hillary 2020 !!

[qmuddy2]

i would love to see hillary run, one more time, in 2020 !!   who agrees with me ?  she would be a shoe-in win !!! thanks

[kimmy]

No. She should move on.  The fact that she couldn't even defeat the orange clown should make it unmistakably clear: Americans just don't want her to be President.  Someone else will carry the torch.

 -k

[Wilber]

I think she would have done a good job but kimmy is probably right. Failed US presidential candidates don't get second chances.

Edited March 12, 2017 by Wilber

[DogOnPorch]

14 minutes ago, Wilber said:

I think she would have done a good job but kimmy is probably right. Failed US presidential candidates don't get second chances.

lol

nah...none of that crown the queen stuff.

[Moonlight Graham]

2 shots, 2 failures.  Next.

[bush_cheney2004]

2 hours ago, Wilber said:

....Failed US presidential candidates don't get second chances.

 

Really ?    See Adlai Stevenson II ('52, '56) and Richard Nixon ('60, '68).

[BillyBeaver]

i hope she is hung or rotting in jail by then

[GostHacked]

Hillary Clinton failed twice to get to the White House. Next candidate please!

[Queenmandy85]

I suspect that the interference of the FBI director in the last week of the campaign cost her the election. That being said, I think her Presidency would be paralyzed by massive opposition from Congress and the Senate.

By 2020, she will be considered too old.

Edited March 16, 2017 by Queenmandy85

[Bonam]

10 hours ago, Queenmandy85 said:

 That being said, I think her Presidency would be paralyzed by massive opposition from Congress and the Senate.

By 2020, she will be considered too old.

I think it would have been no more paralyzed than Obama's had been. I think after the frothing idiocy of election-season rhetoric had died down, Republicans would have probably been able to work with Clinton a bit moreso than they did with Obama (she is far less liberal/progressive than Obama is). That said, yeah, she managed to lose to Trump of all people, so definitely time for a new candidate. Hopefully somebody younger instead of all these gerontocrats, too. 

[-TSS-]

No thanks. Bye bye Hillary!

[Topaz]

How can anyone support the Clinton's when they gave info. or equipment to North Korea and China and now  the world is facing a possible nuke war with the crazy guy from N.K.

[bush_cheney2004]

Hillary Clinton's fall from grace began long before Trump....it was Barack Obama that killed the beast.

[Cum Laude]

On 3/12/2017 at 1:55 PM, kimmy said:

No. She should move on.  The fact that she couldn't even defeat the orange clown should make it unmistakably clear: Americans just don't want her to be President.  Someone else will carry the torch.

 -k

We are ingrained with the belief that the president should act “presidential”. That some career politician, or attorney, or partisan mafioso should be held, and maintain, deep respect. De facto legitimacy. The great thing about Trump, is that he destroyed that. We no longer MUST hold these criminals and clowns in high respect. When the president Tweets that the cow Meryl Streep is an overrated actress, we are met with pangs of embarrassment, followed by waves of joy… finally someone reverential… speaking the truth. Hilarious.

[Michael Hardner]

1 hour ago, Cum Laude said:

We are ingrained with the belief that the president should act “presidential”. That some career politician, or attorney, or partisan mafioso should be held, and maintain, deep respect. De facto legitimacy.  

There's some truth to this, but being more "real" has been done before, and has been also done with honesty and hard work.  As you point out, "presidential" behaviour is superficial and that cuts two ways.

Trump's numbers are down today - maybe because the better healthcare plan he promised hits his core supporters.

He's down to 37% approval, with a tough week coming up...

 

http://www.gallup.com/poll/201617/gallup-daily-trump-job-approval.aspx