GostHacked

http://www.cbc.ca/world/story/2006/11/16/annan-darfur.html In order to help out the crisis in Darfur the UN and the AU will get together and send in peace keepers. So now we have the European Union, the African Union, and the North American Union is on it's way as well. Seems like the Globalists have been busy. http://www.africa-union.org/root/au/index/index.htm

"Where the hell are they" Who knows and that's what the problem is. These cowards are like chameleons and blend in with regular civilian populations. I don't think the terrorist threat has been grossly inflated and most people 'don't piss their pants over it', but is something these terrorist love making a hapless victim do prior to severing the head off of one. But here is a link to keep you properly informed: http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/index.html#Attacks The majority of those attacks are in Iraq. So I would rule those out as genuine terrorist attacks, knowing we are still in a 'war' over there. Also with the current Big Brother mentality in place from the people in power, you would find out that they know and hear alot of what is going on out there. MORE ATTACKS COMMING !!! Don't worry, MI5 et al are here to help you. How?

This shows the current 'stay the course' mentality is not working. If they were not in this much trouble the UK and the US would not be asking for Iran or Syria's help. Why the hell is it up to those two to help out in stablizing Iraq? I thought that is what the coalotion of the willing was for? Help out or face isolation? I think that has already happened for the most part. Well isolation from 'western ideologies'. To me this shows that they really had no intention of winning the war on terror in Iraq. More correct would be to say that they had poor planning and forsight and not enough information at the start to get the job done right.

I will say now that I think Leafless is simply trolling for the responses he is getting. For no one can be that.... um wait.... war on what? Leafless. I don't know what your game is here in this thread, but I am calling you out on it.

Leafless. How about this. I would like to hear about those Western Ideals you hold so dear to your heart. I would really like to know what the proper and/or correct Western Ideology we are fighting for? Please don't give me something generic like 'freedom' et al. What are those ideals you believe in? I have read this thread several times and don't really know or understand what it is you believe we are fighting for. I bet they would be close to mine as well.

The Left = What? Where? Why? When? How? The Right = 'Man...u dumb ...pantywaiste Islamofascist sympathizer wink.gif' amirite?

Bush held on to Rummy as long as he needed him. Same thing happened essentialy with Colin Powel. But Rummy is not completly innocent and he should have been taken out along time ago. But now who is this Devil we don't know? It was politicly motivated 100%. But interesting to see what happens.

Funny, the same can be said for the Canadians, especially some of your past leaders. I agree, as a country we voted in the wrong person for the job. It happens. And yes Canadians are responsible for Adscam, by not being more active and involved in the government and its processes. When the population does not pay attention, the leaders we elected have the potential for widespread abuse. Don't go passing the buck and say 'well I did not vote for him' Have more integrity than that. Do something about it. The last great Prime Minister we have has was in my opinion Trudeau. Nothing has equaled that man to this date. Martin, and Harper don't even come close. And yes I will take the blame for Harper's future fuck ups. I actually forgot to vote in the last election which I am not proud of. So yes blame me for having Harper in office for I as a citizen of this country did not do my duty to make sure we elect the right government for the job. Shame on all of you for passing the buck and not taking responsibility of things. I see plenty of ignorance south of the border as well JJF.

Everything you say is unreasonable because the U.S.A. is a country. Only people can be arrogant (or power freak or keep their word or whatever), not a whole country. Therefore, who exactly are you identifying as being arrogant (or power freak or keep their word or whatever) in your blame-game? But it is those arrogant people who are elected to represent the whole country. So, yes blame the country and it's people.

Generaly from what I encounter, kids are more potty mouthed than ever. And kids know more about obsenities, sex and other shit from the Internet indeed. I'd give Bush the finger for sure. How can one respect the office of the president when he is a complete idiot? I don't think Bush respects much. So screw him . Fired for that? That seems way to extreme for the 'crime'.

Eventhough I believe that they had planned the war long time in advance. I call bullshit on this one. That letter seems fakes. I was with so and so, who is this, when we were at this place. I am sure they would be talking about Iraq at a freakin basketball game. Even if it was in a secured room/box.

