Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Pro israel or anti holocaust?

:rolleyes:

As for your links, what's so outrageous about saying you will act if attacked? Any different from the rhetoric coming from the U.S. and its mid-east ally?

Either way.....Iran should be neutered. Sooner the better.

And why is that?

Heck, let's have some fun with this. Muster all the surviving Iran Hostage Crisis prisoners from 1979 and fly them to Nevada to "hot pickle" Iran from a Predator trailer in the desert. Payback is a BITCH!

The hostages that Canada got out after your people botched the job?

Iran attacked Iraq last week. Artillery laid on the Kurds....

And?

  • Replies 239
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
:rolleyes:

As for your links, what's so outrageous about saying you will act if attacked?

You don't find terrorism outrageous? You think if I attack a military target it's okay for you to attack a daycare?

Any different from the rhetoric coming from the U.S. and its mid-east ally?

You will have to direct me to where the US and "it's mid east ally" have threatened to launch missiles at an Iran civilian centre.

And?

And? Is Iran attacking Iraq a good thing or a bad thing? Maybe if they gassed them you will have an easier time making up your mind.

RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS

If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us

Posted
The hostages that Canada got out after your people botched the job?

Yes....especially them. Better to die as an American than to be free as a fake Canadian. McCain stayed in the Hanoi Hilton even when Canada tried to smuggle him out with a Canuck flagged backpack.

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted
You don't find terrorism outrageous? You think if I attack a military target it's okay for you to attack a daycare?

Given you're endorsing a first strike policy, it seems a little funny to be getting all squeamish about the civilized conduct of war.

You will have to direct me to where the US and "it's mid east ally" have threatened to launch missiles at an Iran civilian centre.

If you want to start a fucking war, don't cry about the consequences, is all I'm saying.

Maybe Iran can borrow the "we were attacking military targets but they were hidden in civilian areas" line. That always hooks the punters.

And? Is Iran attacking Iraq a good thing or a bad thing?

I dunno. Is it like when Turkey attacked Iraq? Or when Israel attacks Syria?

Posted
Yes....especially them. Better to die as an American than to be free as a fake Canadian.

Strange that you would be so disdainful of the hostages who escaped, since they chose to be free as fake Canadians and all.

McCain stayed in the Hanoi Hilton even when Canada tried to smuggle him out with a Canuck flagged backpack.

sure sure.

Posted
Strange that you would be so disdainful of the hostages who escaped, since they chose to be free as fake Canadians and all.

It was their choice....I'm a hardcore bastard and would rather die like a Navy Seal thrown on the tarmac than slither away as a fake subject of the Crown.

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted
Given you're endorsing a first strike policy, it seems a little funny to be getting all squeamish about the civilized conduct of war.

If you want to start a fucking war, don't cry about the consequences, is all I'm saying.

You are beyond your depth. Premptive strikes and the civilized conduct of war are not at odds with each other. Launching terror attacks against civilian population centres is.

Yoiu must be one of those who think the only justification for war is after the blow has landed.

But I will note, you have no problem with terrorism.

RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS

If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us

Posted
I dunno. Is it like when Turkey attacked Iraq? Or when Israel attacks Syria?

It's like when Turkey attacked...but not like Syria....and not like when we attacked France...

Good thing or bad thing?

RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS

If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us

Posted
You are beyond your depth. Premptive strikes and the civilized conduct of war are not at odds with each other.

Except you're not actually talking about a preemptive strike. The definition of preemptive strike is, loosely, "we are going to be attacked, so we will attack first.

It is not "we might, at some uncertain point in the future, be attacked, so we will attack first."

Launching terror attacks against civilian population centres is.

Like this ?

You must be one of those who think the only justification for war is after the blow has landed.

Or if there's, you know, an actual and immediate threat.

Posted
Like this ?

Or if there's, you know, an actual and immediate threat.

Dresden was definately a terror attack. So was London, Coventry etc etc....

RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS

If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us

Posted
Except you're not actually talking about a preemptive strike. The definition of preemptive strike is, loosely, "we are going to be attacked, so we will attack first.

If Iran doesn't comply it is safe to assume the worst. In that case it is a premptive attack.

RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS

If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us

Posted
If Iran doesn't comply it is safe to assume the worst. In that case it is a premptive attack.

