WestCanMan Posted December 21, 2015 Report Posted December 21, 2015 I think many Canadians feel that they can control Islam. De-fang it, so to speak.Trudeau's warm GQ smile will CRUSH any inspirations they might have of following the Koran, or the example set by the predecessors. If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. "If it didn't come from CNN, it's heresy!" - leftist "intellectuals"
DogOnPorch Posted December 21, 2015 Report Posted December 21, 2015 (edited) Trudeau's warm GQ smile will CRUSH any inspirations they might have of following the Koran, or the example set by the predecessors. Oh sure. A beer and a hockey game and these fellas will forget all about their Allah. It's scary because it's true. And friendly smiles all around because this time, Islam will be different as we get things RIGHT in Canada. Unlike everywhere else on planet Earth. Edited December 21, 2015 by DogOnPorch Nothing cracks a turtle like Leon Uris.
WestCanMan Posted December 21, 2015 Report Posted December 21, 2015 Oh sure. A beer and a hockey game and these fellas will forget all about their Allah. It's scary because it's true. And friendly smiles all around because this time, Islam will be different as we get things RIGHT in Canada. Unlike everywhere else on planet Earth. Trudeau rolls up his sleeves. Other world leaders should do more of that. If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. "If it didn't come from CNN, it's heresy!" - leftist "intellectuals"
DogOnPorch Posted December 21, 2015 Report Posted December 21, 2015 Trudeau rolls up his sleeves. Other world leaders should do more of that. His long walk in the snow is YEARS away. Nothing cracks a turtle like Leon Uris.
drummindiver Posted December 21, 2015 Report Posted December 21, 2015 Would it be considered an attack if I disagreed? Responding to any WCR post is considered an attack by her.
WestCoastRunner Posted December 21, 2015 Report Posted December 21, 2015 Responding to any WCR post is considered an attack by her. There you go. I love to see a young girl go out and grab the world by the lapels. Life's a bitch. You've got to go out and kick ass. - Maya Angelou
drummindiver Posted December 21, 2015 Report Posted December 21, 2015 There you go. Stating an observable fact is not an attack. Please refer to moderating thread, where you dramatically and erroneously cite attacks that never occurred. You would seriously have to be on drugs to assume an attack had occurred, and by "you", I mean anybody reading the thread, not you WCR.
WestCoastRunner Posted December 21, 2015 Report Posted December 21, 2015 Stating an observable fact is not an attack. Please refer to moderating thread, where you dramatically and erroneously cite attacks that never occurred. You would seriously have to be on drugs to assume an attack had occurred, and by "you", I mean anybody reading the thread, not you WCR. I have no idea what you are talking about. I love to see a young girl go out and grab the world by the lapels. Life's a bitch. You've got to go out and kick ass. - Maya Angelou
eyeball Posted December 21, 2015 Report Posted December 21, 2015 It should be remembered by ALL that before 9-11, Madrid, London, Bali etc....Islam was generally thought of as a quaint medieval desert religion by Westerners. Sure, the Israelis/Jews had problems with Islam...but the Jews have problems with a lot of things...being the overall consensus. But, to myself and I'm sure many others, A 1001 Arabian Nights was about as close as one got. There was no Islamophobia. Lest we forget, a progressive think-tank coined the term in 1997 which suggests they'd probably been seeing the phobia amongst un-progressive before that. Wikiphobes A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.
DogOnPorch Posted December 21, 2015 Report Posted December 21, 2015 Lest we forget, a progressive think-tank coined the term in 1997 which suggests they'd probably been seeing the phobia amongst un-progressive before that. Wikiphobes No doubt you were accusing people of Islamophobia in 1997. Nothing cracks a turtle like Leon Uris.
DogOnPorch Posted December 21, 2015 Report Posted December 21, 2015 It's the Year of Our Lord, 1176...a random year. The biggest threat to Western civilization is Islam. Nothing cracks a turtle like Leon Uris.
DogOnPorch Posted December 21, 2015 Report Posted December 21, 2015 It's the year of Our Lord, 1453. The biggest threat to Western Civilization is Islam. http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/File:Siege_constantinople_bnf_fr2691.jpg Nothing cracks a turtle like Leon Uris.
eyeball Posted December 21, 2015 Report Posted December 21, 2015 No doubt you were accusing people of Islamophobia in 1997. No, people who have Islamophobia should be pitied. It's more likely I would have been accusing people who were inciting it along with loathing, back in 1997. Loathing shouldn't be pitied it should be excoriated. People who incite it should be to. A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.
