebody twice and they give you the exact lines word for word once more.

— Anonymous, "Are you an NPC?", 4chan (July 7, 2016)^[6][8]

 

In the intro he's introducing you to the irony of a belief in NPC types that they are the rebels, while he speaks of his uniformity as a follower. He tells you who he follows in his robot voice. 

Quote

You can't be edgy unless you're repeating the word of unions, entertainment celebrities, funny TV late night joke-men, college professors, unionized government school teachers, and I also very much advocate for censorship on big tech platforms for anyone who disagrees with my world view and my world view is that of Proctor and Gamble, Boeing, Raytheon, and corporate marketing culture of the S&P 500. I feel like such a Rebel and edgy.

You really have to stick around to the end to fully get it though. 30 seconds won't help you with your ignorance of the corporate allies to the hard left.

Well, they were allies. Now that the corporates have their guy and gal in charge you're seeing the hard left realizing they've been betrayed. Hell, we could have told them that was going to happen if they weren't so determined to remain ignorant.

[DogOnPorch]

Black Pigeon Speaks is far too reality based for the likes of the those that support the corporate establishment. They demand conformity of thought...not freedom of thought.

So he simply won't watch.

Edited December 16, 2020 by DogOnPorch

[Infidel Dog]

Oh and BTW, Barr was working to protect Hunter Biden.

You'd have to be working overtime to remain ignorant of that one. Even the mainstream has it. 

Oh well...do what you do, I guess.

[DogOnPorch]

However, if the MSM gives the green light to these people to watch Black Pigeon Speaks for whatever reason, they'd eagerly consume...as ordered. It's okay if the master says it's okay...

[Michael Hardner]

5 hours ago, DogOnPorch said:

Black Pigeon Speaks is far too reality based for the likes of the those that support the cooperate establishment. They demand conformity of thought...not freedom of thought.

So he simply won't watch.

I am proud to be part of an establishment that cooperates.

 

If it were the first time I was watching this made up nonsense from anonymous crcackpots then yes I would give it more than 30 seconds.

 

20 years ago, I learned from the 9/11 conspiracy folks that you can NEVER watch enough of their nutty material to be considered open minded... if you don't conclude that they are right.

 

I am glad that the conspiracy set appears to be consigned to become a tiny hobby group, like model train enthusiasts or Jimmy Buffet fans.  ( Likely a lot of overlap with those groups come to think about it)

 

Anyway, I am not convinced.  It's a nonsense conspiracy theory to my mind.  Biden is a bad candidate, but the kind of dull centrist that will hopefully revive normal dialogue in North America.  There's no Chinese invasion coming, no Marxist, not even a return to Reagan era tax levels.

Sorry for conforming.

 

[Boges]

12 hours ago, Infidel Dog said:

It always makes me smile when Progressives (even when they pretend they're moderates) claim expertise on what a "real' Conservative is.

Well considering I've never voted Liberal in my life, I think I do have some level of expertise. 

I can tell you that being Conservative has nothing to do with pledging fealty to a Conman. 

[Boges]

5 hours ago, Infidel Dog said:

Oh and BTW, Barr was working to protect Hunter Biden.

You'd have to be working overtime to remain ignorant of that one. Even the mainstream has it. 

Oh well...do what you do, I guess.

He was probably trying to keep investigations from swaying political opinions. That's what Comey got flack for doing. 

Imagine what would have been said if Comey came out with all the stuff his team was hearing about Russia in October 2016. 

[Boges]

Mitch is telling his Senators not to go along with any challenges to the Jan 6 acceptance of the EC result. 

It would create a fealty vote to Trump. You know Trump will be taking notes on who votes to challenge the result. And now andy Dem can have that vote to be used as a campaign tool against them. 

https://www.politico.com/news/2020/12/15/mcconnell-gop-election-results-445524

Quote

McConnell told his caucus that challenging the results would force Republicans to take a “terrible vote” because they would need to vote it down and appear against President Donald Trump. Senate Majority Whip John Thune (R-S.D.) and Sen. Roy Blunt (R-Mo.) also echoed McConnell’s remarks.