Been here 9 years to know that much. It is as much french here as it was back in Sudbury ON. So Quebec and that dude can le piss up la rope.

Minime stop humping the frigian high energy beam weapon Sorry, thats pretty damn funny, it's like something from Austin Powers. I know that explosives seems like way to far out there for most of you, and the energy beam weapons is a really big freakin stretch. I know they are in development with the US Military, but. um, I don't think they are at full production yet. That would be one hell of a 'test' for the energy beam to turn the WTC to dust. POLYNEWBIE, dude please. I am in your camp, but even I know when some of this crap is utter tripe. What I think you should focus on is the money trail. That is where I am looking at things. Sept 10, 2001, Rumsfeld announces that it cannot account for 2.3 trillian dollars of the military budget, (about 25% that year) back for 98-99, and anothe trillian from 99-2000. The WTC was the finnancial backbone of the American economy. Everyone did business there. Many insurance companies were in the towers. Some high profiles like Arthur Anderson and the Enron scandal. Securitys and Exchange Commissions were at WTC7, ect etc. There was alot of gold/silver held at the base of the towers, and that has been moved or could be still there. But who really knows. I have shifted my focus from 'demolitions brought down the buildings' to 'who had the most to loose/gain with 9/11'. Again, 19 guys from Saudi Arabia whom 4 of them had US FAA commercial pilots licenses, and all had valid VISAs to be in the US. So they managed to beat all the security at the time. So simple and easy of a plan, that it can work again. Weather it was total incompetence or if the US assisted in the attacks, both outcomes kind of scare me.

http://www.gop.com/ The ad that you see on the TV and online. Nothing but PURE fearmongering. jdobbin, there is a reason the senate is out of touch with things. That is not going to work much longer unless there IS another terror attack in the US. People are starting to get tired of the fearmongering. http://democrats.org/ Nothing of that sort from what I see on the Democrats site. No fearmongering at all on the scale the republicans are at. Stolen from another site I visit often enough. http://www.shacknews.com/ja.zz?id=13081975 ELECTION TIME! I bet the voters are tired of all this crap as well. Again the comparison comes up to a South Park eppisode when you vote between a Giant Douche and a Turd Sandwich.

Terrorists are criminals not an invading army. Where does it say it has to be an army. Who says it is an invasion??

You would see the divide already, For that has been going on for centuries and nothing has changed to support the two species. We are still all human. Some are ugly, some are hot, some are dumb, some are smart. I've met ugly and stupid rich people. I've met hot and stupid rich people. I can go on and on and on. Unless genetic code is seriously being altered with mixing the breeding classes then this is all bullshit. Last time I cheked, we are all of the human species, and doubt that anyone is a sub-species of humans.

What the hell is with you and Syria? Who is talking about Syria? The thread is in the US/Canada forum. If it is such small potatoes why did Tony Blair ask for and get an exemption for Brits? Once again we have the George Bush fan club bending over so far backwards it's looking up its arse. It is ironic indeed to see a country that constantly harangues China over its human rights abuses turning itself into exactly the same sort of legal system. If Bush is so crazy about protecting US lives, let him do something about their gun laws. Get a clue. I think he is refering to the Maher Arar case in Canada. He went to the Middle East on vacation/business, stopped over in the US before going home to Canada, and was detained and renditioed off to Syria. Turns out he was innocent after all. Innocent untill proven guilty. I think I understood that the US can detain anyone not a US citizen on their own soil. Fair enough. No problems with that really. If the Patriot Act can basicly override the constitution. (not 100% sure it can) Bush can say 'enemy combatant' and you could find yourself in a living hell.