DogOnPorch Posted December 21, 2015 Report Posted December 21, 2015 No, people who have Islamophobia should be pitied. It's more likely I would have been accusing people who were inciting it along with loathing, back in 1997. Loathing shouldn't be pitied it should be excoriated. People who incite it should be to. So in 732...many centuries ago...you'd be looking upon those complaining about the invading Islamic armies in France as Islamophobic. Good to know. Nothing cracks a turtle like Leon Uris.
eyeball Posted December 21, 2015 Report Posted December 21, 2015 (edited) It's the year of Our Lord, 1453. The biggest threat to Western Civilization is Islam. It's like it was just yesterday. Don't forget your coconuts. link Edited December 21, 2015 by Michael Hardner added link A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.
DogOnPorch Posted December 21, 2015 Report Posted December 21, 2015 1453, for those that failed history, was the Siege of Constantinople. Islamic armies finally put the boots to the last vestiges of Western Civilization in the region. Nothing cracks a turtle like Leon Uris.
DogOnPorch Posted December 21, 2015 Report Posted December 21, 2015 It's 1881, and the new big problem in the British Empire is the rise of the Mahdi...the guided one. Islamic forces under the Mahdi form a pure Islamic State in The Sudan. "I am the Mahdi, the Successor of the Prophet of God. Cease to pay taxes to the infidel Turks and let everyone who finds a Turk kill him, for the Turks are infidel." ---Muhammad Ahmad (The Mahdi) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahdist_War Of course, Charles Gordon found out he was an infidel, as well. Nothing cracks a turtle like Leon Uris.
tworivers Posted December 21, 2015 Report Posted December 21, 2015 Yesterday , like everyday , I gave some homeless folks food and some warm clothes.One of the homeless talked to me which is rare because most people usually ignore or call them lazy so they are scared for their safety. I asked her what happened that she and her son live on the street. Long story short they fell not through the crack in our system but the gaping hole that is there and they are all but forgotten. She is trying to work 2 minimum wage jobs and the 15 year old son delivers papers. Now here in Surrey BC we do not have the funding or the space for most poor and homeless people. There are no politicians here getting there picture taken with them and they are invisible , so my question is to all these folks here who want to help the refugees in other countries...When will we help our own people as we seem to be able to find billions for them to come here and what ignore the problem here we have had for many years ?
drummindiver Posted December 21, 2015 Report Posted December 21, 2015 No, people who have Islamophobia should be pitied. It's more likely I would have been accusing people who were inciting it along with loathing, back in 1997. Loathing shouldn't be pitied it should be excoriated. People who incite it should be to. I'm sorry, what? Loathing, and people who incite loathing should be denounced? PPl with Islamophobia should be pitied, but not loathed?
eyeball Posted December 21, 2015 Report Posted December 21, 2015 When will we help our own people as we seem to be able to find billions for them to come here and what ignore the problem here we have had for many years ? Maybe when we stop spending billions on policies that create refugees in the first place. A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.
eyeball Posted December 21, 2015 Report Posted December 21, 2015 I'm sorry, what? Loathing, and people who incite loathing should be denounced? PPl with Islamophobia should be pitied, but not loathed? Kudos for comprehension. A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.
drummindiver Posted December 21, 2015 Report Posted December 21, 2015 Kudos for comprehension. I did not understand your post and was asking for clarification.
eyeball Posted December 21, 2015 Report Posted December 21, 2015 Go get yourself a dictionary I guess and we'll start from the beginning. The first word I used, No, starts with an N. A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.
drummindiver Posted December 21, 2015 Report Posted December 21, 2015 Go get yourself a dictionary I guess and we'll start from the beginning. The first word I used, No, starts with an N. I see. Politely asking for clarification gets you sarcasm. I imagine living on a boat with other men you stop using manners. Fair enough,. No, people who have Islamophobia should be pitied. It's more likely I would have been accusing people who were inciting it along with loathing, back in 1997. Loathing shouldn't be pitied it should be excoriated. People who incite it should be to. So, ppl who have Islamophophobia should be pitied,. But loathing shouldn't be pitied, it should be denounced,as should those who incite it. So, just to be clear, if you are an Islamophobe, do not denounce them, pity them. Don't pity Islamophobes (?) loath them but don't pity them.
eyeball Posted December 21, 2015 Report Posted December 21, 2015 I see. Politely asking for clarification gets you sarcasm. I imagine living on a boat with other men you stop using manners. Fair enough, No, we just keep talk to a minimum and speak precisely so there's no misunderstanding. That's how mistakes are made. So, ppl who have Islamophophobia should be pitied,. Yes you should be concerned about putting their fears to rest. But loathing shouldn't be pitied, it should be denounced,as should those who incite it. Yes, unequivocally. So, just to be clear, if you are an Islamophobe, do not denounce them, pity them. Correct. Don't pity Islamophobes (?) loath them but don't pity them. /facepalm. You were doing so good too. A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.
.thumb.jpg.9a49e1b2f22a6d34a345152c50044aa9.jpg)
Recommended Posts