Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Don't bet on a different out come in January. The President can veto it if it doesn't not contain items HE wants in there and I heard on US news that this could take another year or two.

  • Replies 514
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Always been thus. WIll continue that way for quite some time.

Trudeau should re-introduce punitive tariffs that force all Canadians to buy expensive made-in-Ontario goods, like the good old days. Lets get those jobs back from China and Mexico and get Ontario factory workers back to work!

Science too hard for you? Try religion!

Posted

Don't bet on a different out come in January. The President can veto it if it doesn't not contain items HE wants in there and I heard on US news that this could take another year or two.

He can veto it but then congress can veto the veto, if they can get the numbers. From what I've been hearing that's iffy.

Posted

I can see two scenarios;

Harper declares some kind of guidelines for carbon reduction and Obama signs because he has made a "deal".

OR

New Senate takes over, passes the same bill, Obama veto's and congress and senate get the 2/3 needed for an override.

Last vote Keystone got 59 votes - that means that in this lame Senate 12 Democrats voted for the bill. A Senate veto override needs 67 votes. In the next government there are a few more Republicans coming in. All the backers of this bill have to get is 8 more votes. I think they can get them.

Keystone pipeline is going to happen.

Note - For those expecting a response from Big Guy: I generally do not read or respond to posts longer then 300 words nor to parsed comments.

Posted

Keystone XL bill fails to pass in the U.S. Senate....very close but no banana. This will impact the run-off election in Louisiana.

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Democrat-controlled Senate has defeated a bill to approve the Keystone XL oil pipeline.

The Senate's 59-41 vote Tuesday night was a nail-biter to the end.

The bill needed 60 votes to reach the White House. The House passed it overwhelmingly last week.

Exactly. The Republican running there is likely to cruise to an easy victory now that the Democrats have thrown their fellow Democrat under the bus.

Posted

Exactly. The Republican running there is likely to cruise to an easy victory now that the Democrats have thrown their fellow Democrat under the bus.

Not exactly rocket science to figure that out.

I love to see a young girl go out and grab the world by the lapels. Life's a bitch. You've got to go out and kick ass. - Maya Angelou

Posted

Maybe you did. The highest use of prorogation as well as closure in the history of the country, and of course the only PM to be found in contempt. Does that not give you cause for concern?

Not in the least. Prorogation is nothing to be afraid of. It's akin to the State of the Union. It simply ends one session of Parliament and begins another.

Posted

Not in the least. Prorogation is nothing to be afraid of. It's akin to the State of the Union. It simply ends one session of Parliament and begins another.

That's the simplified version, but in the hands of Harper it's much more than that. It's a way to avoid a legitimate vote, which is the business of parliament, which he is afraid will go against his government. And of course closure is a way of limiting committees from properly assessing new bills. Both are attempts to limit the democratic process and that is something to be afraid of.

Posted

Maybe you did. The highest use of prorogation as well as closure in the history of the country, and of course the only PM to be found in contempt. Does that not give you cause for concern?

And if JT was doing it as PM you'd be marvelling at it.

Posted

The US public doesn't know who Harper is, much less cares what he says.

I do. I resent that remark.

As for the pipeline I support it. Anything to make North America a major net exporter of energy.

  • Free speech: "You can say what you want, but I don't have to lend you my megaphone."
  • Always remember that when you are in the right you can afford to keep your temper, and when you are in the wrong you cannot afford to lose it. - J.J. Reynolds.
  • Will the steps anyone is proposing to fight "climate change" reduce a single temperature, by a single degree, at a single location?
  • The mantra of "world opinion" or the views of the "international community" betrays flabby and weak reasoning (link).

Posted

I do. I resent that remark.

As for the pipeline I support it. Anything to make North America a major net exporter of energy.

You really think Americans want Canadian corrosive dilbit piped through their territory to get shipped to China, just to improve the net exports of North America?

.

Posted

I'm confused. So do you left wing types no longer like China even though they are communist? Are left wingers now a protectionist group?

No, we're just nowhere near as hypocritical when it comes to trucking and trading with dictatorships.

Not long it was the exact opposite. I may have missed something.

I think it's more a case of you imagining something.

A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.

Posted

I'm confused. So do you left wing types no longer like China even though they are communist? Are left wingers now a protectionist group?

Not long it was the exact opposite. I may have missed something.

I guess now I'm confused. I didn't realize you right wing types loved the communists so much you can't wait to send them all our oil.

Posted

The love affair only really started getting torrid with the rise of the oligarchs. The idea that trade with a place like China would make it more like our's was always a two way street and I think right-wingers have suffered from our exposure to China more than anyone else.

Right-wingers just can't get enough of wealthy powerful people.

A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.

Posted

I'm confused. So do you left wing types no longer like China even though they are communist? Are left wingers now a protectionist group?

Not long it was the exact opposite. I may have missed something.

I think you are confusing yourself with your own oversimplification of complex situations.

If you can't think past categorizing and labelling people 'right-good left-bad' ... then you will continue to be confused by human complexities.

.

Posted
No, we're just nowhere near as hypocritical when it comes to trucking and trading with dictatorships.

The US is not usually categorized as a dictatorship.

Note yet again that oil in the pipeplines, trains, refineries etc does not belong to Canada. Or the US for that matter.

Science too hard for you? Try religion!

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,898
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    Flora smith
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...