You're talking about a preventative, not preemptive war. In other words, war based on fears and not necessarily a demonstrated threat.

Posted

The photo of rockets in the link looks like a kind of Katyusha. Even if they are missiles, I doubt their ranges would be more than 150km. Usually a long range missile takes the vertical lift off to go through the thick part of atmosphere as soon as posible for reduceing air-resistance and increasing its range. Only short range rockets take the declining lift off like cannons.

Posted

There is a good quote from Herr von Bismarck on preventative war:

I would ... never advise your Majesty to declare war forthwith, simply because it appeared that our opponent would begin hostilities in the near future. One can never anticipate the way of divine providence securely enough for that.
Posted
Iran attacked Iraq last week. Artillery laid on the Kurds....

Like anyone cars about the Kurds, Turkey has been making cross border raids for years, but no one says crap about it. Only since it is EVIL IRAN .... and because the US has this agenda for the middle east... anyone else could bomb the Kurds and no one will say boo about it.

Not to mention even the US downplayed the latest rocket tests from Iran today. It was a left over rocket that failed the day before.

Posted
There is a good quote from Herr von Bismarck on preventative war:

Bismark didn't have to worry about nukes in the hands of crazy religious wackos.

"A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley

Posted
And why is that?

Because they are wackos. They have been wackos since the Shah left, and there is no sign that they are about to abandon their wackiness.

Wackos are acceptable. Wackos with nukes are not.

"A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley

Posted
Bismark didn't have to worry about nukes in the hands of crazy religious wackos.

I doubt that he would of have taken in by the portrayal of Iran an a bunch of crazy religious wackos. He probably would think that Iran is merely trying to increase its power like almost every other nation, and to that effect would be unlikely to precipitate its own destruction out of hand.

Posted
I doubt that he would of have taken in by the portrayal of Iran an a bunch of crazy religious wackos. He probably would think that Iran is merely trying to increase its power like almost every other nation, and to that effect would be unlikely to precipitate its own destruction out of hand.

It's news to me that "almost every other nation" is trying to increase its power. To what end does a nation wish to increase its power?

"A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley

Posted

Look up " Realism " in the field of International Relations. It is a quite a prominent school of thought, the most prominent, even. As to what end, that is up for debate. Relative gains in strength compared to other nations. The Neo-Realists say that it is a quest for security instead of just power.

Posted
The photo of rockets in the link looks like a kind of Katyusha. Even if they are missiles, I doubt their ranges would be more than 150km. Usually a long range missile takes the vertical lift off to go through the thick part of atmosphere as soon as posible for reduceing air-resistance and increasing its range. Only short range rockets take the declining lift off like cannons.

The missiles are Zelzal-2s or 3s with a range of about 3-500km. The real threat is the new Shahab-3 to 6 which are guided MRBMs capable of hitting Tel Aviv and beyond. The Shahab with a kicker stage (orbital rocket) will probably launch Iran's satellites in the future rather than being contracted to the Russians.

http://www.fas.org/nuke/guide/iran/missile/index.html

Many folks are unaware that Iran has had a vigorous space/missile program for decades. Some seem to think this is a new thing....

------------------------------------------

Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired, signifies in the final sense a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed.

---President/General Dwight D. Eisenhower

Posted
Like anyone cars about the Kurds, Turkey has been making cross border raids for years, but no one says crap about it. .

It's been brought up a number of times here. Nice way to paint it though, "cross border raids for years"

In fact there have been less that 5 raids mainly in the last year.

RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS

If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us

Posted (edited)

Why should I care that Iran is threatening Israel? What am I missing here? Am I supposed to give a damn what happens to Israel? Can somebody tell me why? Israel makes its own problems and then comes running to the West for protection. We have our own problems. Israel's had fifty years and all its managed to do is piss everyone off.

Right now oil is at $145 and at least $5 of that is because of Israel's bellicosity. You like that word? I got it from former oil company executive, Condy Rice.

Edited by HisSelf

...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      11,017
    • Most Online
      2,945

    Newest Member
    taylor66
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Gtechalax earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Gtechalax earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Gtechalax earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Canadaisintrouble earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • AlizyMalik earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...