Time to jump back into this thread. Interesting read the past few pages. Kimmy is at least was throwing out some math. Kudos to her. PolyNewbie. Advice : your tactics are not working to convnce anyone. Hell not even ME. And I am with you in the conspiracy camp. It's the way it is being presented by you with very little to back anything up. If you want to convince the general population that something really shaddy went down that day you, one needs to be more tactful in the responses. I can quote websites till the cows come home but, it won't convince people. What you should be doing is to prove False Flag operations. The US has done it before, so you would be better off comparing 9/11 to any of those events and the eventual outcomes and results of said events. Where were we before and where are we now? Pearl Harbour for example is one used by Alex Jones and others to support 9/11 was an inside job. Basicly saying that the top US Navy brass were aware of the attack, but did nothing to prevent it. This provided the US with the oppourtunity to enter WWII which at that pointy the US had not wanted to go to war. But again, this provided the US with the 'duty' to combat evil in the world. Who better etter to do that than the US. I read as much as I can on this topic and have become well informed and even missinformed by both the official story and the conspiracy story. Right now I am reading The 9/11 Investigations. Only 100 pages in so far. I could not get ahold of the 9/11 Commission report that day (sold out) so that is next weeks purchase. It does show intelligence failures to connect the dots in regards to Bin Laden and the Hijackers. Hell it loos like most of those hijackers were trained in the US flight schools and 4 of them were commercial pilot license holders. Polynewbie. Change the tactics and how you word things. Since you are not really even convincing me by regurgitating the same stuff over and over from places you do not even provide reference links for, the argument fails and you look stupid. Micheal Hardner and Kimmy. You two just keep on doing what you are doing in this thread. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2nd_law_of_thermodynamics I can see where you are going with that argument and I understand it for the most part. A 'cold' fire cannot melt steel. The fire was not hot enough in the buildings to melt the steel. For the temperature of the fire was less than the melting point (or even to the point where the steel will start to loose integrety). So the transfer of heat from a 'cold' fire to the steel beams would not have happened. It would balance out and everything would be a consistant temperature.

http://www.npr.org/news/specials/response/...laden.tape.html You can watch that 'confession tape' here. Better quality here. http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=-51...447&q=osama Osama does not wear rings or any jewlery. here is another video of bin Laden http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=689...626&q=osama Those two men do not look the same. Check out the nose dudes.

Well when it comes to Foley : At least no one died. http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/10/11/sha...y.ap/index.html Good reporting, or that is a missleading headline. And those youngins he had relations with probalby died a little on the inside. Terrorist Attack in 3, 2 ......

That's simply community standards. If you don't like them perhaps you would prefer a place where the people don't where clothes. Exactly.....and a non alcoholic taxi may be the drivers community standards......he if won't compremise his values for money, he won't get my tip wait wait wait what??? Compromise on values? Then being a cabbie is not for him then. Also like most restauraunts I am going to guess cabs have the same right to refuse service for any reason. Suck it up buttercup. If it was a cab company policy then I cannot bitch. And he won't get your tip cause well, you had to end up taking another cab, and gave the other guy the tip.

This is the reason they went after Iraq first. They did not have the nukes or WMDs. No no major threat to the troops when they invaded. Saddam was a kook, but Kim (I think) would actually use them on the threat of invasion. More so than Saddam et al.

Religion : Serious Buisness. Hands down discrimination and enforcing their beliefs on others. The cabbie should be fired stat. Or like poeple have said here, boycott the cabbies. And screw the friggen trip. Cabbies can refuse people - too drunk/rowdy - susicious behaviour - ?? - profit! There might be a disclaimer for what they can refuse and what are those guidelines, I doubt refusing booze is a valid argument. When in Rome ?

Uh, no, it does not. Any group of law-abiding people should be able to hold an assembly in a hall and give a speech or presentation to a willing audience without being violently interrupted. I don't care what the opinion is, unless it's illegal. Anyone who interupts it with violence ought to be put in prison. Certainly in a perfect world all those students who took part in this would be identified and summarily expelled. Of course, that won't happen, as collegs are so gutlessly politically correct. Wait.. an opinion can be illegal? News to me. And I think a backstory IS needed. Did they protest before the Minutemen came to the hall? And still protesting because they are now there? If free speech is legal then the right to assemble where others are is justified as well. Again backstory is needed. If you go on things at face value (like this with no context or backstory) then you cannot possibly account for what caused the scene we see through the link. I don't think they used violence. Seems like those two girls used a banner and got on stage. Lots of anger and ranting and shouting, but again I saw no violence.

That was awesome. But there needs to be more backstory for this. Was there a protest before about having the Minutemen there in the first place? But it went ahead anyways? This clip offers nothing in that. So to say who is right and who is acting like idiots remains to be determined.